unified-ai-gateway
Operate and evaluate Unified AI System through fifteen governed MCP tools, including provider-free prompt enhancement, while preserving fake-provider, authorization, and evidence boundaries.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-13
- Stars
- ★ 1.6k
- Forks
- 483
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- unified-ai-gateway
- license
- Apache-2.0
- metadata
- { "risk": "critical", "tags": "ai-gateway, codex, mcp, self-hosted, governance", "tools": "codex", "author": "happy520ai", "source": "https://github.com/happy520ai/unified-ai-system/tree/master/skills/unified-ai-gateway", "category": "ai-ml", "date_added": "2026-08-01", "source_repo": "happy520ai/unified-ai-system", "source_type": "official", "license_source": "https://github.com/happy520ai/unified-ai-system/blob/master/LICENSE" }
- description
- Operate and evaluate Unified AI System through fifteen governed MCP tools, including provider-free prompt enhancement, while preserving fake-provider, authorization, and evidence boundaries.
02 资源文件 1
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml203 B
03 SKILL.md 正文
Unified AI Gateway
Overview
Use the official unified-ai-system MCP server to inspect and exercise a local
AI gateway without provider credentials. This skill file provides operating
guidance; it does not install the server or change Codex configuration by
itself. The official Codex plugin bundles the MCP definition, while skill-only
installations require the manual setup below.
Version Note
These are two different things and they are not equal today:
- Current release:
v0.8.0. It declares and ships fifteen tool names, and the 60-second demo command in the README names that version. Read it live withnode tools/verify-image-roster.mjs 0.8.0, which reports the roster from the image bytes rather than from this file. That command needs a clone of the repository, run from its root: the script ships with the source, not inside an installed skill bundle. Without a clone, the same roster is published at https://happy520ai.github.io/unified-ai-system/verify-mcp-docker-image.html. - Newest content review:
0.8.0(review), read from the published layer tarballs withnode tools/inspect-image-filesystem.mjs 0.8.0- no Docker engine and nothing executed. It found one thing worth knowing before you pull: thelinux/arm64tag carries x86-64 native modules, includingbetter_sqlite3.node, so request--platform linux/amd64. - Reviewed and pinned below:
0.4.9. The inspection procedure in this file pins that image's recorded digests because0.4.9is the newest version reviewed by that procedure, which exports a container filesystem with Docker. The 0.8.0 review above uses a different method and pins its own digests, so the table below still describes 0.4.9 until it is rewritten against a 0.8.0 export.0.4.9carries 9 of the fifteen names: the model-backed enhancement, knowledge retrieval and workflow execution tools arrived at 0.5.0, and the three governance tools at 0.8.0.
Do not substitute a mutable tag for a pinned digest, and do not move the pin to a newer version just because this file looks out of date: a new content review is required first, and the pinned identity is only as good as the review that backs it.
Prerequisites And Setup
- Confirm that Codex CLI and Docker are installed and Docker is running.
- If the nine tools are already visible, skip setup and do not register a duplicate server.
- Explain the first stage: it downloads one reviewed platform from the
immutable
0.4.9multi-platform index into Docker's cache, inspects its metadata and layer history, creates but never starts a temporary container, exports its root filesystem, removes that temporary container, and writes an inspection inventory to a temporary directory. The reviewed platforms are linux/amd64 and linux/arm64. Obtain explicit user approval for those download and inspection changes only. - After that first approval, pull the reviewed platform manifest and complete the inspection. Do not execute the image or register it yet:
IMAGE='ghcr.io/happy520ai/unified-ai-system/mcp-server@sha256:751a0d32acd2d6b1da6ad9ac67987fbd1ff36ce26b7160014d8605f18b7907b3'
PLATFORM='linux/amd64' # Use linux/arm64 only on a reviewed ARM64 engine.
REVIEW_DIR="$(mktemp -d)"
docker pull --platform "$PLATFORM" "$IMAGE"
docker image inspect "$IMAGE" --format 'Id={{.Id}} OS={{.Os}} Architecture={{.Architecture}} User={{json .Config.User}} Entrypoint={{json .Config.Entrypoint}} Cmd={{json .Config.Cmd}} Labels={{json .Config.Labels}}'
docker image history --no-trunc "$IMAGE" > "$REVIEW_DIR/image-history.txt"
REVIEW_CONTAINER="$(docker create --platform "$PLATFORM" --pull never --entrypoint /bin/true "$IMAGE")"
docker export --output "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs.tar" "$REVIEW_CONTAINER"
docker rm "$REVIEW_CONTAINER"
tar -tf "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs.tar" > "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs-files.txt"
mkdir -p "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs"
tar --same-permissions -xf "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs.tar" -C "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs"
find "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs/app" -type f -print > "$REVIEW_DIR/app-files.txt"
: > "$REVIEW_DIR/app-links.txt"
while IFS= read -r -d '' APP_LINK; do
ls -ld -- "$APP_LINK" >> "$REVIEW_DIR/app-links.txt"
done < <(find "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs/app" \( -type l -o -type f -links +1 \) -print0)
: > "$REVIEW_DIR/native-binaries.sha256"
while IFS= read -r -d '' NATIVE_BINARY; do
sha256sum -- "$NATIVE_BINARY" >> "$REVIEW_DIR/native-binaries.sha256"
done < <(find "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs/app" -type f -name '*.node' -print0)
find "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs" -type f \( -perm -0100 -o -perm -0010 -o -perm -0001 \) -print > "$REVIEW_DIR/executable-files.txt"
find "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs" -type f \( -perm -4000 -o -perm -2000 \) -print > "$REVIEW_DIR/suid-sgid-files.txt"
find "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs/app" -type f \( -name '.env' -o -name '.env.*' -o -name '*.pem' -o -name '*.key' -o -name '*.p12' -o -name '*.pfx' -o -path '*/.ssh/id_*' \) -print > "$REVIEW_DIR/credential-like-files.txt"
grep -RInHE --include='package.json' '"(preinstall|install|postinstall|prepare|prepack|postpack)"' "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs/app" > "$REVIEW_DIR/lifecycle-hooks.txt"
grep -RInE 'child_process|spawn\(|fetch\(|AI_GATEWAY_MCP_URL|process\.env|writeFile|appendFile|unlink|rm\(' "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs/app/packages/mcp-server/src" "$REVIEW_DIR/rootfs/app/packages/shared-sdk/src" > "$REVIEW_DIR/runtime-sensitive-code.txt"
If sha256sum is unavailable, use the platform's SHA-256 utility and preserve
the same report. Keep the review directory until the report is accepted; its
deletion is another filesystem change and requires approval for the exact path.
-
Read every generated inventory and report the inspection before proceeding. Compare it with the versioned image content review. Require OCI index digest
sha256:751a0d32acd2d6b1da6ad9ac67987fbd1ff36ce26b7160014d8605f18b7907b3. For linux/amd64, require manifest digestsha256:ff6cf988b01d5fb2e97aabe8e952f6a303dcffe650df5b4dcb0ba3d51ee88c06and config digestsha256:0c2c0c7b9c7fb7ca24c73d9a903bcf719b079a0b285a3a3269ee3ae059905e97. For linux/arm64, require manifest digestsha256:90318b9e373820f863c1c1addc759be4b5ce186f2ecb6232ee502fad7c6613deand config digestsha256:c2047eb63fdc42bcb16d53fca17d78a4a6fb355cf6320b9aa6688e594371054f. Require sourcehttps://github.com/happy520ai/unified-ai-system, revision342a47313927870bcc696be13c9e5fb922062dac, version0.4.9, licenseApache-2.0, entrypointdocker-entrypoint.sh, and commandnode packages/mcp-server/src/index.js.Report these reviewed risks explicitly: the image uses the default root user; includes Debian shell/package utilities and 11 base-image SUID/SGID files; contains 522 internal pnpm links, three native Node binaries, and eight lifecycle-hook declarations; and starts a child gateway with loopback HTTP. The optional
AI_GATEWAY_MCP_URLcan make an HTTP or HTTPS connection only when explicitly passed. The registered command below passes no host files, environment variables, or ports and disables container networking. Stop on any mismatch, unexpected link, credential-like file, native binary, hook, privileged file, or sensitive-code behavior. -
Explain the second stage: it persists a Codex MCP configuration and permits Codex to launch the inspected image in a later task. Obtain a separate explicit approval for registration and activation; the download approval does not carry over.
-
After that second approval, register the reviewed platform digest with pulling, container networking, Linux capabilities, and privilege escalation disabled, then inspect the stored configuration:
IMAGE='ghcr.io/happy520ai/unified-ai-system/mcp-server@sha256:751a0d32acd2d6b1da6ad9ac67987fbd1ff36ce26b7160014d8605f18b7907b3'
PLATFORM='linux/amd64' # Match the reviewed platform inspected above.
codex mcp add unified-ai-system -- docker run --rm -i --pull never --platform "$PLATFORM" --network none --cap-drop ALL --security-opt no-new-privileges "$IMAGE"
codex mcp get unified-ai-system --json
- Restart Codex or open a new task, then use
/mcp verboseto confirm that all nine tools are available - the pinned0.4.9image ships nine of the fifteen names the current release declares. Remove the registration when it is no longer wanted:
codex mcp remove unified-ai-system
Removing the registration does not remove the pulled image from Docker's cache. Treat image-cache deletion as a separate host-state change and obtain approval before doing it.
When to Use This Skill
- Use when a user asks whether Unified AI System is healthy or ready.
- Use when a user wants a credential-free gateway chat proof.
- Use when a user asks about the gateway's knowledge, workflow, or workforce surfaces.
- Use when a user wants evidence from the bundled MCP tools rather than a claim inferred from documentation or process exit codes.
Do not use this skill for generic model comparisons, unrelated MCP servers, or deploying a production gateway.
Workflow
- Confirm that the
unified-ai-systemMCP tools are available in the current task. If they are absent, follow the approved setup above and wait for a restarted or new task. - Call
gateway_health, thengateway_readiness, before attempting chat. - Select the narrowest additional tool that answers the request.
- Report returned provider, execution mode, readiness, and blockers exactly.
- Separate transport success from product, production-readiness, autonomy, or AGI claims.
Tool Map
Nine of these ship in the reviewed 0.4.9 image below; the six marked 0.5.0 and
0.8.0 are in the current release and are absent from that older image.
Status and boundaries:
gateway_health: gateway health, provider mode, and the real-provider safety flaggateway_readiness: first-run readiness for chat and the local gateway runtimeknowledge_readiness: knowledge infrastructure without loading or changing dataworkflow_health: the governed workflow subsystem without starting a workflowworkflow_actions: workflow action definitions without invoking any actionworkforce_health: the workforce subsystem without planning or executing workworkforce_agents: configured workforce agent descriptors without dispatching them
Doing work locally, still with no provider call:
gateway_prompt_enhance: structures a plain-language request into a prompt locally, without provider credentials or provider callsgateway_prompt_enhance_llm(0.5.0): semantic rewriting through a provider when one is configured, falling back to the deterministic local engine when none isknowledge_retrieve(0.5.0): keyword search over the local knowledge base, returning ranked chunks with citations; calls no providerworkflow_run(0.5.0): the 3-step local workflow - retrieve knowledge, compose a Markdown report, write a controlled artifact; calls no providergateway_chat: one chat request, accepted only when the gateway proves real providers are disabled
The governed Agent surface, read-only (0.8.0):
agent_governance_status: governance status through the authenticated Gateway identity; no tenant override is accepted and it fails closed when that identity is not authorized for platform statusagent_governance_list: only the governed Agents visible to that tenant, with no tenant or owner override argumentagent_governance_describe(takesagentId): one Agent as seen by that tenant; cross-tenant and missing identifiers stay indistinguishable on purpose
Creating, executing, revoking, approving or activating anything in that surface remains a human REST/SDK/CLI operation and is not exposed to the model at all.
Example
User: Check whether the local gateway is ready, then prove chat works safely.
Agent:
1. Call gateway_health.
2. Call gateway_readiness.
3. Call gateway_chat only if both results prove fake-provider mode.
4. Report provider, model, execution mode, response, and every blocker.
Safety Boundaries
- Keep the credential-free local fake provider as the default.
- Never request, read, or transmit provider credentials through this skill.
- Do not enable or call a real provider without explicit scoped authorization.
- Treat MCP registration, image pulls, container creation, networking, and teardown as host-state changes that require informed user approval.
- Never substitute a mutable tag, a different OCI index, or an unreviewed
platform manifest for the reviewed
0.4.9identities. Keep download and inspection approval separate from registration and activation approval. - Keep
--pull neverin the registered command. If the reviewed image is absent from the local cache, fail closed and return to the first approval stage. - Keep
--network none,--cap-drop ALL, and--security-opt no-new-privilegesin the registered command. - Do not claim production readiness, L5 autonomy, or AGI from a healthy handshake.
- Treat a zero exit code as transport evidence, not proof that readiness gates passed.
Limitations
- This skill file does not bundle the MCP server, Docker image, or Codex configuration. It only operates tools supplied by the separately installed official integration.
- It does not deploy, benchmark, or certify the gateway for production use.
- The credential-free chat tool proves only the deterministic local fake path.
- It does not configure real providers or handle provider credentials.
- The published MCP image requires Docker.
- The reviewed
0.4.9path covers linux/amd64 and linux/arm64. Do not activate another platform image without a separate content review. - The image runs as the container's default root user and bundles the gateway source, package-manager tooling, native dependencies, and base-image SUID/SGID files. The registered command drops capabilities, prevents new privileges, disables networking, and leaves the image in Docker's cache.
- Existing Codex tasks may not hot-load a newly installed MCP configuration.
Troubleshooting
- If the tools are missing after approved registration, inspect
codex mcp get unified-ai-system --json, then restart Codex or start a new task. - If readiness is blocked, report the returned blocker instead of retrying chat blindly.
- If the runtime might use a real provider, stop before chat and keep the session read-only.
Additional Resources
04 同仓库更多 Skills
migrate-to-e2e
Moves an existing Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, Appium, Detox, Maestro, or TesterArmy suite to e2e one slice at a time, with the old suite running beside the new one until each ported test is proven. Keeps a MIGRATION.md progress file so any later session resumes where the last stopped. Optionally plants a defect to show both suites catch it. Use for /migrate-to-e2e, "migrate our tests to e2e", "port these Maestro flows", "move our TesterArmy tests", or when a project has an e2e config and an older suite still running.
e2e
Writes, runs, and debugs end-to-end tests for web and mobile apps with e2e, the agentic test runner, which mixes agent.act goals with exact locator assertions on a Playwright browser or an iOS or Android device. Also drives a project's running app live over the e2e MCP server to look at a screen, check a UI change, take a screenshot or record a video, and try a locator; and runs bug bashes, parallel e2e explore runs with each bug proven by a repro test. Use when a project depends on e2e or has an e2e.config.ts, when asked for end-to-end, browser, mobile, or agentic UI tests, to check a change in the running app, to QA or bug bash an app or branch, or when an e2e run fails.
create-verification-skill
Generate a project-local verify-<app> skill on top of e2e, so any coding agent can launch the app, check it is worth driving, exercise a feature the way a user does, keep evidence, and bug bash it. Writes the skill, a feature map with one explore charter per feature, and proves it once. Use for /create-verification-skill, "make a verification skill for this repo", or when a project has no scripted way to prove UI behavior.
deja-search
deja-vu memory — search the user's past AI coding sessions with the deja CLI. Holds what they already settled and never wrote into the repo (naming rules, banned or already-tried tools, required checks before merge, preferred values, who owns what). Use before your first edit in a task, before you call a change done or ready to merge, before you recommend a tool, library, design or reviewer, before re-debugging an error that may already be solved, when they say 'didn't we fix this before', 'what did we decide about X' or 'I already have that', and before telling them something on this machine does not exist.
deja-reflect
End-of-session reflection and memory curation with deja-vu. Review what was decided, what commands broke and what repaired them, and record durable project rules or decisions with deja remember so the next session starts with them.
revid
Make, edit, export and post AI videos with Revid (revid.ai) through the Revid MCP server. Use whenever the user wants a short-form or long-form video made (from an idea, a script, a URL, an article, a PDF, a tweet, a product page, their own clips, or a song), wants to find what is going viral on TikTok, YouTube, Instagram or X before making something, wants to edit or re-export an existing Revid project, generate a standalone AI image or clip, make a series episode, or publish and schedule a finished video to connected social accounts. Covers setup (hosted MCP with OAuth, or an API key), the 36 tools, credits, polling and the rules for publishing. Routes to the more specific revid-* skills when one fits.