agenthub
Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-25
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- agenthub
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "author": "Alireza Rezvani", "updated": 1773705600000, "version": "2.1.2", "category": "engineering" }
- description
- Multi-agent collaboration plugin that spawns N parallel subagents competing on the same task via git worktree isolation. Agents work independently, results are evaluated by metric or LLM judge, and the best branch is merged. Use when: user wants multiple approaches tried in parallel — code optimization, content variation, research exploration, or any task that benefits from parallel competition. Requires: a git repo.
03 SKILL.md 正文
AgentHub — Multi-Agent Collaboration
Spawn N parallel AI agents that compete on the same task. Each agent works in an isolated git worktree. The coordinator evaluates results and merges the winner.
Slash Commands
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
/hub:hub-init |
Create a new collaboration session — task, agent count, eval criteria |
/hub:spawn |
Launch N parallel subagents in isolated worktrees |
/hub:hub-status |
Show DAG state, agent progress, branch status |
/hub:eval |
Rank agent results by metric or LLM judge |
/hub:merge |
Merge winning branch, archive losers |
/hub:board |
Read/write the agent message board |
/hub:run |
One-shot lifecycle: init → baseline → spawn → eval → merge |
Agent Templates
When spawning with --template, agents follow a predefined iteration pattern:
| Template | Pattern | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
optimizer |
Edit → eval → keep/discard → repeat x10 | Performance, latency, size |
refactorer |
Restructure → test → iterate until green | Code quality, tech debt |
test-writer |
Write tests → measure coverage → repeat | Test coverage gaps |
bug-fixer |
Reproduce → diagnose → fix → verify | Bug fix approaches |
Templates are defined in references/agent-templates.md.
When This Skill Activates
Trigger phrases:
- "try multiple approaches"
- "have agents compete"
- "parallel optimization"
- "spawn N agents"
- "compare different solutions"
- "fan-out" or "tournament"
- "generate content variations"
- "compare different drafts"
- "A/B test copy"
- "explore multiple strategies"
Coordinator Protocol
The main Claude Code session is the coordinator. It follows this lifecycle:
INIT → DISPATCH → MONITOR → EVALUATE → MERGE
1. Init
Run /hub:hub-init to create a session. This generates:
.agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/config.yaml— task config.agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/state.json— state machine.agenthub/board/— message board channels
2. Dispatch
Run /hub:spawn to launch agents. For each agent 1..N:
- Post task assignment to
.agenthub/board/dispatch/ - Spawn via Agent tool with
isolation: "worktree" - All agents launched in a single message (parallel)
3. Monitor
Run /hub:hub-status to check progress:
dag_analyzer.py --status --session {id}shows branch state- Board
progress/channel has agent updates
4. Evaluate
Run /hub:eval to rank results:
- Metric mode: run eval command in each worktree, parse numeric result
- Judge mode: read diffs, coordinator ranks by quality
- Hybrid: metric first, LLM-judge for ties
5. Merge
Run /hub:merge to finalize:
git merge --no-ffwinner into base branch- Tag losers:
git tag hub/archive/{session}/agent-{i} - Clean up worktrees
- Post merge summary to board
Agent Protocol
Each subagent receives this prompt pattern:
You are agent-{i} in hub session {session-id}.
Your task: {task description}
Instructions:
1. Read your assignment at .agenthub/board/dispatch/{seq}-agent-{i}.md
2. Work in your worktree — make changes, run tests, iterate
3. Commit all changes with descriptive messages
4. Write your result summary to .agenthub/board/results/agent-{i}-result.md
5. Exit when done
Agents do NOT see each other's work. They do NOT communicate with each other. They only write to the board for the coordinator to read.
DAG Model
Branch Naming
hub/{session-id}/agent-{N}/attempt-{M}
- Session ID: timestamp-based (
YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS) - Agent N: sequential (1 to agent-count)
- Attempt M: increments on retry (usually 1)
Frontier Detection
Frontier = branch tips with no child branches. Equivalent to AgentHub's "leaves" query.
python scripts/dag_analyzer.py --frontier --session {id}
Immutability
The DAG is append-only:
- Never rebase or force-push agent branches
- Never delete commits (only branch refs after archival)
- Every approach preserved via git tags
Message Board
Location: .agenthub/board/
Channels
| Channel | Writer | Reader | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
dispatch/ |
Coordinator | Agents | Task assignments |
progress/ |
Agents | Coordinator | Status updates |
results/ |
Agents + Coordinator | All | Final results + merge summary |
Post Format
---
author: agent-1
timestamp: 2026-03-17T14:30:22Z
channel: results
parent: null
---
## Result Summary
- **Approach**: Replaced O(n²) sort with hash map
- **Files changed**: 3
- **Metric**: 142ms (baseline: 180ms, delta: -38ms)
- **Confidence**: High — all tests pass
Board Rules
- Append-only: never edit or delete posts
- Unique filenames:
{seq:03d}-{author}-{timestamp}.md - YAML frontmatter required on all posts
Evaluation Modes
Metric-Based
Best for: benchmarks, test pass rates, file sizes, response times.
python scripts/result_ranker.py --session {id} \
--eval-cmd "pytest bench.py --json" \
--metric p50_ms --direction lower
The ranker runs the eval command in each agent's worktree directory and parses the metric from stdout.
LLM Judge
Best for: code quality, readability, architecture decisions.
The coordinator reads each agent's diff (git diff base...agent-branch) and ranks by:
- Correctness (does it solve the task?)
- Simplicity (fewer lines changed preferred)
- Quality (clean execution, good structure)
Hybrid
Run metric first. If top agents are within 10% of each other, use LLM judge to break ties.
Session Lifecycle
init → running → evaluating → merged
→ archived (if no winner)
State transitions managed by session_manager.py:
| From | To | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
init |
running |
/hub:spawn completes |
running |
evaluating |
All agents return |
evaluating |
merged |
/hub:merge completes |
evaluating |
archived |
No winner / all failed |
Proactive Triggers
The coordinator should act when:
| Signal | Action |
|---|---|
| All agents crashed | Post failure summary, suggest retry with different constraints |
| No improvement over baseline | Archive session, suggest different approaches |
| Orphan worktrees detected | Run session_manager.py --cleanup {id} |
Session stuck in running |
Check board for progress, consider timeout |
Installation
# Copy to your Claude Code skills directory
cp -r engineering/agenthub ~/.claude/skills/agenthub
# Or install via ClawHub
clawhub install agenthub
Scripts
| Script | Purpose |
|---|---|
hub_init.py |
Initialize .agenthub/ structure and session |
dag_analyzer.py |
Frontier detection, DAG graph, branch status |
board_manager.py |
Message board CRUD (channels, posts, threads) |
result_ranker.py |
Rank agents by metric or diff quality |
session_manager.py |
Session state machine and cleanup |
Related Skills
- autoresearch-agent — Single-agent optimization loop (use AgentHub when you want N agents competing)
- self-improving-agent — Self-modifying agent (use AgentHub when you want external competition)
- git-worktree-manager — Git worktree utilities (AgentHub uses worktrees internally)
04 同仓库更多 Skills
webmcpify
Make a web app agent-ready — propose a WebMCP tool manifest, integrate, verify in a real browser, heal; unrelated code stays untouched. Use for "webmcpify", "add WebMCP", or "expose app actions to AI agents".
vardoger-analyze
Use when the user asks to personalize the GitHub Copilot CLI assistant, adapt Copilot to their style, use vardoger, or analyze their Copilot CLI conversation history. Reads the local session directory at `~/.copilot/session-state/`, extracts recurring preferences and conventions, and writes a fenced personalization block into `~/.copilot/copilot-instructions.md`. Runs entirely on the user's machine via the local `vardoger` CLI (`pipx install vardoger`); no network calls and no uploads. Triggers: 'personalize my copilot', 'analyze my copilot history', 'tailor copilot to me', 'run vardoger', 'update my copilot instructions from history', 'make copilot learn my style'.
transloadit-media-processing
Process media files (video, audio, images, documents) using Transloadit. Use when asked to encode video to HLS/MP4, generate thumbnails, resize or watermark images, extract audio, concatenate clips, add subtitles, OCR documents, or run any media processing pipeline. Covers 86+ processing robots for file transformation at scale.
terraform-azurerm-set-diff-analyzer
Analyze Terraform plan JSON output for AzureRM Provider to distinguish between false-positive diffs (order-only changes in Set-type attributes) and actual resource changes. Use when reviewing terraform plan output for Azure resources like Application Gateway, Load Balancer, Firewall, Front Door, NSG, and other resources with Set-type attributes that cause spurious diffs due to internal ordering changes.
technical-job-search
Use this skill when a software engineer asks for help with job search tasks: parsing or analyzing a job description, tailoring a CV/resume, writing a cover letter, evaluating a job offer, or drafting a post-interview follow-up email. Do not activate for general career advice unrelated to an active job search action.
steno-mode
Shorthand-first response compression that cuts ~40% of response tokens while preserving technical precision and exact literals. Use when the user says "steno mode", "shorthand mode", "compressed responses", "token reduction", "brief structured output", or invokes /steno. Supports four compression levels: lite, brief, court, machine. Do not trigger for requests needing polished prose such as onboarding/tutorial content, stakeholder or customer-facing copy, or teaching-focused explanations.