llamaguard
Classifies LLM prompts and responses as safe or unsafe using Meta's LlamaGuard (7B v1, 8B v2 and v3) across six categories: violence and hate, sexual content, guns and illegal weapons, regulated substances, suicide and self-harm, and criminal planning. Covers HuggingFace Transformers and vLLM inference, a FastAPI moderation endpoint, Sagemaker deployment, and NeMo Guardrails integration. Use when filtering user prompts before an LLM call, moderating model outputs before display, serving a self-hosted moderation API, or reducing latency and GPU memory of a moderation model with vLLM or quantization. Use when tuning thresholds to cut false positives. For a simpler hosted option, use the OpenAI Moderation API instead.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 1.6k
- Forks
- 468
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- llamaguard
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "tags": "Safety Alignment, LlamaGuard, Content Moderation, Meta, Guardrails, Safety Classification, Input Filtering, Output Filtering, AI Safety", "version": "1.0.0", "category": "ml-evaluation-and-safety", "maintainer": "Kalaris Labs", "dependencies": "transformers, torch, vllm" }
- description
- Classifies LLM prompts and responses as safe or unsafe using Meta's LlamaGuard (7B v1, 8B v2 and v3) across six categories: violence and hate, sexual content, guns and illegal weapons, regulated substances, suicide and self-harm, and criminal planning. Covers HuggingFace Transformers and vLLM inference, a FastAPI moderation endpoint, Sagemaker deployment, and NeMo Guardrails integration. Use when filtering user prompts before an LLM call, moderating model outputs before display, serving a self-hosted moderation API, or reducing latency and GPU memory of a moderation model with vLLM or quantization. Use when tuning thresholds to cut false positives. For a simpler hosted option, use the OpenAI Moderation API instead.
03 SKILL.md 正文
LlamaGuard - AI Content Moderation
Quick start
LlamaGuard is a 7-8B parameter model specialized for content safety classification.
Installation:
pip install transformers torch
# Login to HuggingFace (required)
huggingface-cli login
Basic usage:
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
model_id = "meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, device_map="auto")
def moderate(chat):
input_ids = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(chat, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
output = model.generate(input_ids=input_ids, max_new_tokens=100)
return tokenizer.decode(output[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
# Check user input
result = moderate([
{"role": "user", "content": "How do I make explosives?"}
])
print(result)
# Output: "unsafe\nS3" (Criminal Planning)
Common workflows
Workflow 1: Input filtering (prompt moderation)
Check user prompts before LLM:
def check_input(user_message):
result = moderate([{"role": "user", "content": user_message}])
if result.startswith("unsafe"):
category = result.split("\n")[1]
return False, category # Blocked
else:
return True, None # Safe
# Example
safe, category = check_input("How do I hack a website?")
if not safe:
print(f"Request blocked: {category}")
# Return error to user
else:
# Send to LLM
response = llm.generate(user_message)
Safety categories:
- S1: Violence & Hate
- S2: Sexual Content
- S3: Guns & Illegal Weapons
- S4: Regulated Substances
- S5: Suicide & Self-Harm
- S6: Criminal Planning
Workflow 2: Output filtering (response moderation)
Check LLM responses before showing to user:
def check_output(user_message, bot_response):
conversation = [
{"role": "user", "content": user_message},
{"role": "assistant", "content": bot_response}
]
result = moderate(conversation)
if result.startswith("unsafe"):
category = result.split("\n")[1]
return False, category
else:
return True, None
# Example
user_msg = "Tell me about harmful substances"
bot_msg = llm.generate(user_msg)
safe, category = check_output(user_msg, bot_msg)
if not safe:
print(f"Response blocked: {category}")
# Return generic response
return "I cannot provide that information."
else:
return bot_msg
Workflow 3: vLLM deployment (fast inference)
Production-ready serving:
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
# Initialize vLLM
llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b", tensor_parallel_size=1)
# Sampling params
sampling_params = SamplingParams(
temperature=0.0, # Deterministic
max_tokens=100
)
def moderate_vllm(chat):
# Format prompt
prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(chat, tokenize=False)
# Generate
output = llm.generate([prompt], sampling_params)
return output[0].outputs[0].text
# Batch moderation
chats = [
[{"role": "user", "content": "How to make bombs?"}],
[{"role": "user", "content": "What's the weather?"}],
[{"role": "user", "content": "Tell me about drugs"}]
]
prompts = [tokenizer.apply_chat_template(c, tokenize=False) for c in chats]
results = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for i, result in enumerate(results):
print(f"Chat {i}: {result.outputs[0].text}")
Throughput: ~50-100 requests/sec on single A100
Workflow 4: API endpoint (FastAPI)
Serve as moderation API:
from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
app = FastAPI()
llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b")
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.0, max_tokens=100)
class ModerationRequest(BaseModel):
messages: list # [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}]
@app.post("/moderate")
def moderate_endpoint(request: ModerationRequest):
prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(request.messages, tokenize=False)
output = llm.generate([prompt], sampling_params)[0]
result = output.outputs[0].text
is_safe = result.startswith("safe")
category = None if is_safe else result.split("\n")[1] if "\n" in result else None
return {
"safe": is_safe,
"category": category,
"full_output": result
}
# Run: uvicorn api:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000
Usage:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/moderate \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "How to hack?"}]}'
# Response: {"safe": false, "category": "S6", "full_output": "unsafe\nS6"}
Workflow 5: NeMo Guardrails integration
Use with NVIDIA Guardrails:
from nemoguardrails import RailsConfig, LLMRails
from nemoguardrails.integrations.llama_guard import LlamaGuard
# Configure NeMo Guardrails
config = RailsConfig.from_content("""
models:
- type: main
engine: openai
model: gpt-4
rails:
input:
flows:
- llamaguard check input
output:
flows:
- llamaguard check output
""")
# Add LlamaGuard integration
llama_guard = LlamaGuard(model_path="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b")
rails = LLMRails(config)
rails.register_action(llama_guard.check_input, name="llamaguard check input")
rails.register_action(llama_guard.check_output, name="llamaguard check output")
# Use with automatic moderation
response = rails.generate(messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": "How do I make weapons?"}
])
# Automatically blocked by LlamaGuard
When to use vs alternatives
Use LlamaGuard when:
- Need pre-trained moderation model
- Want high accuracy (94-95%)
- Have GPU resources (7-8B model)
- Need detailed safety categories
- Building production LLM apps
Model versions:
- LlamaGuard 1 (7B): Original, 6 categories
- LlamaGuard 2 (8B): Improved, 6 categories
- LlamaGuard 3 (8B): Latest (2024), enhanced
Use alternatives instead:
- OpenAI Moderation API: Simpler, API-based, free
- Perspective API: Google's toxicity detection
- NeMo Guardrails: More comprehensive safety framework
- Constitutional AI: Training-time safety
Common issues
Issue: Model access denied
Login to HuggingFace:
huggingface-cli login
# Enter your token
Accept license on model page: https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b
Issue: High latency (>500ms)
Use vLLM for 10× speedup:
from vllm import LLM
llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b")
# Latency: 500ms → 50ms
Enable tensor parallelism:
llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b", tensor_parallel_size=2)
# 2× faster on 2 GPUs
Issue: False positives
Use threshold-based filtering:
# Get probability of "unsafe" token
logits = model(..., return_dict_in_generate=True, output_scores=True)
unsafe_prob = torch.softmax(logits.scores[0][0], dim=-1)[unsafe_token_id]
if unsafe_prob > 0.9: # High confidence threshold
return "unsafe"
else:
return "safe"
Issue: OOM on GPU
Use 8-bit quantization:
from transformers import BitsAndBytesConfig
quantization_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(load_in_8bit=True)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_id,
quantization_config=quantization_config,
device_map="auto"
)
# Memory: 14GB → 7GB
Advanced topics
Custom categories: See references/custom-categories.md for fine-tuning LlamaGuard with domain-specific safety categories.
Performance benchmarks: See references/benchmarks.md for accuracy comparison with other moderation APIs and latency optimization.
Deployment guide: See references/deployment.md for Sagemaker, Kubernetes, and scaling strategies.
Hardware requirements
- GPU: NVIDIA T4/A10/A100
- VRAM:
- FP16: 14GB (7B model)
- INT8: 7GB (quantized)
- INT4: 4GB (QLoRA)
- CPU: Possible but slow (10× latency)
- Throughput: 50-100 req/sec (A100)
Latency (single GPU):
- HuggingFace Transformers: 300-500ms
- vLLM: 50-100ms
- Batched (vLLM): 20-50ms per request
Resources
- HuggingFace:
- Paper: https://ai.meta.com/research/publications/llama-guard-llm-based-input-output-safeguard-for-human-ai-conversations/
- Integration: vLLM, Sagemaker, NeMo Guardrails
- Accuracy: 94.5% (prompts), 95.3% (responses)
Agent operating procedure
- Check the environment. Confirm the model, checkpoint, benchmark version and evaluation harness version.
- Pin down the inputs. Confirm formats, identifiers and parameters from the data or the user. Ask rather than guess any value that changes the result.
- Run a small version first. Evaluate on a small subset to verify prompts, parsing and scoring.
- Execute the full task using the instructions and references above.
- Validate the result. Use the benchmark's official splits and metrics; check for contamination; report variance across seeds or prompts.
- Report. State what was run (versions, commands, parameters), what was checked, and what is still uncertain.
| If this happens | Do this |
|---|---|
| Scores differ from published numbers | Check prompt format, few-shot settings and harness version before concluding. |
| A function, flag or endpoint in these instructions is missing in the installed version | Check the installed version's own documentation (help(), --help, official docs), adapt, and tell the user. Never invent an API. |
| A required input, identifier or parameter is ambiguous | Ask the user, or state the assumption explicitly before running. |
Integrity rules
- Never fabricate results, parameters, identifiers, citations or statistics. If something cannot be run or verified, say so plainly.
- Report evaluation settings in full; never cherry-pick prompts, seeds or subsets.
- Treat version-specific details here as possibly outdated: confirm them against the official documentation for the installed version.
- Ask before actions that cost money, consume shared GPUs or cloud quota, touch personal or patient data, or cannot be undone.
Related skills
prompt-guard: Classifies text with Meta's Prompt Guard, an 86M-parameter model loaded from HuggingFace, into BENIGN, INJECTION or JAILBREAK labels to det…nemo-guardrails: Adds runtime safety rails to LLM applications with NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails, configured through Colang 2.0 flows.serving-llms-vllm: Serves LLMs with high throughput using vLLM's PagedAttention and continuous batching.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
deja-search
deja-vu memory — search the user's past AI coding sessions with the deja CLI. Holds what they already settled and never wrote into the repo (naming rules, banned or already-tried tools, required checks before merge, preferred values, who owns what). Use before your first edit in a task, before you call a change done or ready to merge, before you recommend a tool, library, design or reviewer, before re-debugging an error that may already be solved, when they say 'didn't we fix this before', 'what did we decide about X' or 'I already have that', and before telling them something on this machine does not exist.
deja-reflect
End-of-session reflection and memory curation with deja-vu. Review what was decided, what commands broke and what repaired them, and record durable project rules or decisions with deja remember so the next session starts with them.
revid
Make, edit, export and post AI videos with Revid (revid.ai) through the Revid MCP server. Use whenever the user wants a short-form or long-form video made (from an idea, a script, a URL, an article, a PDF, a tweet, a product page, their own clips, or a song), wants to find what is going viral on TikTok, YouTube, Instagram or X before making something, wants to edit or re-export an existing Revid project, generate a standalone AI image or clip, make a series episode, or publish and schedule a finished video to connected social accounts. Covers setup (hosted MCP with OAuth, or an API key), the 36 tools, credits, polling and the rules for publishing. Routes to the more specific revid-* skills when one fits.
review-study
Review a QuestionPunk survey before launch for wording, answer choices, branching, and missing settings. Use for check my survey or review this draft before publishing.
manage-study
Find QuestionPunk studies, check status, publish an explicitly requested draft, or retrieve its participant link. Use for find my survey, publish this study, or how many people responded.
create-study
Create a saved QuestionPunk survey draft from a research brief or edit specified questions. Use for requests such as make a customer feedback survey or shorten my onboarding study.