AGENT SKILL

competitive-teardown

Analyzes competitor products and companies by synthesizing data from pricing pages, app store reviews, job postings, SEO signals, and social media into structured competitive intelligence. Produces feature comparison matrices scored across 12 dimensions, SWOT analyses, positioning maps, UX audits, pricing model breakdowns, action item roadmaps, and stakeholder presentation templates. Use when conducting competitor analysis, comparing products against competitors, researching the competitive landscape, building battle cards for sales, preparing for a product strategy or roadmap session, responding to a competitor's new feature or pricing change, or performing a quarterly competitive review.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-04-01
Stars
★ 3
Forks
2

01 前言 Front Matter

name
competitive-teardown
description
Analyzes competitor products and companies by synthesizing data from pricing pages, app store reviews, job postings, SEO signals, and social media into structured competitive intelligence. Produces feature comparison matrices scored across 12 dimensions, SWOT analyses, positioning maps, UX audits, pricing model breakdowns, action item roadmaps, and stakeholder presentation templates. Use when conducting competitor analysis, comparing products against competitors, researching the competitive landscape, building battle cards for sales, preparing for a product strategy or roadmap session, responding to a competitor's new feature or pricing change, or performing a quarterly competitive review.

02 资源文件 5

03 SKILL.md 正文

Competitive Teardown

Tier: POWERFUL
Category: Product Team
Domain: Competitive Intelligence, Product Strategy, Market Analysis


When to Use

  • Before a product strategy or roadmap session
  • When a competitor launches a major feature or pricing change
  • Quarterly competitive review
  • Before a sales pitch where you need battle card data
  • When entering a new market segment

Teardown Workflow

Follow these steps in sequence to produce a complete teardown:

  1. Define competitors — List 2–4 competitors to analyze. Confirm which is the primary focus.
  2. Collect data — Use references/data-collection-guide.md to gather raw signals from at least 3 sources per competitor (website, reviews, job postings, SEO, social).
    Validation checkpoint: Before proceeding, confirm you have pricing data, at least 20 reviews, and job posting counts for each competitor.
  3. Score using rubric — Apply the 12-dimension rubric below to produce a numeric scorecard for each competitor and your own product.
    Validation checkpoint: Every dimension should have a score and at least one supporting evidence note.
  4. Generate outputs — Populate the templates in references/analysis-templates.md (Feature Matrix, Pricing Analysis, SWOT, Positioning Map, UX Audit).
  5. Build action plan — Translate findings into the Action Items template (quick wins / medium-term / strategic).
  6. Package for stakeholders — Assemble the Stakeholder Presentation using outputs from steps 3–5.

Data Collection Guide

Full executable scripts for each source are in references/data-collection-guide.md. Summaries of what to capture are below.

1. Website Analysis

Key things to capture:

  • Pricing tiers and price points
  • Feature lists per tier
  • Primary CTA and messaging
  • Case studies / customer logos (signals ICP)
  • Integration logos
  • Trust signals (certifications, compliance badges)

2. App Store Reviews

Review sentiment categories:

  • Praise → what users love (defend / strengthen these)
  • Feature requests → unmet needs (opportunity gaps)
  • Bugs → quality signals
  • UX complaints → friction points you can beat them on

Sample App Store query (iTunes Search API):

GET https://itunes.apple.com/search?term=<competitor_name>&entity=software&limit=1
# Extract trackId, then:
GET https://itunes.apple.com/rss/customerreviews/id=<trackId>/sortBy=mostRecent/json?l=en&limit=50

Parse entry[].content.label for review text and entry[].im:rating.label for star rating.

3. Job Postings (Team Size & Tech Stack Signals)

Signals from job postings:

  • Engineering volume → scaling vs. consolidating
  • Specific tech mentions → stack (React/Vue, Postgres/Mongo, AWS/GCP)
  • Sales/CS ratio → product-led vs. sales-led motion
  • Data/ML roles → upcoming AI features
  • Compliance roles → regulatory expansion

4. SEO Analysis

SEO signals to capture:

  • Top 20 organic keywords (intent: informational / navigational / commercial)
  • Domain Authority / backlink count
  • Blog publishing cadence and topics
  • Which pages rank (product pages vs. blog vs. docs)

5. Social Media Sentiment

Capture recent mentions via Twitter/X API v2, Reddit, or LinkedIn. Look for recurring praise, complaints, and feature requests. See references/data-collection-guide.md for API query examples.


Scoring Rubric (12 Dimensions, 1-5)

# Dimension 1 (Weak) 3 (Average) 5 (Best-in-class)
1 Features Core only, many gaps Solid coverage Comprehensive + unique
2 Pricing Confusing / overpriced Market-rate, clear Transparent, flexible, fair
3 UX Confusing, high friction Functional Delightful, minimal friction
4 Performance Slow, unreliable Acceptable Fast, high uptime
5 Docs Sparse, outdated Decent coverage Comprehensive, searchable
6 Support Email only, slow Chat + email 24/7, great response
7 Integrations 0-5 integrations 6-25 26+ or deep ecosystem
8 Security No mentions SOC2 claimed SOC2 Type II, ISO 27001
9 Scalability No enterprise tier Mid-market ready Enterprise-grade
10 Brand Generic, unmemorable Decent positioning Strong, differentiated
11 Community None Forum / Slack Active, vibrant community
12 Innovation No recent releases Quarterly Frequent, meaningful

Example completed row (Competitor: Acme Corp, Dimension 3 – UX):

Dimension Acme Corp Score Evidence
UX 2 App Store reviews cite "confusing navigation" (38 mentions); onboarding requires 7 steps before TTFV; no onboarding wizard; CC required at signup.

Apply this pattern to all 12 dimensions for each competitor.


Templates

Full template markdown is in references/analysis-templates.md. Abbreviated reference below.

Feature Comparison Matrix

Rows: core features, pricing tiers, platform capabilities (web, iOS, Android, API).
Columns: your product + up to 3 competitors.
Score each cell 1–5. Sum to get total out of 60.
Score legend: 5=Best-in-class, 4=Strong, 3=Average, 2=Below average, 1=Weak/Missing

Pricing Analysis

Capture per competitor: model type (per-seat / usage-based / flat rate / freemium), entry/mid/enterprise price points, free trial length.
Summarize: price leader, value leader, premium positioning, your position, and 2–3 pricing opportunity bullets.

SWOT Analysis

For each competitor: 3–5 bullets per quadrant (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities for us, Threats to us). Anchor every bullet to a data signal (review quote, job posting count, pricing page, etc.).

Positioning Map

2x2 axes (e.g., Simple ↔ Complex / Low Value ↔ High Value). Place each competitor and your product. Bubble size = market share or funding. See references/analysis-templates.md for ASCII and editable versions.

UX Audit Checklist

Onboarding: TTFV (minutes), steps to activation, CC-required, onboarding wizard quality.
Key workflows: steps, friction points, comparative score (yours vs. theirs).
Mobile: iOS/Android ratings, feature parity, top complaint and praise.
Navigation: global search, keyboard shortcuts, in-app help.

Action Items

Horizon Effort Examples
Quick wins (0–4 wks) Low Add review badges, publish comparison landing page
Medium-term (1–3 mo) Moderate Launch free tier, improve onboarding TTFV, add top-requested integration
Strategic (3–12 mo) High Enter new market, build API v2, achieve SOC2 Type II

Stakeholder Presentation (7 slides)

  1. Executive Summary — Threat level (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH/CRITICAL), top strength, top opportunity, recommended action
  2. Market Position — 2x2 positioning map
  3. Feature Scorecard — 12-dimension radar or table, total scores
  4. Pricing Analysis — Comparison table + key insight
  5. UX Highlights — What they do better (3 bullets) vs. where we win (3 bullets)
  6. Voice of Customer — Top 3 review complaints (quoted or paraphrased)
  7. Our Action Plan — Quick wins, medium-term, strategic priorities; Appendix with raw data

Related Skills

  • Product Strategist (product-team/product-strategist/) — Competitive insights feed OKR and strategy planning
  • Landing Page Generator (product-team/landing-page-generator/) — Competitive positioning informs landing page messaging

04 同仓库更多 Skills

afaizalam2003
afaizalam2003/Master-claude-skill

soc2-compliance

Use when the user asks to prepare for SOC 2 audits, map Trust Service Criteria, build control matrices, collect audit evidence, perform gap analysis, or assess SOC 2 Type I vs Type II readiness.

律师与法务
★ 3
afaizalam2003
afaizalam2003/Master-claude-skill

risk-management-specialist

Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk control, risk matrix, benefit-risk analysis, residual risk, risk acceptability, or post-market risk.

★ 3
afaizalam2003
afaizalam2003/Master-claude-skill

regulatory-affairs-head

Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Prepares FDA 510(k), De Novo, and PMA submission packages; analyzes regulatory pathways for new medical devices; drafts responses to FDA deficiency letters and Notified Body queries; develops CE marking technical documentation under EU MDR 2017/745; coordinates multi-market approval strategies across FDA, EU, Health Canada, PMDA, and NMPA; and maintains regulatory intelligence on evolving standards. Use when users need to plan or execute FDA submissions, navigate 510(k) or PMA approval processes, achieve CE marking, prepare pre-submission meeting materials, write regulatory strategy documents, respond to agency queries, or manage compliance documentation for medical device market access.

★ 3
afaizalam2003
afaizalam2003/Master-claude-skill

quality-manager-qms-iso13485

ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device documentation, and corrective action workflows.

设计师视觉设计
★ 3
afaizalam2003
afaizalam2003/Master-claude-skill

quality-manager-qmr

Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2.

律师与法务
★ 3
afaizalam2003
afaizalam2003/Master-claude-skill

quality-documentation-manager

Document control system management for medical device QMS. Covers document numbering, version control, change management, and 21 CFR Part 11 compliance. Use for document control procedures, change control workflow, document numbering, version management, electronic signature compliance, or regulatory documentation review.

律师与法务文档处理Skill与智能体开发
★ 3