[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6KBJYRWTB7JD4DFE3AN1JSV":3,"skill-same:01M6KBJYRWTB7JD4DFE3AN1JSV":99},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":31,"publishedAt":52,"linkOnly":53,"markdownContent":54,"markdownBody":55,"frontMatter":56,"refName":61,"commitSha":62,"skillDirectory":63,"forksCount":64,"repositoryHtmlUrl":65,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":66,"ownerBlogUrl":67,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":68,"install":69,"resources":82},"01M6KBJYRWTB7JD4DFE3AN1JSV","competitor-alternatives",null,"When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'switch from competitor,' or 'comparison content.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.","afaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill","afaizalam2003","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F222019359?v=4","01M6K8F2XNT0HKBPF00JQ78SV3","Faiz Alam","01M6K8F31EBXAPER0EG8R9HTR5",3,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmarketing-skill\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives\u002FSKILL.md",[18,23,26],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000019","营销推广","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究",{"categoryNo":27,"categoryName":28,"taxonomyType":29,"taxonomyTypeDesc":30},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000035","市场营销","PROFESSION","适用职业",[32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51],"alternatives","competitor alternatives","switch","for","tables","formats","you","types","competitive","feature","deep","architecture","sales enablement","page","marketing","seo","deep research","product","create","modular","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: \"competitor-alternatives\"\ndescription: \"When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'switch from competitor,' or 'comparison content.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.\"\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  version: 1.0.0\n  author: Md Faiz Alam\n  category: marketing\n  updated: 2026-03-06\n---\n\n# Competitor & Alternative Pages\n\nYou are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.\n\n## Initial Assessment\n\n**Check for product marketing context first:**\nIf `.claude\u002Fproduct-marketing-context.md` exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.\n\nBefore creating competitor pages, understand:\n\n1. **Your Product**\n   - Core value proposition\n   - Key differentiators\n   - Ideal customer profile\n   - Pricing model\n   - Strengths and honest weaknesses\n\n2. **Competitive Landscape**\n   - Direct competitors\n   - Indirect\u002Fadjacent competitors\n   - Market positioning of each\n   - Search volume for competitor terms\n\n3. **Goals**\n   - SEO traffic capture\n   - Sales enablement\n   - Conversion from competitor users\n   - Brand positioning\n\n---\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### 1. Honesty Builds Trust\n- Acknowledge competitor strengths\n- Be accurate about your limitations\n- Don't misrepresent competitor features\n- Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims\n\n### 2. Depth Over Surface\n- Go beyond feature checklists\n- Explain *why* differences matter\n- Include use cases and scenarios\n- Show, don't just tell\n\n### 3. Help Them Decide\n- Different tools fit different needs\n- Be clear about who you're best for\n- Be clear about who competitor is best for\n- Reduce evaluation friction\n\n### 4. Modular Content Architecture\n- Competitor data should be centralized\n- Updates propagate to all pages\n- Single source of truth per competitor\n\n---\n\n## Page Formats\n\n### Format 1: [Competitor] Alternative (Singular)\n\n**Search intent**: User is actively looking to switch from a specific competitor\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Falternatives\u002F[competitor]` or `\u002F[competitor]-alternative`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[Competitor] alternative\", \"alternative to [Competitor]\", \"switch from [Competitor]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Why people look for alternatives (validate their pain)\n2. Summary: You as the alternative (quick positioning)\n3. Detailed comparison (features, service, pricing)\n4. Who should switch (and who shouldn't)\n5. Migration path\n6. Social proof from switchers\n7. CTA\n\n---\n\n### Format 2: [Competitor] Alternatives (Plural)\n\n**Search intent**: User is researching options, earlier in journey\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Falternatives\u002F[competitor]-alternatives`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[Competitor] alternatives\", \"best [Competitor] alternatives\", \"tools like [Competitor]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Why people look for alternatives (common pain points)\n2. What to look for in an alternative (criteria framework)\n3. List of alternatives (you first, but include real options)\n4. Comparison table (summary)\n5. Detailed breakdown of each alternative\n6. Recommendation by use case\n7. CTA\n\n**Important**: Include 4-7 real alternatives. Being genuinely helpful builds trust and ranks better.\n\n---\n\n### Format 3: You vs [Competitor]\n\n**Search intent**: User is directly comparing you to a specific competitor\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Fvs\u002F[competitor]` or `\u002Fcompare\u002F[you]-vs-[competitor]`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[You] vs [Competitor]\", \"[Competitor] vs [You]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. TL;DR summary (key differences in 2-3 sentences)\n2. At-a-glance comparison table\n3. Detailed comparison by category (Features, Pricing, Support, Ease of use, Integrations)\n4. Who [You] is best for\n5. Who [Competitor] is best for (be honest)\n6. What customers say (testimonials from switchers)\n7. Migration support\n8. CTA\n\n---\n\n### Format 4: [Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]\n\n**Search intent**: User comparing two competitors (not you directly)\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Fcompare\u002F[competitor-a]-vs-[competitor-b]`\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Overview of both products\n2. Comparison by category\n3. Who each is best for\n4. The third option (introduce yourself)\n5. Comparison table (all three)\n6. CTA\n\n**Why this works**: Captures search traffic for competitor terms, positions you as knowledgeable.\n\n---\n\n## Essential Sections\n\n### TL;DR Summary\nStart every page with a quick summary for scanners—key differences in 2-3 sentences.\n\n### Paragraph Comparisons\nGo beyond tables. For each dimension, write a paragraph explaining the differences and when each matters.\n\n### Feature Comparison\nFor each category: describe how each handles it, list strengths and limitations, give bottom line recommendation.\n\n### Pricing Comparison\nInclude tier-by-tier comparison, what's included, hidden costs, and total cost calculation for sample team size.\n\n### Who It's For\nBe explicit about ideal customer for each option. Honest recommendations build trust.\n\n### Migration Section\nCover what transfers, what needs reconfiguration, support offered, and quotes from customers who switched.\n\n**For detailed templates**: See [references\u002Ftemplates.md](references\u002Ftemplates.md)\n\n---\n\n## Content Architecture\n\n### Centralized Competitor Data\nCreate a single source of truth for each competitor with:\n- Positioning and target audience\n- Pricing (all tiers)\n- Feature ratings\n- Strengths and weaknesses\n- Best for \u002F not ideal for\n- Common complaints (from reviews)\n- Migration notes\n\n**For data structure and examples**: See [references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md](references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md)\n\n---\n\n## Research Process\n\n### Deep Competitor Research\n\nFor each competitor, gather:\n\n1. **Product research**: Sign up, use it, document features\u002FUX\u002Flimitations\n2. **Pricing research**: Current pricing, what's included, hidden costs\n3. **Review mining**: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius for common praise\u002Fcomplaint themes\n4. **Customer feedback**: Talk to customers who switched (both directions)\n5. **Content research**: Their positioning, their comparison pages, their changelog\n\n### Ongoing Updates\n\n- **Quarterly**: Verify pricing, check for major feature changes\n- **When notified**: Customer mentions competitor change\n- **Annually**: Full refresh of all competitor data\n\n---\n\n## SEO Considerations\n\n### Keyword Targeting\n\n| Format | Primary Keywords |\n|--------|-----------------|\n| Alternative (singular) | [Competitor] alternative, alternative to [Competitor] |\n| Alternatives (plural) | [Competitor] alternatives, best [Competitor] alternatives |\n| You vs Competitor | [You] vs [Competitor], [Competitor] vs [You] |\n| Competitor vs Competitor | [A] vs [B], [B] vs [A] |\n\n### Internal Linking\n- Link between related competitor pages\n- Link from feature pages to relevant comparisons\n- Create hub page linking to all competitor content\n\n### Schema Markup\nConsider FAQ schema for common questions like \"What is the best alternative to [Competitor]?\"\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Competitor Data File\nComplete competitor profile in YAML format for use across all comparison pages.\n\n### Page Content\nFor each page: URL, meta tags, full page copy organized by section, comparison tables, CTAs.\n\n### Page Set Plan\nRecommended pages to create with priority order based on search volume.\n\n---\n\n## Task-Specific Questions\n\n1. What are common reasons people switch to you?\n2. Do you have customer quotes about switching?\n3. What's your pricing vs. competitors?\n4. Do you offer migration support?\n\n---\n\n## Proactive Triggers\n\nProactively offer competitor page creation when:\n\n1. **Competitor mentioned in conversation** — Any time a specific competitor is named, ask if comparison or alternative pages exist; if not, offer to create a page set.\n2. **Sales team friction** — User mentions prospects comparing them to a specific tool; immediately offer a vs-page for sales enablement.\n3. **SEO gap identified** — Keyword research shows competitor-branded terms with no coverage; propose a full alternative page set with prioritized build order.\n4. **Switcher testimonial available** — When a customer quote about switching surfaces, offer to build a migration-focused alternative page around it.\n5. **Pricing page review** — When reviewing pricing, note that pricing comparison tables belong on dedicated competitor pages, not the pricing page itself.\n\n---\n\n## Output Artifacts\n\n| Artifact | Format | Description |\n|----------|--------|-------------|\n| Competitor Intelligence File | YAML data file | Centralized competitor profile: pricing, features, weaknesses, review themes |\n| Page Set Plan | Prioritized list | Ranked list of pages to build with target keywords and search volume estimates |\n| Alternative Page (Singular) | Full page copy | Complete `\u002F[competitor]-alternative` page with all sections |\n| Vs Page | Full page copy | Complete `\u002Fvs\u002F[competitor]` page with comparison table and CTA |\n| Migration Guide Section | Markdown block | Reusable migration copy for inclusion across multiple pages |\n\n---\n\n## Communication\n\nAll competitor page outputs should be factually accurate, legally safe (no false claims), and fair to competitors. Acknowledge genuine competitor strengths — pages that only disparage competitors lose credibility with evaluators. Reference `marketing-context` for ICP and positioning before writing any comparison copy. Quality bar: every claim must be verifiable from public sources or customer quotes.\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **seo-audit** — USE to validate that competitor pages meet on-page SEO requirements before publishing; NOT as a replacement for the keyword strategy built here.\n- **copywriting** — USE for writing the narrative sections and CTAs on comparison pages; NOT when the task is purely competitor research and architecture.\n- **content-strategy** — USE when planning a full competitive content program across multiple pages; NOT for single-page execution.\n- **competitive-intel** — USE when C-level strategic competitive analysis is needed beyond page creation; NOT for tactical page writing.\n- **marketing-context** — USE as foundation before any competitor page work to align positioning; always load first.\n","# Competitor & Alternative Pages\n\nYou are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.\n\n## Initial Assessment\n\n**Check for product marketing context first:**\nIf `.claude\u002Fproduct-marketing-context.md` exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.\n\nBefore creating competitor pages, understand:\n\n1. **Your Product**\n   - Core value proposition\n   - Key differentiators\n   - Ideal customer profile\n   - Pricing model\n   - Strengths and honest weaknesses\n\n2. **Competitive Landscape**\n   - Direct competitors\n   - Indirect\u002Fadjacent competitors\n   - Market positioning of each\n   - Search volume for competitor terms\n\n3. **Goals**\n   - SEO traffic capture\n   - Sales enablement\n   - Conversion from competitor users\n   - Brand positioning\n\n---\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### 1. Honesty Builds Trust\n- Acknowledge competitor strengths\n- Be accurate about your limitations\n- Don't misrepresent competitor features\n- Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims\n\n### 2. Depth Over Surface\n- Go beyond feature checklists\n- Explain *why* differences matter\n- Include use cases and scenarios\n- Show, don't just tell\n\n### 3. Help Them Decide\n- Different tools fit different needs\n- Be clear about who you're best for\n- Be clear about who competitor is best for\n- Reduce evaluation friction\n\n### 4. Modular Content Architecture\n- Competitor data should be centralized\n- Updates propagate to all pages\n- Single source of truth per competitor\n\n---\n\n## Page Formats\n\n### Format 1: [Competitor] Alternative (Singular)\n\n**Search intent**: User is actively looking to switch from a specific competitor\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Falternatives\u002F[competitor]` or `\u002F[competitor]-alternative`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[Competitor] alternative\", \"alternative to [Competitor]\", \"switch from [Competitor]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Why people look for alternatives (validate their pain)\n2. Summary: You as the alternative (quick positioning)\n3. Detailed comparison (features, service, pricing)\n4. Who should switch (and who shouldn't)\n5. Migration path\n6. Social proof from switchers\n7. CTA\n\n---\n\n### Format 2: [Competitor] Alternatives (Plural)\n\n**Search intent**: User is researching options, earlier in journey\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Falternatives\u002F[competitor]-alternatives`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[Competitor] alternatives\", \"best [Competitor] alternatives\", \"tools like [Competitor]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Why people look for alternatives (common pain points)\n2. What to look for in an alternative (criteria framework)\n3. List of alternatives (you first, but include real options)\n4. Comparison table (summary)\n5. Detailed breakdown of each alternative\n6. Recommendation by use case\n7. CTA\n\n**Important**: Include 4-7 real alternatives. Being genuinely helpful builds trust and ranks better.\n\n---\n\n### Format 3: You vs [Competitor]\n\n**Search intent**: User is directly comparing you to a specific competitor\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Fvs\u002F[competitor]` or `\u002Fcompare\u002F[you]-vs-[competitor]`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[You] vs [Competitor]\", \"[Competitor] vs [You]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. TL;DR summary (key differences in 2-3 sentences)\n2. At-a-glance comparison table\n3. Detailed comparison by category (Features, Pricing, Support, Ease of use, Integrations)\n4. Who [You] is best for\n5. Who [Competitor] is best for (be honest)\n6. What customers say (testimonials from switchers)\n7. Migration support\n8. CTA\n\n---\n\n### Format 4: [Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]\n\n**Search intent**: User comparing two competitors (not you directly)\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Fcompare\u002F[competitor-a]-vs-[competitor-b]`\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Overview of both products\n2. Comparison by category\n3. Who each is best for\n4. The third option (introduce yourself)\n5. Comparison table (all three)\n6. CTA\n\n**Why this works**: Captures search traffic for competitor terms, positions you as knowledgeable.\n\n---\n\n## Essential Sections\n\n### TL;DR Summary\nStart every page with a quick summary for scanners—key differences in 2-3 sentences.\n\n### Paragraph Comparisons\nGo beyond tables. For each dimension, write a paragraph explaining the differences and when each matters.\n\n### Feature Comparison\nFor each category: describe how each handles it, list strengths and limitations, give bottom line recommendation.\n\n### Pricing Comparison\nInclude tier-by-tier comparison, what's included, hidden costs, and total cost calculation for sample team size.\n\n### Who It's For\nBe explicit about ideal customer for each option. Honest recommendations build trust.\n\n### Migration Section\nCover what transfers, what needs reconfiguration, support offered, and quotes from customers who switched.\n\n**For detailed templates**: See [references\u002Ftemplates.md](references\u002Ftemplates.md)\n\n---\n\n## Content Architecture\n\n### Centralized Competitor Data\nCreate a single source of truth for each competitor with:\n- Positioning and target audience\n- Pricing (all tiers)\n- Feature ratings\n- Strengths and weaknesses\n- Best for \u002F not ideal for\n- Common complaints (from reviews)\n- Migration notes\n\n**For data structure and examples**: See [references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md](references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md)\n\n---\n\n## Research Process\n\n### Deep Competitor Research\n\nFor each competitor, gather:\n\n1. **Product research**: Sign up, use it, document features\u002FUX\u002Flimitations\n2. **Pricing research**: Current pricing, what's included, hidden costs\n3. **Review mining**: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius for common praise\u002Fcomplaint themes\n4. **Customer feedback**: Talk to customers who switched (both directions)\n5. **Content research**: Their positioning, their comparison pages, their changelog\n\n### Ongoing Updates\n\n- **Quarterly**: Verify pricing, check for major feature changes\n- **When notified**: Customer mentions competitor change\n- **Annually**: Full refresh of all competitor data\n\n---\n\n## SEO Considerations\n\n### Keyword Targeting\n\n| Format | Primary Keywords |\n|--------|-----------------|\n| Alternative (singular) | [Competitor] alternative, alternative to [Competitor] |\n| Alternatives (plural) | [Competitor] alternatives, best [Competitor] alternatives |\n| You vs Competitor | [You] vs [Competitor], [Competitor] vs [You] |\n| Competitor vs Competitor | [A] vs [B], [B] vs [A] |\n\n### Internal Linking\n- Link between related competitor pages\n- Link from feature pages to relevant comparisons\n- Create hub page linking to all competitor content\n\n### Schema Markup\nConsider FAQ schema for common questions like \"What is the best alternative to [Competitor]?\"\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Competitor Data File\nComplete competitor profile in YAML format for use across all comparison pages.\n\n### Page Content\nFor each page: URL, meta tags, full page copy organized by section, comparison tables, CTAs.\n\n### Page Set Plan\nRecommended pages to create with priority order based on search volume.\n\n---\n\n## Task-Specific Questions\n\n1. What are common reasons people switch to you?\n2. Do you have customer quotes about switching?\n3. What's your pricing vs. competitors?\n4. Do you offer migration support?\n\n---\n\n## Proactive Triggers\n\nProactively offer competitor page creation when:\n\n1. **Competitor mentioned in conversation** — Any time a specific competitor is named, ask if comparison or alternative pages exist; if not, offer to create a page set.\n2. **Sales team friction** — User mentions prospects comparing them to a specific tool; immediately offer a vs-page for sales enablement.\n3. **SEO gap identified** — Keyword research shows competitor-branded terms with no coverage; propose a full alternative page set with prioritized build order.\n4. **Switcher testimonial available** — When a customer quote about switching surfaces, offer to build a migration-focused alternative page around it.\n5. **Pricing page review** — When reviewing pricing, note that pricing comparison tables belong on dedicated competitor pages, not the pricing page itself.\n\n---\n\n## Output Artifacts\n\n| Artifact | Format | Description |\n|----------|--------|-------------|\n| Competitor Intelligence File | YAML data file | Centralized competitor profile: pricing, features, weaknesses, review themes |\n| Page Set Plan | Prioritized list | Ranked list of pages to build with target keywords and search volume estimates |\n| Alternative Page (Singular) | Full page copy | Complete `\u002F[competitor]-alternative` page with all sections |\n| Vs Page | Full page copy | Complete `\u002Fvs\u002F[competitor]` page with comparison table and CTA |\n| Migration Guide Section | Markdown block | Reusable migration copy for inclusion across multiple pages |\n\n---\n\n## Communication\n\nAll competitor page outputs should be factually accurate, legally safe (no false claims), and fair to competitors. Acknowledge genuine competitor strengths — pages that only disparage competitors lose credibility with evaluators. Reference `marketing-context` for ICP and positioning before writing any comparison copy. Quality bar: every claim must be verifiable from public sources or customer quotes.\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **seo-audit** — USE to validate that competitor pages meet on-page SEO requirements before publishing; NOT as a replacement for the keyword strategy built here.\n- **copywriting** — USE for writing the narrative sections and CTAs on comparison pages; NOT when the task is purely competitor research and architecture.\n- **content-strategy** — USE when planning a full competitive content program across multiple pages; NOT for single-page execution.\n- **competitive-intel** — USE when C-level strategic competitive analysis is needed beyond page creation; NOT for tactical page writing.\n- **marketing-context** — USE as foundation before any competitor page work to align positioning; always load first.\n",{"name":5,"license":15,"metadata":57,"description":7},{"author":58,"updated":59,"version":60,"category":46},"Md Faiz Alam",1772755200000,"1.0.0","main","0b48cbb0e6d5be6ff68c0f6b28bc0c65ee21c4a1","marketing-skill\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives",2,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.linkedin.com\u002Fin\u002Fmdfaizalam2003\u002F","2026-04-01 04:35:43",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":70,"prompt":80,"zipAvailable":81},[71,74,77],{"tool":72,"command":73},"npx","npx skills add afaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill --skill competitor-alternatives",{"tool":75,"command":76},"bunx","bunx skills add afaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill --skill competitor-alternatives",{"tool":78,"command":79},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add afaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill --skill competitor-alternatives","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmarketing-skill\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives\u002FSKILL.md",true,[83,89,93],{"path":84,"resourceType":85,"resourceTypeDesc":86,"sizeBytes":87,"sourceHtmlUrl":88},"references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",7370,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmarketing-skill\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives\u002Freferences\u002Fcontent-architecture.md",{"path":90,"resourceType":85,"resourceTypeDesc":86,"sizeBytes":91,"sourceHtmlUrl":92},"references\u002Ftemplates.md",5084,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmarketing-skill\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives\u002Freferences\u002Ftemplates.md",{"path":94,"resourceType":95,"resourceTypeDesc":96,"sizeBytes":97,"sourceHtmlUrl":98},"scripts\u002Fcomparison_matrix_builder.py","SCRIPT","脚本",14448,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmarketing-skill\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives\u002Fscripts\u002Fcomparison_matrix_builder.py",[100,129,153,178,208,228],{"skillNo":101,"name":102,"nameZh":6,"description":103,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":104,"categories":105,"keywords":109,"publishedAt":52},"01M6KC4E8MYR9DBAZTAXHKYMMH","soc2-compliance","Use when the user asks to prepare for SOC 2 audits, map Trust Service Criteria, build control matrices, collect audit evidence, perform gap analysis, or assess SOC 2 Type I vs Type II readiness.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fsoc2-compliance\u002FSKILL.md",[106],{"categoryNo":107,"categoryName":108,"taxonomyType":29,"taxonomyTypeDesc":30},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000037","律师与法务",[110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,35],"compliance","soc2","soc2 compliance","audit evidence","audit","collect","soc","analysis","use","evidence","trust","build","map","control","type","gap","readiness","gap analysis","assess",{"skillNo":130,"name":131,"nameZh":6,"description":132,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":133,"categories":134,"keywords":135,"publishedAt":52},"01M6KC461R3GKGZ1TAYHVR1MW9","risk-management-specialist","Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk control, risk matrix, benefit-risk analysis, residual risk, risk acceptability, or post-market risk.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Frisk-management-specialist\u002FSKILL.md",[],[136,137,138,139,140,49,141,142,117,118,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152],"risk","risk management specialist","management","risk management","risk evaluation","Evaluation","lifecycle","risk matrix","iso","medical","iso 14971","identification","information","post-production","tree","matrix","implementing",{"skillNo":154,"name":155,"nameZh":6,"description":156,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":157,"categories":158,"keywords":159,"publishedAt":52},"01M6KC3HF5ZFSSP2NZF68PEPFB","regulatory-affairs-head","Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Prepares FDA 510(k), De Novo, and PMA submission packages; analyzes regulatory pathways for new medical devices; drafts responses to FDA deficiency letters and Notified Body queries; develops CE marking technical documentation under EU MDR 2017\u002F745; coordinates multi-market approval strategies across FDA, EU, Health Canada, PMDA, and NMPA; and maintains regulatory intelligence on evolving standards. Use when users need to plan or execute FDA submissions, navigate 510(k) or PMA approval processes, achieve CE marking, prepare pre-submission meeting materials, write regulatory strategy documents, respond to agency queries, or manage compliance documentation for medical device market access.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fregulatory-affairs-head\u002FSKILL.md",[],[160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,118,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,35],"regulatory affairs head","regulatory","head","documents","devices","health","plan","write","strategy","standards","queries","manage","strategies","de","users","respond","medical devices","manager",{"skillNo":179,"name":180,"nameZh":6,"description":181,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":182,"categories":183,"keywords":190,"publishedAt":52},"01M6KC34Z8M1559EY1CXYBJB1A","quality-manager-qms-iso13485","ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device documentation, and corrective action workflows.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fquality-manager-qms-iso13485\u002FSKILL.md",[184,187],{"categoryNo":185,"categoryName":186,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000015","视觉设计",{"categoryNo":188,"categoryName":189,"taxonomyType":29,"taxonomyTypeDesc":30},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000032","设计师",[191,192,177,193,194,195,196,197,198,118,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,35,207],"quality manager qms iso13485","quality","design","workflows","validation","actions","certification","system","maintenance","document","systems","records","ISO 13485","organizations","corrective action","internal audit","preparation",{"skillNo":209,"name":210,"nameZh":6,"description":211,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":212,"categories":213,"keywords":215,"publishedAt":52},"01M6KC2FXHBHXYX2ZZ17Y3GDB4","quality-manager-qmr","Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fquality-manager-qmr\u002FSKILL.md",[214],{"categoryNo":107,"categoryName":108,"taxonomyType":29,"taxonomyTypeDesc":30},[216,192,177,217,218,219,220,221,110,222,198,223,161,224,225,226,144,203,35,227],"quality manager qmr","review","policy","performance","governance","monitoring","regulatory compliance","oversight","cost","culture","leadership","person",{"skillNo":229,"name":230,"nameZh":6,"description":231,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":232,"categories":233,"keywords":241,"publishedAt":52},"01M6KC1VRR5JTDBNZANHPS6VR6","quality-documentation-manager","Document control system management for medical device QMS. Covers document numbering, version control, change management, and 21 CFR Part 11 compliance. Use for document control procedures, change control workflow, document numbering, version management, electronic signature compliance, or regulatory documentation review.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fquality-documentation-manager\u002FSKILL.md",[234,237,240],{"categoryNo":235,"categoryName":236,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000002","文档处理",{"categoryNo":238,"categoryName":239,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",{"categoryNo":107,"categoryName":108,"taxonomyType":29,"taxonomyTypeDesc":30},[242,243,192,177,217,244,245,114,198,246,247,248,249,250,145,251,252,253,254,35],"documentation","quality documentation manager","workflow","change","change management","list","master","system management","documentation review","cfr","21 cfr part 11","change control","retention"]