[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6KAS02J8GAZBZ6VEBDN68T4":3,"skill-same:01M6KAS02J8GAZBZ6VEBDN68T4":83},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":39,"linkOnly":40,"markdownContent":41,"markdownBody":42,"frontMatter":43,"refName":51,"commitSha":52,"skillDirectory":53,"forksCount":54,"repositoryHtmlUrl":55,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":56,"ownerBlogUrl":57,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":58,"install":59,"resources":72},"01M6KAS02J8GAZBZ6VEBDN68T4","board-deck-builder",null,"Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.","afaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill","afaizalam2003","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F222019359?v=4","01M6K8F2XNT0HKBPF00JQ78SV3","Faiz Alam","01M6K8F31EBXAPER0EG8R9HTR5",3,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"board deck builder","board","deck","builder","deck builder","structure","suite","updates","reviews","narrative","investor update","bad","fundraising","delivery","update","frameworks","perspectives","common","template","framework","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: \"board-deck-builder\"\ndescription: \"Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.\"\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  version: 1.0.0\n  author: Md Faiz Alam\n  category: c-level\n  domain: board-governance\n  updated: 2026-03-05\n  frameworks: deck-frameworks, board-deck-template\n---\n\n# Board Deck Builder\n\nBuild board decks that tell a story — not just show data. Every section has an owner, a narrative, and a \"so what.\"\n\n## Keywords\nboard deck, investor update, board meeting, board pack, investor relations, quarterly review, board presentation, fundraising deck, investor deck, board narrative, QBR, quarterly business review\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```\n\u002Fboard-deck [quarterly|monthly|fundraising] [stage: seed|seriesA|seriesB]\n```\n\nProvide available metrics. The builder fills gaps with explicit placeholders — never invents numbers.\n\n## Deck Structure (Standard Order)\n\nEvery section follows: **Headline → Data → Narrative → Ask\u002FNext**\n\n### 1. Executive Summary (CEO)\n**3 sentences. No more.**\n- Sentence 1: State of the business (where we are)\n- Sentence 2: Biggest thing that happened this period\n- Sentence 3: Where we're going next quarter\n\n*Bad:* \"We had a good quarter with lots of progress across all areas.\"\n*Good:* \"We closed Q3 at $2.4M ARR (+22% QoQ), signed our largest enterprise contract, and enter Q4 with 14-month runway. The strategic shift to mid-market is working — ACV up 40% and sales cycle down 3 weeks. Q4 priority: close the $3M Series A and hit $2.8M ARR.\"\n\n### 2. Key Metrics Dashboard (COO)\n**6-8 metrics max. Use a table.**\n\n| Metric | This Period | Last Period | Target | Status |\n|--------|-------------|-------------|--------|--------|\n| ARR | $2.4M | $1.97M | $2.3M | ✅ |\n| MoM growth | 8.1% | 7.2% | 7.5% | ✅ |\n| Burn multiple | 1.8x | 2.1x | \u003C2x | ✅ |\n| NRR | 112% | 108% | >110% | ✅ |\n| CAC payback | 11 months | 14 months | \u003C12 months | ✅ |\n| Headcount | 24 | 21 | 25 | ? |\n\nPick metrics the board actually tracks. Swap out anything they've said they don't care about.\n\n### 3. Financial Update (CFO)\n- P&L summary: Revenue, COGS, Gross margin, OpEx, Net burn\n- Cash position and runway (months)\n- Burn multiple trend (3-quarter view)\n- Variance to plan (what was different and why)\n- Forecast update for next quarter\n\n**One sentence on each variance.** Boards hate \"revenue was below target\" with no explanation. Say why.\n\n### 4. Revenue & Pipeline (CRO)\n- ARR waterfall: starting → new → expansion → churn → ending\n- NRR and logo churn rates\n- Pipeline by stage (in $, not just count)\n- Forecast: next quarter with confidence level\n- Top 3 deals: name\u002Famount\u002Fclose date\u002Frisk\n\n**The forecast must have a confidence level.** \"We expect $2.8M\" is weak. \"High confidence $2.6M, upside to $2.9M if two late-stage deals close\" is useful.\n\n### 5. Product Update (CPO)\n- Shipped this quarter: 3-5 bullets, user impact for each\n- Shipping next quarter: 3-5 bullets with target dates\n- PMF signal: NPS trend, DAU\u002FMAU ratio, feature adoption\n- One key learning from customer research\n\n**No feature lists.** Only features with evidence of user impact.\n\n### 6. Growth & Marketing (CMO)\n- CAC by channel (table)\n- Pipeline contribution by channel ($)\n- Brand\u002Fawareness metrics relevant to stage (traffic, share of voice)\n- What's working, what's being cut, what's being tested\n\n### 7. Engineering & Technical (CTO)\n- Delivery velocity trend (last 4 quarters)\n- Tech debt ratio and plan\n- Infrastructure: uptime, incidents, cost trend\n- Security posture (one line, flag anything pending)\n\n**Keep this short unless there's a material issue.** Boards don't need sprint details.\n\n### 8. Team & People (CHRO)\n- Headcount: actual vs plan\n- Hiring: offers out, pipeline, time-to-fill trend\n- Attrition: regrettable vs non-regrettable\n- Engagement: last survey score, trend\n- Key hires this quarter, key open roles\n\n### 9. Risk & Security (CISO)\n- Security posture: status of critical controls\n- Compliance: certifications in progress, deadlines\n- Incidents this quarter (if any): impact, resolution, prevention\n- Top 3 risks and mitigation status\n\n### 10. Strategic Outlook (CEO)\n- Next quarter priorities: 3-5 items, ranked\n- Key decisions needed from the board\n- Asks: budget, introductions, advice, votes\n\n**The \"asks\" slide is the most important.** Be specific. \"We'd like 3 warm introductions to CFOs at Series B companies\" beats \"any help would be appreciated.\"\n\n### 11. Appendix\n- Detailed financial model\n- Full pipeline data\n- Cohort retention charts\n- Customer case studies\n- Detailed headcount breakdown\n\n---\n\n## Narrative Framework\n\nBoards see 10+ decks per quarter. Yours needs a through-line.\n\n**The 4-Act Structure:**\n1. **Where we said we'd be** (last quarter's targets)\n2. **Where we actually are** (honest assessment)\n3. **Why the gap exists** (one cause per variance, not excuses)\n4. **What we're doing about it** (specific, dated actions)\n\nThis works for good news AND bad news. It's credible because it acknowledges reality.\n\n**Opening frame:** Start with the one thing that matters most — the board should know the key message by slide 3, not slide 30.\n\n---\n\n## Delivering Bad News\n\nNever bury it. Boards find out eventually. Finding out late makes it worse.\n\n**Framework:**\n1. **State it plainly** — \"We missed Q3 ARR target by $300K (12% gap)\"\n2. **Own the cause** — \"Primary driver was longer-than-expected sales cycle in enterprise segment\"\n3. **Show you understand it** — \"We analyzed 8 lost\u002Fstalled deals; the pattern is X\"\n4. **Present the fix** — \"We've made 3 changes: [specific, dated changes]\"\n5. **Update the forecast** — \"Revised Q4 target is $2.6M; here's the bottom-up build\"\n\n**What NOT to do:**\n- Don't lead with good news to soften bad news — boards notice and distrust the framing\n- Don't explain without owning — \"market conditions\" is not a cause, it's a context\n- Don't present a fix without data behind it\n- Don't show a revised forecast without showing your assumptions\n\n---\n\n## Common Board Deck Mistakes\n\n| Mistake | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Too many slides (>25) | Cut ruthlessly — if you can't explain it in the room, the slide is wrong |\n| Metrics without targets | Every metric needs a target and a status |\n| No narrative | Data without story forces boards to draw their own conclusions |\n| Burying bad news | Lead with it, own it, fix it |\n| Vague asks | Specific, actionable, person-assigned asks only |\n| No variance explanation | Every gap from target needs one-sentence cause |\n| Stale appendix | Appendix is only useful if it's current |\n| Designing for the reader, not the room | Decks are presented — they must work spoken aloud |\n\n---\n\n## Cadence Notes\n\n**Quarterly (standard):** Full deck, all sections, 20-30 slides. Sent 48 hours in advance.\n**Monthly (for early-stage):** Condensed — metrics dashboard, financials, pipeline, top risks. 8-12 slides.\n**Fundraising:** Opens with market\u002Fvision, closes with ask. See `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` for Sequoia format.\n\n## References\n- `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` — SaaS board pack format, Sequoia structure, investor tailoring\n- `templates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md` — fill-in template for complete board decks\n","# Board Deck Builder\n\nBuild board decks that tell a story — not just show data. Every section has an owner, a narrative, and a \"so what.\"\n\n## Keywords\nboard deck, investor update, board meeting, board pack, investor relations, quarterly review, board presentation, fundraising deck, investor deck, board narrative, QBR, quarterly business review\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```\n\u002Fboard-deck [quarterly|monthly|fundraising] [stage: seed|seriesA|seriesB]\n```\n\nProvide available metrics. The builder fills gaps with explicit placeholders — never invents numbers.\n\n## Deck Structure (Standard Order)\n\nEvery section follows: **Headline → Data → Narrative → Ask\u002FNext**\n\n### 1. Executive Summary (CEO)\n**3 sentences. No more.**\n- Sentence 1: State of the business (where we are)\n- Sentence 2: Biggest thing that happened this period\n- Sentence 3: Where we're going next quarter\n\n*Bad:* \"We had a good quarter with lots of progress across all areas.\"\n*Good:* \"We closed Q3 at $2.4M ARR (+22% QoQ), signed our largest enterprise contract, and enter Q4 with 14-month runway. The strategic shift to mid-market is working — ACV up 40% and sales cycle down 3 weeks. Q4 priority: close the $3M Series A and hit $2.8M ARR.\"\n\n### 2. Key Metrics Dashboard (COO)\n**6-8 metrics max. Use a table.**\n\n| Metric | This Period | Last Period | Target | Status |\n|--------|-------------|-------------|--------|--------|\n| ARR | $2.4M | $1.97M | $2.3M | ✅ |\n| MoM growth | 8.1% | 7.2% | 7.5% | ✅ |\n| Burn multiple | 1.8x | 2.1x | \u003C2x | ✅ |\n| NRR | 112% | 108% | >110% | ✅ |\n| CAC payback | 11 months | 14 months | \u003C12 months | ✅ |\n| Headcount | 24 | 21 | 25 | ? |\n\nPick metrics the board actually tracks. Swap out anything they've said they don't care about.\n\n### 3. Financial Update (CFO)\n- P&L summary: Revenue, COGS, Gross margin, OpEx, Net burn\n- Cash position and runway (months)\n- Burn multiple trend (3-quarter view)\n- Variance to plan (what was different and why)\n- Forecast update for next quarter\n\n**One sentence on each variance.** Boards hate \"revenue was below target\" with no explanation. Say why.\n\n### 4. Revenue & Pipeline (CRO)\n- ARR waterfall: starting → new → expansion → churn → ending\n- NRR and logo churn rates\n- Pipeline by stage (in $, not just count)\n- Forecast: next quarter with confidence level\n- Top 3 deals: name\u002Famount\u002Fclose date\u002Frisk\n\n**The forecast must have a confidence level.** \"We expect $2.8M\" is weak. \"High confidence $2.6M, upside to $2.9M if two late-stage deals close\" is useful.\n\n### 5. Product Update (CPO)\n- Shipped this quarter: 3-5 bullets, user impact for each\n- Shipping next quarter: 3-5 bullets with target dates\n- PMF signal: NPS trend, DAU\u002FMAU ratio, feature adoption\n- One key learning from customer research\n\n**No feature lists.** Only features with evidence of user impact.\n\n### 6. Growth & Marketing (CMO)\n- CAC by channel (table)\n- Pipeline contribution by channel ($)\n- Brand\u002Fawareness metrics relevant to stage (traffic, share of voice)\n- What's working, what's being cut, what's being tested\n\n### 7. Engineering & Technical (CTO)\n- Delivery velocity trend (last 4 quarters)\n- Tech debt ratio and plan\n- Infrastructure: uptime, incidents, cost trend\n- Security posture (one line, flag anything pending)\n\n**Keep this short unless there's a material issue.** Boards don't need sprint details.\n\n### 8. Team & People (CHRO)\n- Headcount: actual vs plan\n- Hiring: offers out, pipeline, time-to-fill trend\n- Attrition: regrettable vs non-regrettable\n- Engagement: last survey score, trend\n- Key hires this quarter, key open roles\n\n### 9. Risk & Security (CISO)\n- Security posture: status of critical controls\n- Compliance: certifications in progress, deadlines\n- Incidents this quarter (if any): impact, resolution, prevention\n- Top 3 risks and mitigation status\n\n### 10. Strategic Outlook (CEO)\n- Next quarter priorities: 3-5 items, ranked\n- Key decisions needed from the board\n- Asks: budget, introductions, advice, votes\n\n**The \"asks\" slide is the most important.** Be specific. \"We'd like 3 warm introductions to CFOs at Series B companies\" beats \"any help would be appreciated.\"\n\n### 11. Appendix\n- Detailed financial model\n- Full pipeline data\n- Cohort retention charts\n- Customer case studies\n- Detailed headcount breakdown\n\n---\n\n## Narrative Framework\n\nBoards see 10+ decks per quarter. Yours needs a through-line.\n\n**The 4-Act Structure:**\n1. **Where we said we'd be** (last quarter's targets)\n2. **Where we actually are** (honest assessment)\n3. **Why the gap exists** (one cause per variance, not excuses)\n4. **What we're doing about it** (specific, dated actions)\n\nThis works for good news AND bad news. It's credible because it acknowledges reality.\n\n**Opening frame:** Start with the one thing that matters most — the board should know the key message by slide 3, not slide 30.\n\n---\n\n## Delivering Bad News\n\nNever bury it. Boards find out eventually. Finding out late makes it worse.\n\n**Framework:**\n1. **State it plainly** — \"We missed Q3 ARR target by $300K (12% gap)\"\n2. **Own the cause** — \"Primary driver was longer-than-expected sales cycle in enterprise segment\"\n3. **Show you understand it** — \"We analyzed 8 lost\u002Fstalled deals; the pattern is X\"\n4. **Present the fix** — \"We've made 3 changes: [specific, dated changes]\"\n5. **Update the forecast** — \"Revised Q4 target is $2.6M; here's the bottom-up build\"\n\n**What NOT to do:**\n- Don't lead with good news to soften bad news — boards notice and distrust the framing\n- Don't explain without owning — \"market conditions\" is not a cause, it's a context\n- Don't present a fix without data behind it\n- Don't show a revised forecast without showing your assumptions\n\n---\n\n## Common Board Deck Mistakes\n\n| Mistake | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Too many slides (>25) | Cut ruthlessly — if you can't explain it in the room, the slide is wrong |\n| Metrics without targets | Every metric needs a target and a status |\n| No narrative | Data without story forces boards to draw their own conclusions |\n| Burying bad news | Lead with it, own it, fix it |\n| Vague asks | Specific, actionable, person-assigned asks only |\n| No variance explanation | Every gap from target needs one-sentence cause |\n| Stale appendix | Appendix is only useful if it's current |\n| Designing for the reader, not the room | Decks are presented — they must work spoken aloud |\n\n---\n\n## Cadence Notes\n\n**Quarterly (standard):** Full deck, all sections, 20-30 slides. Sent 48 hours in advance.\n**Monthly (for early-stage):** Condensed — metrics dashboard, financials, pipeline, top risks. 8-12 slides.\n**Fundraising:** Opens with market\u002Fvision, closes with ask. See `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` for Sequoia format.\n\n## References\n- `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` — SaaS board pack format, Sequoia structure, investor tailoring\n- `templates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md` — fill-in template for complete board decks\n",{"name":5,"license":15,"metadata":44,"description":7},{"author":45,"domain":46,"updated":47,"version":48,"category":49,"frameworks":50},"Md Faiz Alam","board-governance",1772668800000,"1.0.0","c-level","deck-frameworks, board-deck-template","main","0b48cbb0e6d5be6ff68c0f6b28bc0c65ee21c4a1","c-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder",2,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.linkedin.com\u002Fin\u002Fmdfaizalam2003\u002F","2026-04-01 04:35:43",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":60,"prompt":70,"zipAvailable":71},[61,64,67],{"tool":62,"command":63},"npx","npx skills add afaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill --skill board-deck-builder",{"tool":65,"command":66},"bunx","bunx skills add afaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill --skill board-deck-builder",{"tool":68,"command":69},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add afaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill --skill board-deck-builder","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder\u002FSKILL.md",true,[73,79],{"path":74,"resourceType":75,"resourceTypeDesc":76,"sizeBytes":77,"sourceHtmlUrl":78},"references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",6952,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder\u002Freferences\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md",{"path":80,"resourceType":75,"resourceTypeDesc":76,"sizeBytes":81,"sourceHtmlUrl":82},"templates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md",5885,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder\u002Ftemplates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md",[84,116,141,166,198,218],{"skillNo":85,"name":86,"nameZh":6,"description":87,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":88,"categories":89,"keywords":95,"publishedAt":39},"01M6KC4E8MYR9DBAZTAXHKYMMH","soc2-compliance","Use when the user asks to prepare for SOC 2 audits, map Trust Service Criteria, build control matrices, collect audit evidence, perform gap analysis, or assess SOC 2 Type I vs Type II readiness.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fsoc2-compliance\u002FSKILL.md",[90],{"categoryNo":91,"categoryName":92,"taxonomyType":93,"taxonomyTypeDesc":94},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000037","律师与法务","PROFESSION","适用职业",[96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115],"compliance","soc2","soc2 compliance","audit evidence","audit","collect","soc","analysis","use","evidence","trust","build","map","control","type","gap","readiness","gap analysis","assess","for",{"skillNo":117,"name":118,"nameZh":6,"description":119,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":120,"categories":121,"keywords":122,"publishedAt":39},"01M6KC461R3GKGZ1TAYHVR1MW9","risk-management-specialist","Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk control, risk matrix, benefit-risk analysis, residual risk, risk acceptability, or post-market risk.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Frisk-management-specialist\u002FSKILL.md",[],[123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,103,104,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140],"risk","risk management specialist","management","risk management","risk evaluation","product","Evaluation","lifecycle","risk matrix","iso","medical","iso 14971","identification","information","post-production","tree","matrix","implementing",{"skillNo":142,"name":143,"nameZh":6,"description":144,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":145,"categories":146,"keywords":147,"publishedAt":39},"01M6KC3HF5ZFSSP2NZF68PEPFB","regulatory-affairs-head","Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Prepares FDA 510(k), De Novo, and PMA submission packages; analyzes regulatory pathways for new medical devices; drafts responses to FDA deficiency letters and Notified Body queries; develops CE marking technical documentation under EU MDR 2017\u002F745; coordinates multi-market approval strategies across FDA, EU, Health Canada, PMDA, and NMPA; and maintains regulatory intelligence on evolving standards. Use when users need to plan or execute FDA submissions, navigate 510(k) or PMA approval processes, achieve CE marking, prepare pre-submission meeting materials, write regulatory strategy documents, respond to agency queries, or manage compliance documentation for medical device market access.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fregulatory-affairs-head\u002FSKILL.md",[],[148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,104,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,115],"regulatory affairs head","regulatory","head","documents","devices","health","plan","write","strategy","standards","queries","manage","strategies","de","users","respond","medical devices","manager",{"skillNo":167,"name":168,"nameZh":6,"description":169,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":170,"categories":171,"keywords":180,"publishedAt":39},"01M6KC34Z8M1559EY1CXYBJB1A","quality-manager-qms-iso13485","ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device documentation, and corrective action workflows.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fquality-manager-qms-iso13485\u002FSKILL.md",[172,177],{"categoryNo":173,"categoryName":174,"taxonomyType":175,"taxonomyTypeDesc":176},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000015","视觉设计","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":178,"categoryName":179,"taxonomyType":93,"taxonomyTypeDesc":94},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000032","设计师",[181,182,165,183,184,185,186,187,188,104,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,115,197],"quality manager qms iso13485","quality","design","workflows","validation","actions","certification","system","maintenance","document","systems","records","ISO 13485","organizations","corrective action","internal audit","preparation",{"skillNo":199,"name":200,"nameZh":6,"description":201,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":202,"categories":203,"keywords":205,"publishedAt":39},"01M6KC2FXHBHXYX2ZZ17Y3GDB4","quality-manager-qmr","Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fquality-manager-qmr\u002FSKILL.md",[204],{"categoryNo":91,"categoryName":92,"taxonomyType":93,"taxonomyTypeDesc":94},[206,182,165,207,208,209,210,211,96,212,188,213,149,214,215,216,132,193,115,217],"quality manager qmr","review","policy","performance","governance","monitoring","regulatory compliance","oversight","cost","culture","leadership","person",{"skillNo":219,"name":220,"nameZh":6,"description":221,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":222,"categories":223,"keywords":231,"publishedAt":39},"01M6KC1VRR5JTDBNZANHPS6VR6","quality-documentation-manager","Document control system management for medical device QMS. Covers document numbering, version control, change management, and 21 CFR Part 11 compliance. Use for document control procedures, change control workflow, document numbering, version management, electronic signature compliance, or regulatory documentation review.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fafaizalam2003\u002FMaster-claude-skill\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fra-qm-team\u002Fquality-documentation-manager\u002FSKILL.md",[224,227,230],{"categoryNo":225,"categoryName":226,"taxonomyType":175,"taxonomyTypeDesc":176},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000002","文档处理",{"categoryNo":228,"categoryName":229,"taxonomyType":175,"taxonomyTypeDesc":176},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",{"categoryNo":91,"categoryName":92,"taxonomyType":93,"taxonomyTypeDesc":94},[232,233,182,165,207,234,235,100,188,236,237,238,239,240,133,241,242,243,244,115],"documentation","quality documentation manager","workflow","change","change management","list","master","system management","documentation review","cfr","21 cfr part 11","change control","retention"]