listen

Listen for Skill Usage

Perform the following instructions and enforce using all the skills referenced in the skills used. Perform the following instructions and listen for all the — whether referenced directly or transitively through other skills.

Instructions: "$ARGUMENTS"

---

Enforcement Protocol

Before executing the instructions above, you MUST:

1. Scan the instructions for every /skill-name reference (e.g., /tdd, /brainstorming, /expert-review, /super, /duper, /cat, or any other skill invocation).
2. Build a checklist of every skill found. Create a task for each one.
3. Invoke each skill using the Skill tool at the appropriate point during execution. A skill reference in the instructions is NOT a suggestion — it is a requirement.
4. Verify completeness before reporting done: every skill on the checklist must have been invoked. If any skill was skipped, go back and invoke it now.

Rules

• If the instructions reference a compositional skill (e.g., /super-duper-cat), invoke that skill directly — do not decompose it into its primitives unless the skill itself does so.

• If the instructions contain no skill references, execute them normally without this enforcement overhead.

• If a referenced skill fails or is denied by the user, note it explicitly in your output rather than silently skipping it.

• Follow the invoked skills' own instructions exactly — this enforcement layer adds the guarantee that they are all used, but does not override how each skill operates.

• If the instructions reference a compositional skill (e.g., /super-duper-cat), invoke that skill directly — do not decompose it into its primitives unless the skill itself does so.

• If the instructions contain no skill references, execute them normally without this enforcement overhead.

• If a referenced skill fails or is denied by the user, note it explicitly in your output rather than silently skipping it.

• Follow the invoked skills' own instructions exactly — this enforcement layer adds the guarantee that they are all used, but does not override how each skill operates.

Satisfaction Semantics

A skill reference in the instructions is satisfied when one of the following holds:

1. Direct invocation — the Skill tool was called with that skill's name (e.g. Skill(skill="superpowers:writing-skills")) during this execution.
2. Compositional delegation — a compositional skill was directly invoked whose body text explicitly delegates to the referenced skill. When claiming satisfaction via composition, cite the composing skill's line that delegates (e.g. "/super-duper-cat invokes /writing-skills at phase N"). If you cannot cite a specific delegation line, the claim does not hold.

Transitive / implicit application does NOT satisfy the requirement. Following a skill's discipline "in spirit" — applying its pattern without invocation — is not satisfaction. Reading a skill's content without invoking it is not satisfaction. If the skill was referenced in the instructions and you never invoked it (directly or through a composing skill that explicitly delegates), the requirement is unmet — go back and invoke it now.

Rationalization counter:

Excuse	Reality
"I followed /writing-skills discipline through the chain — that counts"	Composition counts only when the composing skill's text explicitly delegates. "In spirit" does not. Cite the delegation line or invoke directly.
"The skill's content informed my behavior, so it was applied"	Content-informed behavior is not invocation. Invoke via the Skill tool.
"Invoking it at the end is redundant"	Invoking at the right point is the requirement, not at the end. If skipped at the point, you have a gap — invoke now and note it.
"The compositional skill I used must be doing that internally"	Must cite the internal delegation, otherwise no claim. If the composing skill doesn't actually delegate, invoke the target directly.
"Skill invocation order should be reordered for dependency reasons"	Dependency reordering may move when a skill fires but never whether. The reference is a requirement, not a suggestion. If a dependency truly makes invocation impossible at the listed point, surface the blocker explicitly — never silently drop the invocation.