AGENT SKILL

executive-session-checklist

Verify that a proposed closed session has proper statutory grounds, compliant notice, and the documentation needed to defend the session from a sunshine-law challenge.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-02
Stars
★ 1
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
executive-session-checklist
description
Verify that a proposed closed session has proper statutory grounds, compliant notice, and the documentation needed to defend the session from a sunshine-law challenge.
argument-hint
[ "session-topic" ]

02 资源文件 1

03 SKILL.md 正文

Executive Session Checklist

Purpose: Test a proposed closed session against open-meetings law. Closed sessions are an exception to a presumption of openness; grounds are narrow, procedures are strict, and states differ (list of permitted topics, whether a vote is required, who may attend, and whether recordings or minutes are mandatory). Verify your own statute. Use executive-session-script.md.

Required inputs

  • Topic and what the body hopes to accomplish
  • Statute and city rule listing permitted grounds
  • Who would attend (attorney, manager, outside counsel, labor negotiator, others)
  • Agenda language and posting date

Workflow

  1. Match a specific statutory ground. Commonly recognized (verify): consultation with the attorney on pending or threatened litigation or privileged legal advice; real property acquisition or sale price negotiation; labor negotiations strategy; specific personnel matters (appointment, discipline, evaluation of an individual); security matters; certain licensing or confidential-by-law matters. "Sensitive" or "politically awkward" is not a ground.
  2. Narrow the scope. Discuss only what the ground allows. General policy, budget, and public-interest questions belong in open session even if they relate to the matter.
  3. Notice and agenda: describe the ground with the specificity your law requires (some require the statutory citation and the identity of the negotiators or the case caption).
  4. Open-session motion: convene publicly, state the ground in open session, vote if required, and announce expected duration and whether the body will reconvene.
  5. Attendance: only people necessary; the attorney should attend when relying on attorney-client privilege. Non-members, staff, and consultants who are not part of the privilege can waive it.
  6. Conduct: no final action unless the statute allows (most states require final votes in public); no side topics; no recording leaks; note who attended.
  7. Documentation: minutes or a confidential record, per statute; sealed record rules; certification by the presiding officer or attorney that the session complied.
  8. Reconvene: report out as required (e.g., "direction given" without disclosing privileged content) and take any vote publicly.
  9. Confidentiality: members' duty not to disclose, penalties, and the process if a leak occurs.

Output structure

  • Ground-fit table: ground | statute (to be verified) | supporting facts | fit (Yes/No/Unsure)
  • Agenda language and the open-session motion
  • Attendee list with role and privilege note
  • Post-session reporting plan

Red flags / escalate to the city attorney

  • Real property or personnel topics expanded into public-policy discussion
  • Elected official wants non-attorney advisors present
  • Final action, straw votes, or consensus-gathering in closed session
  • Prior challenge or complaint about closed sessions

Common mistakes

  • Citing a ground in the agenda that does not match the discussion
  • Not recording the motion and statutory citation in open session
  • Taking a vote because "everyone agrees"

Not legal advice.

04 同仓库更多 Skills