yeet
Use only when the user explicitly asks to stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request in one flow using the GitHub CLI (`gh`).
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-03-28
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 2
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- yeet
- author
- openai
- description
- Use only when the user explicitly asks to stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request in one flow using the GitHub CLI (`gh`).
02 资源文件 4
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml273 B
- 资产文件assets/yeet-small.svg967 B
- 资产文件assets/yeet.png1.2 KB
- 许可证LICENSE.txt10.5 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Prerequisites
- Require GitHub CLI
gh. Checkgh --version. If missing, ask the user to installghand stop. - Require authenticated
ghsession. Rungh auth status. If not authenticated, ask the user to rungh auth login(and re-rungh auth status) before continuing.
Naming conventions
- Branch:
codex/{description}when starting from main/master/default. - Commit:
{description}(terse). - PR title:
[codex] {description}summarizing the full diff.
Workflow
- If on main/master/default, create a branch:
git checkout -b "codex/{description}" - Otherwise stay on the current branch.
- Confirm status, then stage everything:
git status -sbthengit add -A. - Commit tersely with the description:
git commit -m "{description}" - Run checks if not already. If checks fail due to missing deps/tools, install dependencies and rerun once.
- Push with tracking:
git push -u origin $(git branch --show-current) - If git push fails due to workflow auth errors, pull from master and retry the push.
- Open a PR and edit title/body to reflect the description and the deltas:
GH_PROMPT_DISABLED=1 GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT=0 gh pr create --draft --fill --head $(git branch --show-current) - Write the PR description to a temp file with real newlines (e.g. pr-body.md ... EOF) and run pr-body.md to avoid \n-escaped markdown.
- PR description (markdown) must be detailed prose covering the issue, the cause and effect on users, the root cause, the fix, and any tests or checks used to validate.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
zapier-make-patterns
No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power
workflow-automation
Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility
trigger-dev
Trigger.dev expert for background jobs, AI workflows, and reliable async execution with excellent developer experience and TypeScript-first design. Use when: trigger.dev, trigger dev, background task, ai background job, long running task.
planning-with-files
Transforms workflow to use Manus-style persistent markdown files for planning, progress tracking, and knowledge storage. Use when starting complex tasks, multi-step projects, research tasks, or when the user mentions planning, organizing work, tracking progress, or wants structured output.
n8n-workflow-patterns
Proven workflow architectural patterns from real n8n workflows. Use when building new workflows, designing workflow structure, choosing workflow patterns, planning workflow architecture, or asking about webhook processing, HTTP API integration, database operations, AI agent workflows, or scheduled tasks.
n8n-validation-expert
Interpret validation errors and guide fixing them. Use when encountering validation errors, validation warnings, false positives, operator structure issues, or need help understanding validation results. Also use when asking about validation profiles, error types, or the validation loop process.