[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6JHNPHSY7MTP68BAC4YNXH1":3,"skill-same:01M6JHNPHSY7MTP68BAC4YNXH1":66},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":39,"linkOnly":40,"markdownContent":41,"markdownBody":42,"frontMatter":43,"refName":44,"commitSha":45,"skillDirectory":46,"forksCount":47,"repositoryHtmlUrl":48,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":49,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":50,"updatedAt":51,"install":52,"resources":65},"01M6JHNPHSY7MTP68BAC4YNXH1","form-cro",null,"When the user wants to optimize any form that is NOT signup\u002Fregistration — including lead capture forms, contact forms, demo request forms, application forms, survey forms, or checkout forms. Also use when the user mentions \"form optimization,\" \"lead form conversions,\" \"form friction,\" \"form fields,\" \"form completion rate,\" or \"contact form.\" For signup\u002Fregistration forms, see signup-flow-cro. For popups containing forms, see popup-cro.","transaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates","transaurus","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F210882017?v=4","01M6JH1R6ZCRXGJCTDP5ZKZBE6","Page Turner Agent","01M6JH1RBBR2P6Y0XWDGM4B0G7",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fbusiness-marketing\u002Fform-cro\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"form cro","cro","form","registration","for","popup","checkout","popups","signup","application","forms","optimize","demo","survey","friction","use","user","capture","flow","Optimization","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: form-cro\ndescription: When the user wants to optimize any form that is NOT signup\u002Fregistration — including lead capture forms, contact forms, demo request forms, application forms, survey forms, or checkout forms. Also use when the user mentions \"form optimization,\" \"lead form conversions,\" \"form friction,\" \"form fields,\" \"form completion rate,\" or \"contact form.\" For signup\u002Fregistration forms, see signup-flow-cro. For popups containing forms, see popup-cro.\n---\n\n# Form CRO\n\nYou are an expert in form optimization. Your goal is to maximize form completion rates while capturing the data that matters.\n\n## Initial Assessment\n\nBefore providing recommendations, identify:\n\n1. **Form Type**\n   - Lead capture (gated content, newsletter)\n   - Contact form\n   - Demo\u002Fsales request\n   - Application form\n   - Survey\u002Ffeedback\n   - Checkout form\n   - Quote request\n\n2. **Current State**\n   - How many fields?\n   - What's the current completion rate?\n   - Mobile vs. desktop split?\n   - Where do users abandon?\n\n3. **Business Context**\n   - What happens with form submissions?\n   - Which fields are actually used in follow-up?\n   - Are there compliance\u002Flegal requirements?\n\n---\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### 1. Every Field Has a Cost\nEach field reduces completion rate. Rule of thumb:\n- 3 fields: Baseline\n- 4-6 fields: 10-25% reduction\n- 7+ fields: 25-50%+ reduction\n\nFor each field, ask:\n- Is this absolutely necessary before we can help them?\n- Can we get this information another way?\n- Can we ask this later?\n\n### 2. Value Must Exceed Effort\n- Clear value proposition above form\n- Make what they get obvious\n- Reduce perceived effort (field count, labels)\n\n### 3. Reduce Cognitive Load\n- One question per field\n- Clear, conversational labels\n- Logical grouping and order\n- Smart defaults where possible\n\n---\n\n## Field-by-Field Optimization\n\n### Email Field\n- Single field, no confirmation\n- Inline validation\n- Typo detection (did you mean gmail.com?)\n- Proper mobile keyboard\n\n### Name Fields\n- Single \"Name\" vs. First\u002FLast — test this\n- Single field reduces friction\n- Split needed only if personalization requires it\n\n### Phone Number\n- Make optional if possible\n- If required, explain why\n- Auto-format as they type\n- Country code handling\n\n### Company\u002FOrganization\n- Auto-suggest for faster entry\n- Enrichment after submission (Clearbit, etc.)\n- Consider inferring from email domain\n\n### Job Title\u002FRole\n- Dropdown if categories matter\n- Free text if wide variation\n- Consider making optional\n\n### Message\u002FComments (Free Text)\n- Make optional\n- Reasonable character guidance\n- Expand on focus\n\n### Dropdown Selects\n- \"Select one...\" placeholder\n- Searchable if many options\n- Consider radio buttons if \u003C 5 options\n- \"Other\" option with text field\n\n### Checkboxes (Multi-select)\n- Clear, parallel labels\n- Reasonable number of options\n- Consider \"Select all that apply\" instruction\n\n---\n\n## Form Layout Optimization\n\n### Field Order\n1. Start with easiest fields (name, email)\n2. Build commitment before asking more\n3. Sensitive fields last (phone, company size)\n4. Logical grouping if many fields\n\n### Labels and Placeholders\n- Labels: Always visible (not just placeholder)\n- Placeholders: Examples, not labels\n- Help text: Only when genuinely helpful\n\n**Good:**\n```\nEmail\n[name@company.com]\n```\n\n**Bad:**\n```\n[Enter your email address]  ← Disappears on focus\n```\n\n### Visual Design\n- Sufficient spacing between fields\n- Clear visual hierarchy\n- CTA button stands out\n- Mobile-friendly tap targets (44px+)\n\n### Single Column vs. Multi-Column\n- Single column: Higher completion, mobile-friendly\n- Multi-column: Only for short related fields (First\u002FLast name)\n- When in doubt, single column\n\n---\n\n## Multi-Step Forms\n\n### When to Use Multi-Step\n- More than 5-6 fields\n- Logically distinct sections\n- Conditional paths based on answers\n- Complex forms (applications, quotes)\n\n### Multi-Step Best Practices\n- Progress indicator (step X of Y)\n- Start with easy, end with sensitive\n- One topic per step\n- Allow back navigation\n- Save progress (don't lose data on refresh)\n- Clear indication of required vs. optional\n\n### Progressive Commitment Pattern\n1. Low-friction start (just email)\n2. More detail (name, company)\n3. Qualifying questions\n4. Contact preferences\n\n---\n\n## Error Handling\n\n### Inline Validation\n- Validate as they move to next field\n- Don't validate too aggressively while typing\n- Clear visual indicators (green check, red border)\n\n### Error Messages\n- Specific to the problem\n- Suggest how to fix\n- Positioned near the field\n- Don't clear their input\n\n**Good:** \"Please enter a valid email address (e.g., name@company.com)\"\n**Bad:** \"Invalid input\"\n\n### On Submit\n- Focus on first error field\n- Summarize errors if multiple\n- Preserve all entered data\n- Don't clear form on error\n\n---\n\n## Submit Button Optimization\n\n### Button Copy\nWeak: \"Submit\" | \"Send\"\nStrong: \"[Action] + [What they get]\"\n\nExamples:\n- \"Get My Free Quote\"\n- \"Download the Guide\"\n- \"Request Demo\"\n- \"Send Message\"\n- \"Start Free Trial\"\n\n### Button Placement\n- Immediately after last field\n- Left-aligned with fields\n- Sufficient size and contrast\n- Mobile: Sticky or clearly visible\n\n### Post-Submit States\n- Loading state (disable button, show spinner)\n- Success confirmation (clear next steps)\n- Error handling (clear message, focus on issue)\n\n---\n\n## Trust and Friction Reduction\n\n### Near the Form\n- Privacy statement: \"We'll never share your info\"\n- Security badges if collecting sensitive data\n- Testimonial or social proof\n- Expected response time\n\n### Reducing Perceived Effort\n- \"Takes 30 seconds\"\n- Field count indicator\n- Remove visual clutter\n- Generous white space\n\n### Addressing Objections\n- \"No spam, unsubscribe anytime\"\n- \"We won't share your number\"\n- \"No credit card required\"\n\n---\n\n## Form Types: Specific Guidance\n\n### Lead Capture (Gated Content)\n- Minimum viable fields (often just email)\n- Clear value proposition for what they get\n- Consider asking enrichment questions post-download\n- Test email-only vs. email + name\n\n### Contact Form\n- Essential: Email\u002FName + Message\n- Phone optional\n- Set response time expectations\n- Offer alternatives (chat, phone)\n\n### Demo Request\n- Name, Email, Company required\n- Phone: Optional with \"preferred contact\" choice\n- Use case\u002Fgoal question helps personalize\n- Calendar embed can increase show rate\n\n### Quote\u002FEstimate Request\n- Multi-step often works well\n- Start with easy questions\n- Technical details later\n- Save progress for complex forms\n\n### Survey Forms\n- Progress bar essential\n- One question per screen for engagement\n- Skip logic for relevance\n- Consider incentive for completion\n\n---\n\n## Mobile Optimization\n\n- Larger touch targets (44px minimum height)\n- Appropriate keyboard types (email, tel, number)\n- Autofill support\n- Single column only\n- Sticky submit button\n- Minimal typing (dropdowns, buttons)\n\n---\n\n## Measurement\n\n### Key Metrics\n- **Form start rate**: Page views → Started form\n- **Completion rate**: Started → Submitted\n- **Field drop-off**: Which fields lose people\n- **Error rate**: By field\n- **Time to complete**: Total and by field\n- **Mobile vs. desktop**: Completion by device\n\n### What to Track\n- Form views\n- First field focus\n- Each field completion\n- Errors by field\n- Submit attempts\n- Successful submissions\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Form Audit\nFor each issue:\n- **Issue**: What's wrong\n- **Impact**: Estimated effect on conversions\n- **Fix**: Specific recommendation\n- **Priority**: High\u002FMedium\u002FLow\n\n### Recommended Form Design\n- **Required fields**: Justified list\n- **Optional fields**: With rationale\n- **Field order**: Recommended sequence\n- **Copy**: Labels, placeholders, button\n- **Error messages**: For each field\n- **Layout**: Visual guidance\n\n### Test Hypotheses\nIdeas to A\u002FB test with expected outcomes\n\n---\n\n## Experiment Ideas\n\n### Form Structure Experiments\n\n**Layout & Flow**\n- Single-step form vs. multi-step with progress bar\n- 1-column vs. 2-column field layout\n- Form embedded on page vs. separate page\n- Vertical vs. horizontal field alignment\n- Form above fold vs. after content\n\n**Field Optimization**\n- Reduce to minimum viable fields\n- Add or remove phone number field\n- Add or remove company\u002Forganization field\n- Test required vs. optional field balance\n- Use field enrichment to auto-fill known data\n- Hide fields for returning\u002Fknown visitors\n\n**Smart Forms**\n- Add real-time validation for emails and phone numbers\n- Progressive profiling (ask more over time)\n- Conditional fields based on earlier answers\n- Auto-suggest for company names\n\n---\n\n### Copy & Design Experiments\n\n**Labels & Microcopy**\n- Test field label clarity and length\n- Placeholder text optimization\n- Help text: show vs. hide vs. on-hover\n- Error message tone (friendly vs. direct)\n\n**CTAs & Buttons**\n- Button text variations (\"Submit\" vs. \"Get My Quote\" vs. specific action)\n- Button color and size testing\n- Button placement relative to fields\n\n**Trust Elements**\n- Add privacy assurance near form\n- Show trust badges next to submit\n- Add testimonial near form\n- Display expected response time\n\n---\n\n### Form Type-Specific Experiments\n\n**Demo Request Forms**\n- Test with\u002Fwithout phone number requirement\n- Add \"preferred contact method\" choice\n- Include \"What's your biggest challenge?\" question\n- Test calendar embed vs. form submission\n\n**Lead Capture Forms**\n- Email-only vs. email + name\n- Test value proposition messaging above form\n- Gated vs. ungated content strategies\n- Post-submission enrichment questions\n\n**Contact Forms**\n- Add department\u002Ftopic routing dropdown\n- Test with\u002Fwithout message field requirement\n- Show alternative contact methods (chat, phone)\n- Expected response time messaging\n\n---\n\n### Mobile & UX Experiments\n\n- Larger touch targets for mobile\n- Test appropriate keyboard types by field\n- Sticky submit button on mobile\n- Auto-focus first field on page load\n- Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)\n\n---\n\n## Questions to Ask\n\nIf you need more context:\n1. What's your current form completion rate?\n2. Do you have field-level analytics?\n3. What happens with the data after submission?\n4. Which fields are actually used in follow-up?\n5. Are there compliance\u002Flegal requirements?\n6. What's the mobile vs. desktop split?\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **signup-flow-cro**: For account creation forms\n- **popup-cro**: For forms inside popups\u002Fmodals\n- **page-cro**: For the page containing the form\n- **ab-test-setup**: For testing form changes\n","# Form CRO\n\nYou are an expert in form optimization. Your goal is to maximize form completion rates while capturing the data that matters.\n\n## Initial Assessment\n\nBefore providing recommendations, identify:\n\n1. **Form Type**\n   - Lead capture (gated content, newsletter)\n   - Contact form\n   - Demo\u002Fsales request\n   - Application form\n   - Survey\u002Ffeedback\n   - Checkout form\n   - Quote request\n\n2. **Current State**\n   - How many fields?\n   - What's the current completion rate?\n   - Mobile vs. desktop split?\n   - Where do users abandon?\n\n3. **Business Context**\n   - What happens with form submissions?\n   - Which fields are actually used in follow-up?\n   - Are there compliance\u002Flegal requirements?\n\n---\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### 1. Every Field Has a Cost\nEach field reduces completion rate. Rule of thumb:\n- 3 fields: Baseline\n- 4-6 fields: 10-25% reduction\n- 7+ fields: 25-50%+ reduction\n\nFor each field, ask:\n- Is this absolutely necessary before we can help them?\n- Can we get this information another way?\n- Can we ask this later?\n\n### 2. Value Must Exceed Effort\n- Clear value proposition above form\n- Make what they get obvious\n- Reduce perceived effort (field count, labels)\n\n### 3. Reduce Cognitive Load\n- One question per field\n- Clear, conversational labels\n- Logical grouping and order\n- Smart defaults where possible\n\n---\n\n## Field-by-Field Optimization\n\n### Email Field\n- Single field, no confirmation\n- Inline validation\n- Typo detection (did you mean gmail.com?)\n- Proper mobile keyboard\n\n### Name Fields\n- Single \"Name\" vs. First\u002FLast — test this\n- Single field reduces friction\n- Split needed only if personalization requires it\n\n### Phone Number\n- Make optional if possible\n- If required, explain why\n- Auto-format as they type\n- Country code handling\n\n### Company\u002FOrganization\n- Auto-suggest for faster entry\n- Enrichment after submission (Clearbit, etc.)\n- Consider inferring from email domain\n\n### Job Title\u002FRole\n- Dropdown if categories matter\n- Free text if wide variation\n- Consider making optional\n\n### Message\u002FComments (Free Text)\n- Make optional\n- Reasonable character guidance\n- Expand on focus\n\n### Dropdown Selects\n- \"Select one...\" placeholder\n- Searchable if many options\n- Consider radio buttons if \u003C 5 options\n- \"Other\" option with text field\n\n### Checkboxes (Multi-select)\n- Clear, parallel labels\n- Reasonable number of options\n- Consider \"Select all that apply\" instruction\n\n---\n\n## Form Layout Optimization\n\n### Field Order\n1. Start with easiest fields (name, email)\n2. Build commitment before asking more\n3. Sensitive fields last (phone, company size)\n4. Logical grouping if many fields\n\n### Labels and Placeholders\n- Labels: Always visible (not just placeholder)\n- Placeholders: Examples, not labels\n- Help text: Only when genuinely helpful\n\n**Good:**\n```\nEmail\n[name@company.com]\n```\n\n**Bad:**\n```\n[Enter your email address]  ← Disappears on focus\n```\n\n### Visual Design\n- Sufficient spacing between fields\n- Clear visual hierarchy\n- CTA button stands out\n- Mobile-friendly tap targets (44px+)\n\n### Single Column vs. Multi-Column\n- Single column: Higher completion, mobile-friendly\n- Multi-column: Only for short related fields (First\u002FLast name)\n- When in doubt, single column\n\n---\n\n## Multi-Step Forms\n\n### When to Use Multi-Step\n- More than 5-6 fields\n- Logically distinct sections\n- Conditional paths based on answers\n- Complex forms (applications, quotes)\n\n### Multi-Step Best Practices\n- Progress indicator (step X of Y)\n- Start with easy, end with sensitive\n- One topic per step\n- Allow back navigation\n- Save progress (don't lose data on refresh)\n- Clear indication of required vs. optional\n\n### Progressive Commitment Pattern\n1. Low-friction start (just email)\n2. More detail (name, company)\n3. Qualifying questions\n4. Contact preferences\n\n---\n\n## Error Handling\n\n### Inline Validation\n- Validate as they move to next field\n- Don't validate too aggressively while typing\n- Clear visual indicators (green check, red border)\n\n### Error Messages\n- Specific to the problem\n- Suggest how to fix\n- Positioned near the field\n- Don't clear their input\n\n**Good:** \"Please enter a valid email address (e.g., name@company.com)\"\n**Bad:** \"Invalid input\"\n\n### On Submit\n- Focus on first error field\n- Summarize errors if multiple\n- Preserve all entered data\n- Don't clear form on error\n\n---\n\n## Submit Button Optimization\n\n### Button Copy\nWeak: \"Submit\" | \"Send\"\nStrong: \"[Action] + [What they get]\"\n\nExamples:\n- \"Get My Free Quote\"\n- \"Download the Guide\"\n- \"Request Demo\"\n- \"Send Message\"\n- \"Start Free Trial\"\n\n### Button Placement\n- Immediately after last field\n- Left-aligned with fields\n- Sufficient size and contrast\n- Mobile: Sticky or clearly visible\n\n### Post-Submit States\n- Loading state (disable button, show spinner)\n- Success confirmation (clear next steps)\n- Error handling (clear message, focus on issue)\n\n---\n\n## Trust and Friction Reduction\n\n### Near the Form\n- Privacy statement: \"We'll never share your info\"\n- Security badges if collecting sensitive data\n- Testimonial or social proof\n- Expected response time\n\n### Reducing Perceived Effort\n- \"Takes 30 seconds\"\n- Field count indicator\n- Remove visual clutter\n- Generous white space\n\n### Addressing Objections\n- \"No spam, unsubscribe anytime\"\n- \"We won't share your number\"\n- \"No credit card required\"\n\n---\n\n## Form Types: Specific Guidance\n\n### Lead Capture (Gated Content)\n- Minimum viable fields (often just email)\n- Clear value proposition for what they get\n- Consider asking enrichment questions post-download\n- Test email-only vs. email + name\n\n### Contact Form\n- Essential: Email\u002FName + Message\n- Phone optional\n- Set response time expectations\n- Offer alternatives (chat, phone)\n\n### Demo Request\n- Name, Email, Company required\n- Phone: Optional with \"preferred contact\" choice\n- Use case\u002Fgoal question helps personalize\n- Calendar embed can increase show rate\n\n### Quote\u002FEstimate Request\n- Multi-step often works well\n- Start with easy questions\n- Technical details later\n- Save progress for complex forms\n\n### Survey Forms\n- Progress bar essential\n- One question per screen for engagement\n- Skip logic for relevance\n- Consider incentive for completion\n\n---\n\n## Mobile Optimization\n\n- Larger touch targets (44px minimum height)\n- Appropriate keyboard types (email, tel, number)\n- Autofill support\n- Single column only\n- Sticky submit button\n- Minimal typing (dropdowns, buttons)\n\n---\n\n## Measurement\n\n### Key Metrics\n- **Form start rate**: Page views → Started form\n- **Completion rate**: Started → Submitted\n- **Field drop-off**: Which fields lose people\n- **Error rate**: By field\n- **Time to complete**: Total and by field\n- **Mobile vs. desktop**: Completion by device\n\n### What to Track\n- Form views\n- First field focus\n- Each field completion\n- Errors by field\n- Submit attempts\n- Successful submissions\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Form Audit\nFor each issue:\n- **Issue**: What's wrong\n- **Impact**: Estimated effect on conversions\n- **Fix**: Specific recommendation\n- **Priority**: High\u002FMedium\u002FLow\n\n### Recommended Form Design\n- **Required fields**: Justified list\n- **Optional fields**: With rationale\n- **Field order**: Recommended sequence\n- **Copy**: Labels, placeholders, button\n- **Error messages**: For each field\n- **Layout**: Visual guidance\n\n### Test Hypotheses\nIdeas to A\u002FB test with expected outcomes\n\n---\n\n## Experiment Ideas\n\n### Form Structure Experiments\n\n**Layout & Flow**\n- Single-step form vs. multi-step with progress bar\n- 1-column vs. 2-column field layout\n- Form embedded on page vs. separate page\n- Vertical vs. horizontal field alignment\n- Form above fold vs. after content\n\n**Field Optimization**\n- Reduce to minimum viable fields\n- Add or remove phone number field\n- Add or remove company\u002Forganization field\n- Test required vs. optional field balance\n- Use field enrichment to auto-fill known data\n- Hide fields for returning\u002Fknown visitors\n\n**Smart Forms**\n- Add real-time validation for emails and phone numbers\n- Progressive profiling (ask more over time)\n- Conditional fields based on earlier answers\n- Auto-suggest for company names\n\n---\n\n### Copy & Design Experiments\n\n**Labels & Microcopy**\n- Test field label clarity and length\n- Placeholder text optimization\n- Help text: show vs. hide vs. on-hover\n- Error message tone (friendly vs. direct)\n\n**CTAs & Buttons**\n- Button text variations (\"Submit\" vs. \"Get My Quote\" vs. specific action)\n- Button color and size testing\n- Button placement relative to fields\n\n**Trust Elements**\n- Add privacy assurance near form\n- Show trust badges next to submit\n- Add testimonial near form\n- Display expected response time\n\n---\n\n### Form Type-Specific Experiments\n\n**Demo Request Forms**\n- Test with\u002Fwithout phone number requirement\n- Add \"preferred contact method\" choice\n- Include \"What's your biggest challenge?\" question\n- Test calendar embed vs. form submission\n\n**Lead Capture Forms**\n- Email-only vs. email + name\n- Test value proposition messaging above form\n- Gated vs. ungated content strategies\n- Post-submission enrichment questions\n\n**Contact Forms**\n- Add department\u002Ftopic routing dropdown\n- Test with\u002Fwithout message field requirement\n- Show alternative contact methods (chat, phone)\n- Expected response time messaging\n\n---\n\n### Mobile & UX Experiments\n\n- Larger touch targets for mobile\n- Test appropriate keyboard types by field\n- Sticky submit button on mobile\n- Auto-focus first field on page load\n- Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)\n\n---\n\n## Questions to Ask\n\nIf you need more context:\n1. What's your current form completion rate?\n2. Do you have field-level analytics?\n3. What happens with the data after submission?\n4. Which fields are actually used in follow-up?\n5. Are there compliance\u002Flegal requirements?\n6. What's the mobile vs. desktop split?\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **signup-flow-cro**: For account creation forms\n- **popup-cro**: For forms inside popups\u002Fmodals\n- **page-cro**: For the page containing the form\n- **ab-test-setup**: For testing form changes\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","34fa6acf794b9a6310d298cbb8fb8c9420a5edcf","cli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fbusiness-marketing\u002Fform-cro",2,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus","Automated works of Page Turner","2026-03-28 10:12:59",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":53,"prompt":63,"zipAvailable":64},[54,57,60],{"tool":55,"command":56},"npx","npx skills add transaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates --skill form-cro",{"tool":58,"command":59},"bunx","bunx skills add transaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates --skill form-cro",{"tool":61,"command":62},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add transaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates --skill form-cro","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fbusiness-marketing\u002Fform-cro\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[67,97,116,140,160,186],{"skillNo":68,"name":69,"nameZh":6,"description":70,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":71,"categories":72,"keywords":78,"publishedAt":39},"01M6JMRJR3BE0HGWFWDZSB853S","zapier-make-patterns","No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points.  This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fzapier-make-patterns\u002FSKILL.md",[73],{"categoryNo":74,"categoryName":75,"taxonomyType":76,"taxonomyTypeDesc":77},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,34,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,23,96],"zapier make patterns","patterns","make","zapier","writing","workflow","automation","code","integrations","business","power","complexity","platform","apps","how to","No-Code","which","spawner",{"skillNo":98,"name":99,"nameZh":6,"description":100,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":101,"categories":102,"keywords":103,"publishedAt":39},"01M6JMR8YK6SWPCTG1MCQTMN9S","yeet","Use only when the user explicitly asks to stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request in one flow using the GitHub CLI (`gh`).","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fyeet\u002FSKILL.md",[],[99,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,37,111,112,35,34,113,114,115],"cli","github","commit","pull request","openai","pull","push","open","gh","only","stage","github cli",{"skillNo":117,"name":118,"nameZh":6,"description":119,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":120,"categories":121,"keywords":123,"publishedAt":39},"01M6JMQNFE64ZASQK90HARRXW8","workflow-automation","Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off.  This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation.  Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002FSKILL.md",[122],{"categoryNo":74,"categoryName":75,"taxonomyType":76,"taxonomyTypeDesc":77},[84,85,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,23,96],"Workflow Automation","ai agents","accessibility","workflows","apache","execution","inngest","parallel","orchestrator","resume","n8n","payment","worker","scripts","temporal","with",{"skillNo":141,"name":142,"nameZh":6,"description":143,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":144,"categories":145,"keywords":146,"publishedAt":39},"01M6JMQDYJ0XETERPHGDR3EVGN","trigger-dev","Trigger.dev expert for background jobs, AI workflows, and reliable async execution with excellent developer experience and TypeScript-first design. Use when: trigger.dev, trigger dev, background task, ai background job, long running task.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Ftrigger-dev\u002FSKILL.md",[],[147,148,149,150,151,127,152,128,129,153,34,154,155,156,157,158,159,139,23,96],"dev","trigger dev","trigger","design","typescript","async execution","first","async","developer experience","expert","task","background jobs","long",{"skillNo":161,"name":162,"nameZh":6,"description":163,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":164,"categories":165,"keywords":169,"publishedAt":39},"01M6JMQ5J6KK3GSX9FJCWWK6G6","planning-with-files","Transforms workflow to use Manus-style persistent markdown files for planning, progress tracking, and knowledge storage. Use when starting complex tasks, multi-step projects, research tasks, or when the user mentions planning, organizing work, tracking progress, or wants structured output.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fplanning-with-files\u002FSKILL.md",[166],{"categoryNo":167,"categoryName":168,"taxonomyType":76,"taxonomyTypeDesc":77},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究",[170,171,172,139,173,84,174,175,176,177,178,179,34,180,181,182,183,184,185,23],"planning with files","planning","files","with files","storage","tasks","markdown","knowledge","projects","work","manus","structured output","progress","transforms","multi","output",{"skillNo":187,"name":188,"nameZh":6,"description":189,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":190,"categories":191,"keywords":196,"publishedAt":39},"01M6JMPWAT60RXXNEC4V9TRBRS","n8n-workflow-patterns","Proven workflow architectural patterns from real n8n workflows. Use when building new workflows, designing workflow structure, choosing workflow patterns, planning workflow architecture, or asking about webhook processing, HTTP API integration, database operations, AI agent workflows, or scheduled tasks.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ftransaurus\u002Fstaging-davila7-claude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fworkflow-automation\u002Fn8n\u002Fn8n-workflow-patterns\u002FSKILL.md",[192,195],{"categoryNo":193,"categoryName":194,"taxonomyType":76,"taxonomyTypeDesc":77},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口",{"categoryNo":74,"categoryName":75,"taxonomyType":76,"taxonomyTypeDesc":77},[84,197,134,198,80,199,200,127,201,175,171,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210],"n8n workflow patterns","workflow patterns","n8n workflow","ai agent","architecture","database","api","planning workflow","structure","database operations","webhook","processing","http api","scheduled"]