[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6JHAJDN6HDR9J81ZSW9DFNJ":3,"skill-same:01M6JHAJDN6HDR9J81ZSW9DFNJ":70},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":22,"publishedAt":42,"linkOnly":43,"markdownContent":44,"markdownBody":45,"frontMatter":46,"refName":50,"commitSha":51,"skillDirectory":52,"forksCount":13,"repositoryHtmlUrl":53,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":54,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":55,"install":56,"resources":69},"01M6JHAJDN6HDR9J81ZSW9DFNJ","gtm-developer-ecosystem",null,"Build and scale developer-led adoption through ecosystem programs. Use when deciding open vs curated ecosystems, building developer programs, scaling platform adoption, or designing student program pipelines.","JiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing","JiayiV","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F54466889?v=4","01M6JFJYYMRZ3QRGP9339JNQ2K","01M6JFJZ35KB0QVT50NAHPJA7G",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgtm-developer-ecosystem\u002FSKILL.md",[17],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41],"ecosystem","developer","gtm developer ecosystem","gtm","use","student","scale","platform","scaling","ecosystems","build","pipelines","github","technical","linkedin","open","adoption","https","product","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: gtm-developer-ecosystem\ndescription: Build and scale developer-led adoption through ecosystem programs. Use when deciding open vs curated ecosystems, building developer programs, scaling platform adoption, or designing student program pipelines.\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  author: Smit Patel (https:\u002F\u002Flinkedin.com\u002Fin\u002Fsmitkpatel)\n  source: https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbeingsmit\u002Ftechnical-product-gtm\n---\n\n# Developer Ecosystem\n\nBuild and scale developer-led adoption through ecosystem programs, community, and partnerships. Focus on what actually drives adoption, not vanity metrics.\n\n## When to Use\n\n**Triggers:**\n- \"How do we build a developer ecosystem?\"\n- \"Should we curate quality or go open?\"\n- \"Developer community isn't growing\"\n- \"Nobody's building on our API\"\n- \"How do we compete with larger platforms?\"\n\n**Context:**\n- API platforms and developer tools\n- Products with extensibility (plugins, integrations)\n- Developer-first GTM motion\n- Platform business models\n\n---\n\n## Core Frameworks\n\n### 1. Open vs Curated Ecosystem (The Marketplace Decision)\n\n**The Pattern:**\n\nRunning ecosystem at a developer platform. Leadership debate: Open the marketplace to anyone, or curate for quality?\n\n**Quality control camp:** \"We need gatekeeping. Otherwise we'll get SEO spam, low-quality integrations, brand damage.\"\n\n**Open camp:** \"Developers route around gatekeepers. Network effects matter more than quality control.\"\n\n**The decision:** Went open. Quality concerns were real, but we made a bet: control comes from discovery and trust layers, not submission gatekeeping.\n\n**What We Built Instead of Gatekeeping:**\n\n1. **Search and discovery** — Surface high-quality integrations through algorithms, not human curation\n2. **Trust signals** — Verified badges, usage stats, health scores\n3. **Community curation** — User ratings, collections, recommendations\n4. **Moderation** — Remove spam after publication, not block before\n\n**Result:** Network effects won. Thousands of integrations published. Quality surfaced through usage, not through us deciding upfront.\n\n**Decision Framework:**\n- **Curated** works when: Brand risk high, dozens of partners, can scale human review\n- **Open** works when: Hundreds\u002Fthousands of potential partners, network effects matter more than quality control\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nDefaulting to curated because \"we need quality control.\" This works when you have 10 partners. At 100+, you become the bottleneck. Build discovery and trust systems instead.\n\n---\n\n### 2. The Three-Year Student Program Arc\n\n**The Pattern:**\n\nMost developer programs optimize for quick wins. Better approach: Build long-term talent pipeline.\n\n**Year 1: University Partnerships**\n- Partner with CS departments\n- Curriculum integration (hackathons, coursework)\n- Student licenses (free or heavily discounted)\n- Metrics: # universities, # students activated\n\n**Year 2: Student Community & Certification**\n- Student expert certification program\n- Student-led workshops and events\n- Campus ambassadors\n- Metrics: # certified, # student-led events\n\n**Year 3: Career Bridge**\n- Job board connecting students → companies\n- Enterprise partnerships (hire certified students)\n- Alumni network\n- Metrics: # hired, company partnerships\n\n**Why This Works:**\n\nStudents become enterprise buyers 5-10 years later. You're building brand loyalty before they have purchasing power.\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nTreating students as immediate revenue. They're not. They're future enterprise decision-makers.\n\n---\n\n### 3. Developer Journey (Awareness → Integration → Advocacy)\n\n**Stage 1: Awareness**\n- How do they discover you?\n- Content, search, word-of-mouth, events\n\n**Stage 2: Onboarding**\n- First API call in \u003C10 minutes\n- Quick-start guides\n- Sample code in popular languages\n\n**Stage 3: Integration**\n- Building real use cases\n- Integration guides\n- Support when stuck\n\n**Stage 4: Production**\n- Deployed and generating value\n- Monitoring usage\n- Enterprise upgrade path\n\n**Stage 5: Advocacy**\n- Sharing publicly\n- Recommending to others\n- Contributing back (docs, code, community)\n\n**Metrics That Matter:**\n- Time to first API call (onboarding)\n- % reaching production (integration success)\n- Monthly active developers (engagement)\n- Developer NPS (advocacy)\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nMeasuring vanity metrics (sign-ups, downloads) instead of real engagement (API calls, production deployments).\n\n---\n\n### 4. Documentation Hierarchy\n\n**Tier 1: Quick Starts (Get to Value Fast)**\n- \"Hello World\" in 5 minutes\n- Common use case examples\n- Copy-paste code that works\n\n**Tier 2: Guides (Solve Real Problems)**\n- Use case-specific tutorials\n- Integration patterns\n- Best practices\n\n**Tier 3: Reference (Complete API Docs)**\n- Every endpoint documented\n- Request\u002Fresponse examples\n- Error codes and handling\n\n**Tier 4: Conceptual (Understand the System)**\n- Architecture overviews\n- Design philosophy\n- Advanced patterns\n\n**Most developers need:** Tier 1 first, then Tier 2. Very few read Tier 4.\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nStarting with Tier 3 (comprehensive API reference). Developers want quick wins first.\n\n---\n\n### 5. Community vs Support (When to Use Which)\n\n**Community (Async, Scalable):**\n- Slack\u002FDiscord for real-time help\n- Forum for searchable Q&A\n- GitHub discussions for feature requests\n- Best for: Common questions, peer-to-peer help\n\n**Support (Sync, Expensive):**\n- Email support for enterprise\n- Dedicated Slack channels for partners\n- Video calls for complex integrations\n- Best for: Paying customers, strategic partners\n\n**How to Route:**\n\n**Community first:**\n- Developer asks question\n- Community member answers\n- You validate and upvote\n- Searchable for future developers\n\n**Escalate to support when:**\n- No community answer in 24 hours\n- Enterprise\u002Fpaying customer\n- Security or compliance issue\n- Complex integration requiring custom work\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nProviding white-glove support to everyone. Doesn't scale. Build community that helps itself.\n\n---\n\n### 6. Partner Tiering for Developer Ecosystems\n\n**Tier 1: Integration Partners (Self-Serve)**\n- Build with public API\n- You provide: docs, Slack channel, office hours\n- They drive their own marketing\n- Best for: Ambitious partners with resources\n\n**Tier 2: Strategic Partners (Co-Development)**\n- Co-developed integration\n- You provide: dedicated channel, co-marketing\n- Joint case studies\n- Best for: High-impact integrations\n\n**Don't over-tier.** 2 tiers is enough. More creates confusion.\n\n---\n\n## Decision Trees\n\n### Open or Curated Ecosystem?\n\n```\nIs brand damage risk high if low-quality partners join?\n├─ Yes (regulated, security) → Curated\n└─ No → Continue...\n    │\n    Can you scale human review?\n    ├─ No (hundreds\u002Fthousands) → Open + discovery systems\n    └─ Yes (dozens) → Curated\n```\n\n### Community or Support?\n\n```\nIs this a common question?\n├─ Yes → Community (forum, Slack, docs)\n└─ No → Continue...\n    │\n    Is requester paying customer?\n    ├─ Yes → Support (email, dedicated)\n    └─ No → Community (with escalation path)\n```\n\n---\n\n## Common Mistakes\n\n**1. Building ecosystem before product-market fit**\n   - Fix core product first, then build ecosystem\n\n**2. No developer success team**\n   - Developers need help to succeed beyond docs\n\n**3. Poor documentation**\n   - Foundation of ecosystem, non-negotiable\n\n**4. Treating all developers equally**\n   - Tier support by strategic value (paying > free, partners > hobbyists)\n\n**5. No integration quality standards**\n   - Low-quality integrations hurt your brand\n\n**6. Measuring only vanity metrics**\n   - Track activation and production usage, not just sign-ups\n\n**7. Developer advocates with no technical depth**\n   - Hire developers who can code and teach\n\n---\n\n## Quick Reference\n\n**Open ecosystem checklist:**\n- [ ] Search and discovery (surface quality algorithmically)\n- [ ] Trust signals (verified badges, usage stats, ratings)\n- [ ] Community curation (user recommendations, collections)\n- [ ] Moderation (remove spam after publication)\n\n**Developer journey metrics:**\n- Awareness: Traffic, sign-ups\n- Onboarding: Time to first API call (\u003C10 min target)\n- Integration: % reaching production deployment\n- Advocacy: Developer NPS, public sharing\n\n**Documentation hierarchy:**\n1. Quick starts (5-min \"Hello World\")\n2. Use case guides (solve real problems)\n3. API reference (complete documentation)\n4. Conceptual (architecture, philosophy)\n\n**Partner tiers:**\n- Tier 1: Self-serve (public API, docs, community)\n- Tier 2: Strategic (co-development, co-marketing)\n\n**Student program timeline:**\n- Year 1: University partnerships, activation\n- Year 2: Certification, student community\n- Year 3: Job board, enterprise hiring bridge\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **partnership-architecture**: Partner deal structures and co-marketing\n- **product-led-growth**: Self-serve activation funnels for developer products\n- **0-to-1-launch**: Launching developer products\n\n---\n\n*Based on building developer ecosystems at multiple platform companies, including the open vs curated marketplace decision, student program development (3-year arc building talent pipeline), and partner ecosystem growth. Not theory — patterns from building developer ecosystems that actually drove platform adoption and multi-year brand loyalty.*\n","# Developer Ecosystem\n\nBuild and scale developer-led adoption through ecosystem programs, community, and partnerships. Focus on what actually drives adoption, not vanity metrics.\n\n## When to Use\n\n**Triggers:**\n- \"How do we build a developer ecosystem?\"\n- \"Should we curate quality or go open?\"\n- \"Developer community isn't growing\"\n- \"Nobody's building on our API\"\n- \"How do we compete with larger platforms?\"\n\n**Context:**\n- API platforms and developer tools\n- Products with extensibility (plugins, integrations)\n- Developer-first GTM motion\n- Platform business models\n\n---\n\n## Core Frameworks\n\n### 1. Open vs Curated Ecosystem (The Marketplace Decision)\n\n**The Pattern:**\n\nRunning ecosystem at a developer platform. Leadership debate: Open the marketplace to anyone, or curate for quality?\n\n**Quality control camp:** \"We need gatekeeping. Otherwise we'll get SEO spam, low-quality integrations, brand damage.\"\n\n**Open camp:** \"Developers route around gatekeepers. Network effects matter more than quality control.\"\n\n**The decision:** Went open. Quality concerns were real, but we made a bet: control comes from discovery and trust layers, not submission gatekeeping.\n\n**What We Built Instead of Gatekeeping:**\n\n1. **Search and discovery** — Surface high-quality integrations through algorithms, not human curation\n2. **Trust signals** — Verified badges, usage stats, health scores\n3. **Community curation** — User ratings, collections, recommendations\n4. **Moderation** — Remove spam after publication, not block before\n\n**Result:** Network effects won. Thousands of integrations published. Quality surfaced through usage, not through us deciding upfront.\n\n**Decision Framework:**\n- **Curated** works when: Brand risk high, dozens of partners, can scale human review\n- **Open** works when: Hundreds\u002Fthousands of potential partners, network effects matter more than quality control\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nDefaulting to curated because \"we need quality control.\" This works when you have 10 partners. At 100+, you become the bottleneck. Build discovery and trust systems instead.\n\n---\n\n### 2. The Three-Year Student Program Arc\n\n**The Pattern:**\n\nMost developer programs optimize for quick wins. Better approach: Build long-term talent pipeline.\n\n**Year 1: University Partnerships**\n- Partner with CS departments\n- Curriculum integration (hackathons, coursework)\n- Student licenses (free or heavily discounted)\n- Metrics: # universities, # students activated\n\n**Year 2: Student Community & Certification**\n- Student expert certification program\n- Student-led workshops and events\n- Campus ambassadors\n- Metrics: # certified, # student-led events\n\n**Year 3: Career Bridge**\n- Job board connecting students → companies\n- Enterprise partnerships (hire certified students)\n- Alumni network\n- Metrics: # hired, company partnerships\n\n**Why This Works:**\n\nStudents become enterprise buyers 5-10 years later. You're building brand loyalty before they have purchasing power.\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nTreating students as immediate revenue. They're not. They're future enterprise decision-makers.\n\n---\n\n### 3. Developer Journey (Awareness → Integration → Advocacy)\n\n**Stage 1: Awareness**\n- How do they discover you?\n- Content, search, word-of-mouth, events\n\n**Stage 2: Onboarding**\n- First API call in \u003C10 minutes\n- Quick-start guides\n- Sample code in popular languages\n\n**Stage 3: Integration**\n- Building real use cases\n- Integration guides\n- Support when stuck\n\n**Stage 4: Production**\n- Deployed and generating value\n- Monitoring usage\n- Enterprise upgrade path\n\n**Stage 5: Advocacy**\n- Sharing publicly\n- Recommending to others\n- Contributing back (docs, code, community)\n\n**Metrics That Matter:**\n- Time to first API call (onboarding)\n- % reaching production (integration success)\n- Monthly active developers (engagement)\n- Developer NPS (advocacy)\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nMeasuring vanity metrics (sign-ups, downloads) instead of real engagement (API calls, production deployments).\n\n---\n\n### 4. Documentation Hierarchy\n\n**Tier 1: Quick Starts (Get to Value Fast)**\n- \"Hello World\" in 5 minutes\n- Common use case examples\n- Copy-paste code that works\n\n**Tier 2: Guides (Solve Real Problems)**\n- Use case-specific tutorials\n- Integration patterns\n- Best practices\n\n**Tier 3: Reference (Complete API Docs)**\n- Every endpoint documented\n- Request\u002Fresponse examples\n- Error codes and handling\n\n**Tier 4: Conceptual (Understand the System)**\n- Architecture overviews\n- Design philosophy\n- Advanced patterns\n\n**Most developers need:** Tier 1 first, then Tier 2. Very few read Tier 4.\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nStarting with Tier 3 (comprehensive API reference). Developers want quick wins first.\n\n---\n\n### 5. Community vs Support (When to Use Which)\n\n**Community (Async, Scalable):**\n- Slack\u002FDiscord for real-time help\n- Forum for searchable Q&A\n- GitHub discussions for feature requests\n- Best for: Common questions, peer-to-peer help\n\n**Support (Sync, Expensive):**\n- Email support for enterprise\n- Dedicated Slack channels for partners\n- Video calls for complex integrations\n- Best for: Paying customers, strategic partners\n\n**How to Route:**\n\n**Community first:**\n- Developer asks question\n- Community member answers\n- You validate and upvote\n- Searchable for future developers\n\n**Escalate to support when:**\n- No community answer in 24 hours\n- Enterprise\u002Fpaying customer\n- Security or compliance issue\n- Complex integration requiring custom work\n\n**Common Mistake:**\n\nProviding white-glove support to everyone. Doesn't scale. Build community that helps itself.\n\n---\n\n### 6. Partner Tiering for Developer Ecosystems\n\n**Tier 1: Integration Partners (Self-Serve)**\n- Build with public API\n- You provide: docs, Slack channel, office hours\n- They drive their own marketing\n- Best for: Ambitious partners with resources\n\n**Tier 2: Strategic Partners (Co-Development)**\n- Co-developed integration\n- You provide: dedicated channel, co-marketing\n- Joint case studies\n- Best for: High-impact integrations\n\n**Don't over-tier.** 2 tiers is enough. More creates confusion.\n\n---\n\n## Decision Trees\n\n### Open or Curated Ecosystem?\n\n```\nIs brand damage risk high if low-quality partners join?\n├─ Yes (regulated, security) → Curated\n└─ No → Continue...\n    │\n    Can you scale human review?\n    ├─ No (hundreds\u002Fthousands) → Open + discovery systems\n    └─ Yes (dozens) → Curated\n```\n\n### Community or Support?\n\n```\nIs this a common question?\n├─ Yes → Community (forum, Slack, docs)\n└─ No → Continue...\n    │\n    Is requester paying customer?\n    ├─ Yes → Support (email, dedicated)\n    └─ No → Community (with escalation path)\n```\n\n---\n\n## Common Mistakes\n\n**1. Building ecosystem before product-market fit**\n   - Fix core product first, then build ecosystem\n\n**2. No developer success team**\n   - Developers need help to succeed beyond docs\n\n**3. Poor documentation**\n   - Foundation of ecosystem, non-negotiable\n\n**4. Treating all developers equally**\n   - Tier support by strategic value (paying > free, partners > hobbyists)\n\n**5. No integration quality standards**\n   - Low-quality integrations hurt your brand\n\n**6. Measuring only vanity metrics**\n   - Track activation and production usage, not just sign-ups\n\n**7. Developer advocates with no technical depth**\n   - Hire developers who can code and teach\n\n---\n\n## Quick Reference\n\n**Open ecosystem checklist:**\n- [ ] Search and discovery (surface quality algorithmically)\n- [ ] Trust signals (verified badges, usage stats, ratings)\n- [ ] Community curation (user recommendations, collections)\n- [ ] Moderation (remove spam after publication)\n\n**Developer journey metrics:**\n- Awareness: Traffic, sign-ups\n- Onboarding: Time to first API call (\u003C10 min target)\n- Integration: % reaching production deployment\n- Advocacy: Developer NPS, public sharing\n\n**Documentation hierarchy:**\n1. Quick starts (5-min \"Hello World\")\n2. Use case guides (solve real problems)\n3. API reference (complete documentation)\n4. Conceptual (architecture, philosophy)\n\n**Partner tiers:**\n- Tier 1: Self-serve (public API, docs, community)\n- Tier 2: Strategic (co-development, co-marketing)\n\n**Student program timeline:**\n- Year 1: University partnerships, activation\n- Year 2: Certification, student community\n- Year 3: Job board, enterprise hiring bridge\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **partnership-architecture**: Partner deal structures and co-marketing\n- **product-led-growth**: Self-serve activation funnels for developer products\n- **0-to-1-launch**: Launching developer products\n\n---\n\n*Based on building developer ecosystems at multiple platform companies, including the open vs curated marketplace decision, student program development (3-year arc building talent pipeline), and partner ecosystem growth. Not theory — patterns from building developer ecosystems that actually drove platform adoption and multi-year brand loyalty.*\n",{"name":5,"license":14,"metadata":47,"description":7},{"author":48,"source":49},"Smit Patel (https:\u002F\u002Flinkedin.com\u002Fin\u002Fsmitkpatel)","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fbeingsmit\u002Ftechnical-product-gtm","main","068c2486ccc0f8d200a3db4d21ec137064eda3b4","skills\u002Fgtm-developer-ecosystem","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV","2026-08-25 16:30:52",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":57,"prompt":67,"zipAvailable":68},[58,61,64],{"tool":59,"command":60},"npx","npx skills add JiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing --skill gtm-developer-ecosystem",{"tool":62,"command":63},"bunx","bunx skills add JiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing --skill gtm-developer-ecosystem",{"tool":65,"command":66},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add JiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing --skill gtm-developer-ecosystem","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgtm-developer-ecosystem\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[71,94,122,155,183,215],{"skillNo":72,"name":73,"nameZh":6,"description":74,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":75,"categories":76,"keywords":77,"publishedAt":42},"01M6NN9PJS9NHWPDG4QP93BP8F","webmcpify","Make a web app agent-ready — propose a WebMCP tool manifest, integrate, verify in a real browser, heal; unrelated code stays untouched. Use for \"webmcpify\", \"add WebMCP\", or \"expose app actions to AI agents\".","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwebmcpify\u002FSKILL.md",[],[73,35,78,79,80,81,82,40,83,84,85,86,87,27,88,89,90,91,92,93],"ai agents","web","notes","code","browser","actions","manifest","inventory","verify","tool","ready","unrelated","app","scope","for","webmcp",{"skillNo":95,"name":96,"nameZh":6,"description":97,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":98,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":99,"categories":100,"keywords":101,"publishedAt":42},"01M6NN6KZE5RBN6NGHN2WXV1RE","vardoger-analyze","Use when the user asks to personalize the GitHub Copilot CLI assistant, adapt Copilot to their style, use vardoger, or analyze their Copilot CLI conversation history. Reads the local session directory at `~\u002F.copilot\u002Fsession-state\u002F`, extracts recurring preferences and conventions, and writes a fenced personalization block into `~\u002F.copilot\u002Fcopilot-instructions.md`. Runs entirely on the user's machine via the local `vardoger` CLI (`pipx install vardoger`); no network calls and no uploads. Triggers: 'personalize my copilot', 'analyze my copilot history', 'tailor copilot to me', 'run vardoger', 'update my copilot instructions from history', 'make copilot learn my style'.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fvardoger-analyze\u002FSKILL.md",[],[102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121],"vardoger analyze","analyze","directory","cli","github copilot","copilot","run","update","learn","network","my style","install","conversation","me","local","github copilot cli","pipx","my","at","copilot instructions",{"skillNo":123,"name":124,"nameZh":6,"description":125,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":126,"categories":127,"keywords":136,"publishedAt":42},"01M6NN3CZGQP3XAJ04BM1NNYGT","transloadit-media-processing","Process media files (video, audio, images, documents) using Transloadit. Use when asked to encode video to HLS\u002FMP4, generate thumbnails, resize or watermark images, extract audio, concatenate clips, add subtitles, OCR documents, or run any media processing pipeline. Covers 86+ processing robots for file transformation at scale.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftransloadit-media-processing\u002FSKILL.md",[128,133],{"categoryNo":129,"categoryName":130,"taxonomyType":131,"taxonomyTypeDesc":132},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000016","图像与多媒体","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":134,"categoryName":135,"taxonomyType":131,"taxonomyTypeDesc":132},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,27,150,151,152,153,92,154],"transloadit media processing","Media","media processing","processing","MCP","mcp server","documents","subtitles","pipeline","ocr","Video","Audio","mp4","images","files","transformation","free","hls",{"skillNo":156,"name":157,"nameZh":6,"description":158,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":159,"categories":160,"keywords":164,"publishedAt":42},"01M6NN28E92F9GH4WFYQ2H1Y15","terraform-azurerm-set-diff-analyzer","Analyze Terraform plan JSON output for AzureRM Provider to distinguish between false-positive diffs (order-only changes in Set-type attributes) and actual resource changes. Use when reviewing terraform plan output for Azure resources like Application Gateway, Load Balancer, Firewall, Front Door, NSG, and other resources with Set-type attributes that cause spurious diffs due to internal ordering changes.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fterraform-azurerm-set-diff-analyzer\u002FSKILL.md",[161],{"categoryNo":162,"categoryName":163,"taxonomyType":131,"taxonomyTypeDesc":132},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000011","运维与部署",[165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,27,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,92],"terraform","SET","terraform azurerm set diff analyzer","diff","analyzer","diffs","azure","gateway","firewall","only","resource changes","provider","resources","load balancer","attributes","front","load","balancer",{"skillNo":184,"name":185,"nameZh":6,"description":186,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":187,"categories":188,"keywords":198,"publishedAt":42},"01M6NN1QMH2TDYWTH3XY3N5XPV","technical-job-search","Use this skill when a software engineer asks for help with job search tasks: parsing or analyzing a job description, tailoring a CV\u002Fresume, writing a cover letter, evaluating a job offer, or drafting a post-interview follow-up email. Do not activate for general career advice unrelated to an active job search action.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Ftechnical-job-search\u002FSKILL.md",[189,192,195],{"categoryNo":190,"categoryName":191,"taxonomyType":131,"taxonomyTypeDesc":132},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":193,"categoryName":194,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",{"categoryNo":196,"categoryName":197,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000038","人力资源",[199,200,201,36,202,203,204,205,103,206,27,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,92,214],"search","Job Search","technical job search","writing","tasks","email","parsing","interview","up","engineer","general","activate","do","task","cv","letter",{"skillNo":216,"name":217,"nameZh":6,"description":218,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":219,"categories":220,"keywords":221,"publishedAt":42},"01M6NMZFA67XYS1GS09WT42235","steno-mode","Shorthand-first response compression that cuts ~40% of response tokens while preserving technical precision and exact literals. Use when the user says \"steno mode\", \"shorthand mode\", \"compressed responses\", \"token reduction\", \"brief structured output\", or invokes \u002Fsteno. Supports four compression levels: lite, brief, court, machine. Do not trigger for requests needing polished prose such as onboarding\u002Ftutorial content, stakeholder or customer-facing copy, or teaching-focused explanations.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FJiayiV\u002Fquestion_mixing\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fsteno-mode\u002FSKILL.md",[],[222,223,224,225,226,36,227,27,211,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,92,237],"steno mode","mode","customer","brief","first","tutorial","teaching","tokens","as","trigger","structured output","machine","output","court","requests","response compression"]