[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6JD0KFHED2FVJPENCTZW2BC":3,"skill-same:01M6JD0KFHED2FVJPENCTZW2BC":58},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":17,"publishedAt":31,"linkOnly":32,"markdownContent":33,"markdownBody":34,"frontMatter":35,"refName":36,"commitSha":37,"skillDirectory":38,"forksCount":39,"repositoryHtmlUrl":40,"repositoryHomepageUrl":41,"ownerHtmlUrl":42,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":43,"install":44,"resources":57},"01M6JD0KFHED2FVJPENCTZW2BC","gateguard",null,"Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit\u002FWrite\u002FBash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents.","S3YED\u002Fappie-kit","S3YED","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F62743867?v=4","01M6JBKBRRVP6KMS0VWZ27T3R6","01M6JBKBX0KG30284PW1DBYJT1",14,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED\u002Fappie-kit\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fecc\u002Fgateguard\u002FSKILL.md",[],[5,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30],"data","investigation","Bash","quality","write","edit","user","gate","community","forcing","blocks","output","action","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: gateguard\ndescription: Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit\u002FWrite\u002FBash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents.\norigin: community\n---\n\n# GateGuard — Fact-Forcing Pre-Action Gate\n\nA PreToolUse hook that forces Claude to investigate before editing. Instead of self-evaluation (\"are you sure?\"), it demands concrete facts. The act of investigation creates awareness that self-evaluation never did.\n\n## When to Activate\n\n- Working on any codebase where file edits affect multiple modules\n- Projects with data files that have specific schemas or date formats\n- Teams where AI-generated code must match existing patterns\n- Any workflow where Claude tends to guess instead of investigating\n\n## Core Concept\n\nLLM self-evaluation doesn't work. Ask \"did you violate any policies?\" and the answer is always \"no.\" This is verified experimentally.\n\nBut asking \"list every file that imports this module\" forces the LLM to run Grep and Read. The investigation itself creates context that changes the output.\n\n**Three-stage gate:**\n\n```\n1. DENY  — block the first Edit\u002FWrite\u002FBash attempt\n2. FORCE — tell the model exactly which facts to gather\n3. ALLOW — permit retry after facts are presented\n```\n\nNo competitor does all three. Most stop at deny.\n\n## Evidence\n\nTwo independent A\u002FB tests, identical agents, same task:\n\n| Task | Gated | Ungated | Gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Analytics module | 8.0\u002F10 | 6.5\u002F10 | +1.5 |\n| Webhook validator | 10.0\u002F10 | 7.0\u002F10 | +3.0 |\n| **Average** | **9.0** | **6.75** | **+2.25** |\n\nBoth agents produce code that runs and passes tests. The difference is design depth.\n\n## Gate Types\n\n### Edit \u002F MultiEdit Gate (first edit per file)\n\nMultiEdit is handled identically — each file in the batch is gated individually.\n\n```\nBefore editing {file_path}, present these facts:\n\n1. List ALL files that import\u002Frequire this file (use Grep)\n2. List the public functions\u002Fclasses affected by this change\n3. If this file reads\u002Fwrites data files, show field names, structure,\n   and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)\n4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim\n```\n\n### Write Gate (first new file creation)\n\n```\nBefore creating {file_path}, present these facts:\n\n1. Name the file(s) and line(s) that will call this new file\n2. Confirm no existing file serves the same purpose (use Glob)\n3. If this file reads\u002Fwrites data files, show field names, structure,\n   and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)\n4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim\n```\n\n### Destructive Bash Gate (every destructive command)\n\nTriggers on: `rm -rf`, `git reset --hard`, `git push --force`, `drop table`, etc.\n\n```\n1. List all files\u002Fdata this command will modify or delete\n2. Write a one-line rollback procedure\n3. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim\n```\n\n### Routine Bash Gate (once per session)\n\n```\n1. The current user request in one sentence\n2. What this specific command verifies or produces\n```\n\n## Quick Start\n\n### Option A: Use the ECC hook (zero install)\n\nThe hook at `scripts\u002Fhooks\u002Fgateguard-fact-force.js` is included in this plugin. Enable it via hooks.json.\n\nIf GateGuard blocks setup or repair work, start the session with\n`ECC_GATEGUARD=off`. For hook-level control, keep using\n`ECC_DISABLED_HOOKS` with the GateGuard hook ID.\n\n### Option B: Full package with config\n\n```bash\npip install gateguard-ai\ngateguard init\n```\n\nThis adds `.gateguard.yml` for per-project configuration (custom messages, ignore paths, gate toggles).\n\n## Anti-Patterns\n\n- **Don't use self-evaluation instead.** \"Are you sure?\" always gets \"yes.\" This is experimentally verified.\n- **Don't skip the data schema check.** Both A\u002FB test agents assumed ISO-8601 dates when real data used `%Y\u002F%m\u002F%d %H:%M`. Checking data structure (with redacted values) prevents this entire class of bugs.\n- **Don't gate every single Bash command.** Routine bash gates once per session. Destructive bash gates every time. This balance avoids slowdown while catching real risks.\n\n## Best Practices\n\n- Let the gate fire naturally. Don't try to pre-answer the gate questions — the investigation itself is what improves quality.\n- Customize gate messages for your domain. If your project has specific conventions, add them to the gate prompts.\n- Use `.gateguard.yml` to ignore paths like `.venv\u002F`, `node_modules\u002F`, `.git\u002F`.\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- `safety-guard` — Runtime safety checks (complementary, not overlapping)\n- `code-reviewer` — Post-edit review (GateGuard is pre-edit investigation)\n","# GateGuard — Fact-Forcing Pre-Action Gate\n\nA PreToolUse hook that forces Claude to investigate before editing. Instead of self-evaluation (\"are you sure?\"), it demands concrete facts. The act of investigation creates awareness that self-evaluation never did.\n\n## When to Activate\n\n- Working on any codebase where file edits affect multiple modules\n- Projects with data files that have specific schemas or date formats\n- Teams where AI-generated code must match existing patterns\n- Any workflow where Claude tends to guess instead of investigating\n\n## Core Concept\n\nLLM self-evaluation doesn't work. Ask \"did you violate any policies?\" and the answer is always \"no.\" This is verified experimentally.\n\nBut asking \"list every file that imports this module\" forces the LLM to run Grep and Read. The investigation itself creates context that changes the output.\n\n**Three-stage gate:**\n\n```\n1. DENY  — block the first Edit\u002FWrite\u002FBash attempt\n2. FORCE — tell the model exactly which facts to gather\n3. ALLOW — permit retry after facts are presented\n```\n\nNo competitor does all three. Most stop at deny.\n\n## Evidence\n\nTwo independent A\u002FB tests, identical agents, same task:\n\n| Task | Gated | Ungated | Gap |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Analytics module | 8.0\u002F10 | 6.5\u002F10 | +1.5 |\n| Webhook validator | 10.0\u002F10 | 7.0\u002F10 | +3.0 |\n| **Average** | **9.0** | **6.75** | **+2.25** |\n\nBoth agents produce code that runs and passes tests. The difference is design depth.\n\n## Gate Types\n\n### Edit \u002F MultiEdit Gate (first edit per file)\n\nMultiEdit is handled identically — each file in the batch is gated individually.\n\n```\nBefore editing {file_path}, present these facts:\n\n1. List ALL files that import\u002Frequire this file (use Grep)\n2. List the public functions\u002Fclasses affected by this change\n3. If this file reads\u002Fwrites data files, show field names, structure,\n   and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)\n4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim\n```\n\n### Write Gate (first new file creation)\n\n```\nBefore creating {file_path}, present these facts:\n\n1. Name the file(s) and line(s) that will call this new file\n2. Confirm no existing file serves the same purpose (use Glob)\n3. If this file reads\u002Fwrites data files, show field names, structure,\n   and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)\n4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim\n```\n\n### Destructive Bash Gate (every destructive command)\n\nTriggers on: `rm -rf`, `git reset --hard`, `git push --force`, `drop table`, etc.\n\n```\n1. List all files\u002Fdata this command will modify or delete\n2. Write a one-line rollback procedure\n3. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim\n```\n\n### Routine Bash Gate (once per session)\n\n```\n1. The current user request in one sentence\n2. What this specific command verifies or produces\n```\n\n## Quick Start\n\n### Option A: Use the ECC hook (zero install)\n\nThe hook at `scripts\u002Fhooks\u002Fgateguard-fact-force.js` is included in this plugin. Enable it via hooks.json.\n\nIf GateGuard blocks setup or repair work, start the session with\n`ECC_GATEGUARD=off`. For hook-level control, keep using\n`ECC_DISABLED_HOOKS` with the GateGuard hook ID.\n\n### Option B: Full package with config\n\n```bash\npip install gateguard-ai\ngateguard init\n```\n\nThis adds `.gateguard.yml` for per-project configuration (custom messages, ignore paths, gate toggles).\n\n## Anti-Patterns\n\n- **Don't use self-evaluation instead.** \"Are you sure?\" always gets \"yes.\" This is experimentally verified.\n- **Don't skip the data schema check.** Both A\u002FB test agents assumed ISO-8601 dates when real data used `%Y\u002F%m\u002F%d %H:%M`. Checking data structure (with redacted values) prevents this entire class of bugs.\n- **Don't gate every single Bash command.** Routine bash gates once per session. Destructive bash gates every time. This balance avoids slowdown while catching real risks.\n\n## Best Practices\n\n- Let the gate fire naturally. Don't try to pre-answer the gate questions — the investigation itself is what improves quality.\n- Customize gate messages for your domain. If your project has specific conventions, add them to the gate prompts.\n- Use `.gateguard.yml` to ignore paths like `.venv\u002F`, `node_modules\u002F`, `.git\u002F`.\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- `safety-guard` — Runtime safety checks (complementary, not overlapping)\n- `code-reviewer` — Post-edit review (GateGuard is pre-edit investigation)\n",{"name":5,"origin":26,"description":7},"master","8ec37df6d71fb664ea19d32c079e7d3ff931a8e0","skills\u002Fecc\u002Fgateguard",3,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED\u002Fappie-kit","https:\u002F\u002Fweblyfe.ai","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED","2026-08-27 01:54:02",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":45,"prompt":55,"zipAvailable":56},[46,49,52],{"tool":47,"command":48},"npx","npx skills add S3YED\u002Fappie-kit --skill gateguard",{"tool":50,"command":51},"bunx","bunx skills add S3YED\u002Fappie-kit --skill gateguard",{"tool":53,"command":54},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add S3YED\u002Fappie-kit --skill gateguard","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED\u002Fappie-kit\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fecc\u002Fgateguard\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[59,95,130,154,185,207],{"skillNo":60,"name":61,"nameZh":6,"description":62,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":63,"categories":64,"keywords":76,"publishedAt":31},"01M6JFD4M6N4DSGC7TXEJ5R3J2","ai-music","AI music generation and audio tools: HeartMuLa lyrics-to-music generation, songwriting craft (+ Suno prompts), and audio spectrogram\u002Ffeature visualization.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED\u002Fappie-kit\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fwethlete\u002Fai-music\u002FSKILL.md",[65,70,73],{"categoryNo":66,"categoryName":67,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000013","分析与可视化","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":71,"categoryName":72,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000016","图像与多媒体",{"categoryNo":74,"categoryName":75,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94],"music","ai music","humanizer","visualization","Tools","Audio","hermes","hermes agent","songwriting","suno","lyrics","prompts","heartmula","craft","generation","feature","ai music generation","music generation",{"skillNo":96,"name":97,"nameZh":6,"description":98,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":99,"categories":100,"keywords":109,"publishedAt":31},"01M6JFCZE4XNFQFMNZDHKHT5V5","agentic-webdesign-design-system-ingestion","Use v0 Design Systems 2.0, Bolt Design System Agents, or Lovable to generate production UI from a client's real design system components — not generic Tailwind. Use when building a client website where brand consistency matters.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED\u002Fappie-kit\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fweb-design\u002Fagentic-webdesign-design-system-ingestion\u002FSKILL.md",[101,104],{"categoryNo":102,"categoryName":103,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000015","视觉设计",{"categoryNo":105,"categoryName":106,"taxonomyType":107,"taxonomyTypeDesc":108},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000032","设计师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129],"design","agentic","design system","system","ingestion","webdesign","agentic webdesign design system ingestion","components","generate","design systems","website","ui","Tailwind","bolt","lovable","v0","design-system","wed","design system components","appie",{"skillNo":131,"name":132,"nameZh":6,"description":133,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":134,"categories":135,"keywords":138,"publishedAt":31},"01M6JFCVPX3913CFAS6QQJ33ZB","agentic-webdesign-agent-elements","Use 21st.dev Agent Elements — 25 shadcn\u002Fui components purpose-built for AI agent UIs. Tool cards (Bash, Edit, Search, Plan, Subagent, MCP), chat, input, streaming. Open source, shadcn-registry install, no runtime lock-in.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED\u002Fappie-kit\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fweb-design\u002Fagentic-webdesign-agent-elements\u002FSKILL.md",[136,137],{"categoryNo":74,"categoryName":75,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},{"categoryNo":105,"categoryName":106,"taxonomyType":107,"taxonomyTypeDesc":108},[111,139,115,140,141,142,117,143,144,145,146,147,20,148,149,23,150,151,152,153],"elements","agentic webdesign agent elements","MCP","ai agent","registry","search","streaming","open source","open","plan","subagent","install","input","lock","source",{"skillNo":155,"name":156,"nameZh":6,"description":157,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":158,"categories":159,"keywords":164,"publishedAt":31},"01M6JFCQC7H65M9QJ6TRE71BS1","vercel-deployment","Deploy static sites and frontends to Vercel — handles both CLI and REST API paths, including the CLI token sanitization workaround.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED\u002Fappie-kit\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fsoftware-development\u002Fvercel-deployment\u002FSKILL.md",[160,163],{"categoryNo":161,"categoryName":162,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000011","运维与部署",{"categoryNo":74,"categoryName":75,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},[165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184],"deployment","vercel deployment","vercel","macos","cli","linux","windows","deploy","vercel deploy","REST","api","site","deploy to vercel","token","rest api","host","sites","paths","sanitization","static site",{"skillNo":186,"name":187,"nameZh":6,"description":188,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":189,"categories":190,"keywords":192,"publishedAt":31},"01M6JFCM4SMTXBM5A01BK2YQG1","software-quality-workflows","Umbrella workflow for TDD, debugging, code simplification, spikes, pre-commit review, and debugger-assisted investigation.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED\u002Fappie-kit\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fsoftware-development\u002Fsoftware-quality-workflows\u002FSKILL.md",[191],{"categoryNo":74,"categoryName":75,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},[193,21,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,19,204,24,205,206],"workflows","software","software quality workflows","review","tdd","workflow","commit","debugging","code","debugger","pre-commit","code simplification","simplification","for",{"skillNo":208,"name":209,"nameZh":6,"description":210,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":211,"categories":212,"keywords":220,"publishedAt":31},"01M6JFCGD0M6CEATY01W7YN6DB","react-component-refactoring","Safely refactor large React components into smaller, maintainable pieces using proven patterns","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FS3YED\u002Fappie-kit\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fsoftware-development\u002Freact-component-refactoring\u002FSKILL.md",[213,216,219],{"categoryNo":214,"categoryName":215,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000007","代码审查",{"categoryNo":217,"categoryName":218,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",{"categoryNo":74,"categoryName":75,"taxonomyType":68,"taxonomyTypeDesc":69},[221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,168,229,230,117,231,171,232,201,233,234,235,236],"react","component","refactoring","component refactoring","react component","react component refactoring","frontend","writing","safe","typescript","react components","modular","refactor","simplify","patterns","test-driven-development"]