[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6GYYR9VNC06SATPJ4084W0P":3,"skill-same:01M6GYYR9VNC06SATPJ4084W0P":107},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":17,"publishedAt":38,"linkOnly":39,"markdownContent":40,"markdownBody":41,"frontMatter":42,"refName":51,"commitSha":52,"skillDirectory":53,"forksCount":54,"repositoryHtmlUrl":55,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":56,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":57,"install":58,"resources":71},"01M6GYYR9VNC06SATPJ4084W0P","performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation",null,"Investigate Active Directory compromise by analyzing authentication logs, replication metadata, Group Policy changes, and Kerberos ticket anomalies to identify attacker persistence and lateral movement paths.","micsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills","micsapp","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F82411001?v=4","01M6GWCFQ6D3PV8EHNY62NN5VW","01M6GWCFVE1PA5HG0DKC7AMFJ3",4,"Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation\u002FSKILL.md",[],[18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37],"active","performing active directory compromise investigation","investigation","directory","lateral-movement","lateral movement","replication","golden","paths","ticket","incident","golden-ticket","analyzing","dfir","active-directory","logs","authentication","identity","cybersecurity","policy","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation\ndescription: Investigate Active Directory compromise by analyzing authentication logs, replication metadata, Group Policy changes, and Kerberos ticket anomalies to identify attacker persistence and lateral movement paths.\ndomain: cybersecurity\nsubdomain: incident-response\ntags: [active-directory, compromise-investigation, identity-forensics, kerberos, lateral-movement, dfir, ntds-dit, golden-ticket]\nversion: \"1.0\"\nauthor: mahipal\nlicense: Apache-2.0\n---\n\n# Performing Active Directory Compromise Investigation\n\n## Overview\n\nActive Directory (AD) compromise investigation is a critical incident response capability that focuses on identifying how attackers gained access to domain services, what persistence mechanisms they established, and the scope of credential compromise. Since 88% of breaches involve compromised credentials (Verizon 2025 DBIR), AD is the primary target for enterprise-wide attacks. Investigators must analyze NTDS.dit database integrity, Kerberos ticket-granting activity, Group Policy modifications, replication metadata, and privileged group membership changes to reconstruct the attack chain and determine full compromise scope.\n\n\n## When to Use\n\n- When conducting security assessments that involve performing active directory compromise investigation\n- When following incident response procedures for related security events\n- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities\n- When validating security controls through hands-on testing\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n- Familiarity with incident response concepts and tools\n- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution\n- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed\n- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities\n\n## Key Investigation Areas\n\n### 1. NTDS.dit Database Analysis\n\nThe NTDS.dit file is the core Active Directory credential database containing all password hashes for domain accounts. Attackers commonly exfiltrate this file using tools like ntdsutil, secretsdump.py, or DCSync attacks via Mimikatz.\n\n**Detection indicators:**\n- Event ID 4662: Access to directory service objects with replication permissions\n- Event ID 4742: Computer account modifications on domain controllers\n- Volume Shadow Copy creation on domain controllers (Event ID 8222)\n- Unusual ntdsutil.exe or vssadmin.exe execution\n- Replication traffic from non-DC sources (DCSync detection)\n\n### 2. Kerberos Attack Detection\n\n**Golden Ticket indicators:**\n- TGT tickets with abnormally long lifetimes (default is 10 hours)\n- Event ID 4769 with encryption type 0x17 (RC4) instead of AES\n- TGT issued without corresponding Event ID 4768 (AS-REQ)\n- Kerberos tickets referencing non-existent or disabled accounts\n\n**Silver Ticket indicators:**\n- Service tickets without corresponding TGT requests\n- Event ID 4769 with unusual service names\n- Tickets with forged PAC data\n\n**Kerberoasting indicators:**\n- High volume of Event ID 4769 for service accounts\n- RC4 encryption requests for accounts that support AES\n- Requests from workstations not normally accessing those services\n\n### 3. Group Policy Abuse\n\n- GPO modifications granting new privileges (Event ID 5136)\n- Scheduled task deployment via GPO\n- Software installation policies added to domain\n- Login script modifications\n- Registry-based policy changes for persistence\n\n### 4. Privileged Group Enumeration\n\nTrack modifications to these critical groups:\n- Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins\n- Account Operators, Backup Operators\n- DnsAdmins (can execute arbitrary DLLs on DCs)\n- Group Policy Creator Owners\n- Protected Users group membership changes\n\n### 5. Trust Relationship Analysis\n\n- New forest\u002Fdomain trusts created (Event ID 4706)\n- SID History injection for privilege escalation\n- Trust ticket forgery indicators\n- Cross-domain authentication anomalies\n\n## Investigation Methodology\n\n### Phase 1: Scoping and Evidence Collection\n```\n1. Identify potentially compromised domain controllers\n2. Collect Security, System, Directory Service event logs\n3. Extract AD replication metadata using repadmin\n4. Capture ntdsutil snapshots for offline analysis\n5. Collect DNS server logs and zone transfer records\n6. Export Group Policy Object configurations\n7. Document current privileged group memberships\n```\n\n### Phase 2: Authentication Log Analysis\n```\n1. Parse Event ID 4624\u002F4625 for logon patterns\n2. Identify pass-the-hash indicators (Event ID 4624 Type 3 with NTLM)\n3. Analyze Event ID 4768\u002F4769\u002F4771 for Kerberos anomalies\n4. Review Event ID 4776 for NTLM authentication failures\n5. Cross-reference logon events with known compromised accounts\n6. Map lateral movement paths through authentication chains\n```\n\n### Phase 3: Persistence and Backdoor Detection\n```\n1. Enumerate AdminSDHolder ACL modifications\n2. Check for SID History abuse on accounts\n3. Verify krbtgt account password age\n4. Audit DSRM password configuration\n5. Check for skeleton key malware indicators\n6. Review AD Certificate Services for rogue certificates\n7. Validate DNS records for poisoning\n```\n\n### Phase 4: Remediation Planning\n```\n1. Double-rotate krbtgt password (wait replication between rotations)\n2. Reset all compromised account passwords\n3. Remove unauthorized privileged group members\n4. Revoke rogue certificates if AD CS compromised\n5. Rebuild domain controllers from clean media if needed\n6. Implement tiered administration model\n7. Enable Protected Users group for privileged accounts\n```\n\n## Critical Event IDs for AD Investigation\n\n| Event ID | Source | Description |\n|----------|--------|-------------|\n| 4624 | Security | Successful logon |\n| 4625 | Security | Failed logon |\n| 4648 | Security | Explicit credential logon |\n| 4662 | Security | Operation on AD object |\n| 4768 | Security | Kerberos TGT requested |\n| 4769 | Security | Kerberos service ticket requested |\n| 4771 | Security | Kerberos pre-authentication failed |\n| 4776 | Security | NTLM credential validation |\n| 5136 | Security | Directory object modified |\n| 5137 | Security | Directory object created |\n| 4706 | Security | Trust created |\n| 4707 | Security | Trust removed |\n| 4742 | Security | Computer account changed |\n| 8222 | System | Shadow copy created |\n\n## Tools for AD Investigation\n\n| Tool | Purpose |\n|------|---------|\n| **BloodHound** | Attack path mapping and privilege escalation analysis |\n| **Pingcastle** | AD security assessment and risk scoring |\n| **Purple Knight** | AD vulnerability scanning by Semperis |\n| **ADRecon** | Active Directory data gathering |\n| **Mimikatz** | Credential extraction and Kerberos analysis |\n| **Impacket** | DCSync detection and NTLM relay analysis |\n| **Velociraptor** | Remote forensic artifact collection |\n| **Timeline Explorer** | Event log timeline analysis |\n\n## MITRE ATT&CK Mapping\n\n| Technique | ID | Relevance |\n|-----------|----|-----------|\n| DCSync | T1003.006 | NTDS.dit credential extraction |\n| Golden Ticket | T1558.001 | Kerberos TGT forgery |\n| Silver Ticket | T1558.002 | Service ticket forgery |\n| Kerberoasting | T1558.003 | Service account hash extraction |\n| Pass-the-Hash | T1550.002 | NTLM hash reuse |\n| Group Policy Modification | T1484.001 | Persistence via GPO |\n| Account Manipulation | T1098 | Privileged group changes |\n| SID-History Injection | T1134.005 | Privilege escalation |\n\n## References\n\n- [CISA: Detecting and Mitigating Active Directory Compromises](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cisa.gov\u002Fresources-tools\u002Fresources\u002Fdetecting-and-mitigating-active-directory-compromises)\n- [Microsoft: Total Identity Compromise IR Lessons](https:\u002F\u002Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com\u002Fblog\u002Fmicrosoftsecurityexperts\u002Ftotal-identity-compromise-microsoft-incident-response-lessons-on-securing-active\u002F3753391)\n- [Semperis: Top 10 Active Directory Risks](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.semperis.com\u002Fblog\u002F10-ad-risks-caught-by-identity-forensics-and-incident-response\u002F)\n- [Fidelis: Active Directory Compromise Response](https:\u002F\u002Ffidelissecurity.com\u002Fthreatgeek\u002Factive-directory-security\u002Frespond-after-an-active-directory-compromise\u002F)\n","# Performing Active Directory Compromise Investigation\n\n## Overview\n\nActive Directory (AD) compromise investigation is a critical incident response capability that focuses on identifying how attackers gained access to domain services, what persistence mechanisms they established, and the scope of credential compromise. Since 88% of breaches involve compromised credentials (Verizon 2025 DBIR), AD is the primary target for enterprise-wide attacks. Investigators must analyze NTDS.dit database integrity, Kerberos ticket-granting activity, Group Policy modifications, replication metadata, and privileged group membership changes to reconstruct the attack chain and determine full compromise scope.\n\n\n## When to Use\n\n- When conducting security assessments that involve performing active directory compromise investigation\n- When following incident response procedures for related security events\n- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities\n- When validating security controls through hands-on testing\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n- Familiarity with incident response concepts and tools\n- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution\n- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed\n- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities\n\n## Key Investigation Areas\n\n### 1. NTDS.dit Database Analysis\n\nThe NTDS.dit file is the core Active Directory credential database containing all password hashes for domain accounts. Attackers commonly exfiltrate this file using tools like ntdsutil, secretsdump.py, or DCSync attacks via Mimikatz.\n\n**Detection indicators:**\n- Event ID 4662: Access to directory service objects with replication permissions\n- Event ID 4742: Computer account modifications on domain controllers\n- Volume Shadow Copy creation on domain controllers (Event ID 8222)\n- Unusual ntdsutil.exe or vssadmin.exe execution\n- Replication traffic from non-DC sources (DCSync detection)\n\n### 2. Kerberos Attack Detection\n\n**Golden Ticket indicators:**\n- TGT tickets with abnormally long lifetimes (default is 10 hours)\n- Event ID 4769 with encryption type 0x17 (RC4) instead of AES\n- TGT issued without corresponding Event ID 4768 (AS-REQ)\n- Kerberos tickets referencing non-existent or disabled accounts\n\n**Silver Ticket indicators:**\n- Service tickets without corresponding TGT requests\n- Event ID 4769 with unusual service names\n- Tickets with forged PAC data\n\n**Kerberoasting indicators:**\n- High volume of Event ID 4769 for service accounts\n- RC4 encryption requests for accounts that support AES\n- Requests from workstations not normally accessing those services\n\n### 3. Group Policy Abuse\n\n- GPO modifications granting new privileges (Event ID 5136)\n- Scheduled task deployment via GPO\n- Software installation policies added to domain\n- Login script modifications\n- Registry-based policy changes for persistence\n\n### 4. Privileged Group Enumeration\n\nTrack modifications to these critical groups:\n- Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins\n- Account Operators, Backup Operators\n- DnsAdmins (can execute arbitrary DLLs on DCs)\n- Group Policy Creator Owners\n- Protected Users group membership changes\n\n### 5. Trust Relationship Analysis\n\n- New forest\u002Fdomain trusts created (Event ID 4706)\n- SID History injection for privilege escalation\n- Trust ticket forgery indicators\n- Cross-domain authentication anomalies\n\n## Investigation Methodology\n\n### Phase 1: Scoping and Evidence Collection\n```\n1. Identify potentially compromised domain controllers\n2. Collect Security, System, Directory Service event logs\n3. Extract AD replication metadata using repadmin\n4. Capture ntdsutil snapshots for offline analysis\n5. Collect DNS server logs and zone transfer records\n6. Export Group Policy Object configurations\n7. Document current privileged group memberships\n```\n\n### Phase 2: Authentication Log Analysis\n```\n1. Parse Event ID 4624\u002F4625 for logon patterns\n2. Identify pass-the-hash indicators (Event ID 4624 Type 3 with NTLM)\n3. Analyze Event ID 4768\u002F4769\u002F4771 for Kerberos anomalies\n4. Review Event ID 4776 for NTLM authentication failures\n5. Cross-reference logon events with known compromised accounts\n6. Map lateral movement paths through authentication chains\n```\n\n### Phase 3: Persistence and Backdoor Detection\n```\n1. Enumerate AdminSDHolder ACL modifications\n2. Check for SID History abuse on accounts\n3. Verify krbtgt account password age\n4. Audit DSRM password configuration\n5. Check for skeleton key malware indicators\n6. Review AD Certificate Services for rogue certificates\n7. Validate DNS records for poisoning\n```\n\n### Phase 4: Remediation Planning\n```\n1. Double-rotate krbtgt password (wait replication between rotations)\n2. Reset all compromised account passwords\n3. Remove unauthorized privileged group members\n4. Revoke rogue certificates if AD CS compromised\n5. Rebuild domain controllers from clean media if needed\n6. Implement tiered administration model\n7. Enable Protected Users group for privileged accounts\n```\n\n## Critical Event IDs for AD Investigation\n\n| Event ID | Source | Description |\n|----------|--------|-------------|\n| 4624 | Security | Successful logon |\n| 4625 | Security | Failed logon |\n| 4648 | Security | Explicit credential logon |\n| 4662 | Security | Operation on AD object |\n| 4768 | Security | Kerberos TGT requested |\n| 4769 | Security | Kerberos service ticket requested |\n| 4771 | Security | Kerberos pre-authentication failed |\n| 4776 | Security | NTLM credential validation |\n| 5136 | Security | Directory object modified |\n| 5137 | Security | Directory object created |\n| 4706 | Security | Trust created |\n| 4707 | Security | Trust removed |\n| 4742 | Security | Computer account changed |\n| 8222 | System | Shadow copy created |\n\n## Tools for AD Investigation\n\n| Tool | Purpose |\n|------|---------|\n| **BloodHound** | Attack path mapping and privilege escalation analysis |\n| **Pingcastle** | AD security assessment and risk scoring |\n| **Purple Knight** | AD vulnerability scanning by Semperis |\n| **ADRecon** | Active Directory data gathering |\n| **Mimikatz** | Credential extraction and Kerberos analysis |\n| **Impacket** | DCSync detection and NTLM relay analysis |\n| **Velociraptor** | Remote forensic artifact collection |\n| **Timeline Explorer** | Event log timeline analysis |\n\n## MITRE ATT&CK Mapping\n\n| Technique | ID | Relevance |\n|-----------|----|-----------|\n| DCSync | T1003.006 | NTDS.dit credential extraction |\n| Golden Ticket | T1558.001 | Kerberos TGT forgery |\n| Silver Ticket | T1558.002 | Service ticket forgery |\n| Kerberoasting | T1558.003 | Service account hash extraction |\n| Pass-the-Hash | T1550.002 | NTLM hash reuse |\n| Group Policy Modification | T1484.001 | Persistence via GPO |\n| Account Manipulation | T1098 | Privileged group changes |\n| SID-History Injection | T1134.005 | Privilege escalation |\n\n## References\n\n- [CISA: Detecting and Mitigating Active Directory Compromises](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cisa.gov\u002Fresources-tools\u002Fresources\u002Fdetecting-and-mitigating-active-directory-compromises)\n- [Microsoft: Total Identity Compromise IR Lessons](https:\u002F\u002Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com\u002Fblog\u002Fmicrosoftsecurityexperts\u002Ftotal-identity-compromise-microsoft-incident-response-lessons-on-securing-active\u002F3753391)\n- [Semperis: Top 10 Active Directory Risks](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.semperis.com\u002Fblog\u002F10-ad-risks-caught-by-identity-forensics-and-incident-response\u002F)\n- [Fidelis: Active Directory Compromise Response](https:\u002F\u002Ffidelissecurity.com\u002Fthreatgeek\u002Factive-directory-security\u002Frespond-after-an-active-directory-compromise\u002F)\n",{"name":5,"tags":43,"author":48,"domain":36,"license":14,"version":49,"subdomain":50,"description":7},[32,44,45,46,22,31,47,29],"compromise-investigation","identity-forensics","kerberos","ntds-dit","mahipal","1.0","incident-response","master","3f5d983eb4ef375b749adcd6b07ec03bd82ae8a8","_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp","2026-03-20 11:24:18",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":59,"prompt":69,"zipAvailable":70},[60,63,66],{"tool":61,"command":62},"npx","npx skills add micsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills --skill performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation",{"tool":64,"command":65},"bunx","bunx skills add micsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills --skill performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation",{"tool":67,"command":68},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add micsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills --skill performing-active-directory-compromise-investigation","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation\u002FSKILL.md",true,[72,78,83,89,93,97,103],{"path":73,"resourceType":74,"resourceTypeDesc":75,"sizeBytes":76,"sourceHtmlUrl":77},"assets\u002Ftemplate.md","ASSET","资产文件",3816,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation\u002Fassets\u002Ftemplate.md",{"path":79,"resourceType":79,"resourceTypeDesc":80,"sizeBytes":81,"sourceHtmlUrl":82},"LICENSE","许可证",11255,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation\u002FLICENSE",{"path":84,"resourceType":85,"resourceTypeDesc":86,"sizeBytes":87,"sourceHtmlUrl":88},"references\u002Fapi-reference.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",2646,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation\u002Freferences\u002Fapi-reference.md",{"path":90,"resourceType":85,"resourceTypeDesc":86,"sizeBytes":91,"sourceHtmlUrl":92},"references\u002Fstandards.md",2659,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation\u002Freferences\u002Fstandards.md",{"path":94,"resourceType":85,"resourceTypeDesc":86,"sizeBytes":95,"sourceHtmlUrl":96},"references\u002Fworkflows.md",4096,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation\u002Freferences\u002Fworkflows.md",{"path":98,"resourceType":99,"resourceTypeDesc":100,"sizeBytes":101,"sourceHtmlUrl":102},"scripts\u002Fagent.py","SCRIPT","脚本",9075,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation\u002Fscripts\u002Fagent.py",{"path":104,"resourceType":99,"resourceTypeDesc":100,"sizeBytes":105,"sourceHtmlUrl":106},"scripts\u002Fprocess.py",22805,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_universal\u002Fcybersecurity-skills\u002Fskills\u002Fperforming-active-directory-compromise-investigation\u002Fscripts\u002Fprocess.py",[108,145,175,195,215,240],{"skillNo":109,"name":110,"nameZh":6,"description":111,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":112,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":113,"categories":114,"keywords":125,"publishedAt":38},"01M6HBTJ02FXBFG9NYEHHYAP52","azure-apim-architecture","Analyzes and explains Azure API Management architecture decisions for enterprise API marketplace implementations using VNet Internal mode, Front Door, hybrid authentication, and multi-environment strategies. Use when discussing APIM component selection, network topology, cost optimization, or comparing alternatives like workspaces vs instances, VNet Internal vs External mode, or Front Door vs Application Gateway.","MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fcopilot-cli\u002Fcopilot-agent-skills\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fazure-apim-architecture\u002FSKILL.md",[115,120],{"categoryNo":116,"categoryName":117,"taxonomyType":118,"taxonomyTypeDesc":119},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":121,"categoryName":122,"taxonomyType":123,"taxonomyTypeDesc":124},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[126,127,128,129,34,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144],"architecture","azure","azure apim architecture","component","gateway","topology","Optimization","network","api","team","environment","multi-environment","workspaces","instances","selection","strategies","azure api management","mode","for",{"skillNo":146,"name":147,"nameZh":6,"description":148,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":112,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":149,"categories":150,"keywords":159,"publishedAt":38},"01M6HBT7J4H082JEEA670B3EQ9","apiops-deployment","Guides deployment of Azure API Management infrastructure using Infrastructure as Code (Bicep\u002FTerraform), CI\u002FCD pipelines (GitHub Actions\u002FAzure DevOps), and APIOps workflows. Use when deploying APIM, creating pipelines, or implementing dev→test→prod promotion strategies.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fcopilot-cli\u002Fcopilot-agent-skills\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fapiops-deployment\u002FSKILL.md",[151,152,155,158],{"categoryNo":116,"categoryName":117,"taxonomyType":118,"taxonomyTypeDesc":119},{"categoryNo":153,"categoryName":154,"taxonomyType":118,"taxonomyTypeDesc":119},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000011","运维与部署",{"categoryNo":156,"categoryName":157,"taxonomyType":118,"taxonomyTypeDesc":119},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",{"categoryNo":121,"categoryName":122,"taxonomyType":123,"taxonomyTypeDesc":124},[160,161,162,163,127,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,134,135,141,171,172,142,173,174],"deployment","apiops deployment","workflows","azure devops","infrastructure","code","infrastructure as code","actions","ci","github actions","github-actions","as","guides","CI\u002FCD","implementing",{"skillNo":176,"name":177,"nameZh":6,"description":178,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":112,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":179,"categories":180,"keywords":182,"publishedAt":38},"01M6HBT2HEA23THNE9E00GYQBE","apim-policy-authoring","Creates production-ready Azure API Management policy XML for authentication (OAuth 2.0, JWT validation, subscription keys), rate limiting, CORS configuration, error handling, and API transformations. Use when implementing API security, access control, or request\u002Fresponse processing logic.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fcopilot-cli\u002Fcopilot-agent-skills\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fapim-policy-authoring\u002FSKILL.md",[181],{"categoryNo":116,"categoryName":117,"taxonomyType":118,"taxonomyTypeDesc":119},[37,183,184,185,127,34,134,135,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,142,193,194,174,144],"authoring","apim policy authoring","security","access","use","ready","api security","Access Control","error","processing","cors configuration","production-ready",{"skillNo":196,"name":197,"nameZh":6,"description":198,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":112,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":199,"categories":200,"keywords":203,"publishedAt":38},"01M6HBSY65SB29J9WE9KYD0K6T","api-security-review","Reviews Azure API Management configurations for security vulnerabilities, OWASP API Security Top 10 compliance, VNet Internal mode validation, Private Link verification, and Azure Security Benchmark alignment. Use when performing security audits, pre-deployment validation, or compliance reviews.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fcopilot-cli\u002Fcopilot-agent-skills\u002F.github\u002Fskills\u002Fapi-security-review\u002FSKILL.md",[201,202],{"categoryNo":116,"categoryName":117,"taxonomyType":118,"taxonomyTypeDesc":119},{"categoryNo":121,"categoryName":122,"taxonomyType":123,"taxonomyTypeDesc":124},[204,185,205,134,189,206,127,160,207,208,209,210,135,211,142,212,213,214,143,144],"review","security review","api security review","benchmark","verification","owasp","owasp-api","alignment","azure security","reviews","top",{"skillNo":216,"name":217,"nameZh":6,"description":218,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":112,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":219,"categories":220,"keywords":221,"publishedAt":38},"01M6HBSRW4PDFE6K4F8JYPZQ05","jira-cli","Interact with Jira from the command line to create, list, view, edit, and transition issues, manage sprints and epics, and perform common Jira workflows. Use when the user asks about Jira tasks, tickets, issues, sprints, or needs to manage project work items.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fcopilot-cli\u002Fawesome-copilot-agents\u002Fskills\u002Fjira-cli\u002FSKILL.md",[],[222,223,224,162,225,226,227,228,134,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239],"cli","jira","jira cli","init","tasks","create","issues","common","work","command","edit","list","view","project","project work","token","line","sprints",{"skillNo":241,"name":242,"nameZh":6,"description":243,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":112,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":244,"categories":245,"keywords":246,"publishedAt":38},"01M6HBSNS3JHMW603G47TWE31H","calculator","Performs arbitrary-precision arithmetic calculations including addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and exponents. Use when the user asks to calculate, compute, or evaluate math expressions, or when precise decimal arithmetic is needed to avoid floating-point errors.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicsapp\u002Fmicstec-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fcopilot-cli\u002Fawesome-copilot-agents\u002Fskills\u002Fcalculator\u002FSKILL.md",[],[242,247,248,249,250,251,252,187,253,254],"npm","js","calculate","node","math","user","compute","errors"]