[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6FXDS33QZC68M7JX5GVT6S7":3,"skill-same:01M6FXDS33QZC68M7JX5GVT6S7":70},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":29,"linkOnly":30,"markdownContent":31,"markdownBody":32,"frontMatter":33,"refName":34,"commitSha":35,"skillDirectory":36,"forksCount":14,"repositoryHtmlUrl":37,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":38,"ownerBlogUrl":39,"ownerDescription":40,"updatedAt":41,"install":42,"resources":55},"01M6FXDS33QZC68M7JX5GVT6S7","subagent-driven-development",null,"Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session","reikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills","reikiplanet","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F96377599?v=4","01M6CVWCMD740YHQDK7E9QYBW4","Reiki Planet","01M6CVWCS4KXVA2CWFVJ43EAXK",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fother\u002Fsuperpowers-subagent-driven-development\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28],"development","subagent driven development","subagent","driven","tasks","session","use","implementation","plans","with","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: subagent-driven-development\ndescription: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session\n---\n\n# Subagent-Driven Development\n\nExecute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\n**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n\n## When to Use\n\n```dot\ndigraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n```\n\n**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n- Same session (no context switch)\n- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n\n## The Process\n\n```dot\ndigraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}\n```\n\n## Prompt Templates\n\n- `.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n- `.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n- `.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n\n## Example Workflow\n\n```\nYou: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs\u002Fplans\u002Ffeature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~\u002F.config\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fhooks\u002F)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5\u002F5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify\u002Frepair modes\n  - 8\u002F8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!\n```\n\n## Advantages\n\n**vs. Manual execution:**\n- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\n**vs. Executing Plans:**\n- Same session (no handoff)\n- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n- Review checkpoints automatic\n\n**Efficiency gains:**\n- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\n**Quality gates:**\n- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n- Spec compliance prevents over\u002Funder-building\n- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\n**Cost:**\n- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n- Review loops add iterations\n- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Start implementation on main\u002Fmaster branch without explicit user consent\n- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n- Proceed with unfixed issues\n- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)\n- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n\n**If subagent asks questions:**\n- Answer clearly and completely\n- Provide additional context if needed\n- Don't rush them into implementation\n\n**If reviewer finds issues:**\n- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n- Reviewer reviews again\n- Repeat until approved\n- Don't skip the re-review\n\n**If subagent fails task:**\n- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n\n## Integration\n\n**Required workflow skills:**\n- **superpowers:using-git-worktrees** - REQUIRED: Set up isolated workspace before starting\n- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes\n- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents\n- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks\n\n**Subagents should use:**\n- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\n**Alternative workflow:**\n- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution\n","# Subagent-Driven Development\n\nExecute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n\n**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n\n## When to Use\n\n```dot\ndigraph when_to_use {\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n}\n```\n\n**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n- Same session (no context switch)\n- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n\n## The Process\n\n```dot\ndigraph process {\n    rankdir=TB;\n\n    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n        label=\"Per Task\";\n        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    }\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n\n    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"re-review\"];\n    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n}\n```\n\n## Prompt Templates\n\n- `.\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n- `.\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n- `.\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n\n## Example Workflow\n\n```\nYou: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.\n\n[Read plan file once: docs\u002Fplans\u002Ffeature-plan.md]\n[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]\n[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]\n\nTask 1: Hook installation script\n\n[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: \"Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?\"\n\nYou: \"User level (~\u002F.config\u002Fsuperpowers\u002Fhooks\u002F)\"\n\nImplementer: \"Got it. Implementing now...\"\n[Later] Implementer:\n  - Implemented install-hook command\n  - Added tests, 5\u002F5 passing\n  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra\n\n[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.\n\n[Mark Task 1 complete]\n\nTask 2: Recovery modes\n\n[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]\n[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]\n\nImplementer: [No questions, proceeds]\nImplementer:\n  - Added verify\u002Frepair modes\n  - 8\u002F8 tests passing\n  - Self-review: All good\n  - Committed\n\n[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]\nSpec reviewer: ❌ Issues:\n  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says \"report every 100 items\")\n  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)\n\n[Implementer fixes issues]\nImplementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting\n\n[Spec reviewer reviews again]\nSpec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now\n\n[Dispatch code quality reviewer]\nCode reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)\n\n[Implementer fixes]\nImplementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant\n\n[Code reviewer reviews again]\nCode reviewer: ✅ Approved\n\n[Mark Task 2 complete]\n\n...\n\n[After all tasks]\n[Dispatch final code-reviewer]\nFinal reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge\n\nDone!\n```\n\n## Advantages\n\n**vs. Manual execution:**\n- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n\n**vs. Executing Plans:**\n- Same session (no handoff)\n- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n- Review checkpoints automatic\n\n**Efficiency gains:**\n- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n\n**Quality gates:**\n- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n- Spec compliance prevents over\u002Funder-building\n- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n\n**Cost:**\n- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n- Review loops add iterations\n- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Start implementation on main\u002Fmaster branch without explicit user consent\n- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n- Proceed with unfixed issues\n- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is ✅** (wrong order)\n- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n\n**If subagent asks questions:**\n- Answer clearly and completely\n- Provide additional context if needed\n- Don't rush them into implementation\n\n**If reviewer finds issues:**\n- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n- Reviewer reviews again\n- Repeat until approved\n- Don't skip the re-review\n\n**If subagent fails task:**\n- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n\n## Integration\n\n**Required workflow skills:**\n- **superpowers:using-git-worktrees** - REQUIRED: Set up isolated workspace before starting\n- **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes\n- **superpowers:requesting-code-review** - Code review template for reviewer subagents\n- **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks\n\n**Subagents should use:**\n- **superpowers:test-driven-development** - Subagents follow TDD for each task\n\n**Alternative workflow:**\n- **superpowers:executing-plans** - Use for parallel session instead of same-session execution\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"master","dff58085da947e81e8418c922055644bf0082b1b","other\u002Fsuperpowers-subagent-driven-development","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.reiki-planet.com","Reiki Planet Game","2026-03-29 06:02:29",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":43,"prompt":53,"zipAvailable":54},[44,47,50],{"tool":45,"command":46},"npx","npx skills add reikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills --skill subagent-driven-development",{"tool":48,"command":49},"bunx","bunx skills add reikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills --skill subagent-driven-development",{"tool":51,"command":52},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add reikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills --skill subagent-driven-development","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fother\u002Fsuperpowers-subagent-driven-development\u002FSKILL.md",true,[56,62,66],{"path":57,"resourceType":58,"resourceTypeDesc":59,"sizeBytes":60,"sourceHtmlUrl":61},"code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",630,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fother\u002Fsuperpowers-subagent-driven-development\u002Fcode-quality-reviewer-prompt.md",{"path":63,"resourceType":58,"resourceTypeDesc":59,"sizeBytes":64,"sourceHtmlUrl":65},"implementer-prompt.md",2195,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fother\u002Fsuperpowers-subagent-driven-development\u002Fimplementer-prompt.md",{"path":67,"resourceType":58,"resourceTypeDesc":59,"sizeBytes":68,"sourceHtmlUrl":69},"spec-reviewer-prompt.md",1999,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fother\u002Fsuperpowers-subagent-driven-development\u002Fspec-reviewer-prompt.md",[71,97,109,123,142,165],{"skillNo":72,"name":73,"nameZh":6,"description":74,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":75,"categories":76,"keywords":77,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G614JTEQJHPT8AKK3YQ18S","web-games","Web browser game development principles. Framework selection, WebGPU, optimization, PWA.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fweb-games\u002FSKILL.md",[],[78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,19,96],"games","web games","web","grep","principles","selection","community","framework selection","edit","write","read","pwa","game","web browser","game development","Optimization","framework","browser","webgpu",{"skillNo":98,"name":99,"nameZh":6,"description":100,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":101,"categories":102,"keywords":103,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G611H2YGV0GZFP90D38ZMJ","vr-ar","VR\u002FAR development principles. Comfort, interaction, performance requirements.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fvr-ar\u002FSKILL.md",[],[104,105,19,106,107,84,86,87,88,81,108,82],"ar","vr ar","interaction","requirements","performance",{"skillNo":110,"name":111,"nameZh":6,"description":112,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":113,"categories":114,"keywords":115,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G60XNMHAMV1SV0EJ1CX0AY","templates","Project scaffolding templates for new applications. Use when creating new projects from scratch. Contains 12 templates for various tech stacks.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftemplates\u002FSKILL.md",[],[111,116,117,118,119,120,84,25,88,121,122,81],"project scaffolding","From Scratch","tech","project","scaffolding","projects","applications",{"skillNo":124,"name":125,"nameZh":6,"description":126,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":127,"categories":128,"keywords":129,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G60T0GATMK3Q5H8GDC1Z8S","wcag-audit-patterns","Conduct WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits with automated testing, manual verification, and remediation guidance. Use when auditing websites for accessibility, fixing WCAG violations, or implementing ac...","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwcag-audit-patterns\u002FSKILL.md",[],[130,131,132,133,134,84,135,28,136,137,25,138,139,140,141],"wcag audit patterns","wcag audit","patterns","WCAG","audit","manual","automated testing","guidance","remediation","verification","accessibility","testing",{"skillNo":143,"name":144,"nameZh":6,"description":145,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":146,"categories":147,"keywords":148,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G60PMCHW1FRZ63F931QK3R","vulnerability-scanner","Advanced vulnerability analysis principles. OWASP 2025, Supply Chain Security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fvulnerability-scanner\u002FSKILL.md",[],[149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,84,88,81,157,82,158,159,160,161,162,163,164],"scanner","vulnerability scanner","vulnerability","prioritization","2025","mapping","chain","supply chain","Bash","analysis","risk","owasp","supply chain security","security","supply","advanced",{"skillNo":166,"name":167,"nameZh":6,"description":168,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":169,"categories":170,"keywords":171,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G60JZBB8DK0W3DSG1WNMZK","threat-modeling-expert","Expert in threat modeling methodologies, security architecture review, and risk assessment. Masters STRIDE, PASTA, attack trees, and security requirement extraction. Use for security architecture r...","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fthreat-modeling-expert\u002FSKILL.md",[],[172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,162,25,180,181,182,84,183,184,185,159,186,187],"modeling","threat modeling expert","threat modeling","expert","threat","risk assessment","architecture review","architecture","security architecture review","trees","security architecture","security requirement extraction","assessment","extraction","review","stride"]