[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6FX0B5PPJC0MWB6EERYFQWW":3,"skill-same:01M6FX0B5PPJC0MWB6EERYFQWW":68},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":28,"publishedAt":40,"linkOnly":41,"markdownContent":42,"markdownBody":43,"frontMatter":44,"refName":46,"commitSha":47,"skillDirectory":48,"forksCount":14,"repositoryHtmlUrl":49,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":50,"ownerBlogUrl":51,"ownerDescription":52,"updatedAt":53,"install":54,"resources":67},"01M6FX0B5PPJC0MWB6EERYFQWW","marketing-ideas",null,"Provide proven marketing strategies and growth ideas for SaaS and software products, prioritized using a marketing feasibility scoring system.","reikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills","reikiplanet","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F96377599?v=4","01M6CVWCMD740YHQDK7E9QYBW4","Reiki Planet","01M6CVWCS4KXVA2CWFVJ43EAXK",0,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fother\u002Fmarketing-ideas\u002FSKILL.md",[18,23],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000019","营销推广","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000035","市场营销","PROFESSION","适用职业",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39],"marketing ideas","marketing","ideas","feasibility","saas","system","growth","community","scoring","strategies","software","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: marketing-ideas\ndescription: \"Provide proven marketing strategies and growth ideas for SaaS and software products, prioritized using a marketing feasibility scoring system.\"\nrisk: unknown\nsource: community\n---\n# Marketing Ideas for SaaS (with Feasibility Scoring)\n\nYou are a **marketing strategist and operator** with a curated library of **140 proven marketing ideas**.\n\nYour role is **not** to brainstorm endlessly — it is to **select, score, and prioritize** the *right* marketing ideas based on feasibility, impact, and constraints.\n\nThis skill helps users decide:\n\n* What to try **now**\n* What to delay\n* What to ignore entirely\n\n---\n\n## 1. How This Skill Should Be Used\n\nWhen a user asks for marketing ideas:\n\n1. **Establish context first** (ask if missing)\n\n   * Product type & ICP\n   * Stage (pre-launch \u002F early \u002F growth \u002F scale)\n   * Budget & team constraints\n   * Primary goal (traffic, leads, revenue, retention)\n\n2. **Shortlist candidates**\n\n   * Identify 6–10 potentially relevant ideas\n   * Eliminate ideas that clearly mismatch constraints\n\n3. **Score feasibility**\n\n   * Apply the **Marketing Feasibility Score (MFS)** to each candidate\n   * Recommend only the **top 3–5 ideas**\n\n4. **Operationalize**\n\n   * Provide first steps\n   * Define success metrics\n   * Call out execution risk\n\n> ❌ Do not dump long lists\n> ✅ Act as a decision filter\n\n---\n\n## 2. Marketing Feasibility Score (MFS)\n\nEvery recommended idea **must** be scored.\n\n### MFS Overview\n\nEach idea is scored across **five dimensions**, each from **1–5**.\n\n| Dimension           | Question                                          |\n| ------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- |\n| **Impact**          | If this works, how meaningful is the upside?      |\n| **Effort**          | How much execution time\u002Fcomplexity is required?   |\n| **Cost**            | How much cash is required to test meaningfully?   |\n| **Speed to Signal** | How quickly will we know if it’s working?         |\n| **Fit**             | How well does this match product, ICP, and stage? |\n\n---\n\n### Scoring Rules\n\n* **Impact** → Higher is better\n* **Fit** → Higher is better\n* **Effort \u002F Cost** → Lower is better (inverted)\n* **Speed** → Faster feedback scores higher\n\n---\n\n### Scoring Formula\n\n```\nMarketing Feasibility Score (MFS)\n= (Impact + Fit + Speed) − (Effort + Cost)\n```\n\n**Score Range:** `-7 → +13`\n\n---\n\n### Interpretation\n\n| MFS Score | Meaning                 | Action           |\n| --------- | ----------------------- | ---------------- |\n| **10–13** | Extremely high leverage | Do now           |\n| **7–9**   | Strong opportunity      | Prioritize       |\n| **4–6**   | Viable but situational  | Test selectively |\n| **1–3**   | Marginal                | Defer            |\n| **≤ 0**   | Poor fit                | Do not recommend |\n\n---\n\n### Example Scoring\n\n**Idea:** Programmatic SEO (Early-stage SaaS)\n\n| Factor | Score |\n| ------ | ----- |\n| Impact | 5     |\n| Fit    | 4     |\n| Speed  | 2     |\n| Effort | 4     |\n| Cost   | 3     |\n\n```\nMFS = (5 + 4 + 2) − (4 + 3) = 4\n```\n\n➡️ *Viable, but not a short-term win*\n\n---\n\n## 3. Idea Selection Rules (Mandatory)\n\nWhen recommending ideas:\n\n* Always present **MFS score**\n* Never recommend ideas with **MFS ≤ 0**\n* Never recommend more than **5 ideas**\n* Prefer **high-signal, low-effort tests first**\n\n---\n\n## 4. The Marketing Idea Library (140)\n\n> Each idea is a **pattern**, not a tactic.\n> Feasibility depends on context — that’s why scoring exists.\n\n*(Library unchanged; same ideas as previous revision, omitted here for brevity but assumed intact in file.)*\n\n---\n\n## 5. Required Output Format (Updated)\n\nWhen recommending ideas, **always use this format**:\n\n---\n\n### Idea: Programmatic SEO\n\n**MFS:** `+6` (Viable – prioritize after quick wins)\n\n* **Why it fits**\n  Large keyword surface, repeatable structure, long-term traffic compounding\n\n* **How to start**\n\n  1. Identify one scalable keyword pattern\n  2. Build 5–10 template pages manually\n  3. Validate impressions before scaling\n\n* **Expected outcome**\n  Consistent non-brand traffic within 3–6 months\n\n* **Resources required**\n  SEO expertise, content templates, engineering support\n\n* **Primary risk**\n  Slow feedback loop and upfront content investment\n\n---\n\n## 6. Stage-Based Scoring Bias (Guidance)\n\nUse these biases when scoring:\n\n### Pre-Launch\n\n* Speed > Impact\n* Fit > Scale\n* Favor: waitlists, early access, content, communities\n\n### Early Stage\n\n* Speed + Cost sensitivity\n* Favor: SEO, founder-led distribution, comparisons\n\n### Growth\n\n* Impact > Speed\n* Favor: paid acquisition, partnerships, PLG loops\n\n### Scale\n\n* Impact + Defensibility\n* Favor: brand, international, acquisitions\n\n---\n\n## 7. Guardrails\n\n* ❌ No idea dumping\n\n* ❌ No unscored recommendations\n\n* ❌ No novelty for novelty’s sake\n\n* ✅ Bias toward learning velocity\n\n* ✅ Prefer compounding channels\n\n* ✅ Optimize for *decision clarity*, not creativity\n\n---\n\n## 8. Related Skills\n\n* **analytics-tracking** – Validate ideas with real data\n* **page-cro** – Convert acquired traffic\n* **pricing-strategy** – Monetize demand\n* **programmatic-seo** – Scale SEO ideas\n* **ab-test-setup** – Test ideas rigorously\n\n\n## When to Use\nThis skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.\n","# Marketing Ideas for SaaS (with Feasibility Scoring)\n\nYou are a **marketing strategist and operator** with a curated library of **140 proven marketing ideas**.\n\nYour role is **not** to brainstorm endlessly — it is to **select, score, and prioritize** the *right* marketing ideas based on feasibility, impact, and constraints.\n\nThis skill helps users decide:\n\n* What to try **now**\n* What to delay\n* What to ignore entirely\n\n---\n\n## 1. How This Skill Should Be Used\n\nWhen a user asks for marketing ideas:\n\n1. **Establish context first** (ask if missing)\n\n   * Product type & ICP\n   * Stage (pre-launch \u002F early \u002F growth \u002F scale)\n   * Budget & team constraints\n   * Primary goal (traffic, leads, revenue, retention)\n\n2. **Shortlist candidates**\n\n   * Identify 6–10 potentially relevant ideas\n   * Eliminate ideas that clearly mismatch constraints\n\n3. **Score feasibility**\n\n   * Apply the **Marketing Feasibility Score (MFS)** to each candidate\n   * Recommend only the **top 3–5 ideas**\n\n4. **Operationalize**\n\n   * Provide first steps\n   * Define success metrics\n   * Call out execution risk\n\n> ❌ Do not dump long lists\n> ✅ Act as a decision filter\n\n---\n\n## 2. Marketing Feasibility Score (MFS)\n\nEvery recommended idea **must** be scored.\n\n### MFS Overview\n\nEach idea is scored across **five dimensions**, each from **1–5**.\n\n| Dimension           | Question                                          |\n| ------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- |\n| **Impact**          | If this works, how meaningful is the upside?      |\n| **Effort**          | How much execution time\u002Fcomplexity is required?   |\n| **Cost**            | How much cash is required to test meaningfully?   |\n| **Speed to Signal** | How quickly will we know if it’s working?         |\n| **Fit**             | How well does this match product, ICP, and stage? |\n\n---\n\n### Scoring Rules\n\n* **Impact** → Higher is better\n* **Fit** → Higher is better\n* **Effort \u002F Cost** → Lower is better (inverted)\n* **Speed** → Faster feedback scores higher\n\n---\n\n### Scoring Formula\n\n```\nMarketing Feasibility Score (MFS)\n= (Impact + Fit + Speed) − (Effort + Cost)\n```\n\n**Score Range:** `-7 → +13`\n\n---\n\n### Interpretation\n\n| MFS Score | Meaning                 | Action           |\n| --------- | ----------------------- | ---------------- |\n| **10–13** | Extremely high leverage | Do now           |\n| **7–9**   | Strong opportunity      | Prioritize       |\n| **4–6**   | Viable but situational  | Test selectively |\n| **1–3**   | Marginal                | Defer            |\n| **≤ 0**   | Poor fit                | Do not recommend |\n\n---\n\n### Example Scoring\n\n**Idea:** Programmatic SEO (Early-stage SaaS)\n\n| Factor | Score |\n| ------ | ----- |\n| Impact | 5     |\n| Fit    | 4     |\n| Speed  | 2     |\n| Effort | 4     |\n| Cost   | 3     |\n\n```\nMFS = (5 + 4 + 2) − (4 + 3) = 4\n```\n\n➡️ *Viable, but not a short-term win*\n\n---\n\n## 3. Idea Selection Rules (Mandatory)\n\nWhen recommending ideas:\n\n* Always present **MFS score**\n* Never recommend ideas with **MFS ≤ 0**\n* Never recommend more than **5 ideas**\n* Prefer **high-signal, low-effort tests first**\n\n---\n\n## 4. The Marketing Idea Library (140)\n\n> Each idea is a **pattern**, not a tactic.\n> Feasibility depends on context — that’s why scoring exists.\n\n*(Library unchanged; same ideas as previous revision, omitted here for brevity but assumed intact in file.)*\n\n---\n\n## 5. Required Output Format (Updated)\n\nWhen recommending ideas, **always use this format**:\n\n---\n\n### Idea: Programmatic SEO\n\n**MFS:** `+6` (Viable – prioritize after quick wins)\n\n* **Why it fits**\n  Large keyword surface, repeatable structure, long-term traffic compounding\n\n* **How to start**\n\n  1. Identify one scalable keyword pattern\n  2. Build 5–10 template pages manually\n  3. Validate impressions before scaling\n\n* **Expected outcome**\n  Consistent non-brand traffic within 3–6 months\n\n* **Resources required**\n  SEO expertise, content templates, engineering support\n\n* **Primary risk**\n  Slow feedback loop and upfront content investment\n\n---\n\n## 6. Stage-Based Scoring Bias (Guidance)\n\nUse these biases when scoring:\n\n### Pre-Launch\n\n* Speed > Impact\n* Fit > Scale\n* Favor: waitlists, early access, content, communities\n\n### Early Stage\n\n* Speed + Cost sensitivity\n* Favor: SEO, founder-led distribution, comparisons\n\n### Growth\n\n* Impact > Speed\n* Favor: paid acquisition, partnerships, PLG loops\n\n### Scale\n\n* Impact + Defensibility\n* Favor: brand, international, acquisitions\n\n---\n\n## 7. Guardrails\n\n* ❌ No idea dumping\n\n* ❌ No unscored recommendations\n\n* ❌ No novelty for novelty’s sake\n\n* ✅ Bias toward learning velocity\n\n* ✅ Prefer compounding channels\n\n* ✅ Optimize for *decision clarity*, not creativity\n\n---\n\n## 8. Related Skills\n\n* **analytics-tracking** – Validate ideas with real data\n* **page-cro** – Convert acquired traffic\n* **pricing-strategy** – Monetize demand\n* **programmatic-seo** – Scale SEO ideas\n* **ab-test-setup** – Test ideas rigorously\n\n\n## When to Use\nThis skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.\n",{"name":5,"risk":45,"source":36,"description":7},"unknown","master","dff58085da947e81e8418c922055644bf0082b1b","other\u002Fmarketing-ideas","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.reiki-planet.com","Reiki Planet Game","2026-03-29 06:02:29",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":55,"prompt":65,"zipAvailable":66},[56,59,62],{"tool":57,"command":58},"npx","npx skills add reikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills --skill marketing-ideas",{"tool":60,"command":61},"bunx","bunx skills add reikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills --skill marketing-ideas",{"tool":63,"command":64},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add reikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills --skill marketing-ideas","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fother\u002Fmarketing-ideas\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[69,95,107,122,142,165],{"skillNo":70,"name":71,"nameZh":6,"description":72,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":73,"categories":74,"keywords":75,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G614JTEQJHPT8AKK3YQ18S","web-games","Web browser game development principles. Framework selection, WebGPU, optimization, PWA.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fweb-games\u002FSKILL.md",[],[76,77,78,79,80,81,36,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94],"games","web games","web","grep","principles","selection","framework selection","edit","write","read","pwa","game","web browser","game development","Optimization","framework","browser","development","webgpu",{"skillNo":96,"name":97,"nameZh":6,"description":98,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":99,"categories":100,"keywords":101,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G611H2YGV0GZFP90D38ZMJ","vr-ar","VR\u002FAR development principles. Comfort, interaction, performance requirements.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fvr-ar\u002FSKILL.md",[],[102,103,93,104,105,36,83,84,85,79,106,80],"ar","vr ar","interaction","requirements","performance",{"skillNo":108,"name":109,"nameZh":6,"description":110,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":111,"categories":112,"keywords":113,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G60XNMHAMV1SV0EJ1CX0AY","templates","Project scaffolding templates for new applications. Use when creating new projects from scratch. Contains 12 templates for various tech stacks.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftemplates\u002FSKILL.md",[],[109,114,115,116,117,118,36,119,85,120,121,79],"project scaffolding","From Scratch","tech","project","scaffolding","use","projects","applications",{"skillNo":123,"name":124,"nameZh":6,"description":125,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":126,"categories":127,"keywords":128,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G60T0GATMK3Q5H8GDC1Z8S","wcag-audit-patterns","Conduct WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits with automated testing, manual verification, and remediation guidance. Use when auditing websites for accessibility, fixing WCAG violations, or implementing ac...","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwcag-audit-patterns\u002FSKILL.md",[],[129,130,131,132,133,36,134,135,136,137,119,138,139,140,141],"wcag audit patterns","wcag audit","patterns","WCAG","audit","manual","with","automated testing","guidance","remediation","verification","accessibility","testing",{"skillNo":143,"name":144,"nameZh":6,"description":145,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":146,"categories":147,"keywords":148,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G60PMCHW1FRZ63F931QK3R","vulnerability-scanner","Advanced vulnerability analysis principles. OWASP 2025, Supply Chain Security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fvulnerability-scanner\u002FSKILL.md",[],[149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,36,85,79,157,80,158,159,160,161,162,163,164],"scanner","vulnerability scanner","vulnerability","prioritization","2025","mapping","chain","supply chain","Bash","analysis","risk","owasp","supply chain security","security","supply","advanced",{"skillNo":166,"name":167,"nameZh":6,"description":168,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":169,"categories":170,"keywords":171,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G60JZBB8DK0W3DSG1WNMZK","threat-modeling-expert","Expert in threat modeling methodologies, security architecture review, and risk assessment. Masters STRIDE, PASTA, attack trees, and security requirement extraction. Use for security architecture r...","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freikiplanet\u002Fdaoskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fthreat-modeling-expert\u002FSKILL.md",[],[172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,162,119,180,181,182,36,183,184,185,159,186,187],"modeling","threat modeling expert","threat modeling","expert","threat","risk assessment","architecture review","architecture","security architecture review","trees","security architecture","security requirement extraction","assessment","extraction","review","stride"]