[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6FSYCDMKM36YP0TDCVM3KP1":3,"skill-same:01M6FSYCDMKM36YP0TDCVM3KP1":83},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":22,"publishedAt":29,"linkOnly":30,"markdownContent":31,"markdownBody":32,"frontMatter":33,"refName":44,"commitSha":45,"skillDirectory":46,"forksCount":47,"repositoryHtmlUrl":48,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":49,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":50,"install":51,"resources":64},"01M6FSYCDMKM36YP0TDCVM3KP1","jiang-irac-opposition",null,"商标异议·无效申请推理引擎（SJ-IRAC）：基于法条要件、证据链与风险分级的专业级审查与攻防系统。","kbarbel640-del\u002Fskills","kbarbel640-del","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F255315490?v=4","01M6CJPPQGCCESXMG3K7BBGQ5J","01M6CJPPX2PB2BCZERFVM2C2B3",1,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fjisngzhongling\u002Fjiang-irac-opposition-invalidation\u002FSKILL.md",[17],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000037","律师与法务","PROFESSION","适用职业",[23,24,25,26,27,28],"jiang irac opposition","github","https","evidence","legal","trademark","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: jiang-irac-opposition\ndescription: 商标异议·无效申请推理引擎（SJ-IRAC）：基于法条要件、证据链与风险分级的专业级审查与攻防系统。\nhomepage: https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjiangzhongling\u002Fjiang-irac-opposition\nmetadata:\n  clawdbot:\n    emoji: \"⚖️\"\n    tags:\n      - trademark\n      - opposition\n      - invalidation\n      - cnipa\n      - sj-irac\n      - evidence\n      - legal-ai\n---\n# 商标异议·无效申请推理引擎（SJ-IRAC）\n\nAuthor: Jiang Zhongling (商标蒋道理)  \nOrganization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd.  \nVersion: 1.1.2 \nLast Updated: 2026-02-03  \n\n---\n\n## Summary (for ClawHub)\n\nA law-firm-grade CNIPA **Opposition \u002F Invalidation** engine that turns case materials into **examiner-readable attack briefs** with **IRAC**, **SJ-6 evidence chains**, and **A–E risk gates**.  \nNo templates. No fluff. No fabricated facts.\n\n---\n\n## What This Skill Does\n\nThis skill ingests **CNIPA registry data + case facts + evidence inventory** and outputs:\n\n- **Ground selection system** (main + auxiliary, prioritized)\n- **Element-by-element legal reasoning** (Article-precise, guideline-aligned)\n- **SJ-6 evidence chain map** (proof purpose + timeline + weak-link detection)\n- **Stop-loss decisions** (standing \u002F time-bar \u002F admissibility \u002F EV-cost kill gates)\n- **Submission-ready structure** (Document Mode)\n\n**Constraint:** No generic AI writing. No speculative conclusions. Only verifiable, evidence-backed reasoning.\n\n---\n\n## v1.1 Highlights (Operational Upgrades)\n\n1) **Standing & Limitation Control (Hard Gate)**  \n- Eligibility screening before any drafting  \n- Time-bar traps surfaced early (relative grounds \u002F 5-year logic where applicable)  \n- “不能打”的案子直接止损，不堆字\n\n2) **Procedural Control Review**  \n- Deadline control and procedural admissibility checks  \n- Suspension triggers \u002F coordination with parallel proceedings  \n- Evidence form compliance checks (source, integrity, probative chain)\n\n3) **Risk Engine Refinement (Kill Gates)**  \n- Procedural \u002F discretionary fatal-defect gates  \n- EV-cost stop-loss when expected value \u003C cost  \n- Evidence weakness quantified and action-ranked\n\n---\n\n## Scope & Positioning\n\n### Primary Scope\n- CNIPA **Opposition**\n- CNIPA **Invalidation** (absolute grounds; relative grounds where legally available)\n\n### Core Mission\nConvert dispute materials into a **decision-grade argument system**:\n- **Which grounds** to use (and in what order)  \n- **Which elements** must be proven  \n- **Which evidence** carries probative weight  \n- **Which defects** are fatal (stop-loss)  \n- **How to write** in a CNIPA examiner-readable structure\n\n### Not a Template Pack\nThis is an **argument + evidence engineering engine**, not a folder of sample briefs.\n\n---\n\n## Legal Basis (Bounded Sources)\n\nOperates strictly within:\n\n- PRC Trademark Law (2019 Amendment)  \n- Implementing Regulations  \n- CNIPA Examination & Adjudication Guidelines \u002F review norms  \n- Nice Classification + Similar Goods\u002FServices Classification (use your latest internal table)\n\n**Prohibited**\n- Fictional statutes, fictional cases, invented timelines  \n- “Common sense” replacing evidence  \n- Fame\u002Frenown claims without third-party proof\n\n---\n\n## Core Framework\n\n### 1) IRAC (Mandatory, Examiner-Oriented)\n\n1. **Issue**: define disputes (grounds, parties, marks, timeframe, target goods\u002Fservices)  \n2. **Rule**: map statutes + guideline purpose + elements + burden\u002Fstandard  \n3. **Application**: match evidence to elements (逐要件对应，不做假设)  \n4. **Conclusion**: enforceable outcome + next-step plan (补证\u002F改路\u002F止损)\n\n### 2) SJ-6 Evidence Chain (Mandatory)\n\nEach item is scored under:\n\n1. Authenticity  \n2. Relevance  \n3. Completeness  \n4. Temporal validity  \n5. Logical consistency  \n6. Cross-examination resistance  \n\n**Evidence organization rules**\n- Timeline-first  \n- Each exhibit must have an explicit **proof purpose**  \n- Identify the **weakest link** and the minimum supplementation set\n\n### 3) Risk Module (A–E + Kill Gates)\n\nOutputs include:\n\n- **Risk Level:** A \u002F B \u002F C \u002F D \u002F E  \n- **Risk Dimensions:** Substantive \u002F Evidentiary \u002F Procedural \u002F Discretionary \u002F EV-cost  \n- **Kill Gates:** standing缺失、时效障碍、证据不可核验、路径不适配、成本倒挂等\n\n---\n\n## Supported Scenarios\n\n- Opposition: absolute \u002F relative grounds (route-prioritized)  \n- Invalidation: absolute grounds; relative grounds within applicable time limits  \n- Bad-faith pattern attack: serial filings \u002F hoarding \u002F imitation patterns  \n- Cross-class confusion reasoning: confusion → similarity inference where supported  \n- Evidence gap diagnosis: replace low-value evidence; build high-signal chain  \n- Overloading control: avoid “全都写上”造成裁量反噬\n\n---\n\n## Input Requirements (Minimum Viable Case Packet)\n\nProvide at least:\n\n1. Target trademark number(s), status, filing\u002Fregistration dates  \n2. Parties and relationship clues (if any)  \n3. Designated goods\u002Fservices + class(es)  \n4. Case timeline (publication\u002Fregistration + prior use milestones)  \n5. Intended grounds (optional; engine can propose)  \n6. Evidence inventory: **source \u002F date \u002F type \u002F brief \u002F proof purpose (if known)**\n\n**If inputs are incomplete → conservative output by design.**\n\n---\n\n## Output Modes\n\n### Quick Mode (Fast Triage)\n- rule positioning  \n- route shortlist (main\u002Faux)  \n- key evidence checklist  \n- go\u002Fno-go (no full IRAC)\n\n### Pro Mode (IRAC + SJ-6 + Risk)\n- full IRAC  \n- evidence chain diagnosis + weak-link list  \n- A–E risk rating + kill-gate triggers  \n- conservative success probability range  \n- action plan + supplementation list (ranked by ROI)\n\n### Document Mode (Submission-Ready)\n- neutral official tone  \n- statute + evidence driven  \n- no probabilistic language  \n- paragraphing optimized for CNIPA examiner reading  \n- exhibits indexed + proof-purpose mapping + timeline tables (if provided)\n\n---\n\n## Compliance & Hard Constraints\n\n- No fabricated facts, transactions, screenshots, or dates  \n- No speculation without evidentiary support  \n- No inflated influence\u002Ffame claims without third-party proof  \n- Always surface: **weakest link + minimum fix**  \n- If expected value \u003C cost → advise against proceeding + alternatives\n\n---\n\n## Typical Use Cases (Law-Firm Grade)\n\n- CNIPA opposition brief drafting (attack route selection + structure)  \n- CNIPA invalidation petition drafting (absolute\u002Frelative route control)  \n- Bad-faith chain construction (pattern proof + linkage logic)  \n- Evidence packet engineering (what to keep \u002F replace \u002F add)  \n- Client-facing risk memo (non-guarantee, cost-aware, decision-grade)\n\n---\n\n## How to Use\n\n1. Provide registry data + facts + evidence inventory  \n2. Choose mode: Quick \u002F Pro \u002F Document  \n3. Receive:\n   - prioritized grounds,\n   - element-based reasoning,\n   - evidence chain + gaps,\n   - risk rating + next actions,\n   - (Document Mode) submission-ready structure.\n\n---\n\n## Versioning Notes\n\n- Patch (x.y.z): doc\u002Fconsistency fixes  \n- Minor (x.y.0): new modules \u002F workflow upgrades  \n- Major (x.0.0): architecture changes","# 商标异议·无效申请推理引擎（SJ-IRAC）\n\nAuthor: Jiang Zhongling (商标蒋道理)  \nOrganization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd.  \nVersion: 1.1.2 \nLast Updated: 2026-02-03  \n\n---\n\n## Summary (for ClawHub)\n\nA law-firm-grade CNIPA **Opposition \u002F Invalidation** engine that turns case materials into **examiner-readable attack briefs** with **IRAC**, **SJ-6 evidence chains**, and **A–E risk gates**.  \nNo templates. No fluff. No fabricated facts.\n\n---\n\n## What This Skill Does\n\nThis skill ingests **CNIPA registry data + case facts + evidence inventory** and outputs:\n\n- **Ground selection system** (main + auxiliary, prioritized)\n- **Element-by-element legal reasoning** (Article-precise, guideline-aligned)\n- **SJ-6 evidence chain map** (proof purpose + timeline + weak-link detection)\n- **Stop-loss decisions** (standing \u002F time-bar \u002F admissibility \u002F EV-cost kill gates)\n- **Submission-ready structure** (Document Mode)\n\n**Constraint:** No generic AI writing. No speculative conclusions. Only verifiable, evidence-backed reasoning.\n\n---\n\n## v1.1 Highlights (Operational Upgrades)\n\n1) **Standing & Limitation Control (Hard Gate)**  \n- Eligibility screening before any drafting  \n- Time-bar traps surfaced early (relative grounds \u002F 5-year logic where applicable)  \n- “不能打”的案子直接止损，不堆字\n\n2) **Procedural Control Review**  \n- Deadline control and procedural admissibility checks  \n- Suspension triggers \u002F coordination with parallel proceedings  \n- Evidence form compliance checks (source, integrity, probative chain)\n\n3) **Risk Engine Refinement (Kill Gates)**  \n- Procedural \u002F discretionary fatal-defect gates  \n- EV-cost stop-loss when expected value \u003C cost  \n- Evidence weakness quantified and action-ranked\n\n---\n\n## Scope & Positioning\n\n### Primary Scope\n- CNIPA **Opposition**\n- CNIPA **Invalidation** (absolute grounds; relative grounds where legally available)\n\n### Core Mission\nConvert dispute materials into a **decision-grade argument system**:\n- **Which grounds** to use (and in what order)  \n- **Which elements** must be proven  \n- **Which evidence** carries probative weight  \n- **Which defects** are fatal (stop-loss)  \n- **How to write** in a CNIPA examiner-readable structure\n\n### Not a Template Pack\nThis is an **argument + evidence engineering engine**, not a folder of sample briefs.\n\n---\n\n## Legal Basis (Bounded Sources)\n\nOperates strictly within:\n\n- PRC Trademark Law (2019 Amendment)  \n- Implementing Regulations  \n- CNIPA Examination & Adjudication Guidelines \u002F review norms  \n- Nice Classification + Similar Goods\u002FServices Classification (use your latest internal table)\n\n**Prohibited**\n- Fictional statutes, fictional cases, invented timelines  \n- “Common sense” replacing evidence  \n- Fame\u002Frenown claims without third-party proof\n\n---\n\n## Core Framework\n\n### 1) IRAC (Mandatory, Examiner-Oriented)\n\n1. **Issue**: define disputes (grounds, parties, marks, timeframe, target goods\u002Fservices)  \n2. **Rule**: map statutes + guideline purpose + elements + burden\u002Fstandard  \n3. **Application**: match evidence to elements (逐要件对应，不做假设)  \n4. **Conclusion**: enforceable outcome + next-step plan (补证\u002F改路\u002F止损)\n\n### 2) SJ-6 Evidence Chain (Mandatory)\n\nEach item is scored under:\n\n1. Authenticity  \n2. Relevance  \n3. Completeness  \n4. Temporal validity  \n5. Logical consistency  \n6. Cross-examination resistance  \n\n**Evidence organization rules**\n- Timeline-first  \n- Each exhibit must have an explicit **proof purpose**  \n- Identify the **weakest link** and the minimum supplementation set\n\n### 3) Risk Module (A–E + Kill Gates)\n\nOutputs include:\n\n- **Risk Level:** A \u002F B \u002F C \u002F D \u002F E  \n- **Risk Dimensions:** Substantive \u002F Evidentiary \u002F Procedural \u002F Discretionary \u002F EV-cost  \n- **Kill Gates:** standing缺失、时效障碍、证据不可核验、路径不适配、成本倒挂等\n\n---\n\n## Supported Scenarios\n\n- Opposition: absolute \u002F relative grounds (route-prioritized)  \n- Invalidation: absolute grounds; relative grounds within applicable time limits  \n- Bad-faith pattern attack: serial filings \u002F hoarding \u002F imitation patterns  \n- Cross-class confusion reasoning: confusion → similarity inference where supported  \n- Evidence gap diagnosis: replace low-value evidence; build high-signal chain  \n- Overloading control: avoid “全都写上”造成裁量反噬\n\n---\n\n## Input Requirements (Minimum Viable Case Packet)\n\nProvide at least:\n\n1. Target trademark number(s), status, filing\u002Fregistration dates  \n2. Parties and relationship clues (if any)  \n3. Designated goods\u002Fservices + class(es)  \n4. Case timeline (publication\u002Fregistration + prior use milestones)  \n5. Intended grounds (optional; engine can propose)  \n6. Evidence inventory: **source \u002F date \u002F type \u002F brief \u002F proof purpose (if known)**\n\n**If inputs are incomplete → conservative output by design.**\n\n---\n\n## Output Modes\n\n### Quick Mode (Fast Triage)\n- rule positioning  \n- route shortlist (main\u002Faux)  \n- key evidence checklist  \n- go\u002Fno-go (no full IRAC)\n\n### Pro Mode (IRAC + SJ-6 + Risk)\n- full IRAC  \n- evidence chain diagnosis + weak-link list  \n- A–E risk rating + kill-gate triggers  \n- conservative success probability range  \n- action plan + supplementation list (ranked by ROI)\n\n### Document Mode (Submission-Ready)\n- neutral official tone  \n- statute + evidence driven  \n- no probabilistic language  \n- paragraphing optimized for CNIPA examiner reading  \n- exhibits indexed + proof-purpose mapping + timeline tables (if provided)\n\n---\n\n## Compliance & Hard Constraints\n\n- No fabricated facts, transactions, screenshots, or dates  \n- No speculation without evidentiary support  \n- No inflated influence\u002Ffame claims without third-party proof  \n- Always surface: **weakest link + minimum fix**  \n- If expected value \u003C cost → advise against proceeding + alternatives\n\n---\n\n## Typical Use Cases (Law-Firm Grade)\n\n- CNIPA opposition brief drafting (attack route selection + structure)  \n- CNIPA invalidation petition drafting (absolute\u002Frelative route control)  \n- Bad-faith chain construction (pattern proof + linkage logic)  \n- Evidence packet engineering (what to keep \u002F replace \u002F add)  \n- Client-facing risk memo (non-guarantee, cost-aware, decision-grade)\n\n---\n\n## How to Use\n\n1. Provide registry data + facts + evidence inventory  \n2. Choose mode: Quick \u002F Pro \u002F Document  \n3. Receive:\n   - prioritized grounds,\n   - element-based reasoning,\n   - evidence chain + gaps,\n   - risk rating + next actions,\n   - (Document Mode) submission-ready structure.\n\n---\n\n## Versioning Notes\n\n- Patch (x.y.z): doc\u002Fconsistency fixes  \n- Minor (x.y.0): new modules \u002F workflow upgrades  \n- Major (x.0.0): architecture changes",{"name":5,"homepage":34,"metadata":35,"description":7},"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjiangzhongling\u002Fjiang-irac-opposition",{"clawdbot":36},{"tags":37,"emoji":43},[28,38,39,40,41,26,42],"opposition","invalidation","cnipa","sj-irac","legal-ai","⚖️","main","e7e336ac628c3e3bd771aff1aaa469c93778f94a","skills\u002Fjisngzhongling\u002Fjiang-irac-opposition-invalidation",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del","2026-08-23 22:39:37",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":52,"prompt":62,"zipAvailable":63},[53,56,59],{"tool":54,"command":55},"npx","npx skills add kbarbel640-del\u002Fskills --skill jiang-irac-opposition",{"tool":57,"command":58},"bunx","bunx skills add kbarbel640-del\u002Fskills --skill jiang-irac-opposition",{"tool":60,"command":61},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add kbarbel640-del\u002Fskills --skill jiang-irac-opposition","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fjisngzhongling\u002Fjiang-irac-opposition-invalidation\u002FSKILL.md",true,[65,71,75,79],{"path":66,"resourceType":67,"resourceTypeDesc":68,"sizeBytes":69,"sourceHtmlUrl":70},"_meta.json","REFERENCE","参考文档",357,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fjisngzhongling\u002Fjiang-irac-opposition-invalidation\u002F_meta.json",{"path":72,"resourceType":67,"resourceTypeDesc":68,"sizeBytes":73,"sourceHtmlUrl":74},"core.txt",3001,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fjisngzhongling\u002Fjiang-irac-opposition-invalidation\u002Fcore.txt",{"path":76,"resourceType":67,"resourceTypeDesc":68,"sizeBytes":77,"sourceHtmlUrl":78},"risk-engine.txt",1943,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fjisngzhongling\u002Fjiang-irac-opposition-invalidation\u002Frisk-engine.txt",{"path":80,"resourceType":67,"resourceTypeDesc":68,"sizeBytes":81,"sourceHtmlUrl":82},"workflow.txt",3554,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fjisngzhongling\u002Fjiang-irac-opposition-invalidation\u002Fworkflow.txt",[84,112,141,162,168,188],{"skillNo":85,"name":86,"nameZh":6,"description":87,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":88,"categories":89,"keywords":93,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G8J55967D6281ACMKAKTEQ","crowd-prompting","A marketplace where AI agents improve prompts, system instructions, tool descriptions, and other text-based content with domain expertise from real-world operations — and earn tokens for valuable contributions.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fzzadrian\u002Fcrowd-prompting\u002FSKILL.md",[90],{"categoryNo":91,"categoryName":92,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,25,110,111],"crowd prompting","prompting","api","with","tokens","domain","world","prompts","operations","instructions","text","tool","system","improve","productivity","marketplace","content","ai agents",{"skillNo":113,"name":114,"nameZh":6,"description":115,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":116,"categories":117,"keywords":123,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G8J0PKPAYVET6BWE8W4C26","dilemm-ai","Compete in DilemmAI, the prisoner's dilemma AI arena at dilemm.ai. Use when an OpenClaw agent wants to create an account, design and submit strategy prompts for their bot, enter matchmaking, analyze historical matches and leaderboards, and iterate on bot strategy. Requires headless browser automation (no API available yet).","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fzyori\u002Fdilemm-ai\u002FSKILL.md",[118],{"categoryNo":119,"categoryName":120,"taxonomyType":121,"taxonomyTypeDesc":122},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[124,96,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,101,140],"dilemm ai","arena","analyze","browser","openclaw agent","create","automation","browser automation","bot","openclaw","design","strategy","headless","compete","submit","matchmaking","use",{"skillNo":142,"name":143,"nameZh":6,"description":144,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":145,"categories":146,"keywords":150,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G8HWAF3K9SW7NP3Z83CPJ6","arxiv-paper-reviews","Interact with arXiv Crawler API to fetch papers, read reviews, and submit comments. Use when working with arXiv papers, fetching paper lists by date\u002Fcategory\u002Finterest, viewing paper details with comments, or submitting paper reviews via API at http:\u002F\u002F150.158.152.82:8000.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fzxrys\u002Fweak-accept\u002FSKILL.md",[147],{"categoryNo":148,"categoryName":149,"taxonomyType":121,"taxonomyTypeDesc":122},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究",[151,152,153,154,155,156,157,97,158,138,140,159,96,160,161],"arxiv paper reviews","reviews","arxiv","paper","crawler","papers","comments","fetch","read","http","via",{"skillNo":163,"name":143,"nameZh":6,"description":144,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":164,"categories":165,"keywords":167,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G8HQJ7N7WMY6YV7D7SSJ16","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fzxrys\u002Farxiv-paper-reviews\u002FSKILL.md",[166],{"categoryNo":148,"categoryName":149,"taxonomyType":121,"taxonomyTypeDesc":122},[154,153,152,151,161,156,157,97,155,138,140,158,159,96,160],{"skillNo":169,"name":170,"nameZh":6,"description":171,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":172,"categories":173,"keywords":174,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G8HM95Y64JNVFC2HN4E2BG","git-summary","Get a quick summary of the current Git repository including status, recent commits, branches, and contributors.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fzweack\u002Fgit-summary\u002FSKILL.md",[],[175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187],"git","summary","git summary","commits","repository","win32","status","linux","contributors","true","quick","get","branches",{"skillNo":189,"name":190,"nameZh":6,"description":191,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":192,"categories":193,"keywords":196,"publishedAt":29},"01M6G8HGEGF05CNEJCGVYFSC4R","agent-constitution","Interact with AgentConstitution governance contracts on Base Sepolia. Check compliance, read rules, log actions, query governance state.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fkbarbel640-del\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fztsalexey\u002Fagent-constitution\u002FSKILL.md",[194,195],{"categoryNo":119,"categoryName":120,"taxonomyType":121,"taxonomyTypeDesc":122},{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},[197,198,199,200,97,201,202,44,203,159,204,205,206,207,208,25,209,210,24],"agent constitution","constitution","contracts","tree","query","base","log","check","Rules","projects","compliance","actions","state","governance"]