jiang-irac-nonuse-evidence
暂无简介
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-23
- Stars
- ★ 1
- Forks
- 0
02 资源文件 13
- 参考文档_meta.json525 B
- 参考文档AUTOMATION.md3.8 KB
- 参考文档CHANGELOG.md104 B
- 参考文档core.txt4.8 KB
- 参考文档cross-exam-library.txt5.9 KB
- 参考文档DISCLAIMER.md176 B
- 脚本generate_suite_v2.py33.6 KB
- 参考文档INSTALL.md179 B
- 许可证LICENSE.txt162 B
- 参考文档README.md1.1 KB
- 参考文档RELEASE_NOTES.md158 B
- 参考文档risk-engine.txt4.5 KB
- 参考文档workflow.txt5.0 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
name: jiang-nonuse description: CNIPA撤三(连续三年不使用)双轨证据引擎:答辩证据链构建 + 质证审计(SJ-6 + IRAC + 风险A–E)。 homepage: https://github.com/jiangzhongling/jiang-nonuse metadata: clawdbot: emoji: "?" tags: - trademark - cnipa - nonuse - evidence - sj-irac - cancellation - legal-ai
SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine(撤三证据推理系统)
Professional Release v2.0.0
Author: Jiang Zhongling(商标蒋道理)
Organization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd.
Last Updated: 2026-02-04
1. System Positioning
SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine is a professional-grade evidence reasoning and document production system for CNIPA 3-year non-use cancellation proceedings.
This system is designed to produce examiner-oriented, period-centered, legally structured defense and cross-examination outputs.
Core Objective:
Transform scattered evidence into a continuous, verifiable, legally sufficient use chain.
2. Problems Addressed
This system focuses on eliminating decisive failure causes in non-use cases:
- Fragmented period coverage
- Time-segment discontinuity
- Evidence–period mismatch
- Unmapped proof elements
- Pseudo-commercial transactions
- Weak examiner persuasion
3. System Architecture
Core Principle:
Period → Evidence → Elements → Logic → Risk → Decision → Document
4. Legal & Evidence Constitution
4.1 Applicable Law
- PRC Trademark Law (2019)
- Implementing Regulations
- CNIPA Guidelines
- Nice Classification
Trademark use must satisfy:
- Real commercial activity
- Public market exposure
- Verifiable records
- Continuous within period
- Linked to designated goods/services
4.2 No-Fabrication Rule
Prohibited:
- Invented transactions
- Fabricated invoices/contracts
- Backdated materials
- Editable screenshots
- Narrative-only statements
Each exhibit must show:
Source / Date / Carrier / Proof Purpose
4.3 SJ-6 Evidence Chain
All exhibits are evaluated by:
- Authenticity
- Relevance
- Completeness
- Temporal Validity
- Logical Consistency
- Resistance
Non-qualified items are excluded.
4.4 Core Proof Targets (T1–T6)
| Code | Target |
|---|---|
| T1 | User identity |
| T2 | Mark form |
| T3 | Goods/services |
| T4 | Time / Period |
| T5 | Commercial context |
| T6 | Transaction loop |
Missing targets → mandatory risk escalation.
4.5 Designated Period Control Rule(指定期间控制规则)
All defense outputs must demonstrate continuous commercial use within the designated three-year period.
Mandatory segmentation:
P1: First 12 months
P2: Middle 12 months
P3: Last 12 months
Rules:
- Each segment must contain ≥1 valid commercial-use proof
- Any empty segment triggers G1 escalation
- Two or more empty segments → fatal defect
Zero-gap continuity is the primary examination anchor.
4.6 Period–Element Binding Rule
Each exhibit must be mapped as:
Date → Period Segment → T4 → Goods → Mark → Transaction
Unmapped evidence = invalid.
5. Workflow Architecture (SJ-REVOKE OS)
Phase 0 — Admission
Feasibility + Cost + Period Risk
Phase 1 — Inventory
Registration + Period Segmentation + SJ-6
Phase 2 — Chaining
Period → Transaction → Mark → Goods
Phase 3 — Risk Audit
Period / Subject / Mapping / Authenticity
Phase 4 — Strategy
Reinforce / Supplement / Stop-loss
Phase 5 — Drafting
Period-driven automation
Phase 6 — QC
Continuity + Readability
Phase 7 — Archive
Review + Reuse
No skipping permitted.
6. Risk & Stop-Loss Engine
6.1 Risk Levels
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
| A | Full period coverage + strong loop |
| B | Minor gaps, repairable |
| C | Partial period missing |
| D | Structural weakness |
| E | Fatal discontinuity |
6.2 Kill Gates
- G1 Period fatal
- G2 Goods fatal
- G3 Mark fatal
- G4 Subject fatal
- G5 Chain fatal
- G6 Authenticity fatal
6.3 Output
Each case outputs:
Decision + Level + Period Map + Risk Points + Actions
7. Dual-Track System
7.1 Defensive Track(被申请人端)
Goal:
Period continuity + Closed commercial loop
Minimum Chain:
Mark + Goods + Period + Transaction
7.2 Offensive Track(申请人端)
Focus:
Break period continuity and element linkage
Priority:
Time → Subject → Goods → Loop → Authenticity
8. Evidence Index Standard (SJ-6 Mandatory)
8.1 Binding Rule
All submissions must include a Period-Mapped SJ-6 Index.
8.2 Mandatory Fields
- ID
- Name
- Source
- Date
- Period Segment
- Goods
- Target
- SJ-6
- Pages
- Risk
8.3 Template
| ID | Name | Date | Period | Goods | Target | SJ6 | Pages | Risk |
|---|
8.4 Grouping
- P1 Evidence
- P2 Evidence
- P3 Evidence
All mandatory.
9. Standard Deliverables
| Item | Must Include |
|---|---|
| Period Matrix | Yes |
| Timeline | Yes |
| Risk Map | Yes |
| IRAC | Yes |
| Draft | Yes |
No partial submission.
10. Input & Invocation
10.1 Inputs
- Reg No
- Class
- Goods
- Period
- Evidence
- Opponent (opt)
Missing period info → reject.
10.2 Modes
- build (defense)
- audit (attack)
11. Non-Suitable Cases
- Period blank ≥2 segments
- No objective proof
- Dormant entities
- Proven fraud
- Cost overflow
→ Mandatory stop-loss.
12. Version Governance
12.1 Format
Major.Minor.Patch
12.2 Principles
- Period first
- Evidence first
- Examiner logic first
- No speculation
12.3 Change Log
v2.0.0
- Integrated Cross-Exam Library
- Embedded Period Control System
- Unified Dual-Role Models
13. Professional Ethics
- Evidence supremacy
- Full risk disclosure
- Cost discipline
- Examiner respect
No manipulation.
14. Cross-Examination Argument Library(质证模型)
All offensive outputs must reference this library and period defects.
(以下内容保持原版,略)
15. Respondent Defense & Self-Audit Model(答辩+自查)
15.1 Pre-Defense Self-Audit
- Period Coverage Test (P1–P3)
- Kill-Gate Test
- T1–T6 Mapping
- SJ-6 Scorecard
Any missing segment → Stop-loss review.
15.2 Defense Workflow
- Build Period Chain
- Repair Weak Segments
- Rank Evidence
- Risk Label
- IRAC Draft
15.3 Defense Output
- Period-Based Opinion
- Evidence Index
- Risk Sheet
- Supplement Plan
16. Applicant Cross-Examination Model(申请人质证)
16.1 Deconstruction
- Period gaps
- Mapping failure
- Loop rupture
- Subject defects
16.2 Strategy Matrix
| Defect | Priority | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Period | Highest | C |
| Authenticity | High | A |
| Relevance | High | B |
| Loop | Medium | D |
| Logic | Medium | E |
16.3 Challenge Output
- Period Defect Table
- Cross-Opinion
- Question List
- Rebuttal Plan
End of Document
04 同仓库更多 Skills
crowd-prompting
A marketplace where AI agents improve prompts, system instructions, tool descriptions, and other text-based content with domain expertise from real-world operations — and earn tokens for valuable contributions.
dilemm-ai
Compete in DilemmAI, the prisoner's dilemma AI arena at dilemm.ai. Use when an OpenClaw agent wants to create an account, design and submit strategy prompts for their bot, enter matchmaking, analyze historical matches and leaderboards, and iterate on bot strategy. Requires headless browser automation (no API available yet).
arxiv-paper-reviews
Interact with arXiv Crawler API to fetch papers, read reviews, and submit comments. Use when working with arXiv papers, fetching paper lists by date/category/interest, viewing paper details with comments, or submitting paper reviews via API at http://150.158.152.82:8000.
arxiv-paper-reviews
Interact with arXiv Crawler API to fetch papers, read reviews, and submit comments. Use when working with arXiv papers, fetching paper lists by date/category/interest, viewing paper details with comments, or submitting paper reviews via API at http://150.158.152.82:8000.
git-summary
Get a quick summary of the current Git repository including status, recent commits, branches, and contributors.
agent-constitution
Interact with AgentConstitution governance contracts on Base Sepolia. Check compliance, read rules, log actions, query governance state.