[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6FPNYDJCD2GDYQ4Q97M3B92":3,"skill-same:01M6FPNYDJCD2GDYQ4Q97M3B92":63},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":17,"publishedAt":34,"linkOnly":35,"markdownContent":36,"markdownBody":37,"frontMatter":38,"refName":39,"commitSha":40,"skillDirectory":41,"forksCount":42,"repositoryHtmlUrl":43,"repositoryHomepageUrl":44,"ownerHtmlUrl":45,"ownerBlogUrl":46,"ownerDescription":47,"updatedAt":48,"install":49,"resources":62},"01M6FPNYDJCD2GDYQ4Q97M3B92","bmad-editorial-review-prose",null,"Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose","reformlab\u002FReformLab","reformlab","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F264161760?v=4","01M6CVRNMTPJRX8QX0P5J8NRZ6","01M6CVRNS5KTS18YC3AZHP1BZ3",1,"AGPL-3.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab\u002FReformLab\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fbmad-editorial-review-prose\u002FSKILL.md",[],[18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33],"review","editorial review","bmad editorial review prose","prose","bmad editorial review","bmad","editor","issues","communication","improve","text","user","use","clinical","copy","reviews","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: bmad-editorial-review-prose\ndescription: 'Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose'\n---\n\n# Editorial Review - Prose\n\n**Goal:** Review text for communication issues that impede comprehension and output suggested fixes in a three-column table.\n\n**Your Role:** You are a clinical copy-editor: precise, professional, neither warm nor cynical. Apply Microsoft Writing Style Guide principles as your baseline. Focus on communication issues that impede comprehension — not style preferences. NEVER rewrite for preference — only fix genuine issues. Follow ALL steps in the STEPS section IN EXACT ORDER. DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence. HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met. Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step.\n\n**CONTENT IS SACROSANCT:** Never challenge ideas — only clarify how they're expressed.\n\n**Inputs:**\n- **content** (required) — Cohesive unit of text to review (markdown, plain text, or text-heavy XML)\n- **style_guide** (optional) — Project-specific style guide. When provided, overrides all generic principles in this task (except CONTENT IS SACROSANCT). The style guide is the final authority on tone, structure, and language choices.\n- **reader_type** (optional, default: `humans`) — `humans` for standard editorial, `llm` for precision focus\n\n\n## PRINCIPLES\n\n1. **Minimal intervention:** Apply the smallest fix that achieves clarity\n2. **Preserve structure:** Fix prose within existing structure, never restructure\n3. **Skip code\u002Fmarkup:** Detect and skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup\n4. **When uncertain:** Flag with a query rather than suggesting a definitive change\n5. **Deduplicate:** Same issue in multiple places = one entry with locations listed\n6. **No conflicts:** Merge overlapping fixes into single entries\n7. **Respect author voice:** Preserve intentional stylistic choices\n\n> **STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE:** If a style_guide input is provided, it overrides ALL generic principles in this task (including the Microsoft Writing Style Guide baseline and reader_type-specific priorities). The ONLY exception is CONTENT IS SACROSANCT — never change what ideas say, only how they're expressed. When style guide conflicts with this task, style guide wins.\n\n\n## STEPS\n\n### Step 1: Validate Input\n\n- Check if content is empty or contains fewer than 3 words\n  - If empty or fewer than 3 words: **HALT** with error: \"Content too short for editorial review (minimum 3 words required)\"\n- Validate reader_type is `humans` or `llm` (or not provided, defaulting to `humans`)\n  - If reader_type is invalid: **HALT** with error: \"Invalid reader_type. Must be 'humans' or 'llm'\"\n- Identify content type (markdown, plain text, XML with text)\n- Note any code blocks, frontmatter, or structural markup to skip\n\n### Step 2: Analyze Style\n\n- Analyze the style, tone, and voice of the input text\n- Note any intentional stylistic choices to preserve (informal tone, technical jargon, rhetorical patterns)\n- Calibrate review approach based on reader_type:\n  - If `llm`: Prioritize unambiguous references, consistent terminology, explicit structure, no hedging\n  - If `humans`: Prioritize clarity, flow, readability, natural progression\n\n### Step 3: Editorial Review (CRITICAL)\n\n- If style_guide provided: Consult style_guide now and note its key requirements — these override default principles for this review\n- Review all prose sections (skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup)\n- Identify communication issues that impede comprehension\n- For each issue, determine the minimal fix that achieves clarity\n- Deduplicate: If same issue appears multiple times, create one entry listing all locations\n- Merge overlapping issues into single entries (no conflicting suggestions)\n- For uncertain fixes, phrase as query: \"Consider: [suggestion]?\" rather than definitive change\n- Preserve author voice — do not \"improve\" intentional stylistic choices\n\n### Step 4: Output Results\n\n- If issues found: Output a three-column markdown table with all suggested fixes\n- If no issues found: Output \"No editorial issues identified\"\n\n**Output format:**\n\n| Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |\n|---------------|--------------|---------|\n| The exact original passage | The suggested revision | Brief explanation of what changed and why |\n\n**Example:**\n\n| Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |\n|---------------|--------------|---------|\n| The system will processes data and it handles errors. | The system processes data and handles errors. | Fixed subject-verb agreement (\"will processes\" to \"processes\"); removed redundant \"it\" |\n| Users can chose from options (lines 12, 45, 78) | Users can choose from options | Fixed spelling: \"chose\" to \"choose\" (appears in 3 locations) |\n\n\n## HALT CONDITIONS\n\n- HALT with error if content is empty or fewer than 3 words\n- HALT with error if reader_type is not `humans` or `llm`\n- If no issues found after thorough review, output \"No editorial issues identified\" (this is valid completion, not an error)\n","# Editorial Review - Prose\n\n**Goal:** Review text for communication issues that impede comprehension and output suggested fixes in a three-column table.\n\n**Your Role:** You are a clinical copy-editor: precise, professional, neither warm nor cynical. Apply Microsoft Writing Style Guide principles as your baseline. Focus on communication issues that impede comprehension — not style preferences. NEVER rewrite for preference — only fix genuine issues. Follow ALL steps in the STEPS section IN EXACT ORDER. DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence. HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met. Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step.\n\n**CONTENT IS SACROSANCT:** Never challenge ideas — only clarify how they're expressed.\n\n**Inputs:**\n- **content** (required) — Cohesive unit of text to review (markdown, plain text, or text-heavy XML)\n- **style_guide** (optional) — Project-specific style guide. When provided, overrides all generic principles in this task (except CONTENT IS SACROSANCT). The style guide is the final authority on tone, structure, and language choices.\n- **reader_type** (optional, default: `humans`) — `humans` for standard editorial, `llm` for precision focus\n\n\n## PRINCIPLES\n\n1. **Minimal intervention:** Apply the smallest fix that achieves clarity\n2. **Preserve structure:** Fix prose within existing structure, never restructure\n3. **Skip code\u002Fmarkup:** Detect and skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup\n4. **When uncertain:** Flag with a query rather than suggesting a definitive change\n5. **Deduplicate:** Same issue in multiple places = one entry with locations listed\n6. **No conflicts:** Merge overlapping fixes into single entries\n7. **Respect author voice:** Preserve intentional stylistic choices\n\n> **STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE:** If a style_guide input is provided, it overrides ALL generic principles in this task (including the Microsoft Writing Style Guide baseline and reader_type-specific priorities). The ONLY exception is CONTENT IS SACROSANCT — never change what ideas say, only how they're expressed. When style guide conflicts with this task, style guide wins.\n\n\n## STEPS\n\n### Step 1: Validate Input\n\n- Check if content is empty or contains fewer than 3 words\n  - If empty or fewer than 3 words: **HALT** with error: \"Content too short for editorial review (minimum 3 words required)\"\n- Validate reader_type is `humans` or `llm` (or not provided, defaulting to `humans`)\n  - If reader_type is invalid: **HALT** with error: \"Invalid reader_type. Must be 'humans' or 'llm'\"\n- Identify content type (markdown, plain text, XML with text)\n- Note any code blocks, frontmatter, or structural markup to skip\n\n### Step 2: Analyze Style\n\n- Analyze the style, tone, and voice of the input text\n- Note any intentional stylistic choices to preserve (informal tone, technical jargon, rhetorical patterns)\n- Calibrate review approach based on reader_type:\n  - If `llm`: Prioritize unambiguous references, consistent terminology, explicit structure, no hedging\n  - If `humans`: Prioritize clarity, flow, readability, natural progression\n\n### Step 3: Editorial Review (CRITICAL)\n\n- If style_guide provided: Consult style_guide now and note its key requirements — these override default principles for this review\n- Review all prose sections (skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup)\n- Identify communication issues that impede comprehension\n- For each issue, determine the minimal fix that achieves clarity\n- Deduplicate: If same issue appears multiple times, create one entry listing all locations\n- Merge overlapping issues into single entries (no conflicting suggestions)\n- For uncertain fixes, phrase as query: \"Consider: [suggestion]?\" rather than definitive change\n- Preserve author voice — do not \"improve\" intentional stylistic choices\n\n### Step 4: Output Results\n\n- If issues found: Output a three-column markdown table with all suggested fixes\n- If no issues found: Output \"No editorial issues identified\"\n\n**Output format:**\n\n| Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |\n|---------------|--------------|---------|\n| The exact original passage | The suggested revision | Brief explanation of what changed and why |\n\n**Example:**\n\n| Original Text | Revised Text | Changes |\n|---------------|--------------|---------|\n| The system will processes data and it handles errors. | The system processes data and handles errors. | Fixed subject-verb agreement (\"will processes\" to \"processes\"); removed redundant \"it\" |\n| Users can chose from options (lines 12, 45, 78) | Users can choose from options | Fixed spelling: \"chose\" to \"choose\" (appears in 3 locations) |\n\n\n## HALT CONDITIONS\n\n- HALT with error if content is empty or fewer than 3 words\n- HALT with error if reader_type is not `humans` or `llm`\n- If no issues found after thorough review, output \"No editorial issues identified\" (this is valid completion, not an error)\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"master","314a64e40d9abca764698290593908a736500b30",".claude\u002Fskills\u002Fbmad-editorial-review-prose",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab\u002FReformLab","https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.reform-lab.eu\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab","https:\u002F\u002Freform-lab.eu\u002F","See who your policy actually helps","2026-05-25 03:50:07",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":50,"prompt":60,"zipAvailable":61},[51,54,57],{"tool":52,"command":53},"npx","npx skills add reformlab\u002FReformLab --skill bmad-editorial-review-prose",{"tool":55,"command":56},"bunx","bunx skills add reformlab\u002FReformLab --skill bmad-editorial-review-prose",{"tool":58,"command":59},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add reformlab\u002FReformLab --skill bmad-editorial-review-prose","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab\u002FReformLab\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fbmad-editorial-review-prose\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[64,89,103,127,144,159],{"skillNo":65,"name":66,"nameZh":6,"description":67,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":68,"categories":69,"keywords":70,"publishedAt":34},"01M6FQK4CGE9096SN2JRE7DA8H","bmad-assist-help","Explain how bmad-assist works in this project by inspecting the local bmad-assist config, sprint status, epics, state, runs, prompts, logs, and relevant source code. Use when the user asks how bmad-assist behaves, how it reads epics and stories, why a run resumed or failed, what files are authoritative, or to investigate bmad-assist execution in the current repo.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab\u002FReformLab\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_bmad\u002Fcore\u002Fskills\u002Fbmad-assist-help\u002FSKILL.md",[],[71,23,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,30,85,86,87,88],"help","bmad assist help","config","run","investigate","code","state","logs","execution","relevant","how","why","explain","repo","files","local","project","sprint",{"skillNo":90,"name":91,"nameZh":6,"description":92,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":93,"categories":94,"keywords":95,"publishedAt":34},"01M6FQK133CMP4ZT00TW6S7TB1","bmad-fix-ci","Diagnose and fix GitHub CI failures locally. Use when the user says 'fix ci' or 'fix ci failures'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab\u002FReformLab\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F_bmad\u002Fbmm\u002Fskills\u002Fbmad-fix-ci\u002FSKILL.md",[],[96,23,97,98,99,29,30,100,101,102],"bmad fix ci","ci","fix ci","fix","diagnose","fix ci failures","github",{"skillNo":104,"name":105,"nameZh":6,"description":106,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":107,"categories":108,"keywords":114,"publishedAt":34},"01M6FQJW69SATT3C9741MT2KJH","bmad-workflow-builder","Builds, converts, and analyzes workflows and skills. Use when the user requests to \"build a workflow\", \"modify a workflow\", \"quality check workflow\", \"analyze skill\", or \"convert a skill\".","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab\u002FReformLab\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F.opencode\u002Fskills\u002Fbmad-workflow-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[109],{"categoryNo":110,"categoryName":111,"taxonomyType":112,"taxonomyTypeDesc":113},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[115,116,23,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,29,30,124,125,126],"bmad workflow builder","workflow","builder","workflow builder","workflows","convert","analyze","quality","check","build","quality check","requests",{"skillNo":128,"name":129,"nameZh":6,"description":130,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":131,"categories":132,"keywords":138,"publishedAt":34},"01M6FQJQMT5GW37ANR711FCBJR","bmad-validate-prd","Validate a PRD against standards. Use when the user says \"validate this PRD\" or \"run PRD validation\"","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab\u002FReformLab\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F.opencode\u002Fskills\u002Fbmad-validate-prd\u002FSKILL.md",[133],{"categoryNo":134,"categoryName":135,"taxonomyType":136,"taxonomyTypeDesc":137},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000031","产品经理","PROFESSION","适用职业",[23,139,140,141,29,74,142,30,143],"bmad validate prd","prd","validate","validation","standards",{"skillNo":145,"name":146,"nameZh":6,"description":147,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":148,"categories":149,"keywords":153,"publishedAt":34},"01M6FQJMCSRVGCG65DAKKGW0M1","bmad-ux-designer","ux-designer agent","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab\u002FReformLab\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F.opencode\u002Fskills\u002Fbmad-ux-designer\u002FSKILL.md",[150],{"categoryNo":151,"categoryName":152,"taxonomyType":136,"taxonomyTypeDesc":137},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000032","设计师",[23,154,155,156,157,158],"bmad ux designer","UX Designer","designer","bmad ux","ux",{"skillNo":160,"name":161,"nameZh":6,"description":162,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":163,"categories":164,"keywords":168,"publishedAt":34},"01M6FQJDFKBXTWMBJD29FAC8TA","bmad-testarch-trace","Generate traceability matrix and quality gate decision. Use when the user says \"lets create traceability matrix\" or \"I want to analyze test coverage\"","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Freformlab\u002FReformLab\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002F.opencode\u002Fskills\u002Fbmad-testarch-trace\u002FSKILL.md",[165],{"categoryNo":166,"categoryName":167,"taxonomyType":112,"taxonomyTypeDesc":113},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",[169,170,171,23,172,173,174,175,121,122,176,29,177,30,178,179,180],"trace","bmad testarch","bmad testarch trace","test","quality gate","create","generate","decision","coverage","test coverage","gate","traceability"]