brain-to-docs
Interview the user to turn project vision and decisions into README and ADR documentation.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 12
- Forks
- 3
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- brain-to-docs
- risk
- critical
- tags
- [ "documentation", "adr", "planning" ]
- tools
- [ "claude", "codex" ]
- author
- davidondrej
- source
- community
- license
- MIT
- category
- productivity
- date_added
- 2026-07-07
- description
- Interview the user to turn project vision and decisions into README and ADR documentation.
- source_repo
- davidondrej/skills
- source_type
- community
- license_source
- https://github.com/davidondrej/skills/blob/main/LICENSE
03 SKILL.md 正文
brain-to-docs
When to Use
- Use when the user wants to extract project vision, decisions, or preferences into durable docs.
- Use when README and ADRs should be built through a back-and-forth interview.
The whole purpose: extract as much of the user's taste, judgment, knowledge, vision,
preferences, and decisions as possible into text — saved as clear, concise
markdown docs for the project. README holds the vision; docs/adr/ holds the
decisions.
The loop
- Check docs first, every time. Read
docs/adr/(andREADME.md) before doing anything — other agents and people add/edit ADRs constantly. - Ask a small set of focused questions through the host's supported question interface or plain text — default 2–3 unless the user asks for a different number. Make them high-variety: a wide, creative spectrum of unique angles, not all the same type (e.g. not all "tech stack" or all "product" or all "monetization"). Exception: if the user asks for a specific focus area, follow it. The user answers whichever they find most useful.
- Integrate confirmed answers into the authorized docs. Preserve unanswered questions and distinguish tentative ideas from accepted decisions. You decide whether it
updates
README.mdor becomes a new ADR — whatever makes sense. - Repeat until the user says "we're done" (or similar).
Rules
- All answers & responses during this "brain to docs" process must be VERY CONCISE, all sentences should be SHORT, and everything should be written in the user's requested language.
- ADRs: short, numbered
NNNN-slug.md, Status + Context + Decision + Consequences. - README: preserve existing installation, usage, and contributor sections. Add vision where it fits; detailed decisions go in ADRs.
- Don't challenge the user's thinking unless they ask, or they're making a severe mistake.
Example
User request:
Extract project vision, decisions, or preferences into durable docs.
Limitations
- Adapted from
davidondrej/skills; verify local paths, tools, credentials, and agent features before acting. - For commands, remote access, scheduling, browser automation, or file-changing workflows, get explicit user approval and confirm the target environment first.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
web-access
Use Treg for public web or platform data only when existing search, browser and connected tools cannot cover the task, with explicit cost and data boundaries.
treg
Use the Treg CLI or MCP catalog to discover, price and call authorized external tools with team-scoped credentials and a user-approved budget.
recruit
Turn a job description into an evidence-linked candidate shortlist through Treg, with job-related ranking and optional authorized business contact enrichment.
rea-growth
Analyze a company’s public growth and content through Treg, distinguish observations from hypotheses, and produce an evidence-linked playbook within an approved budget.
make-ugc
Create original AI UGC-style product videos through Treg: research hooks, approve a licensed presenter and voice, generate clips, add captions and report costs.
lead-signals
Find and qualify public buying signals through Treg, rank fitting business accounts and optionally enrich authorized business contact information.