[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6EVP3XKJSY1Q3W58F4S5HWN":3,"skill-same:01M6EVP3XKJSY1Q3W58F4S5HWN":86},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":39,"linkOnly":40,"markdownContent":41,"markdownBody":42,"frontMatter":43,"refName":52,"commitSha":53,"skillDirectory":54,"forksCount":55,"repositoryHtmlUrl":56,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":57,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":58,"updatedAt":59,"install":60,"resources":73},"01M6EVP3XKJSY1Q3W58F4S5HWN","scenario-war-room",null,"Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or when the user asks 'what if X AND Y both happen?'","luokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai","luokai0","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F266954973?v=4","01M6E16VNT42JB8B3X3254QWJ7","luo kai","01M6E16VTFVP6S5XJF1V1MPV90",14,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F21-external-registries\u002F09-alirezarezvani-skills\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fscenario-war-room\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"scenario war room","scenario","functions","with","strategic","functional","multi","stress","modeling","across","compound","testing","models","use","business","user","decisions","risk","planning","stress testing","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: \"scenario-war-room\"\ndescription: \"Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or when the user asks 'what if X AND Y both happen?'\"\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  version: 1.0.0\n  author: Alireza Rezvani\n  category: c-level\n  domain: strategic-planning\n  updated: 2026-03-05\n  python-tools: scenario_modeler.py\n  frameworks: scenario-planning\n---\n\n# Scenario War Room\n\nModel cascading what-if scenarios across all business functions. Not single-assumption stress tests — compound adversity that shows how one problem creates the next.\n\n## Keywords\nscenario planning, war room, what-if analysis, risk modeling, cascading effects, compound risk, adversity planning, contingency planning, stress test, crisis planning, multi-variable scenario, pre-mortem\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```bash\npython scripts\u002Fscenario_modeler.py   # Interactive scenario builder with cascade modeling\n```\n\nOr describe the scenario:\n```\n\u002Fwar-room \"What if we lose our top customer AND miss the Q3 fundraise?\"\n\u002Fwar-room \"What if 3 engineers quit AND we need to ship by Q3?\"\n\u002Fwar-room \"What if our market shrinks 30% AND a competitor raises $50M?\"\n```\n\n## What This Is Not\n\n- **Not** a single-assumption stress test (that's `\u002Fem:stress-test`)\n- **Not** financial modeling only — every function gets modeled\n- **Not** worst-case-only — models 3 severity levels\n- **Not** paralysis by analysis — outputs concrete hedges and triggers\n\n## Framework: 6-Step Cascade Model\n\n### Step 1: Define Scenario Variables (max 3)\nState each variable with:\n- **What changes** — specific, quantified if possible\n- **Probability** — your best estimate\n- **Timeline** — when it hits\n\n```\nVariable A: Top customer (28% ARR) gives 60-day termination notice\n  Probability: 15% | Timeline: Within 90 days\n\nVariable B: Series A fundraise delayed 6 months beyond target close\n  Probability: 25% | Timeline: Q3\n\nVariable C: Lead engineer resigns\n  Probability: 20% | Timeline: Unknown\n```\n\n### Step 2: Domain Impact Mapping\n\nFor each variable, each relevant role models impact:\n\n| Domain | Owner | Models |\n|--------|-------|--------|\n| Cash & runway | CFO | Burn impact, runway change, bridge options |\n| Revenue | CRO | ARR gap, churn cascade risk, pipeline |\n| Product | CPO | Roadmap impact, PMF risk |\n| Engineering | CTO | Velocity impact, key person risk |\n| People | CHRO | Attrition cascade, hiring freeze implications |\n| Operations | COO | Capacity, OKR impact, process risk |\n| Security | CISO | Compliance timeline risk |\n| Market | CMO | CAC impact, competitive exposure |\n\n### Step 3: Cascade Effect Mapping\n\nThis is the core. Show how Variable A triggers consequences in domains that trigger Variable B's effects:\n\n```\nTRIGGER: Customer churn ($560K ARR)\n  ↓\nCFO: Runway drops 14 → 8 months\n  ↓\nCHRO: Hiring freeze; retention risk increases (morale hit)\n  ↓\nCTO: 3 open engineering reqs frozen; roadmap slips\n  ↓\nCPO: Q4 feature launch delayed → customer retention risk\n  ↓\nCRO: NRR drops; existing accounts see reduced velocity → more churn risk\n  ↓\nCFO: [Secondary cascade — potential death spiral if not interrupted]\n```\n\nName the cascade explicitly. Show where it can be interrupted.\n\n### Step 4: Severity Matrix\n\nModel three scenarios:\n\n| Scenario | Definition | Recovery |\n|----------|------------|---------|\n| **Base** | One variable hits; others don't | Manageable with plan |\n| **Stress** | Two variables hit simultaneously | Requires significant response |\n| **Severe** | All variables hit; full cascade | Existential; requires board intervention |\n\nFor each severity level:\n- Runway impact\n- ARR impact\n- Headcount impact\n- Timeline to unacceptable state (trigger point)\n\n### Step 5: Trigger Points (Early Warning Signals)\n\nDefine the measurable signal that tells you a scenario is unfolding **before** it's confirmed:\n\n```\nTrigger for Customer Churn Risk:\n  - Sponsor goes dark for >3 weeks\n  - Usage drops >25% MoM\n  - No Q1 QBR confirmed by Dec 1\n\nTrigger for Fundraise Delay:\n  - \u003C3 term sheets after 60 days of process\n  - Lead investor requests >30-day extension on DD\n  - Competitor raises at lower valuation (market signal)\n\nTrigger for Engineering Attrition:\n  - Glassdoor activity from engineering team\n  - 2+ referral interview requests from engineers\n  - Above-market offer counter-required in last 3 months\n```\n\n### Step 6: Hedging Strategies\n\nFor each scenario: actions to take **now** (before the scenario materializes) that reduce impact if it does.\n\n| Hedge | Cost | Impact | Owner | Deadline |\n|-------|------|--------|-------|---------|\n| Establish $500K credit line | $5K\u002Fyear | Buys 3 months if churn hits | CFO | 60 days |\n| 12-month retention bonus for 3 key engineers | $90K | Locks team through fundraise | CHRO | 30 days |\n| Diversify to \u003C20% revenue concentration per customer | Sales effort | Reduces single-customer risk | CRO | 2 quarters |\n| Compress fundraise timeline, start parallel process | CEO time | Closes before runways merge | CEO | Immediate |\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\nEvery war room session produces:\n\n```\nSCENARIO: [Name]\nVariables: [A, B, C]\nMost likely path: [which combination actually plays out, with probability]\n\nSEVERITY LEVELS\nBase (A only): [runway\u002FARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]\nStress (A+B): [runway\u002FARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]\nSevere (A+B+C): [runway\u002FARR impact] — existential risk: [yes\u002Fno]\n\nCASCADE MAP\n[A → domain impact → B trigger → domain impact → end state]\n\nEARLY WARNING SIGNALS\n- [Signal 1 → which scenario it indicates]\n- [Signal 2 → which scenario it indicates]\n- [Signal 3 → which scenario it indicates]\n\nHEDGES (take these actions now)\n1. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]\n2. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]\n3. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]\n\nRECOMMENDED DECISION\n[One paragraph. What to do, in what order, and why.]\n```\n\n---\n\n## Rules for Good War Room Sessions\n\n**Max 3 variables per scenario.** More than 3 is noise — you can't meaningfully prepare for 5-variable collapse. Model the 3 that actually worry you.\n\n**Quantify or estimate.** \"Revenue drops\" is not useful. \"$420K ARR at risk over 60 days\" is. Use ranges if uncertain.\n\n**Don't stop at first-order effects.** The damage is always in the cascade, not the initial hit.\n\n**Model recovery, not just impact.** Every scenario should have a \"what we do\" path.\n\n**Separate base case from sensitivity.** Don't conflate \"what probably happens\" with \"what could happen.\"\n\n**Don't over-model.** 3-4 scenarios per planning cycle is the right number. More creates analysis paralysis.\n\n---\n\n## Common Scenarios by Stage\n\n**Seed:**\n- Co-founder leaves + product misses launch\n- Funding runs out + bridge terms unfavorable\n\n**Series A:**\n- Miss ARR target + fundraise delayed\n- Key customer churns + competitor raises\n\n**Series B:**\n- Market contraction + burn multiple spikes\n- Lead investor wants pivot + team resists\n\n## Integration with C-Suite Roles\n\n| Scenario Type | Primary Roles | Cascade To |\n|--------------|---------------|------------|\n| Revenue miss | CRO, CFO | CMO (pipeline), COO (cuts), CHRO (layoffs) |\n| Key person departure | CHRO, COO | CTO (if eng), CRO (if sales) |\n| Fundraise failure | CFO, CEO | COO (runway extension), CHRO (hiring freeze) |\n| Security breach | CISO, CTO | CEO (comms), CFO (cost), CRO (customer impact) |\n| Market shift | CEO, CPO | CMO (repositioning), CRO (new segments) |\n| Competitor move | CMO, CRO | CPO (roadmap response), CEO (strategy) |\n\n## References\n- `references\u002Fscenario-planning.md` — Shell methodology, pre-mortem, Monte Carlo, cascade frameworks\n- `scripts\u002Fscenario_modeler.py` — CLI tool for structured scenario modeling\n","# Scenario War Room\n\nModel cascading what-if scenarios across all business functions. Not single-assumption stress tests — compound adversity that shows how one problem creates the next.\n\n## Keywords\nscenario planning, war room, what-if analysis, risk modeling, cascading effects, compound risk, adversity planning, contingency planning, stress test, crisis planning, multi-variable scenario, pre-mortem\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```bash\npython scripts\u002Fscenario_modeler.py   # Interactive scenario builder with cascade modeling\n```\n\nOr describe the scenario:\n```\n\u002Fwar-room \"What if we lose our top customer AND miss the Q3 fundraise?\"\n\u002Fwar-room \"What if 3 engineers quit AND we need to ship by Q3?\"\n\u002Fwar-room \"What if our market shrinks 30% AND a competitor raises $50M?\"\n```\n\n## What This Is Not\n\n- **Not** a single-assumption stress test (that's `\u002Fem:stress-test`)\n- **Not** financial modeling only — every function gets modeled\n- **Not** worst-case-only — models 3 severity levels\n- **Not** paralysis by analysis — outputs concrete hedges and triggers\n\n## Framework: 6-Step Cascade Model\n\n### Step 1: Define Scenario Variables (max 3)\nState each variable with:\n- **What changes** — specific, quantified if possible\n- **Probability** — your best estimate\n- **Timeline** — when it hits\n\n```\nVariable A: Top customer (28% ARR) gives 60-day termination notice\n  Probability: 15% | Timeline: Within 90 days\n\nVariable B: Series A fundraise delayed 6 months beyond target close\n  Probability: 25% | Timeline: Q3\n\nVariable C: Lead engineer resigns\n  Probability: 20% | Timeline: Unknown\n```\n\n### Step 2: Domain Impact Mapping\n\nFor each variable, each relevant role models impact:\n\n| Domain | Owner | Models |\n|--------|-------|--------|\n| Cash & runway | CFO | Burn impact, runway change, bridge options |\n| Revenue | CRO | ARR gap, churn cascade risk, pipeline |\n| Product | CPO | Roadmap impact, PMF risk |\n| Engineering | CTO | Velocity impact, key person risk |\n| People | CHRO | Attrition cascade, hiring freeze implications |\n| Operations | COO | Capacity, OKR impact, process risk |\n| Security | CISO | Compliance timeline risk |\n| Market | CMO | CAC impact, competitive exposure |\n\n### Step 3: Cascade Effect Mapping\n\nThis is the core. Show how Variable A triggers consequences in domains that trigger Variable B's effects:\n\n```\nTRIGGER: Customer churn ($560K ARR)\n  ↓\nCFO: Runway drops 14 → 8 months\n  ↓\nCHRO: Hiring freeze; retention risk increases (morale hit)\n  ↓\nCTO: 3 open engineering reqs frozen; roadmap slips\n  ↓\nCPO: Q4 feature launch delayed → customer retention risk\n  ↓\nCRO: NRR drops; existing accounts see reduced velocity → more churn risk\n  ↓\nCFO: [Secondary cascade — potential death spiral if not interrupted]\n```\n\nName the cascade explicitly. Show where it can be interrupted.\n\n### Step 4: Severity Matrix\n\nModel three scenarios:\n\n| Scenario | Definition | Recovery |\n|----------|------------|---------|\n| **Base** | One variable hits; others don't | Manageable with plan |\n| **Stress** | Two variables hit simultaneously | Requires significant response |\n| **Severe** | All variables hit; full cascade | Existential; requires board intervention |\n\nFor each severity level:\n- Runway impact\n- ARR impact\n- Headcount impact\n- Timeline to unacceptable state (trigger point)\n\n### Step 5: Trigger Points (Early Warning Signals)\n\nDefine the measurable signal that tells you a scenario is unfolding **before** it's confirmed:\n\n```\nTrigger for Customer Churn Risk:\n  - Sponsor goes dark for >3 weeks\n  - Usage drops >25% MoM\n  - No Q1 QBR confirmed by Dec 1\n\nTrigger for Fundraise Delay:\n  - \u003C3 term sheets after 60 days of process\n  - Lead investor requests >30-day extension on DD\n  - Competitor raises at lower valuation (market signal)\n\nTrigger for Engineering Attrition:\n  - Glassdoor activity from engineering team\n  - 2+ referral interview requests from engineers\n  - Above-market offer counter-required in last 3 months\n```\n\n### Step 6: Hedging Strategies\n\nFor each scenario: actions to take **now** (before the scenario materializes) that reduce impact if it does.\n\n| Hedge | Cost | Impact | Owner | Deadline |\n|-------|------|--------|-------|---------|\n| Establish $500K credit line | $5K\u002Fyear | Buys 3 months if churn hits | CFO | 60 days |\n| 12-month retention bonus for 3 key engineers | $90K | Locks team through fundraise | CHRO | 30 days |\n| Diversify to \u003C20% revenue concentration per customer | Sales effort | Reduces single-customer risk | CRO | 2 quarters |\n| Compress fundraise timeline, start parallel process | CEO time | Closes before runways merge | CEO | Immediate |\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\nEvery war room session produces:\n\n```\nSCENARIO: [Name]\nVariables: [A, B, C]\nMost likely path: [which combination actually plays out, with probability]\n\nSEVERITY LEVELS\nBase (A only): [runway\u002FARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]\nStress (A+B): [runway\u002FARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]\nSevere (A+B+C): [runway\u002FARR impact] — existential risk: [yes\u002Fno]\n\nCASCADE MAP\n[A → domain impact → B trigger → domain impact → end state]\n\nEARLY WARNING SIGNALS\n- [Signal 1 → which scenario it indicates]\n- [Signal 2 → which scenario it indicates]\n- [Signal 3 → which scenario it indicates]\n\nHEDGES (take these actions now)\n1. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]\n2. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]\n3. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]\n\nRECOMMENDED DECISION\n[One paragraph. What to do, in what order, and why.]\n```\n\n---\n\n## Rules for Good War Room Sessions\n\n**Max 3 variables per scenario.** More than 3 is noise — you can't meaningfully prepare for 5-variable collapse. Model the 3 that actually worry you.\n\n**Quantify or estimate.** \"Revenue drops\" is not useful. \"$420K ARR at risk over 60 days\" is. Use ranges if uncertain.\n\n**Don't stop at first-order effects.** The damage is always in the cascade, not the initial hit.\n\n**Model recovery, not just impact.** Every scenario should have a \"what we do\" path.\n\n**Separate base case from sensitivity.** Don't conflate \"what probably happens\" with \"what could happen.\"\n\n**Don't over-model.** 3-4 scenarios per planning cycle is the right number. More creates analysis paralysis.\n\n---\n\n## Common Scenarios by Stage\n\n**Seed:**\n- Co-founder leaves + product misses launch\n- Funding runs out + bridge terms unfavorable\n\n**Series A:**\n- Miss ARR target + fundraise delayed\n- Key customer churns + competitor raises\n\n**Series B:**\n- Market contraction + burn multiple spikes\n- Lead investor wants pivot + team resists\n\n## Integration with C-Suite Roles\n\n| Scenario Type | Primary Roles | Cascade To |\n|--------------|---------------|------------|\n| Revenue miss | CRO, CFO | CMO (pipeline), COO (cuts), CHRO (layoffs) |\n| Key person departure | CHRO, COO | CTO (if eng), CRO (if sales) |\n| Fundraise failure | CFO, CEO | COO (runway extension), CHRO (hiring freeze) |\n| Security breach | CISO, CTO | CEO (comms), CFO (cost), CRO (customer impact) |\n| Market shift | CEO, CPO | CMO (repositioning), CRO (new segments) |\n| Competitor move | CMO, CRO | CPO (roadmap response), CEO (strategy) |\n\n## References\n- `references\u002Fscenario-planning.md` — Shell methodology, pre-mortem, Monte Carlo, cascade frameworks\n- `scripts\u002Fscenario_modeler.py` — CLI tool for structured scenario modeling\n",{"name":5,"license":15,"metadata":44,"description":7},{"author":45,"domain":46,"updated":47,"version":48,"category":49,"frameworks":50,"python-tools":51},"Alireza Rezvani","strategic-planning",1772668800000,"1.0.0","c-level","scenario-planning","scenario_modeler.py","main","4d2fb89cdfb75f3f6fd3c6c5ec9ad90ea129eb3c","ai-agent-skills\u002F21-external-registries\u002F09-alirezarezvani-skills\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fscenario-war-room",1,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0","a solo builder.","2026-05-06 04:29:04",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":61,"prompt":71,"zipAvailable":72},[62,65,68],{"tool":63,"command":64},"npx","npx skills add luokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai --skill scenario-war-room",{"tool":66,"command":67},"bunx","bunx skills add luokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai --skill scenario-war-room",{"tool":69,"command":70},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add luokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai --skill scenario-war-room","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F21-external-registries\u002F09-alirezarezvani-skills\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fscenario-war-room\u002FSKILL.md",true,[74,80],{"path":75,"resourceType":76,"resourceTypeDesc":77,"sizeBytes":78,"sourceHtmlUrl":79},"references\u002Fscenario-planning.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",8011,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F21-external-registries\u002F09-alirezarezvani-skills\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fscenario-war-room\u002Freferences\u002Fscenario-planning.md",{"path":81,"resourceType":82,"resourceTypeDesc":83,"sizeBytes":84,"sourceHtmlUrl":85},"scripts\u002Fscenario_modeler.py","SCRIPT","脚本",17706,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F21-external-registries\u002F09-alirezarezvani-skills\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fskills\u002Fscenario-war-room\u002Fscripts\u002Fscenario_modeler.py",[87,114,131,161,192,228],{"skillNo":88,"name":89,"nameZh":6,"description":90,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":91,"categories":92,"keywords":93,"publishedAt":39},"01M6F2SKTE208174C7S7JJCZC7","write-contracts","Generates secure Aptos Move V2 smart contracts with Object model, Digital Asset integration, security patterns, and storage type guidance. Includes comprehensive storage decision framework for optimal data structure selection. Triggers on: 'write contract', 'create NFT collection', 'build marketplace', 'implement minting', 'generate Move module', 'create token contract', 'build DAO', 'implement staking'. Ask storage questions when: 'store', 'track', 'registry', 'mapping', 'list', 'collection'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F22-clawhub-skills\u002Fwrite-contracts\u002FSKILL.md",[],[94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113],"write","contracts","write contracts","storage","secure","create","generate","collection","model","decision","ask","smart-contracts","selection","objects","structure","nft","token","aptos","critical","move",{"skillNo":115,"name":116,"nameZh":6,"description":117,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":118,"categories":119,"keywords":120,"publishedAt":39},"01M6F2RFXJ6T9MKW0A7N7GM45B","web-search","通用网络搜索技能，支持多引擎搜索（百度、必应、DuckDuckGo），无需API密钥即可获取实时信息","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F22-clawhub-skills\u002Fweb-search-ex-skill\u002FSKILL.md",[],[121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130],"web","search","web search","搜索","baidu","bing","duckduckgo","百度","多引擎","internet",{"skillNo":132,"name":133,"nameZh":6,"description":134,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":135,"categories":136,"keywords":142,"publishedAt":39},"01M6F2K968G1FZEZFPW2E6B222","solo-build","Execute implementation plan tasks with TDD workflow, auto-commit, and phase gates. Use when user says \"build it\", \"start building\", \"execute plan\", \"implement tasks\", \"ship it\", or references a track ID. Do NOT use for planning (use \u002Fplan) or scaffolding (use \u002Fscaffold).","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F22-clawhub-skills\u002Fsolo-build\u002FSKILL.md",[137],{"categoryNo":138,"categoryName":139,"taxonomyType":140,"taxonomyTypeDesc":141},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,122,151,152,153,94,154,155,156,157,158,159,160],"build","solo","solo build","MCP","workflow","commit","tasks","code","Bash","plan","read","auto","references","context7","query","scaffolding","ship it","project",{"skillNo":162,"name":163,"nameZh":6,"description":164,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":165,"categories":166,"keywords":173,"publishedAt":39},"01M6F2GKN39SGHSPWYB3662YC8","react-email","Use when building HTML email templates with React components, adding a visual email editor to an application using the React Email visual editor, rendering emails to HTML, or sending emails with Resend. Covers welcome emails, password resets, notifications, order confirmations, newsletters, transactional emails, and the embeddable email editor component.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F22-clawhub-skills\u002Freact-email-skills\u002FSKILL.md",[167,170],{"categoryNo":168,"categoryName":169,"taxonomyType":140,"taxonomyTypeDesc":141},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000005","邮件与沟通",{"categoryNo":171,"categoryName":172,"taxonomyType":140,"taxonomyTypeDesc":141},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,32,187,188,189,190,191,22],"react","email","react email","github","editor","components","react components","component","welcome","https","notifications","password","node","html","resend","visual","emails","rendering",{"skillNo":193,"name":194,"nameZh":6,"description":195,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":196,"categories":197,"keywords":210,"publishedAt":39},"01M6F2FBVGVDFSG8SSFJGXA40C","APITester Agent-Driven API Testing","Test API endpoints and document responses. Define tests in plain English, run them, get formatted results. Agent-driven Postman alternative.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F22-clawhub-skills\u002Fopenclaw-api-tester\u002FSKILL.md",[198,201,204,205],{"categoryNo":199,"categoryName":200,"taxonomyType":140,"taxonomyTypeDesc":141},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":202,"categoryName":203,"taxonomyType":140,"taxonomyTypeDesc":141},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口",{"categoryNo":138,"categoryName":139,"taxonomyType":140,"taxonomyTypeDesc":141},{"categoryNo":206,"categoryName":207,"taxonomyType":208,"taxonomyTypeDesc":209},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[30,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227],"api","api testing","driven","APITester Agent Driven API Testing","test","run","postman","results","plain english","tester","endpoints","document","get","define","tests","english","api-tester",{"skillNo":229,"name":230,"nameZh":6,"description":231,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":232,"categories":233,"keywords":234,"publishedAt":39},"01M6F273Y3NGAPVJZ608BC0G9G","hubspot-implementation-plan","Generate a phased implementation plan from a HubSpot audit report. Creates prioritized, sequenced cleanup processes with effort estimates, dependencies, and automation feasibility. Use after running \u002Fhubspot-audit.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fluokai0\u002Fai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fai-agent-skills\u002F22-clawhub-skills\u002Fhubspot-implementation-plan\u002FSKILL.md",[],[152,235,236,237,238,239,240,100,37,241,242,243,244,32,245,246,22,247],"implementation","hubspot","hubspot implementation plan","automation","feasibility","cleanup","report","audit","audit report","phased implementation","dependencies","processes","hubspot audit"]