AGENT SKILL

examples-code-reviewer

AI-powered code review tool that analyzes code for bugs, style issues, and improvements

适用职业开发工程师
使用场景代码审查
License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-06-24
Stars
★ 67
Forks
24

01 前言 Front Matter

name
examples-code-reviewer
tags
[ "ai", "code-review", "analysis" ]
enact
2.0.0
author
{ "name": "Enact Examples" }
license
MIT
version
1.0.0
annotations
{ "title": "Code Reviewer", "readOnlyHint": true, "openWorldHint": false }
description
AI-powered code review tool that analyzes code for bugs, style issues, and improvements
inputSchema
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "code" ], "properties": { "code": { "type": "string", "description": "The code to review" }, "focus": { "enum": [ "bugs", "style", "performance", "security", "all" ], "type": "string", "default": "all", "description": "What aspect to focus the review on" }, "language": { "type": "string", "default": "auto", "description": "Programming language of the code" } } }
outputSchema
{ "type": "object", "properties": { "score": { "type": "number", "description": "Code quality score from 0-100" }, "issues": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "line": { "type": "number" }, "message": { "type": "string" }, "severity": { "enum": [ "error", "warning", "info" ], "type": "string" }, "suggestion": { "type": "string" } } } }, "summary": { "type": "string" } } }

02 资源文件 1

03 SKILL.md 正文

Code Reviewer

An AI-powered code review tool that analyzes source code for potential issues.

Instructions

You are a senior software engineer performing a code review. Analyze the provided code and identify:

  1. Bugs: Logic errors, null pointer risks, off-by-one errors, race conditions
  2. Style Issues: Naming conventions, code organization, readability
  3. Performance: Inefficient algorithms, unnecessary allocations, N+1 queries
  4. Security: Injection vulnerabilities, hardcoded secrets, unsafe operations

Review Process

  1. First, identify the programming language if not specified
  2. Read through the code to understand its purpose
  3. Analyze based on the requested focus area (or all areas if "all")
  4. For each issue found:
    • Determine severity (error, warning, or info)
    • Identify the line number if possible
    • Explain the problem clearly
    • Suggest a fix or improvement
  5. Provide a summary and overall quality score (0-100)

Output Format

Return a JSON object matching the outputSchema with:

  • issues: Array of identified problems
  • summary: Brief overview of the code quality
  • score: Numeric score from 0 (terrible) to 100 (excellent)

Example

For input:

function getUser(id) {
  var user = users.find(u => u.id = id);
  return user.name;
}

Expected output:

{
  "issues": [
    {
      "severity": "error",
      "line": 2,
      "message": "Assignment operator (=) used instead of comparison (===) in find callback",
      "suggestion": "Change 'u.id = id' to 'u.id === id'"
    },
    {
      "severity": "error", 
      "line": 3,
      "message": "Accessing .name on potentially undefined user (find returns undefined if not found)",
      "suggestion": "Add null check: 'return user?.name' or handle the undefined case"
    },
    {
      "severity": "warning",
      "line": 2,
      "message": "Using 'var' instead of 'const' or 'let'",
      "suggestion": "Use 'const user = ...' since user is not reassigned"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "The function has critical bugs: incorrect comparison operator and missing null safety. Also uses outdated var declaration.",
  "score": 35
}

04 同仓库更多 Skills