iterate-art-to-sanity

When to use

Use when generated images need quality gating before acceptance or delivery.

Workflow

1. Read the active visual/media contracts and the task's existing candidate/revision allowance. Write observable acceptance criteria before producing a candidate; retain the required anatomy, text, language and safety checks below.
2. Review every requested item against those criteria and its current source identity. For each failure, record the item or region, expected property, observation, evidence and likely stage owner. A good batch average cannot clear one failed required item.
3. Choose the smallest available, authorized correction that addresses the cause. A local visual defect, wrong composition, text error and missing provenance need different remedies. Keep accepted siblings unchanged; do not regenerate a whole batch solely because one item failed.
4. Before another operation, check remaining allowance and actual repair capability. Preserve rejected attempts and their ancestry. Stop further production when the allowance is exhausted, a prerequisite is missing, or another attempt has no materially different permitted approach; record unresolved work and the next decision. No new default allowance, model switch, provider fallback or installation is implied.
5. Review the corrected output at delivery size and refresh affected evidence. A partial edit may still invalidate a whole-set approval in the selected workflow; it never inherits acceptance from the unchanged regions. Technical, independent and human review remain separate from promotion.

Output

• criterion-specific findings for each candidate, with its identity and actual review status
• permitted correction or explicit blocked/exhausted status, retaining failed attempts
• remaining misses and affected approval/validation requirements before handoff

Notes

• Required fail conditions:
  • unintended anatomy or attachment artifacts against the declared subject, including unexpected extra hands
  • duplicated/malformed letters in rendered text
  • text language mismatch vs required language
  • nudity
  • graphic violence
• A plausible image or favorable score does not repair missing coverage, rights, provenance or required review. An exhausted allowance leaves unresolved criteria; it does not make the best remaining candidate accepted.