paper-narrative-archetypes
Select a narrative archetype from the RESULTS SHAPE (null-result, heterogeneity/targeting, methods-comparison, effect-with-implications) and structure the paper around it — papers must not all read the same.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-09-28
- Stars
- ★ 5
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- paper-narrative-archetypes
- layer
- writing
- version
- 1.0
- priority
- 1
- resources
- []
- description
- Select a narrative archetype from the RESULTS SHAPE (null-result, heterogeneity/targeting, methods-comparison, effect-with-implications) and structure the paper around it — papers must not all read the same.
- rule_severity
- mandatory
- trigger_keywords
- [ "narrative", "archetype", "story", "framing", "structure" ]
- applicable_stages
- [ "OutlineAgent", "Writer" ]
- references_skills
- [ "paper-writing-style-rules" ]
- applicable_datasets
- []
- applicable_task_types
- []
03 SKILL.md 正文
Narrative Archetypes (Arc S)
A paper's structure should follow its FINDINGS, not a fixed template.
Pick ONE archetype using the deterministic selection rule, name it in
the outline's narrative_hook, and let it drive section emphasis.
Selection rule (apply in order, first match wins)
- Null-result paper — the headline CI covers zero (prediction: best model ≈ baseline; causal: effect CI spans 0; ITR: value-gain CI spans 0). The null IS the story: lead with it, devote Discussion to what the well-estimated null rules out and for whom.
- Heterogeneity / targeting paper — subgroup gaps > 5%, CATE spread is substantial, or an ITR rule with a positive gain. The average is the backdrop; the WHO-differs question is the spine.
- Methods-comparison paper — estimators/models materially disagree (beyond 2 SE) or a robustness battery is the most informative output. The disagreement is the finding; explain WHY the methods diverge on this data.
- Effect-with-implications paper — a clear, robust effect. Classic arc, but the Discussion must earn it: concrete decisions a school/policymaker would change.
Per-archetype emphasis
| Archetype | Expand | Compress |
|---|---|---|
| Null-result | Discussion (what the null excludes), power/precision framing | Related-work tour |
| Heterogeneity/targeting | Subgroup/rule sections, fairness of targeting | Average-effect exposition |
| Methods-comparison | Methods + the divergence anatomy | Implications |
| Effect-with-implications | Implications, mechanisms | Methods minutiae |
Anti-sameness rules
- Two papers with different archetypes must not share their opening paragraph structure. Do not open every abstract with "In this study, we...".
- The title should signal the archetype (a null-result paper's title says so — "No Detectable...", "Little Evidence That...").
- Never force archetype 4's triumphant arc onto shapes 1–3; that is the formulaic failure this skill exists to prevent.
Source provenance
Authored in V3.7 Arc S per the v4 roadmap (internal) §6; extends the OutlineAgent emphasis-trigger mechanism.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
acm-fixture
Fixture writing skill for ACM acmart sigconf paper output.
prediction-fixture
Fixture skill for the prediction task type; references shap-fixture.
causal-fixture
Fixture skill for the causal_inference task type.
shap-fixture
Fixture methodology for SHAP feature importance analysis.
cluster-recon-fixture
Fixture methodology for reconstructing cluster IDs from fingerprint variables.
hsls09-fixture
Fixture skill for HSLS:09 with a bundled YAML resource and one cross-reference.