lm-studio-subagents
暂无简介
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-06-24
- Stars
- ★ 67
- Forks
- 24
02 资源文件 73
- 参考文档checklist.md13.4 KB
- 其他customize.toml1.5 KB
- 参考文档instructions.md1.1 KB
- 参考文档nfr-report-template.md13.6 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/adr-quality-readiness-checklist.md24.8 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/api-request.md16.7 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/api-testing-patterns.md26.3 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/auth-session.md15.8 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/burn-in.md6.4 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/ci-burn-in.md22.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/component-tdd.md15.8 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/contract-testing.md38.1 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/data-factories.md15.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/email-auth.md24.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/error-handling.md22.4 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/feature-flags.md22.7 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/file-utils.md13.4 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/fixture-architecture.md12.1 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/fixtures-composition.md11.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/intercept-network-call.md13.2 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/log.md11.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/network-error-monitor.md12.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/network-first.md15.9 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/network-recorder.md15.1 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/nfr-criteria.md26.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/overview.md9.4 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/pact-broker-webhooks.md13.1 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/pact-consumer-di.md11.7 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/pact-consumer-framework-setup.md35.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/pact-mcp.md8.8 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/pactjs-utils-consumer-helpers.md15.7 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/pactjs-utils-overview.md10.2 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/pactjs-utils-provider-verifier.md17.8 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/pactjs-utils-request-filter.md7.1 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/playwright-cli.md14.6 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/playwright-config.md21.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/probability-impact.md18.8 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/recurse.md12.6 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/risk-governance.md20.5 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/selective-testing.md21.3 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/selector-resilience.md19.3 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/test-healing-patterns.md20.9 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/test-levels-framework.md14.4 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/test-priorities-matrix.md11.2 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/test-quality.md24.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/timing-debugging.md13.7 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/visual-debugging.md17.1 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/webhook-module-setup.md5.7 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/webhook-providers.md6.3 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/webhook-risk-guidance.md6.3 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/webhook-template-matchers.md5.9 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/webhook-testing-fundamentals.md3.1 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/webhook-timeout-error.md5.6 KB
- 参考文档resources/knowledge/webhook-waiting-querying.md6.9 KB
- 资产文件resources/tea-index.csv10.7 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-01-load-context.md3.7 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-01b-resume.md3.2 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-02-define-thresholds.md2.5 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-03-gather-evidence.md3.1 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-04-evaluate-and-score.md6.8 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-04a-subagent-security.md3.1 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-04b-subagent-performance.md1.8 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-04c-subagent-reliability.md1.8 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-04d-subagent-scalability.md2.0 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-04e-aggregate-nfr.md6.8 KB
- 参考文档steps-c/step-05-generate-report.md3.1 KB
- 参考文档steps-e/step-01-assess.md1.2 KB
- 参考文档steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md1.4 KB
- 参考文档steps-v/step-01-validate.md1.8 KB
- 参考文档validation-report-20260127-095021.md2.0 KB
- 参考文档validation-report-20260127-102401.md3.7 KB
- 参考文档workflow-plan.md397 B
- 参考文档workflow.yaml1.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
LM Studio Subagents
Overview
Offload LLM tasks to local models running in LM Studio to save API costs and maintain privacy. LM Studio provides an OpenAI-compatible API for local models, making it a drop-in replacement for cloud LLM calls. Use local models for high-volume, lower-complexity tasks like summarization, extraction, classification, and reformatting while reserving cloud APIs for complex reasoning.
Instructions
When a user wants to use local models via LM Studio, determine the task:
Task A: Set up LM Studio as a local API server
-
Download and install LM Studio from
https://lmstudio.ai/ -
Download a model through the LM Studio UI (recommended starting models):
lmstudio-community/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct-GGUF(general purpose)lmstudio-community/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3-GGUF(fast inference)lmstudio-community/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF(multilingual)
-
Start the local server:
- Open LM Studio, go to the "Developer" tab
- Load a model and click "Start Server"
- Server runs at
http://localhost:1234by default
-
Verify the server is running:
curl http://localhost:1234/v1/models
Task B: Call LM Studio from Python (OpenAI-compatible)
from openai import OpenAI
# Point to local LM Studio server
client = OpenAI(
base_url="http://localhost:1234/v1",
api_key="lm-studio", # Any string works
)
def ask_local(prompt: str, system: str = "You are a helpful assistant.") -> str:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="loaded-model", # LM Studio ignores this, uses loaded model
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": system},
{"role": "user", "content": prompt},
],
temperature=0.3,
max_tokens=1024,
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
# Example usage
result = ask_local("Summarize this text in 2 sentences: ...")
print(result)
Task C: Create task-specific subagents
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="http://localhost:1234/v1", api_key="lm-studio")
class LocalSubagent:
def __init__(self, system_prompt: str, temperature: float = 0.2):
self.system_prompt = system_prompt
self.temperature = temperature
def run(self, user_input: str) -> str:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="loaded-model",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": self.system_prompt},
{"role": "user", "content": user_input},
],
temperature=self.temperature,
max_tokens=2048,
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
# Define specialized subagents
summarizer = LocalSubagent(
system_prompt="You are a summarization expert. Produce concise 2-3 sentence summaries."
)
classifier = LocalSubagent(
system_prompt="Classify the input into one of these categories: billing, technical, general, urgent. Respond with only the category name.",
temperature=0.0,
)
extractor = LocalSubagent(
system_prompt="Extract all named entities (people, organizations, dates, amounts) from the text. Return as JSON.",
temperature=0.0,
)
# Use the subagents
summary = summarizer.run("Long document text here...")
category = classifier.run("I can't log into my account and I need to submit a report by EOD")
entities = extractor.run("John Smith signed a $50,000 contract with Acme Corp on March 15, 2025")
Task D: Batch processing with local models
import asyncio
from openai import AsyncOpenAI
client = AsyncOpenAI(base_url="http://localhost:1234/v1", api_key="lm-studio")
async def process_batch(items: list[str], system_prompt: str, max_concurrent: int = 4) -> list[str]:
semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent)
async def process_one(text: str) -> str:
async with semaphore:
response = await client.chat.completions.create(
model="loaded-model",
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": system_prompt},
{"role": "user", "content": text},
],
temperature=0.2,
max_tokens=512,
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
tasks = [process_one(item) for item in items]
return await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
# Batch summarize 100 documents
documents = ["doc1 text...", "doc2 text...", ...] # 100 documents
summaries = asyncio.run(process_batch(
documents,
system_prompt="Summarize in 2 sentences.",
max_concurrent=2, # LM Studio handles one request at a time by default
))
Task E: Cost comparison and routing strategy
Decide when to use local vs. cloud models:
| Task | Local Model | Cloud API | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summarization | Good | Better | Local (save cost) |
| Classification | Good | Good | Local (save cost) |
| Data extraction | Moderate | Good | Local for simple, cloud for complex |
| Code generation | Moderate | Better | Cloud |
| Complex reasoning | Weak | Strong | Cloud |
| Translation | Good | Better | Local for common languages |
def smart_route(task_type: str, text: str) -> str:
"""Route tasks between local and cloud models."""
local_tasks = {"summarize", "classify", "extract_simple", "reformat"}
if task_type in local_tasks:
return ask_local(text) # Free, local inference
else:
return ask_cloud(text) # Paid, cloud API
Examples
Example 1: Summarize 500 support tickets locally
User request: "Summarize all our support tickets from last month without API costs"
tickets = load_tickets_from_csv("tickets.csv")
summaries = asyncio.run(process_batch(
[t["description"] for t in tickets],
system_prompt="Summarize this support ticket in one sentence. Include the main issue and any resolution.",
max_concurrent=2,
))
# Cost: $0 (vs ~$15 with GPT-4)
Example 2: Classify incoming emails
User request: "Auto-classify emails into categories using a local model"
classifier = LocalSubagent(
system_prompt="Classify this email into exactly one category: sales, support, spam, internal. Reply with only the category.",
temperature=0.0,
)
for email in emails:
category = classifier.run(email["subject"] + "\n" + email["body"])
email["category"] = category.strip().lower()
Example 3: Extract structured data from documents
User request: "Extract names, dates, and amounts from these contracts"
extractor = LocalSubagent(
system_prompt='Extract fields from the contract as JSON: {"parties": [], "date": "", "amount": "", "term": ""}',
temperature=0.0,
)
for doc in contracts:
data = extractor.run(doc["text"])
print(f"{doc['filename']}: {data}")
Guidelines
- LM Studio processes one request at a time by default. Set
max_concurrent=1-2for batch jobs. - Use quantized models (Q4_K_M or Q5_K_M) for best speed-to-quality ratio on consumer hardware.
- 8B parameter models are the sweet spot for most extraction and classification tasks.
- Set
temperature=0.0for deterministic tasks like classification and extraction. - Test local model accuracy on a sample of 20-50 items before running full batches.
- For tasks where local models underperform, fall back to cloud APIs automatically.
- Keep LM Studio running as a background service for always-on local inference.
- Monitor RAM and VRAM usage; 7B models need ~6 GB RAM (quantized) or ~16 GB (full precision).