AGENT SKILL

competitive-intel

Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building sales battlecards, tracking market moves, positioning against alternatives, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-05-02
Stars
★ 3
Forks
1

01 前言 Front Matter

name
competitive-intel
license
MIT
metadata
{ "author": "Alireza Rezvani", "domain": "competitive-strategy", "updated": 1772668800000, "version": "1.0.0", "category": "c-level", "frameworks": "ci-playbook, battlecard-template" }
description
Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building sales battlecards, tracking market moves, positioning against alternatives, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning.

03 SKILL.md 正文

Competitive Intelligence

Systematic competitor tracking. Not obsession — intelligence that drives real decisions.

Keywords

competitive intelligence, competitor analysis, battlecard, win/loss analysis, competitive positioning, competitive tracking, market intelligence, competitor research, SWOT, competitive map, feature gap analysis, competitive strategy

Quick Start

/ci:landscape         — Map your competitive space (direct, indirect, future)
/ci:battlecard [name] — Build a sales battlecard for a specific competitor
/ci:winloss           — Analyze recent wins and losses by reason
/ci:update [name]     — Track what a competitor did recently
/ci:map               — Build competitive positioning map

Framework: 5-Layer Intelligence System

Layer 1: Competitor Identification

Direct competitors: Same ICP, same problem, comparable solution, similar price point. Indirect competitors: Same budget, different solution (including "do nothing" and "build in-house"). Future competitors: Well-funded startups in adjacent space; large incumbents with stated roadmap overlap.

The 2x2 Threat Matrix:

Same ICP Different ICP
Same problem Direct threat Adjacent (watch)
Different problem Displacement risk Ignore for now

Update this quarterly. Who's moved quadrants?

Layer 2: Tracking Dimensions

Track these 8 dimensions per competitor:

Dimension Sources Cadence
Product moves Changelog, G2/Capterra reviews, Twitter/LinkedIn Monthly
Pricing changes Pricing page, sales call intel, customer feedback Triggered
Funding Crunchbase, TechCrunch, LinkedIn Triggered
Hiring signals LinkedIn job postings, Indeed Monthly
Partnerships Press releases, co-marketing Triggered
Customer wins Case studies, review sites, LinkedIn Monthly
Customer losses Win/loss interviews, churned accounts Ongoing
Messaging shifts Homepage, ads (Facebook/Google Ad Library) Quarterly

Layer 3: Analysis Frameworks

SWOT per Competitor:

  • Strengths: What do they do well? Where do they win?
  • Weaknesses: Where do they lose? What do customers complain about?
  • Opportunities: What could they do that would threaten you?
  • Threats: What's their existential risk?

Competitive Positioning Map (2 axis): Choose axes that matter for your buyers:

  • Common: Price vs Feature Depth; Enterprise-ready vs SMB-ready; Easy to implement vs Configurable
  • Pick axes that show YOUR differentiation clearly

Feature Gap Analysis:

Feature You Competitor A Competitor B Gap status
[Feature] ✅ ✅ ❌ Your advantage
[Feature] ❌ ✅ ✅ Gap — roadmap?
[Feature] ✅ ❌ ❌ Moat
[Feature] ❌ ❌ ✅ Competitor B only

Layer 4: Output Formats

For Sales (CRO): Battlecards — one page per competitor, designed for pre-call prep. See templates/battlecard-template.md

For Marketing (CMO): Positioning update — message shifts, new differentiators, claims to stop or start making.

For Product (CPO): Feature gap summary — what customers ask for that we don't have, what competitors ship, what to reprioritize.

For CEO/Board: Monthly competitive summary — 1-page: who moved, what it means, recommended responses.

Layer 5: Intelligence Cadence

Monthly (scheduled):

  • Review all tier-1 competitors (direct threats, top 3)
  • Update battlecards with new intel
  • Publish 1-page summary to leadership

Triggered (event-based):

  • Competitor raises funding → assess implications within 48 hours
  • Competitor launches major feature → product + sales response within 1 week
  • Competitor poaches key customer → win/loss interview within 2 weeks
  • Competitor changes pricing → analyze and respond within 1 week

Quarterly:

  • Full competitive landscape review
  • Update positioning map
  • Refresh ICP competitive threat assessment
  • Add/remove companies from tracking list

Win/Loss Analysis

This is the highest-signal competitive data you have. Most companies do it too rarely.

When to interview:

  • Every lost deal >$50K ACV
  • Every churn >6 months tenure
  • Every competitive win (learn why — it may not be what you think)

Who conducts it:

  • NOT the AE who worked the deal (too close, prospect won't be candid)
  • Customer success, product team, or external researcher

Question structure:

  1. "Walk me through your evaluation process"
  2. "Who else were you considering?"
  3. "What were the top 3 criteria in your decision?"
  4. "Where did [our product] fall short?"
  5. "What was the deciding factor?"
  6. "What would have changed your decision?"

Aggregate findings monthly:

  • Win reasons (rank by frequency)
  • Loss reasons (rank by frequency)
  • Competitor win rates (by competitor, by segment)
  • Patterns over time

The Balance: Intelligence Without Obsession

Signs you're over-tracking competitors:

  • Roadmap decisions are primarily driven by "they just shipped X"
  • Team morale drops when competitors fundraise
  • You're shipping features you don't believe in to match their checklist
  • Pricing discussions always start with "well, they charge X"

Signs you're under-tracking:

  • Your AEs get blindsided on calls
  • Prospects know more about competitors than your team does
  • You missed a major product launch until customers told you
  • Your positioning hasn't changed in 12+ months despite market moves

The right posture:

  • Know competitors well enough to win against them
  • Don't let them set your agenda
  • Your roadmap is led by customer problems, informed by competitive gaps

Distributing Intelligence

Audience Format Cadence Owner
AEs + SDRs Updated battlecards in CRM Monthly + triggered CRO
Product Feature gap analysis Quarterly CPO
Marketing Positioning brief Quarterly CMO
Leadership 1-page competitive summary Monthly CEO/COO
Board Competitive landscape slide Quarterly CEO

One source of truth: All competitive intel lives in one place (Notion, Confluence, Salesforce). Avoid Slack-only distribution — it disappears.


Red Flags in Competitive Intelligence

Signal What it means
Competitor's win rate >50% in your core segment Fundamental positioning problem, not sales problem
Same objection from 5+ deals: "competitor has X" Feature gap that's real, not just optics
Competitor hired 10 engineers in your domain Major product investment incoming
Competitor raised >$20M and targets your ICP 12-month runway for them to compete hard
Prospects evaluate you to justify competitor decision You're the "check box" — fix perception or segment

Integration with C-Suite Roles

Intelligence Type Feeds To Output Format
Product moves CPO Roadmap input, feature gap analysis
Pricing changes CRO, CFO Pricing response recommendations
Funding rounds CEO, CFO Strategic positioning update
Hiring signals CHRO, CTO Talent market intelligence
Customer wins/losses CRO, CMO Battlecard updates, positioning shifts
Marketing campaigns CMO Counter-positioning, channel intelligence

References

  • references/ci-playbook.md — OSINT sources, win/loss framework, positioning map construction
  • templates/battlecard-template.md — sales battlecard template

04 同仓库更多 Skills

levalencia
levalencia/agent-god-mode

zarr-python

Chunked N-D arrays for cloud storage. Compressed arrays, parallel I/O, S3/GCS integration, NumPy/Dask/Xarray compatible, for large-scale scientific computing pipelines.

★ 3
levalencia
levalencia/agent-god-mode

zabbix

Zabbix monitoring system automation via API and Python. Use when: (1) Managing hosts, templates, items, triggers, or host groups, (2) Automating monitoring configuration, (3) Sending data via Zabbix trapper/sender, (4) Querying historical data or events, (5) Bulk operations on Zabbix objects, (6) Maintenance window management, (7) User/permission management

开发工程师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3
levalencia
levalencia/agent-god-mode

x-twitter-growth

X/Twitter growth engine for building audience, crafting viral content, and analyzing engagement. Use when the user wants to grow on X/Twitter, write tweets or threads, analyze their X profile, research competitors on X, plan a posting strategy, or optimize engagement. Complements social-content (generic multi-platform) with X-specific depth: algorithm mechanics, thread engineering, reply strategy, profile optimization, and competitive intelligence via web search.

★ 3
levalencia
levalencia/agent-god-mode

what-if-oracle

Run structured What-If scenario analysis with multi-branch possibility exploration. Use this skill when the user asks speculative questions like "what if...", "what would happen if...", "what are the possibilities", "explore scenarios", "scenario analysis", "possibility space", "what could go wrong", "best case / worst case", "risk analysis", "contingency planning", "strategic options", or any question about uncertain futures. Also trigger when the user faces a fork-in-the-road decision, wants to stress-test an idea, or needs to think through consequences before committing.

★ 3
levalencia
levalencia/agent-god-mode

vercel-react-best-practices

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

前端开发
★ 3
levalencia
levalencia/agent-god-mode

venue-templates

Access comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.

内容创作者写作与文案资料检索与研究
★ 3