[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6EB3EMXJDKS3MXC38KNP48S":3,"skill-same:01M6EB3EMXJDKS3MXC38KNP48S":84},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":39,"linkOnly":40,"markdownContent":41,"markdownBody":42,"frontMatter":43,"refName":51,"commitSha":52,"skillDirectory":53,"forksCount":54,"repositoryHtmlUrl":55,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":56,"ownerBlogUrl":57,"ownerDescription":58,"updatedAt":59,"install":60,"resources":73},"01M6EB3EMXJDKS3MXC38KNP48S","board-deck-builder",null,"Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.","levalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode","levalencia","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F6962857?v=4","01M6EB0FZZ4BPQPC4HET4QY6NM","Luis Valencia ","01M6EB0G4HWHPWW0H9X7QKSAHP",3,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002F.gemini-board-deck-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"board deck builder","deck builder","board","deck","builder","narrative","update","investor update","bad","roles","fundraising","delivery","structure","frameworks","use","business","perspectives","common","template","framework","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: \"board-deck-builder\"\ndescription: \"Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.\"\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  version: 1.0.0\n  author: Alireza Rezvani\n  category: c-level\n  domain: board-governance\n  updated: 2026-03-05\n  frameworks: deck-frameworks, board-deck-template\n---\n\n# Board Deck Builder\n\nBuild board decks that tell a story — not just show data. Every section has an owner, a narrative, and a \"so what.\"\n\n## Keywords\nboard deck, investor update, board meeting, board pack, investor relations, quarterly review, board presentation, fundraising deck, investor deck, board narrative, QBR, quarterly business review\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```\n\u002Fboard-deck [quarterly|monthly|fundraising] [stage: seed|seriesA|seriesB]\n```\n\nProvide available metrics. The builder fills gaps with explicit placeholders — never invents numbers.\n\n## Deck Structure (Standard Order)\n\nEvery section follows: **Headline → Data → Narrative → Ask\u002FNext**\n\n### 1. Executive Summary (CEO)\n**3 sentences. No more.**\n- Sentence 1: State of the business (where we are)\n- Sentence 2: Biggest thing that happened this period\n- Sentence 3: Where we're going next quarter\n\n*Bad:* \"We had a good quarter with lots of progress across all areas.\"\n*Good:* \"We closed Q3 at $2.4M ARR (+22% QoQ), signed our largest enterprise contract, and enter Q4 with 14-month runway. The strategic shift to mid-market is working — ACV up 40% and sales cycle down 3 weeks. Q4 priority: close the $3M Series A and hit $2.8M ARR.\"\n\n### 2. Key Metrics Dashboard (COO)\n**6-8 metrics max. Use a table.**\n\n| Metric | This Period | Last Period | Target | Status |\n|--------|-------------|-------------|--------|--------|\n| ARR | $2.4M | $1.97M | $2.3M | ✅ |\n| MoM growth | 8.1% | 7.2% | 7.5% | ✅ |\n| Burn multiple | 1.8x | 2.1x | \u003C2x | ✅ |\n| NRR | 112% | 108% | >110% | ✅ |\n| CAC payback | 11 months | 14 months | \u003C12 months | ✅ |\n| Headcount | 24 | 21 | 25 | ? |\n\nPick metrics the board actually tracks. Swap out anything they've said they don't care about.\n\n### 3. Financial Update (CFO)\n- P&L summary: Revenue, COGS, Gross margin, OpEx, Net burn\n- Cash position and runway (months)\n- Burn multiple trend (3-quarter view)\n- Variance to plan (what was different and why)\n- Forecast update for next quarter\n\n**One sentence on each variance.** Boards hate \"revenue was below target\" with no explanation. Say why.\n\n### 4. Revenue & Pipeline (CRO)\n- ARR waterfall: starting → new → expansion → churn → ending\n- NRR and logo churn rates\n- Pipeline by stage (in $, not just count)\n- Forecast: next quarter with confidence level\n- Top 3 deals: name\u002Famount\u002Fclose date\u002Frisk\n\n**The forecast must have a confidence level.** \"We expect $2.8M\" is weak. \"High confidence $2.6M, upside to $2.9M if two late-stage deals close\" is useful.\n\n### 5. Product Update (CPO)\n- Shipped this quarter: 3-5 bullets, user impact for each\n- Shipping next quarter: 3-5 bullets with target dates\n- PMF signal: NPS trend, DAU\u002FMAU ratio, feature adoption\n- One key learning from customer research\n\n**No feature lists.** Only features with evidence of user impact.\n\n### 6. Growth & Marketing (CMO)\n- CAC by channel (table)\n- Pipeline contribution by channel ($)\n- Brand\u002Fawareness metrics relevant to stage (traffic, share of voice)\n- What's working, what's being cut, what's being tested\n\n### 7. Engineering & Technical (CTO)\n- Delivery velocity trend (last 4 quarters)\n- Tech debt ratio and plan\n- Infrastructure: uptime, incidents, cost trend\n- Security posture (one line, flag anything pending)\n\n**Keep this short unless there's a material issue.** Boards don't need sprint details.\n\n### 8. Team & People (CHRO)\n- Headcount: actual vs plan\n- Hiring: offers out, pipeline, time-to-fill trend\n- Attrition: regrettable vs non-regrettable\n- Engagement: last survey score, trend\n- Key hires this quarter, key open roles\n\n### 9. Risk & Security (CISO)\n- Security posture: status of critical controls\n- Compliance: certifications in progress, deadlines\n- Incidents this quarter (if any): impact, resolution, prevention\n- Top 3 risks and mitigation status\n\n### 10. Strategic Outlook (CEO)\n- Next quarter priorities: 3-5 items, ranked\n- Key decisions needed from the board\n- Asks: budget, introductions, advice, votes\n\n**The \"asks\" slide is the most important.** Be specific. \"We'd like 3 warm introductions to CFOs at Series B companies\" beats \"any help would be appreciated.\"\n\n### 11. Appendix\n- Detailed financial model\n- Full pipeline data\n- Cohort retention charts\n- Customer case studies\n- Detailed headcount breakdown\n\n---\n\n## Narrative Framework\n\nBoards see 10+ decks per quarter. Yours needs a through-line.\n\n**The 4-Act Structure:**\n1. **Where we said we'd be** (last quarter's targets)\n2. **Where we actually are** (honest assessment)\n3. **Why the gap exists** (one cause per variance, not excuses)\n4. **What we're doing about it** (specific, dated actions)\n\nThis works for good news AND bad news. It's credible because it acknowledges reality.\n\n**Opening frame:** Start with the one thing that matters most — the board should know the key message by slide 3, not slide 30.\n\n---\n\n## Delivering Bad News\n\nNever bury it. Boards find out eventually. Finding out late makes it worse.\n\n**Framework:**\n1. **State it plainly** — \"We missed Q3 ARR target by $300K (12% gap)\"\n2. **Own the cause** — \"Primary driver was longer-than-expected sales cycle in enterprise segment\"\n3. **Show you understand it** — \"We analyzed 8 lost\u002Fstalled deals; the pattern is X\"\n4. **Present the fix** — \"We've made 3 changes: [specific, dated changes]\"\n5. **Update the forecast** — \"Revised Q4 target is $2.6M; here's the bottom-up build\"\n\n**What NOT to do:**\n- Don't lead with good news to soften bad news — boards notice and distrust the framing\n- Don't explain without owning — \"market conditions\" is not a cause, it's a context\n- Don't present a fix without data behind it\n- Don't show a revised forecast without showing your assumptions\n\n---\n\n## Common Board Deck Mistakes\n\n| Mistake | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Too many slides (>25) | Cut ruthlessly — if you can't explain it in the room, the slide is wrong |\n| Metrics without targets | Every metric needs a target and a status |\n| No narrative | Data without story forces boards to draw their own conclusions |\n| Burying bad news | Lead with it, own it, fix it |\n| Vague asks | Specific, actionable, person-assigned asks only |\n| No variance explanation | Every gap from target needs one-sentence cause |\n| Stale appendix | Appendix is only useful if it's current |\n| Designing for the reader, not the room | Decks are presented — they must work spoken aloud |\n\n---\n\n## Cadence Notes\n\n**Quarterly (standard):** Full deck, all sections, 20-30 slides. Sent 48 hours in advance.\n**Monthly (for early-stage):** Condensed — metrics dashboard, financials, pipeline, top risks. 8-12 slides.\n**Fundraising:** Opens with market\u002Fvision, closes with ask. See `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` for Sequoia format.\n\n## References\n- `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` — SaaS board pack format, Sequoia structure, investor tailoring\n- `templates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md` — fill-in template for complete board decks\n","# Board Deck Builder\n\nBuild board decks that tell a story — not just show data. Every section has an owner, a narrative, and a \"so what.\"\n\n## Keywords\nboard deck, investor update, board meeting, board pack, investor relations, quarterly review, board presentation, fundraising deck, investor deck, board narrative, QBR, quarterly business review\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```\n\u002Fboard-deck [quarterly|monthly|fundraising] [stage: seed|seriesA|seriesB]\n```\n\nProvide available metrics. The builder fills gaps with explicit placeholders — never invents numbers.\n\n## Deck Structure (Standard Order)\n\nEvery section follows: **Headline → Data → Narrative → Ask\u002FNext**\n\n### 1. Executive Summary (CEO)\n**3 sentences. No more.**\n- Sentence 1: State of the business (where we are)\n- Sentence 2: Biggest thing that happened this period\n- Sentence 3: Where we're going next quarter\n\n*Bad:* \"We had a good quarter with lots of progress across all areas.\"\n*Good:* \"We closed Q3 at $2.4M ARR (+22% QoQ), signed our largest enterprise contract, and enter Q4 with 14-month runway. The strategic shift to mid-market is working — ACV up 40% and sales cycle down 3 weeks. Q4 priority: close the $3M Series A and hit $2.8M ARR.\"\n\n### 2. Key Metrics Dashboard (COO)\n**6-8 metrics max. Use a table.**\n\n| Metric | This Period | Last Period | Target | Status |\n|--------|-------------|-------------|--------|--------|\n| ARR | $2.4M | $1.97M | $2.3M | ✅ |\n| MoM growth | 8.1% | 7.2% | 7.5% | ✅ |\n| Burn multiple | 1.8x | 2.1x | \u003C2x | ✅ |\n| NRR | 112% | 108% | >110% | ✅ |\n| CAC payback | 11 months | 14 months | \u003C12 months | ✅ |\n| Headcount | 24 | 21 | 25 | ? |\n\nPick metrics the board actually tracks. Swap out anything they've said they don't care about.\n\n### 3. Financial Update (CFO)\n- P&L summary: Revenue, COGS, Gross margin, OpEx, Net burn\n- Cash position and runway (months)\n- Burn multiple trend (3-quarter view)\n- Variance to plan (what was different and why)\n- Forecast update for next quarter\n\n**One sentence on each variance.** Boards hate \"revenue was below target\" with no explanation. Say why.\n\n### 4. Revenue & Pipeline (CRO)\n- ARR waterfall: starting → new → expansion → churn → ending\n- NRR and logo churn rates\n- Pipeline by stage (in $, not just count)\n- Forecast: next quarter with confidence level\n- Top 3 deals: name\u002Famount\u002Fclose date\u002Frisk\n\n**The forecast must have a confidence level.** \"We expect $2.8M\" is weak. \"High confidence $2.6M, upside to $2.9M if two late-stage deals close\" is useful.\n\n### 5. Product Update (CPO)\n- Shipped this quarter: 3-5 bullets, user impact for each\n- Shipping next quarter: 3-5 bullets with target dates\n- PMF signal: NPS trend, DAU\u002FMAU ratio, feature adoption\n- One key learning from customer research\n\n**No feature lists.** Only features with evidence of user impact.\n\n### 6. Growth & Marketing (CMO)\n- CAC by channel (table)\n- Pipeline contribution by channel ($)\n- Brand\u002Fawareness metrics relevant to stage (traffic, share of voice)\n- What's working, what's being cut, what's being tested\n\n### 7. Engineering & Technical (CTO)\n- Delivery velocity trend (last 4 quarters)\n- Tech debt ratio and plan\n- Infrastructure: uptime, incidents, cost trend\n- Security posture (one line, flag anything pending)\n\n**Keep this short unless there's a material issue.** Boards don't need sprint details.\n\n### 8. Team & People (CHRO)\n- Headcount: actual vs plan\n- Hiring: offers out, pipeline, time-to-fill trend\n- Attrition: regrettable vs non-regrettable\n- Engagement: last survey score, trend\n- Key hires this quarter, key open roles\n\n### 9. Risk & Security (CISO)\n- Security posture: status of critical controls\n- Compliance: certifications in progress, deadlines\n- Incidents this quarter (if any): impact, resolution, prevention\n- Top 3 risks and mitigation status\n\n### 10. Strategic Outlook (CEO)\n- Next quarter priorities: 3-5 items, ranked\n- Key decisions needed from the board\n- Asks: budget, introductions, advice, votes\n\n**The \"asks\" slide is the most important.** Be specific. \"We'd like 3 warm introductions to CFOs at Series B companies\" beats \"any help would be appreciated.\"\n\n### 11. Appendix\n- Detailed financial model\n- Full pipeline data\n- Cohort retention charts\n- Customer case studies\n- Detailed headcount breakdown\n\n---\n\n## Narrative Framework\n\nBoards see 10+ decks per quarter. Yours needs a through-line.\n\n**The 4-Act Structure:**\n1. **Where we said we'd be** (last quarter's targets)\n2. **Where we actually are** (honest assessment)\n3. **Why the gap exists** (one cause per variance, not excuses)\n4. **What we're doing about it** (specific, dated actions)\n\nThis works for good news AND bad news. It's credible because it acknowledges reality.\n\n**Opening frame:** Start with the one thing that matters most — the board should know the key message by slide 3, not slide 30.\n\n---\n\n## Delivering Bad News\n\nNever bury it. Boards find out eventually. Finding out late makes it worse.\n\n**Framework:**\n1. **State it plainly** — \"We missed Q3 ARR target by $300K (12% gap)\"\n2. **Own the cause** — \"Primary driver was longer-than-expected sales cycle in enterprise segment\"\n3. **Show you understand it** — \"We analyzed 8 lost\u002Fstalled deals; the pattern is X\"\n4. **Present the fix** — \"We've made 3 changes: [specific, dated changes]\"\n5. **Update the forecast** — \"Revised Q4 target is $2.6M; here's the bottom-up build\"\n\n**What NOT to do:**\n- Don't lead with good news to soften bad news — boards notice and distrust the framing\n- Don't explain without owning — \"market conditions\" is not a cause, it's a context\n- Don't present a fix without data behind it\n- Don't show a revised forecast without showing your assumptions\n\n---\n\n## Common Board Deck Mistakes\n\n| Mistake | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Too many slides (>25) | Cut ruthlessly — if you can't explain it in the room, the slide is wrong |\n| Metrics without targets | Every metric needs a target and a status |\n| No narrative | Data without story forces boards to draw their own conclusions |\n| Burying bad news | Lead with it, own it, fix it |\n| Vague asks | Specific, actionable, person-assigned asks only |\n| No variance explanation | Every gap from target needs one-sentence cause |\n| Stale appendix | Appendix is only useful if it's current |\n| Designing for the reader, not the room | Decks are presented — they must work spoken aloud |\n\n---\n\n## Cadence Notes\n\n**Quarterly (standard):** Full deck, all sections, 20-30 slides. Sent 48 hours in advance.\n**Monthly (for early-stage):** Condensed — metrics dashboard, financials, pipeline, top risks. 8-12 slides.\n**Fundraising:** Opens with market\u002Fvision, closes with ask. See `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` for Sequoia format.\n\n## References\n- `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` — SaaS board pack format, Sequoia structure, investor tailoring\n- `templates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md` — fill-in template for complete board decks\n",{"name":5,"license":15,"metadata":44,"description":7},{"author":45,"domain":46,"updated":47,"version":48,"category":49,"frameworks":50},"Alireza Rezvani","board-governance",1772668800000,"1.0.0","c-level","deck-frameworks, board-deck-template","main","fa638b97a18ff6d9f26cf0eaf3dfa123531bcc87","organized-skills\u002F.gemini-board-deck-builder",1,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia","https:\u002F\u002Fmedium.com\u002F@luisevalencia","Microsoft MVP - Artificial Intelligence\r\nMachine Learning Enthusiast\r\n","2026-05-02 06:55:36",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":61,"prompt":71,"zipAvailable":72},[62,65,68],{"tool":63,"command":64},"npx","npx skills add levalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode --skill board-deck-builder",{"tool":66,"command":67},"bunx","bunx skills add levalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode --skill board-deck-builder",{"tool":69,"command":70},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add levalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode --skill board-deck-builder","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002F.gemini-board-deck-builder\u002FSKILL.md",true,[74,80],{"path":75,"resourceType":76,"resourceTypeDesc":77,"sizeBytes":78,"sourceHtmlUrl":79},"references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",6952,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002F.gemini-board-deck-builder\u002Freferences\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md",{"path":81,"resourceType":76,"resourceTypeDesc":77,"sizeBytes":82,"sourceHtmlUrl":83},"templates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md",5885,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002F.gemini-board-deck-builder\u002Ftemplates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md",[85,107,144,171,197,225],{"skillNo":86,"name":87,"nameZh":6,"description":88,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":89,"categories":90,"keywords":91,"publishedAt":39},"01M6EM8ES5M9J4S8N78NJST0YC","zarr-python","Chunked N-D arrays for cloud storage. Compressed arrays, parallel I\u002FO, S3\u002FGCS integration, NumPy\u002FDask\u002FXarray compatible, for large-scale scientific computing pipelines.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002Fzarr-python\u002FSKILL.md",[],[92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106],"python","zarr python","storage","integration","s3","gcs","cloud","dask","parallel","pipelines","arrays","numpy","scientific computing","scale","scientific",{"skillNo":108,"name":109,"nameZh":6,"description":110,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":111,"categories":112,"keywords":126,"publishedAt":39},"01M6EM8AR6ZFKZ9YVW8TTG850Z","zabbix","Zabbix monitoring system automation via API and Python. Use when: (1) Managing hosts, templates, items, triggers, or host groups, (2) Automating monitoring configuration, (3) Sending data via Zabbix trapper\u002Fsender, (4) Querying historical data or events, (5) Bulk operations on Zabbix objects, (6) Maintenance window management, (7) User\u002Fpermission management","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002Fzabbix-api-skill\u002FSKILL.md",[113,118,121],{"categoryNo":114,"categoryName":115,"taxonomyType":116,"taxonomyTypeDesc":117},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":119,"categoryName":120,"taxonomyType":116,"taxonomyTypeDesc":117},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",{"categoryNo":122,"categoryName":123,"taxonomyType":124,"taxonomyTypeDesc":125},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[109,92,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,33,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143],"automation","window management","monitoring","data","templates","api","system","operations","maintenance","objects","permission","bulk operations","triggers","host","events","via","bulk",{"skillNo":145,"name":146,"nameZh":6,"description":147,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":148,"categories":149,"keywords":150,"publishedAt":39},"01M6EM6Q9JG846ECQY9A210A26","x-twitter-growth","X\u002FTwitter growth engine for building audience, crafting viral content, and analyzing engagement. Use when the user wants to grow on X\u002FTwitter, write tweets or threads, analyze their X profile, research competitors on X, plan a posting strategy, or optimize engagement. Complements social-content (generic multi-platform) with X-specific depth: algorithm mechanics, thread engineering, reply strategy, profile optimization, and competitive intelligence via web search.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002Fx-twitter-growth\u002FSKILL.md",[],[151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170],"twitter","x twitter growth","growth","competitive intelligence","search","analyzing","plan","marketing","web search","competitors","analyze","write","optimize","social","intelligence","viral","growth engine","mechanics","grow","competitive",{"skillNo":172,"name":173,"nameZh":6,"description":174,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":175,"categories":176,"keywords":177,"publishedAt":39},"01M6EM3FQNPYNKPC4CV9TCVNGD","what-if-oracle","Run structured What-If scenario analysis with multi-branch possibility exploration. Use this skill when the user asks speculative questions like \"what if...\", \"what would happen if...\", \"what are the possibilities\", \"explore scenarios\", \"scenario analysis\", \"possibility space\", \"what could go wrong\", \"best case \u002F worst case\", \"risk analysis\", \"contingency planning\", \"strategic options\", or any question about uncertain futures. Also trigger when the user faces a fork-in-the-road decision, wants to stress-test an idea, or needs to think through consequences before committing.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002Fwhat-if-oracle\u002FSKILL.md",[],[178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,33,190,191,192,193,194,195,196],"oracle","what if oracle","test","planning","ux","futures","risk","analysis","explore","decision","branch","question","exploration","options","stress-test","strategies","trigger","case","multi",{"skillNo":198,"name":199,"nameZh":6,"description":200,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":201,"categories":202,"keywords":206,"publishedAt":39},"01M6EM08C06RGDYCJ86HAPK0FF","vercel-react-best-practices","React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React\u002FNext.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002Fvercel-react-best-practices\u002FSKILL.md",[203],{"categoryNo":204,"categoryName":205,"taxonomyType":116,"taxonomyTypeDesc":117},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,130,220,221,222,223,224,139],"react","vercel react best practices","best practices","react best practices","vercel","writing","performance","components","react components","guidelines","tasks","code","Optimization","Next.js","refactoring","performance optimization","next","pages",{"skillNo":226,"name":227,"nameZh":6,"description":228,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":229,"categories":230,"keywords":241,"publishedAt":39},"01M6EM00S13326QM08DTM94J6Z","venue-templates","Access comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Flevalencia\u002Fagent-god-mode\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Forganized-skills\u002Fvenue-templates\u002FSKILL.md",[231,234,237,238],{"categoryNo":232,"categoryName":233,"taxonomyType":116,"taxonomyTypeDesc":117},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":235,"categoryName":236,"taxonomyType":116,"taxonomyTypeDesc":117},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究",{"categoryNo":119,"categoryName":120,"taxonomyType":116,"taxonomyTypeDesc":117},{"categoryNo":239,"categoryName":240,"taxonomyType":124,"taxonomyTypeDesc":125},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[131,242,243,216,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,162,251,252,253,254,255,256,106,257],"venue templates","research","NeurIPS","ICML","LaTeX","science","Bash","access","read","edit","proposals","Academic","requirements","formatting","journal","chi"]