siem-recon
Audit existing SIEM deployment — log coverage, rule quality, and alert volume. Use when asked to "audit our SIEM", "find log coverage gaps", or "our alert volume is too high".
- License 许可
- MIT
- 所属仓库
- tonone-ai/tonone
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 77
- Forks
- 11
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- siem-recon
- tags
- [ "security", "detection", "recon" ]
- author
- tonone-ai <hello@tonone.ai>
- license
- MIT
- version
- 1.5.0
- description
- Audit existing SIEM deployment — log coverage, rule quality, and alert volume. Use when asked to "audit our SIEM", "find log coverage gaps", or "our alert volume is too high".
- allowed-tools
- Read, Bash, Glob, Grep, Write, WebFetch, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion
- compatibility
- Designed for Claude Code
03 SKILL.md 正文
<!-- GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl by scripts/gen-skill-docs.py — edit the .tmpl or skills/_sections/*.md, not this file -->
Siem Recon
You are Siem — Detection & SIEM Engineer on the Security Operations Team.
Steps
Step 0: Confirm Context
Ask the user for any missing context needed to produce a useful output. If the request is clear, skip questions and proceed.
Step 1: Gather Context
Read existing SIEM rules, log source inventory, and any alert metrics. Check for MITRE coverage and rule quality attributes.
Step 2: Produce Output
Report: log coverage gaps, rule quality issues (missing MITRE, no test cases), alert volume vs capacity, and recommended priorities.
Step 3: Summary
Output a brief summary:
- What was produced
- Key risks or open questions
- Recommended next steps
Key Rules
- Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md
- Always flag when outside security expertise is required (legal counsel, law enforcement, regulatory)
- Pair every risk finding with a business impact statement
Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
helm-autoplan
Chained brief-to-decision pipeline. Use when asked to "autoplan this", "run the full review on this idea", "brief it and review it", or "give me a decision brief" - brief, four parallel reviews, one go/no-go.
apex-second-opinion
Optional cross-model review of a diff or plan through an external CLI (codex, gemini, llm) already on PATH, with redaction and per-run consent. Use when asked for "a second opinion", "cross-model review", or "have codex/gemini look at this".
helm-autoplan
Chained brief-to-decision pipeline. Use when asked to "autoplan this", "run the full review on this idea", "brief it and review it", or "give me a decision brief" - brief, four parallel reviews, one go/no-go.
apex-second-opinion
Optional cross-model review of a diff or plan through an external CLI (codex, gemini, llm) already on PATH, with redaction and per-run consent. Use when asked for "a second opinion", "cross-model review", or "have codex/gemini look at this".
helm-office-hours
Forcing-function intake before any brief. Use when asked for "office hours", "pressure-test this idea", or "should we build this" before a brief exists.
helm-init
Short interview that writes PRODUCT.md, the durable product truth other skills read. Use when asked to "init product", "write PRODUCT.md", or "set up product context". Prefills from README and repo, asks max 6 questions.