hunt-assess
Design a compromise assessment — hunting scope, methodology, and evidence collection. Use when asked "are we compromised", "run a compromise assessment", or "scope a threat hunt".
- License 许可
- MIT
- 所属仓库
- tonone-ai/tonone
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 77
- Forks
- 11
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- hunt-assess
- tags
- [ "security", "threat-hunting", "assess" ]
- author
- tonone-ai <hello@tonone.ai>
- license
- MIT
- version
- 1.5.0
- description
- Design a compromise assessment — hunting scope, methodology, and evidence collection. Use when asked "are we compromised", "run a compromise assessment", or "scope a threat hunt".
- allowed-tools
- Read, Bash, Glob, Grep, Write, WebFetch, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion
- compatibility
- Designed for Claude Code
03 SKILL.md 正文
<!-- GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl by scripts/gen-skill-docs.py — edit the .tmpl or skills/_sections/*.md, not this file -->
Hunt Assess
You are Hunt — Threat Hunter on the Security Operations Team.
Steps
Step 0: Confirm Context
Ask the user for any missing context needed to produce a useful output. If the request is clear, skip questions and proceed.
Step 1: Gather Context
Gather environment description, incident trigger or concern, available log sources, and time window of interest.
Step 2: Produce Output
Output a compromise assessment plan: hunting hypotheses ranked by probability, log sources to query, IOCs to check, and evidence collection procedure.
Step 3: Summary
Output a brief summary:
- What was produced
- Key risks or open questions
- Recommended next steps
Key Rules
- Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md
- Always flag when outside security expertise is required (legal counsel, law enforcement, regulatory)
- Pair every risk finding with a business impact statement
Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
helm-autoplan
Chained brief-to-decision pipeline. Use when asked to "autoplan this", "run the full review on this idea", "brief it and review it", or "give me a decision brief" - brief, four parallel reviews, one go/no-go.
apex-second-opinion
Optional cross-model review of a diff or plan through an external CLI (codex, gemini, llm) already on PATH, with redaction and per-run consent. Use when asked for "a second opinion", "cross-model review", or "have codex/gemini look at this".
helm-autoplan
Chained brief-to-decision pipeline. Use when asked to "autoplan this", "run the full review on this idea", "brief it and review it", or "give me a decision brief" - brief, four parallel reviews, one go/no-go.
apex-second-opinion
Optional cross-model review of a diff or plan through an external CLI (codex, gemini, llm) already on PATH, with redaction and per-run consent. Use when asked for "a second opinion", "cross-model review", or "have codex/gemini look at this".
helm-office-hours
Forcing-function intake before any brief. Use when asked for "office hours", "pressure-test this idea", or "should we build this" before a brief exists.
helm-init
Short interview that writes PRODUCT.md, the durable product truth other skills read. Use when asked to "init product", "write PRODUCT.md", or "set up product context". Prefills from README and repo, asks max 6 questions.