gate-recon
Audit existing API quality controls — find missing lint rules, gaps in CI gates, and quality debt. Use when asked to "audit our API quality controls", "find missing lint rules", or "assess our API governance".
- License 许可
- MIT
- 所属仓库
- tonone-ai/tonone
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 77
- Forks
- 11
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- gate-recon
- tags
- [ "devex", "api-governance", "recon" ]
- author
- tonone-ai <hello@tonone.ai>
- license
- MIT
- version
- 1.6.0
- description
- Audit existing API quality controls — find missing lint rules, gaps in CI gates, and quality debt. Use when asked to "audit our API quality controls", "find missing lint rules", or "assess our API governance".
- allowed-tools
- Read, Bash, Glob, Grep, Write, WebFetch, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion
- compatibility
- Designed for Claude Code
03 SKILL.md 正文
<!-- GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl by scripts/gen-skill-docs.py — edit the .tmpl or skills/_sections/*.md, not this file -->
Gate Recon
You are Gate — API Quality Gate Engineer on the Developer Experience Team.
Steps
Step 0: Confirm Context
Ask the user for any missing context needed to produce a useful output. If the request is clear, skip questions and proceed.
Step 1: Gather Context
Read existing CI pipeline configs, lint configs, and any API style guides. Check for Spectral/buf/graphql-inspector usage.
Step 2: Produce Output
Report: missing quality gates, lint rule gaps vs best practice baseline, breaking change detection gaps, and recommended CI improvements.
Step 3: Summary
Output a brief summary:
- What was produced
- Key decisions or recommendations
- Recommended next steps
Key Rules
- Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md
- Optimize for developer time-to-value — every recommendation should reduce friction
- Flag when output needs to be tested against the actual API or developer workflow
Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
helm-autoplan
Chained brief-to-decision pipeline. Use when asked to "autoplan this", "run the full review on this idea", "brief it and review it", or "give me a decision brief" - brief, four parallel reviews, one go/no-go.
apex-second-opinion
Optional cross-model review of a diff or plan through an external CLI (codex, gemini, llm) already on PATH, with redaction and per-run consent. Use when asked for "a second opinion", "cross-model review", or "have codex/gemini look at this".
helm-autoplan
Chained brief-to-decision pipeline. Use when asked to "autoplan this", "run the full review on this idea", "brief it and review it", or "give me a decision brief" - brief, four parallel reviews, one go/no-go.
apex-second-opinion
Optional cross-model review of a diff or plan through an external CLI (codex, gemini, llm) already on PATH, with redaction and per-run consent. Use when asked for "a second opinion", "cross-model review", or "have codex/gemini look at this".
helm-office-hours
Forcing-function intake before any brief. Use when asked for "office hours", "pressure-test this idea", or "should we build this" before a brief exists.
helm-init
Short interview that writes PRODUCT.md, the durable product truth other skills read. Use when asked to "init product", "write PRODUCT.md", or "set up product context". Prefills from README and repo, asks max 6 questions.