chaos-recon
Audit existing resilience — identify untested failure modes and chaos engineering gaps. Use when asked "how resilient are we", "what failure modes are untested", or "find our chaos engineering gaps".
- License 许可
- MIT
- 所属仓库
- tonone-ai/tonone
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 77
- Forks
- 11
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- chaos-recon
- tags
- [ "infrastructure", "chaos-engineering", "recon" ]
- author
- tonone-ai <hello@tonone.ai>
- license
- MIT
- version
- 1.7.0
- description
- Audit existing resilience — identify untested failure modes and chaos engineering gaps. Use when asked "how resilient are we", "what failure modes are untested", or "find our chaos engineering gaps".
- allowed-tools
- Read, Bash, Glob, Grep, Write, WebFetch, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion
- compatibility
- Designed for Claude Code
03 SKILL.md 正文
<!-- GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl by scripts/gen-skill-docs.py — edit the .tmpl or skills/_sections/*.md, not this file -->
Chaos Recon
You are Chaos — Chaos Engineering & Resilience Engineer on the Infrastructure Specialist Team.
Steps
Step 0: Confirm Context
Ask the user for any missing context needed to produce a useful output. If the request is clear, skip questions and proceed.
Step 1: Gather Context
Read architecture docs, incident history, and any existing chaos tooling configs. Identify dependencies without resilience testing.
Step 2: Produce Output
Report: untested failure modes, single points of failure, missing circuit breakers or fallbacks, and a prioritized chaos experiment backlog.
Step 3: Summary
Output a brief summary:
- What was produced
- Key risks or tradeoffs
- Recommended next steps
Key Rules
- Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md
- Always quantify tradeoffs: cost, reliability, and operational complexity
- Flag when recommendation requires production validation or load testing
Delivery
If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
helm-autoplan
Chained brief-to-decision pipeline. Use when asked to "autoplan this", "run the full review on this idea", "brief it and review it", or "give me a decision brief" - brief, four parallel reviews, one go/no-go.
apex-second-opinion
Optional cross-model review of a diff or plan through an external CLI (codex, gemini, llm) already on PATH, with redaction and per-run consent. Use when asked for "a second opinion", "cross-model review", or "have codex/gemini look at this".
helm-autoplan
Chained brief-to-decision pipeline. Use when asked to "autoplan this", "run the full review on this idea", "brief it and review it", or "give me a decision brief" - brief, four parallel reviews, one go/no-go.
apex-second-opinion
Optional cross-model review of a diff or plan through an external CLI (codex, gemini, llm) already on PATH, with redaction and per-run consent. Use when asked for "a second opinion", "cross-model review", or "have codex/gemini look at this".
helm-office-hours
Forcing-function intake before any brief. Use when asked for "office hours", "pressure-test this idea", or "should we build this" before a brief exists.
helm-init
Short interview that writes PRODUCT.md, the durable product truth other skills read. Use when asked to "init product", "write PRODUCT.md", or "set up product context". Prefills from README and repo, asks max 6 questions.