AGENT SKILL

aws-serverless

Specialized skill for building production-ready serverless applications on AWS. Covers Lambda functions, API Gateway, DynamoDB, SQS/SNS event-driven patterns, SAM/CDK deployment, and cold start optimization.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-09-04
Stars
★ 0
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
aws-serverless
source
vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)
description
Specialized skill for building production-ready serverless applications on AWS. Covers Lambda functions, API Gateway, DynamoDB, SQS/SNS event-driven patterns, SAM/CDK deployment, and cold start optimization.

02 资源文件 1

03 SKILL.md 正文

AWS Serverless

Patterns

Lambda Handler Pattern

Proper Lambda function structure with error handling

When to use: ['Any Lambda function implementation', 'API handlers, event processors, scheduled tasks']

```javascript
// Node.js Lambda Handler
// handler.js

// Initialize outside handler (reused across invocations)
const { DynamoDBClient } = require('@aws-sdk/client-dynamodb');
const { DynamoDBDocumentClient, GetCommand } = require('@aws-sdk/lib-dynamodb');

const client = new DynamoDBClient({});
const docClient = DynamoDBDocumentClient.from(client);

// Handler function
exports.handler = async (event, context) => {
  // Optional: Don't wait for event loop to clear (Node.js)
  context.callbackWaitsForEmptyEventLoop = false;

  try {
    // Parse input based on event source
    const body = typeof event.body === 'string'
      ? JSON.parse(event.body)
      : event.body;

    // Business logic
    const result = await processRequest(body);

    // Return API Gateway compatible response
    return {
      statusCode: 200,
      headers: {
        'Content-Type': 'application/json',
        'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*'
      },
      body: JSON.stringify(result)
    };
  } catch (error) {
    console.error('Error:', JSON.stringify({
      error: error.message,
      stack: error.stack,
      requestId: context.awsRequestId
    }));

    return {
      statusCode: error.statusCode || 500,
      headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
      body: JSON.stringify({
        error: error.message || 'Internal server error'
      })
    };
  }
};

async function processRequest(data) {
  // Your business logic here
  const result = await docClient.send(new GetCommand({
    TableName: process.env.TABLE_NAME,
    Key: { id: data.id }
  }));
  return result.Item;
}
# Python Lambda Handler
# handler.py

import json
import os
import logging
import boto3
from botocore.exceptions import ClientError

# Initialize outside handler (reused across invocations)
logger = logging.getLogger()
logger.setLevel(logging.INFO)

dynamodb = boto3.resource('dynamodb')
table = dynamodb.Table(os.environ['TABLE_NAME'])

def handler(event, context):
    try:
        # Parse i

API Gateway Integration Pattern

REST API and HTTP API integration with Lambda

When to use: ['Building REST APIs backed by Lambda', 'Need HTTP endpoints for functions']

```yaml
# template.yaml (SAM)
AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09'
Transform: AWS::Serverless-2016-10-31

Globals:
  Function:
    Runtime: nodejs20.x
    Timeout: 30
    MemorySize: 256
    Environment:
      Variables:
        TABLE_NAME: !Ref ItemsTable

Resources:
  # HTTP API (recommended for simple use cases)
  HttpApi:
    Type: AWS::Serverless::HttpApi
    Properties:
      StageName: prod
      CorsConfiguration:
        AllowOrigins:
          - "*"
        AllowMethods:
          - GET
          - POST
          - DELETE
        AllowHeaders:
          - "*"

  # Lambda Functions
  GetItemFunction:
    Type: AWS::Serverless::Function
    Properties:
      Handler: src/handlers/get.handler
      Events:
        GetItem:
          Type: HttpApi
          Properties:
            ApiId: !Ref HttpApi
            Path: /items/{id}
            Method: GET
      Policies:
        - DynamoDBReadPolicy:
            TableName: !Ref ItemsTable

  CreateItemFunction:
    Type: AWS::Serverless::Function
    Properties:
      Handler: src/handlers/create.handler
      Events:
        CreateItem:
          Type: HttpApi
          Properties:
            ApiId: !Ref HttpApi
            Path: /items
            Method: POST
      Policies:
        - DynamoDBCrudPolicy:
            TableName: !Ref ItemsTable

  # DynamoDB Table
  ItemsTable:
    Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table
    Properties:
      AttributeDefinitions:
        - AttributeName: id
          AttributeType: S
      KeySchema:
        - AttributeName: id
          KeyType: HASH
      BillingMode: PAY_PER_REQUEST

Outputs:
  ApiUrl:
    Value: !Sub "https://${HttpApi}.execute-api.${AWS::Region}.amazonaws.com/prod"
// src/handlers/get.js
const { getItem } = require('../lib/dynamodb');

exports.handler = async (event) => {
  const id = event.pathParameters?.id;

  if (!id) {
    return {
      statusCode: 400,
      body: JSON.stringify({ error: 'Missing id parameter' })
    };
  }

  const item =

Event-Driven SQS Pattern

Lambda triggered by SQS for reliable async processing

When to use: ['Decoupled, asynchronous processing', 'Need retry logic and DLQ', 'Processing messages in batches']

```yaml
# template.yaml
Resources:
  ProcessorFunction:
    Type: AWS::Serverless::Function
    Properties:
      Handler: src/handlers/processor.handler
      Events:
        SQSEvent:
          Type: SQS
          Properties:
            Queue: !GetAtt ProcessingQueue.Arn
            BatchSize: 10
            FunctionResponseTypes:
              - ReportBatchItemFailures  # Partial batch failure handling

  ProcessingQueue:
    Type: AWS::SQS::Queue
    Properties:
      VisibilityTimeout: 180  # 6x Lambda timeout
      RedrivePolicy:
        deadLetterTargetArn: !GetAtt DeadLetterQueue.Arn
        maxReceiveCount: 3

  DeadLetterQueue:
    Type: AWS::SQS::Queue
    Properties:
      MessageRetentionPeriod: 1209600  # 14 days
// src/handlers/processor.js
exports.handler = async (event) => {
  const batchItemFailures = [];

  for (const record of event.Records) {
    try {
      const body = JSON.parse(record.body);
      await processMessage(body);
    } catch (error) {
      console.error(`Failed to process message ${record.messageId}:`, error);
      // Report this item as failed (will be retried)
      batchItemFailures.push({
        itemIdentifier: record.messageId
      });
    }
  }

  // Return failed items for retry
  return { batchItemFailures };
};

async function processMessage(message) {
  // Your processing logic
  console.log('Processing:', message);

  // Simulate work
  await saveToDatabase(message);
}
# Python version
import json
import logging

logger = logging.getLogger()

def handler(event, context):
    batch_item_failures = []

    for record in event['Records']:
        try:
            body = json.loads(record['body'])
            process_message(body)
        except Exception as e:
            logger.error(f"Failed to process {record['messageId']}: {e}")
            batch_item_failures.append({
                'itemIdentifier': record['messageId']
            })

    return {'batchItemFailures': batch_ite

Anti-Patterns

❌ Monolithic Lambda

Why bad: Large deployment packages cause slow cold starts. Hard to scale individual operations. Updates affect entire system.

❌ Large Dependencies

Why bad: Increases deployment package size. Slows down cold starts significantly. Most of SDK/library may be unused.

❌ Synchronous Calls in VPC

Why bad: VPC-attached Lambdas have ENI setup overhead. Blocking DNS lookups or connections worsen cold starts.

⚠️ Sharp Edges

Issue Severity Solution
Issue high ## Measure your INIT phase
Issue high ## Set appropriate timeout
Issue high ## Increase memory allocation
Issue medium ## Verify VPC configuration
Issue medium ## Tell Lambda not to wait for event loop
Issue medium ## For large file uploads
Issue high ## Use different buckets/prefixes

04 同仓库更多 Skills

Aceryoung
Aceryoung/familyproject

zapier-make-patterns

No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power

Skill与智能体开发
★ 0
Aceryoung
Aceryoung/familyproject

Cross-Site Scripting and HTML Injection Testing

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for XSS vulnerabilities", "perform cross-site scripting attacks", "identify HTML injection flaws", "exploit client-side injection vulnerabilities", "steal cookies via XSS", or "bypass content security policies". It provides comprehensive techniques for detecting, exploiting, and understanding XSS and HTML injection attack vectors in web applications.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 0
Aceryoung
Aceryoung/familyproject

writing-skills

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment

内容创作者测试与质量写作与文案
★ 0
Aceryoung
Aceryoung/familyproject

writing-plans

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

内容创作者写作与文案
★ 0
Aceryoung
Aceryoung/familyproject

workflow-automation

Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility

Skill与智能体开发
★ 0
Aceryoung
Aceryoung/familyproject

WordPress Penetration Testing

This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest WordPress sites", "scan WordPress for vulnerabilities", "enumerate WordPress users, themes, or plugins", "exploit WordPress vulnerabilities", or "use WPScan". It provides comprehensive WordPress security assessment methodologies.

测试与质量
★ 0