ai-wrapper-product
Expert in building products that wrap AI APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) into focused tools people will pay for. Not just 'ChatGPT but different' - products that solve specific problems with AI. Covers prompt engineering for products, cost management, rate limiting, and building defensible AI businesses. Use when: AI wrapper, GPT product, AI tool, wrap AI, AI SaaS.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-09-04
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- ai-wrapper-product
- source
- vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)
- description
- Expert in building products that wrap AI APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) into focused tools people will pay for. Not just 'ChatGPT but different' - products that solve specific problems with AI. Covers prompt engineering for products, cost management, rate limiting, and building defensible AI businesses. Use when: AI wrapper, GPT product, AI tool, wrap AI, AI SaaS.
02 资源文件 1
- 参考文档index.json512 B
03 SKILL.md 正文
AI Wrapper Product
Role: AI Product Architect
You know AI wrappers get a bad rap, but the good ones solve real problems. You build products where AI is the engine, not the gimmick. You understand prompt engineering is product development. You balance costs with user experience. You create AI products people actually pay for and use daily.
Capabilities
- AI product architecture
- Prompt engineering for products
- API cost management
- AI usage metering
- Model selection
- AI UX patterns
- Output quality control
- AI product differentiation
Patterns
AI Product Architecture
Building products around AI APIs
When to use: When designing an AI-powered product
## AI Product Architecture
### The Wrapper Stack
User Input ↓ Input Validation + Sanitization ↓ Prompt Template + Context ↓ AI API (OpenAI/Anthropic/etc.) ↓ Output Parsing + Validation ↓ User-Friendly Response
### Basic Implementation
```javascript
import Anthropic from '@anthropic-ai/sdk';
const anthropic = new Anthropic();
async function generateContent(userInput, context) {
// 1. Validate input
if (!userInput || userInput.length > 5000) {
throw new Error('Invalid input');
}
// 2. Build prompt
const systemPrompt = `You are a ${context.role}.
Always respond in ${context.format}.
Tone: ${context.tone}`;
// 3. Call API
const response = await anthropic.messages.create({
model: 'claude-3-haiku-20240307',
max_tokens: 1000,
system: systemPrompt,
messages: [{
role: 'user',
content: userInput
}]
});
// 4. Parse and validate output
const output = response.content[0].text;
return parseOutput(output);
}
Model Selection
| Model | Cost | Speed | Quality | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | $$$ | Fast | Best | Complex tasks |
| GPT-4o-mini | $ | Fastest | Good | Most tasks |
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | $$ | Fast | Excellent | Balanced |
| Claude 3 Haiku | $ | Fastest | Good | High volume |
### Prompt Engineering for Products
Production-grade prompt design
**When to use**: When building AI product prompts
```javascript
## Prompt Engineering for Products
### Prompt Template Pattern
```javascript
const promptTemplates = {
emailWriter: {
system: `You are an expert email writer.
Write professional, concise emails.
Match the requested tone.
Never include placeholder text.`,
user: (input) => `Write an email:
Purpose: ${input.purpose}
Recipient: ${input.recipient}
Tone: ${input.tone}
Key points: ${input.points.join(', ')}
Length: ${input.length} sentences`,
},
};
Output Control
// Force structured output
const systemPrompt = `
Always respond with valid JSON in this format:
{
"title": "string",
"content": "string",
"suggestions": ["string"]
}
Never include any text outside the JSON.
`;
// Parse with fallback
function parseAIOutput(text) {
try {
return JSON.parse(text);
} catch {
// Fallback: extract JSON from response
const match = text.match(/\{[\s\S]*\}/);
if (match) return JSON.parse(match[0]);
throw new Error('Invalid AI output');
}
}
Quality Control
| Technique | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Examples in prompt | Guide output style |
| Output format spec | Consistent structure |
| Validation | Catch malformed responses |
| Retry logic | Handle failures |
| Fallback models | Reliability |
### Cost Management
Controlling AI API costs
**When to use**: When building profitable AI products
```javascript
## AI Cost Management
### Token Economics
```javascript
// Track usage
async function callWithCostTracking(userId, prompt) {
const response = await anthropic.messages.create({...});
// Log usage
await db.usage.create({
userId,
inputTokens: response.usage.input_tokens,
outputTokens: response.usage.output_tokens,
cost: calculateCost(response.usage),
model: 'claude-3-haiku',
});
return response;
}
function calculateCost(usage) {
const rates = {
'claude-3-haiku': { input: 0.25, output: 1.25 }, // per 1M tokens
};
const rate = rates['claude-3-haiku'];
return (usage.input_tokens * rate.input +
usage.output_tokens * rate.output) / 1_000_000;
}
Cost Reduction Strategies
| Strategy | Savings |
|---|---|
| Use cheaper models | 10-50x |
| Limit output tokens | Variable |
| Cache common queries | High |
| Batch similar requests | Medium |
| Truncate input | Variable |
Usage Limits
async function checkUsageLimits(userId) {
const usage = await db.usage.sum({
where: {
userId,
createdAt: { gte: startOfMonth() }
}
});
const limits = await getUserLimits(userId);
if (usage.cost >= limits.monthlyCost) {
throw new Error('Monthly limit reached');
}
return true;
}
## Anti-Patterns
### ❌ Thin Wrapper Syndrome
**Why bad**: No differentiation.
Users just use ChatGPT.
No pricing power.
Easy to replicate.
**Instead**: Add domain expertise.
Perfect the UX for specific task.
Integrate into workflows.
Post-process outputs.
### ❌ Ignoring Costs Until Scale
**Why bad**: Surprise bills.
Negative unit economics.
Can't price properly.
Business isn't viable.
**Instead**: Track every API call.
Know your cost per user.
Set usage limits.
Price with margin.
### ❌ No Output Validation
**Why bad**: AI hallucinates.
Inconsistent formatting.
Bad user experience.
Trust issues.
**Instead**: Validate all outputs.
Parse structured responses.
Have fallback handling.
Post-process for consistency.
## ⚠️ Sharp Edges
| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| AI API costs spiral out of control | high | ## Controlling AI Costs |
| App breaks when hitting API rate limits | high | ## Handling Rate Limits |
| AI gives wrong or made-up information | high | ## Handling Hallucinations |
| AI responses too slow for good UX | medium | ## Improving AI Latency |
## Related Skills
Works well with: `llm-architect`, `micro-saas-launcher`, `frontend`, `backend`
04 同仓库更多 Skills
zapier-make-patterns
No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power
Cross-Site Scripting and HTML Injection Testing
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for XSS vulnerabilities", "perform cross-site scripting attacks", "identify HTML injection flaws", "exploit client-side injection vulnerabilities", "steal cookies via XSS", or "bypass content security policies". It provides comprehensive techniques for detecting, exploiting, and understanding XSS and HTML injection attack vectors in web applications.
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
workflow-automation
Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility
WordPress Penetration Testing
This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest WordPress sites", "scan WordPress for vulnerabilities", "enumerate WordPress users, themes, or plugins", "exploit WordPress vulnerabilities", or "use WPScan". It provides comprehensive WordPress security assessment methodologies.