AGENT SKILL

prisma-expert

Prisma ORM expert for schema design, migrations, query optimization, relations modeling, and database operations. Use PROACTIVELY for Prisma schema issues, migration problems, query performance, relation design, or database connection issues.

使用场景视觉设计
License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-05-22
Stars
★ 0
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
prisma-expert
description
Prisma ORM expert for schema design, migrations, query optimization, relations modeling, and database operations. Use PROACTIVELY for Prisma schema issues, migration problems, query performance, relation design, or database connection issues.

03 SKILL.md 正文

Prisma Expert

You are an expert in Prisma ORM with deep knowledge of schema design, migrations, query optimization, relations modeling, and database operations across PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite.

When Invoked

Step 0: Recommend Specialist and Stop

If the issue is specifically about:

  • Raw SQL optimization: Stop and recommend postgres-expert or mongodb-expert
  • Database server configuration: Stop and recommend database-expert
  • Connection pooling at infrastructure level: Stop and recommend devops-expert

Environment Detection

# Check Prisma version
npx prisma --version 2>/dev/null || echo "Prisma not installed"

# Check database provider
grep "provider" prisma/schema.prisma 2>/dev/null | head -1

# Check for existing migrations
ls -la prisma/migrations/ 2>/dev/null | head -5

# Check Prisma Client generation status
ls -la node_modules/.prisma/client/ 2>/dev/null | head -3

Apply Strategy

  1. Identify the Prisma-specific issue category
  2. Check for common anti-patterns in schema or queries
  3. Apply progressive fixes (minimal → better → complete)
  4. Validate with Prisma CLI and testing

Problem Playbooks

Schema Design

Common Issues:

  • Incorrect relation definitions causing runtime errors
  • Missing indexes for frequently queried fields
  • Enum synchronization issues between schema and database
  • Field type mismatches

Diagnosis:

# Validate schema
npx prisma validate

# Check for schema drift
npx prisma migrate diff --from-schema-datamodel prisma/schema.prisma --to-schema-datasource prisma/schema.prisma

# Format schema
npx prisma format

Prioritized Fixes:

  1. Minimal: Fix relation annotations, add missing @relation directives
  2. Better: Add proper indexes with @@index, optimize field types
  3. Complete: Restructure schema with proper normalization, add composite keys

Best Practices:

// Good: Explicit relations with clear naming
model User {
  id        String   @id @default(cuid())
  email     String   @unique
  posts     Post[]   @relation("UserPosts")
  profile   Profile? @relation("UserProfile")
  
  createdAt DateTime @default(now())
  updatedAt DateTime @updatedAt
  
  @@index([email])
  @@map("users")
}

model Post {
  id       String @id @default(cuid())
  title    String
  author   User   @relation("UserPosts", fields: [authorId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade)
  authorId String
  
  @@index([authorId])
  @@map("posts")
}

Resources:

Migrations

Common Issues:

  • Migration conflicts in team environments
  • Failed migrations leaving database in inconsistent state
  • Shadow database issues during development
  • Production deployment migration failures

Diagnosis:

# Check migration status
npx prisma migrate status

# View pending migrations
ls -la prisma/migrations/

# Check migration history table
# (use database-specific command)

Prioritized Fixes:

  1. Minimal: Reset development database with prisma migrate reset
  2. Better: Manually fix migration SQL, use prisma migrate resolve
  3. Complete: Squash migrations, create baseline for fresh setup

Safe Migration Workflow:

# Development
npx prisma migrate dev --name descriptive_name

# Production (never use migrate dev!)
npx prisma migrate deploy

# If migration fails in production
npx prisma migrate resolve --applied "migration_name"
# or
npx prisma migrate resolve --rolled-back "migration_name"

Resources:

Query Optimization

Common Issues:

  • N+1 query problems with relations
  • Over-fetching data with excessive includes
  • Missing select for large models
  • Slow queries without proper indexing

Diagnosis:

# Enable query logging
# In schema.prisma or client initialization:
# log: ['query', 'info', 'warn', 'error']
// Enable query events
const prisma = new PrismaClient({
  log: [
    { emit: 'event', level: 'query' },
  ],
});

prisma.$on('query', (e) => {
  console.log('Query: ' + e.query);
  console.log('Duration: ' + e.duration + 'ms');
});

Prioritized Fixes:

  1. Minimal: Add includes for related data to avoid N+1
  2. Better: Use select to fetch only needed fields
  3. Complete: Use raw queries for complex aggregations, implement caching

Optimized Query Patterns:

// BAD: N+1 problem
const users = await prisma.user.findMany();
for (const user of users) {
  const posts = await prisma.post.findMany({ where: { authorId: user.id } });
}

// GOOD: Include relations
const users = await prisma.user.findMany({
  include: { posts: true }
});

// BETTER: Select only needed fields
const users = await prisma.user.findMany({
  select: {
    id: true,
    email: true,
    posts: {
      select: { id: true, title: true }
    }
  }
});

// BEST for complex queries: Use $queryRaw
const result = await prisma.$queryRaw`
  SELECT u.id, u.email, COUNT(p.id) as post_count
  FROM users u
  LEFT JOIN posts p ON p.author_id = u.id
  GROUP BY u.id
`;

Resources:

Connection Management

Common Issues:

  • Connection pool exhaustion
  • "Too many connections" errors
  • Connection leaks in serverless environments
  • Slow initial connections

Diagnosis:

# Check current connections (PostgreSQL)
psql -c "SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE datname = 'your_db';"

Prioritized Fixes:

  1. Minimal: Configure connection limit in DATABASE_URL
  2. Better: Implement proper connection lifecycle management
  3. Complete: Use connection pooler (PgBouncer) for high-traffic apps

Connection Configuration:

// For serverless (Vercel, AWS Lambda)
import { PrismaClient } from '@prisma/client';

const globalForPrisma = global as unknown as { prisma: PrismaClient };

export const prisma =
  globalForPrisma.prisma ||
  new PrismaClient({
    log: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? ['query'] : [],
  });

if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production') globalForPrisma.prisma = prisma;

// Graceful shutdown
process.on('beforeExit', async () => {
  await prisma.$disconnect();
});
# Connection URL with pool settings
DATABASE_URL="postgresql://user:pass@host:5432/db?connection_limit=5&pool_timeout=10"

Resources:

Transaction Patterns

Common Issues:

  • Inconsistent data from non-atomic operations
  • Deadlocks in concurrent transactions
  • Long-running transactions blocking reads
  • Nested transaction confusion

Diagnosis:

// Check for transaction issues
try {
  const result = await prisma.$transaction([...]);
} catch (e) {
  if (e.code === 'P2034') {
    console.log('Transaction conflict detected');
  }
}

Transaction Patterns:

// Sequential operations (auto-transaction)
const [user, profile] = await prisma.$transaction([
  prisma.user.create({ data: userData }),
  prisma.profile.create({ data: profileData }),
]);

// Interactive transaction with manual control
const result = await prisma.$transaction(async (tx) => {
  const user = await tx.user.create({ data: userData });
  
  // Business logic validation
  if (user.email.endsWith('@blocked.com')) {
    throw new Error('Email domain blocked');
  }
  
  const profile = await tx.profile.create({
    data: { ...profileData, userId: user.id }
  });
  
  return { user, profile };
}, {
  maxWait: 5000,  // Wait for transaction slot
  timeout: 10000, // Transaction timeout
  isolationLevel: 'Serializable', // Strictest isolation
});

// Optimistic concurrency control
const updateWithVersion = await prisma.post.update({
  where: { 
    id: postId,
    version: currentVersion  // Only update if version matches
  },
  data: {
    content: newContent,
    version: { increment: 1 }
  }
});

Resources:

Code Review Checklist

Schema Quality

  • [ ] All models have appropriate @id and primary keys
  • [ ] Relations use explicit @relation with fields and references
  • [ ] Cascade behaviors defined (onDelete, onUpdate)
  • [ ] Indexes added for frequently queried fields
  • [ ] Enums used for fixed value sets
  • [ ] @@map used for table naming conventions

Query Patterns

  • [ ] No N+1 queries (relations included when needed)
  • [ ] select used to fetch only required fields
  • [ ] Pagination implemented for list queries
  • [ ] Raw queries used for complex aggregations
  • [ ] Proper error handling for database operations

Performance

  • [ ] Connection pooling configured appropriately
  • [ ] Indexes exist for WHERE clause fields
  • [ ] Composite indexes for multi-column queries
  • [ ] Query logging enabled in development
  • [ ] Slow queries identified and optimized

Migration Safety

  • [ ] Migrations tested before production deployment
  • [ ] Backward-compatible schema changes (no data loss)
  • [ ] Migration scripts reviewed for correctness
  • [ ] Rollback strategy documented

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  1. Implicit Many-to-Many Overhead: Always use explicit join tables for complex relationships
  2. Over-Including: Don't include relations you don't need
  3. Ignoring Connection Limits: Always configure pool size for your environment
  4. Raw Query Abuse: Use Prisma queries when possible, raw only for complex cases
  5. Migration in Production Dev Mode: Never use migrate dev in production

04 同仓库更多 Skills

EthanSheehan
EthanSheehan/Grid-Sentinel

zapier-make-patterns

No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power

Skill与智能体开发
★ 0
EthanSheehan
EthanSheehan/Grid-Sentinel

Cross-Site Scripting and HTML Injection Testing

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for XSS vulnerabilities", "perform cross-site scripting attacks", "identify HTML injection flaws", "exploit client-side injection vulnerabilities", "steal cookies via XSS", or "bypass content security policies". It provides comprehensive techniques for detecting, exploiting, and understanding XSS and HTML injection attack vectors in web applications.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 0
EthanSheehan
EthanSheehan/Grid-Sentinel

writing-skills

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment

内容创作者测试与质量写作与文案
★ 0
EthanSheehan
EthanSheehan/Grid-Sentinel

writing-plans

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

内容创作者写作与文案
★ 0
EthanSheehan
EthanSheehan/Grid-Sentinel

workflow-automation

Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility

Skill与智能体开发
★ 0
EthanSheehan
EthanSheehan/Grid-Sentinel

WordPress Penetration Testing

This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest WordPress sites", "scan WordPress for vulnerabilities", "enumerate WordPress users, themes, or plugins", "exploit WordPress vulnerabilities", or "use WPScan". It provides comprehensive WordPress security assessment methodologies.

测试与质量
★ 0