[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6DSEG2VRNN40ZC9C3G5XZ2P":3,"skill-same:01M6DSEG2VRNN40ZC9C3G5XZ2P":87},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":30,"publishedAt":49,"linkOnly":50,"markdownContent":51,"markdownBody":52,"frontMatter":53,"refName":56,"commitSha":57,"skillDirectory":58,"forksCount":59,"repositoryHtmlUrl":60,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":61,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":62,"install":63,"resources":76},"01M6DSEG2VRNN40ZC9C3G5XZ2P","competitor-alternatives",null,"When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.","AntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code","AntifragileTech","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F174357194?v=4","01M6DQCYMK4CDSQQAN0ZC72NTV","01M6DQCYS9YPW1WKMQ5TJMPQ43",9,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fmarketing\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives\u002FSKILL.md",[17,22,25],{"categoryNo":18,"categoryName":19,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000019","营销推广","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":23,"categoryName":24,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究",{"categoryNo":26,"categoryName":27,"taxonomyType":28,"taxonomyTypeDesc":29},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000035","市场营销","PROFESSION","适用职业",[31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48],"competitor alternatives","page","pages","feature","deep","sales enablement","use","sales","landing","user","research","seo","deep research","content","product","create","modular","architecture","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: competitor-alternatives\ndescription: \"When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.\"\nmetadata:\n  version: 1.0.0\n---\n\n# Competitor & Alternative Pages\n\nYou are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.\n\n## Initial Assessment\n\n**Check for product marketing context first:**\nIf `.claude\u002Fproduct-marketing-context.md` exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.\n\nBefore creating competitor pages, understand:\n\n1. **Your Product**\n   - Core value proposition\n   - Key differentiators\n   - Ideal customer profile\n   - Pricing model\n   - Strengths and honest weaknesses\n\n2. **Competitive Landscape**\n   - Direct competitors\n   - Indirect\u002Fadjacent competitors\n   - Market positioning of each\n   - Search volume for competitor terms\n\n3. **Goals**\n   - SEO traffic capture\n   - Sales enablement\n   - Conversion from competitor users\n   - Brand positioning\n\n---\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### 1. Honesty Builds Trust\n- Acknowledge competitor strengths\n- Be accurate about your limitations\n- Don't misrepresent competitor features\n- Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims\n\n### 2. Depth Over Surface\n- Go beyond feature checklists\n- Explain *why* differences matter\n- Include use cases and scenarios\n- Show, don't just tell\n\n### 3. Help Them Decide\n- Different tools fit different needs\n- Be clear about who you're best for\n- Be clear about who competitor is best for\n- Reduce evaluation friction\n\n### 4. Modular Content Architecture\n- Competitor data should be centralized\n- Updates propagate to all pages\n- Single source of truth per competitor\n\n---\n\n## Page Formats\n\n### Format 1: [Competitor] Alternative (Singular)\n\n**Search intent**: User is actively looking to switch from a specific competitor\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Falternatives\u002F[competitor]` or `\u002F[competitor]-alternative`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[Competitor] alternative\", \"alternative to [Competitor]\", \"switch from [Competitor]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Why people look for alternatives (validate their pain)\n2. Summary: You as the alternative (quick positioning)\n3. Detailed comparison (features, service, pricing)\n4. Who should switch (and who shouldn't)\n5. Migration path\n6. Social proof from switchers\n7. CTA\n\n---\n\n### Format 2: [Competitor] Alternatives (Plural)\n\n**Search intent**: User is researching options, earlier in journey\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Falternatives\u002F[competitor]-alternatives`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[Competitor] alternatives\", \"best [Competitor] alternatives\", \"tools like [Competitor]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Why people look for alternatives (common pain points)\n2. What to look for in an alternative (criteria framework)\n3. List of alternatives (you first, but include real options)\n4. Comparison table (summary)\n5. Detailed breakdown of each alternative\n6. Recommendation by use case\n7. CTA\n\n**Important**: Include 4-7 real alternatives. Being genuinely helpful builds trust and ranks better.\n\n---\n\n### Format 3: You vs [Competitor]\n\n**Search intent**: User is directly comparing you to a specific competitor\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Fvs\u002F[competitor]` or `\u002Fcompare\u002F[you]-vs-[competitor]`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[You] vs [Competitor]\", \"[Competitor] vs [You]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. TL;DR summary (key differences in 2-3 sentences)\n2. At-a-glance comparison table\n3. Detailed comparison by category (Features, Pricing, Support, Ease of use, Integrations)\n4. Who [You] is best for\n5. Who [Competitor] is best for (be honest)\n6. What customers say (testimonials from switchers)\n7. Migration support\n8. CTA\n\n---\n\n### Format 4: [Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]\n\n**Search intent**: User comparing two competitors (not you directly)\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Fcompare\u002F[competitor-a]-vs-[competitor-b]`\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Overview of both products\n2. Comparison by category\n3. Who each is best for\n4. The third option (introduce yourself)\n5. Comparison table (all three)\n6. CTA\n\n**Why this works**: Captures search traffic for competitor terms, positions you as knowledgeable.\n\n---\n\n## Essential Sections\n\n### TL;DR Summary\nStart every page with a quick summary for scanners—key differences in 2-3 sentences.\n\n### Paragraph Comparisons\nGo beyond tables. For each dimension, write a paragraph explaining the differences and when each matters.\n\n### Feature Comparison\nFor each category: describe how each handles it, list strengths and limitations, give bottom line recommendation.\n\n### Pricing Comparison\nInclude tier-by-tier comparison, what's included, hidden costs, and total cost calculation for sample team size.\n\n### Who It's For\nBe explicit about ideal customer for each option. Honest recommendations build trust.\n\n### Migration Section\nCover what transfers, what needs reconfiguration, support offered, and quotes from customers who switched.\n\n**For detailed templates**: See [references\u002Ftemplates.md](references\u002Ftemplates.md)\n\n---\n\n## Content Architecture\n\n### Centralized Competitor Data\nCreate a single source of truth for each competitor with:\n- Positioning and target audience\n- Pricing (all tiers)\n- Feature ratings\n- Strengths and weaknesses\n- Best for \u002F not ideal for\n- Common complaints (from reviews)\n- Migration notes\n\n**For data structure and examples**: See [references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md](references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md)\n\n---\n\n## Research Process\n\n### Deep Competitor Research\n\nFor each competitor, gather:\n\n1. **Product research**: Sign up, use it, document features\u002FUX\u002Flimitations\n2. **Pricing research**: Current pricing, what's included, hidden costs\n3. **Review mining**: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius for common praise\u002Fcomplaint themes\n4. **Customer feedback**: Talk to customers who switched (both directions)\n5. **Content research**: Their positioning, their comparison pages, their changelog\n\n### Ongoing Updates\n\n- **Quarterly**: Verify pricing, check for major feature changes\n- **When notified**: Customer mentions competitor change\n- **Annually**: Full refresh of all competitor data\n\n---\n\n## SEO Considerations\n\n### Keyword Targeting\n\n| Format | Primary Keywords |\n|--------|-----------------|\n| Alternative (singular) | [Competitor] alternative, alternative to [Competitor] |\n| Alternatives (plural) | [Competitor] alternatives, best [Competitor] alternatives |\n| You vs Competitor | [You] vs [Competitor], [Competitor] vs [You] |\n| Competitor vs Competitor | [A] vs [B], [B] vs [A] |\n\n### Internal Linking\n- Link between related competitor pages\n- Link from feature pages to relevant comparisons\n- Create hub page linking to all competitor content\n\n### Schema Markup\nConsider FAQ schema for common questions like \"What is the best alternative to [Competitor]?\"\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Competitor Data File\nComplete competitor profile in YAML format for use across all comparison pages.\n\n### Page Content\nFor each page: URL, meta tags, full page copy organized by section, comparison tables, CTAs.\n\n### Page Set Plan\nRecommended pages to create with priority order based on search volume.\n\n---\n\n## Task-Specific Questions\n\n1. What are common reasons people switch to you?\n2. Do you have customer quotes about switching?\n3. What's your pricing vs. competitors?\n4. Do you offer migration support?\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **programmatic-seo**: For building competitor pages at scale\n- **copywriting**: For writing compelling comparison copy\n- **seo-audit**: For optimizing competitor pages\n- **schema-markup**: For FAQ and comparison schema\n","# Competitor & Alternative Pages\n\nYou are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.\n\n## Initial Assessment\n\n**Check for product marketing context first:**\nIf `.claude\u002Fproduct-marketing-context.md` exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.\n\nBefore creating competitor pages, understand:\n\n1. **Your Product**\n   - Core value proposition\n   - Key differentiators\n   - Ideal customer profile\n   - Pricing model\n   - Strengths and honest weaknesses\n\n2. **Competitive Landscape**\n   - Direct competitors\n   - Indirect\u002Fadjacent competitors\n   - Market positioning of each\n   - Search volume for competitor terms\n\n3. **Goals**\n   - SEO traffic capture\n   - Sales enablement\n   - Conversion from competitor users\n   - Brand positioning\n\n---\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### 1. Honesty Builds Trust\n- Acknowledge competitor strengths\n- Be accurate about your limitations\n- Don't misrepresent competitor features\n- Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims\n\n### 2. Depth Over Surface\n- Go beyond feature checklists\n- Explain *why* differences matter\n- Include use cases and scenarios\n- Show, don't just tell\n\n### 3. Help Them Decide\n- Different tools fit different needs\n- Be clear about who you're best for\n- Be clear about who competitor is best for\n- Reduce evaluation friction\n\n### 4. Modular Content Architecture\n- Competitor data should be centralized\n- Updates propagate to all pages\n- Single source of truth per competitor\n\n---\n\n## Page Formats\n\n### Format 1: [Competitor] Alternative (Singular)\n\n**Search intent**: User is actively looking to switch from a specific competitor\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Falternatives\u002F[competitor]` or `\u002F[competitor]-alternative`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[Competitor] alternative\", \"alternative to [Competitor]\", \"switch from [Competitor]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Why people look for alternatives (validate their pain)\n2. Summary: You as the alternative (quick positioning)\n3. Detailed comparison (features, service, pricing)\n4. Who should switch (and who shouldn't)\n5. Migration path\n6. Social proof from switchers\n7. CTA\n\n---\n\n### Format 2: [Competitor] Alternatives (Plural)\n\n**Search intent**: User is researching options, earlier in journey\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Falternatives\u002F[competitor]-alternatives`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[Competitor] alternatives\", \"best [Competitor] alternatives\", \"tools like [Competitor]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Why people look for alternatives (common pain points)\n2. What to look for in an alternative (criteria framework)\n3. List of alternatives (you first, but include real options)\n4. Comparison table (summary)\n5. Detailed breakdown of each alternative\n6. Recommendation by use case\n7. CTA\n\n**Important**: Include 4-7 real alternatives. Being genuinely helpful builds trust and ranks better.\n\n---\n\n### Format 3: You vs [Competitor]\n\n**Search intent**: User is directly comparing you to a specific competitor\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Fvs\u002F[competitor]` or `\u002Fcompare\u002F[you]-vs-[competitor]`\n\n**Target keywords**: \"[You] vs [Competitor]\", \"[Competitor] vs [You]\"\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. TL;DR summary (key differences in 2-3 sentences)\n2. At-a-glance comparison table\n3. Detailed comparison by category (Features, Pricing, Support, Ease of use, Integrations)\n4. Who [You] is best for\n5. Who [Competitor] is best for (be honest)\n6. What customers say (testimonials from switchers)\n7. Migration support\n8. CTA\n\n---\n\n### Format 4: [Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]\n\n**Search intent**: User comparing two competitors (not you directly)\n\n**URL pattern**: `\u002Fcompare\u002F[competitor-a]-vs-[competitor-b]`\n\n**Page structure**:\n1. Overview of both products\n2. Comparison by category\n3. Who each is best for\n4. The third option (introduce yourself)\n5. Comparison table (all three)\n6. CTA\n\n**Why this works**: Captures search traffic for competitor terms, positions you as knowledgeable.\n\n---\n\n## Essential Sections\n\n### TL;DR Summary\nStart every page with a quick summary for scanners—key differences in 2-3 sentences.\n\n### Paragraph Comparisons\nGo beyond tables. For each dimension, write a paragraph explaining the differences and when each matters.\n\n### Feature Comparison\nFor each category: describe how each handles it, list strengths and limitations, give bottom line recommendation.\n\n### Pricing Comparison\nInclude tier-by-tier comparison, what's included, hidden costs, and total cost calculation for sample team size.\n\n### Who It's For\nBe explicit about ideal customer for each option. Honest recommendations build trust.\n\n### Migration Section\nCover what transfers, what needs reconfiguration, support offered, and quotes from customers who switched.\n\n**For detailed templates**: See [references\u002Ftemplates.md](references\u002Ftemplates.md)\n\n---\n\n## Content Architecture\n\n### Centralized Competitor Data\nCreate a single source of truth for each competitor with:\n- Positioning and target audience\n- Pricing (all tiers)\n- Feature ratings\n- Strengths and weaknesses\n- Best for \u002F not ideal for\n- Common complaints (from reviews)\n- Migration notes\n\n**For data structure and examples**: See [references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md](references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md)\n\n---\n\n## Research Process\n\n### Deep Competitor Research\n\nFor each competitor, gather:\n\n1. **Product research**: Sign up, use it, document features\u002FUX\u002Flimitations\n2. **Pricing research**: Current pricing, what's included, hidden costs\n3. **Review mining**: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius for common praise\u002Fcomplaint themes\n4. **Customer feedback**: Talk to customers who switched (both directions)\n5. **Content research**: Their positioning, their comparison pages, their changelog\n\n### Ongoing Updates\n\n- **Quarterly**: Verify pricing, check for major feature changes\n- **When notified**: Customer mentions competitor change\n- **Annually**: Full refresh of all competitor data\n\n---\n\n## SEO Considerations\n\n### Keyword Targeting\n\n| Format | Primary Keywords |\n|--------|-----------------|\n| Alternative (singular) | [Competitor] alternative, alternative to [Competitor] |\n| Alternatives (plural) | [Competitor] alternatives, best [Competitor] alternatives |\n| You vs Competitor | [You] vs [Competitor], [Competitor] vs [You] |\n| Competitor vs Competitor | [A] vs [B], [B] vs [A] |\n\n### Internal Linking\n- Link between related competitor pages\n- Link from feature pages to relevant comparisons\n- Create hub page linking to all competitor content\n\n### Schema Markup\nConsider FAQ schema for common questions like \"What is the best alternative to [Competitor]?\"\n\n---\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Competitor Data File\nComplete competitor profile in YAML format for use across all comparison pages.\n\n### Page Content\nFor each page: URL, meta tags, full page copy organized by section, comparison tables, CTAs.\n\n### Page Set Plan\nRecommended pages to create with priority order based on search volume.\n\n---\n\n## Task-Specific Questions\n\n1. What are common reasons people switch to you?\n2. Do you have customer quotes about switching?\n3. What's your pricing vs. competitors?\n4. Do you offer migration support?\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **programmatic-seo**: For building competitor pages at scale\n- **copywriting**: For writing compelling comparison copy\n- **seo-audit**: For optimizing competitor pages\n- **schema-markup**: For FAQ and comparison schema\n",{"name":5,"metadata":54,"description":7},{"version":55},"1.0.0","master","c73386b305dec167db7654e0e6feacb462d4f9dc","assets\u002Fskills\u002Fmarketing\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives",1,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech","2026-10-02 14:22:14",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":64,"prompt":74,"zipAvailable":75},[65,68,71],{"tool":66,"command":67},"npx","npx skills add AntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code --skill competitor-alternatives",{"tool":69,"command":70},"bunx","bunx skills add AntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code --skill competitor-alternatives",{"tool":72,"command":73},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add AntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code --skill competitor-alternatives","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fmarketing\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives\u002FSKILL.md",true,[77,83],{"path":78,"resourceType":79,"resourceTypeDesc":80,"sizeBytes":81,"sourceHtmlUrl":82},"references\u002Fcontent-architecture.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",7591,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fmarketing\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives\u002Freferences\u002Fcontent-architecture.md",{"path":84,"resourceType":79,"resourceTypeDesc":80,"sizeBytes":85,"sourceHtmlUrl":86},"references\u002Ftemplates.md",5415,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fmarketing\u002Fcompetitor-alternatives\u002Freferences\u002Ftemplates.md",[88,109,124,139,152,165],{"skillNo":89,"name":90,"nameZh":6,"description":91,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":92,"categories":93,"keywords":103,"publishedAt":49},"01M6DT9Q6VYA615SCXR757TZZ7","writing-skills","Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fthinking\u002Fwriting-skills\u002FSKILL.md",[94,97,100],{"categoryNo":95,"categoryName":96,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":98,"categoryName":99,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":101,"categoryName":102,"taxonomyType":28,"taxonomyTypeDesc":29},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[104,105,37,106,107,108],"writing skills","writing","editing","work","deployment",{"skillNo":110,"name":111,"nameZh":6,"description":112,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":113,"categories":114,"keywords":117,"publishedAt":49},"01M6DT9GFHDNY90P41WGAE1TV0","writing-plans","Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fthinking\u002Fwriting-plans\u002FSKILL.md",[115,116],{"categoryNo":98,"categoryName":99,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},{"categoryNo":101,"categoryName":102,"taxonomyType":28,"taxonomyTypeDesc":29},[118,119,105,120,121,37,122,123],"plans","writing plans","requirements","task","code","spec",{"skillNo":125,"name":126,"nameZh":6,"description":127,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":128,"categories":129,"keywords":132,"publishedAt":49},"01M6DT9C6PFGD86WS3HY7YE3XG","docs:write-concisely","Apply writing rules to any documentation that humans will read. Makes your writing clearer, stronger, and more professional.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fthinking\u002Fwrite-concisely\u002FSKILL.md",[130,131],{"categoryNo":98,"categoryName":99,"taxonomyType":20,"taxonomyTypeDesc":21},{"categoryNo":101,"categoryName":102,"taxonomyType":28,"taxonomyTypeDesc":29},[133,134,135,136,137,138,105],"docs:write concisely","write","docs","read","Rules","documentation",{"skillNo":140,"name":141,"nameZh":6,"description":142,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":143,"categories":144,"keywords":145,"publishedAt":49},"01M6DT98AWQ27P0N1CG97WAG66","kaizen:why","Iterative Five Whys root cause analysis drilling from symptoms to fundamentals","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fthinking\u002Fwhy\u002FSKILL.md",[],[141,146,147,148,149,150,151],"why","kaizen","issue","five whys","analysis","root cause analysis",{"skillNo":153,"name":154,"nameZh":6,"description":155,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":156,"categories":157,"keywords":158,"publishedAt":49},"01M6DT93EH25NAX19R3WGE1P53","verification-loop","A comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fthinking\u002Fverification-loop\u002FSKILL.md",[],[159,160,161,162,122,163,164],"verification loop","verification","loop","sessions","claude code sessions","system",{"skillNo":166,"name":167,"nameZh":6,"description":168,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":169,"categories":170,"keywords":171,"publishedAt":49},"01M6DT90GW7Z7VCN98P9DVYSNC","verification-before-completion","Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FAntifragileTech\u002Fantifragile-claude-code\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fassets\u002Fskills\u002Fthinking\u002Fverification-before-completion\u002FSKILL.md",[],[172,160,173,107,37,174,175,176],"verification before completion","commands","evidence","claim","complete"]