AGENT SKILL

scenario-war-room

Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or when the user asks 'what if X AND Y both happen?'

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-03-13
Stars
★ 4
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
scenario-war-room
license
MIT
metadata
{ "author": "Alireza Rezvani", "domain": "strategic-planning", "updated": 1772668800000, "version": "1.0.0", "category": "c-level", "frameworks": "scenario-planning", "python-tools": "scenario_modeler.py" }
description
Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or when the user asks 'what if X AND Y both happen?'

02 资源文件 5

03 SKILL.md 正文

Scenario War Room

Model cascading what-if scenarios across all business functions. Not single-assumption stress tests — compound adversity that shows how one problem creates the next.

Keywords

scenario planning, war room, what-if analysis, risk modeling, cascading effects, compound risk, adversity planning, contingency planning, stress test, crisis planning, multi-variable scenario, pre-mortem

Quick Start

python scripts/scenario_modeler.py   # Interactive scenario builder with cascade modeling

Or describe the scenario:

/war-room "What if we lose our top customer AND miss the Q3 fundraise?"
/war-room "What if 3 engineers quit AND we need to ship by Q3?"
/war-room "What if our market shrinks 30% AND a competitor raises $50M?"

What This Is Not

  • Not a single-assumption stress test (that's /em:stress-test)
  • Not financial modeling only — every function gets modeled
  • Not worst-case-only — models 3 severity levels
  • Not paralysis by analysis — outputs concrete hedges and triggers

Framework: 6-Step Cascade Model

Step 1: Define Scenario Variables (max 3)

State each variable with:

  • What changes — specific, quantified if possible
  • Probability — your best estimate
  • Timeline — when it hits
Variable A: Top customer (28% ARR) gives 60-day termination notice
  Probability: 15% | Timeline: Within 90 days

Variable B: Series A fundraise delayed 6 months beyond target close
  Probability: 25% | Timeline: Q3

Variable C: Lead engineer resigns
  Probability: 20% | Timeline: Unknown

Step 2: Domain Impact Mapping

For each variable, each relevant role models impact:

Domain Owner Models
Cash & runway CFO Burn impact, runway change, bridge options
Revenue CRO ARR gap, churn cascade risk, pipeline
Product CPO Roadmap impact, PMF risk
Engineering CTO Velocity impact, key person risk
People CHRO Attrition cascade, hiring freeze implications
Operations COO Capacity, OKR impact, process risk
Security CISO Compliance timeline risk
Market CMO CAC impact, competitive exposure

Step 3: Cascade Effect Mapping

This is the core. Show how Variable A triggers consequences in domains that trigger Variable B's effects:

TRIGGER: Customer churn ($560K ARR)
  ↓
CFO: Runway drops 14 → 8 months
  ↓
CHRO: Hiring freeze; retention risk increases (morale hit)
  ↓
CTO: 3 open engineering reqs frozen; roadmap slips
  ↓
CPO: Q4 feature launch delayed → customer retention risk
  ↓
CRO: NRR drops; existing accounts see reduced velocity → more churn risk
  ↓
CFO: [Secondary cascade — potential death spiral if not interrupted]

Name the cascade explicitly. Show where it can be interrupted.

Step 4: Severity Matrix

Model three scenarios:

Scenario Definition Recovery
Base One variable hits; others don't Manageable with plan
Stress Two variables hit simultaneously Requires significant response
Severe All variables hit; full cascade Existential; requires board intervention

For each severity level:

  • Runway impact
  • ARR impact
  • Headcount impact
  • Timeline to unacceptable state (trigger point)

Step 5: Trigger Points (Early Warning Signals)

Define the measurable signal that tells you a scenario is unfolding before it's confirmed:

Trigger for Customer Churn Risk:
  - Sponsor goes dark for >3 weeks
  - Usage drops >25% MoM
  - No Q1 QBR confirmed by Dec 1

Trigger for Fundraise Delay:
  - <3 term sheets after 60 days of process
  - Lead investor requests >30-day extension on DD
  - Competitor raises at lower valuation (market signal)

Trigger for Engineering Attrition:
  - Glassdoor activity from engineering team
  - 2+ referral interview requests from engineers
  - Above-market offer counter-required in last 3 months

Step 6: Hedging Strategies

For each scenario: actions to take now (before the scenario materializes) that reduce impact if it does.

Hedge Cost Impact Owner Deadline
Establish $500K credit line $5K/year Buys 3 months if churn hits CFO 60 days
12-month retention bonus for 3 key engineers $90K Locks team through fundraise CHRO 30 days
Diversify to <20% revenue concentration per customer Sales effort Reduces single-customer risk CRO 2 quarters
Compress fundraise timeline, start parallel process CEO time Closes before runways merge CEO Immediate

Output Format

Every war room session produces:

SCENARIO: [Name]
Variables: [A, B, C]
Most likely path: [which combination actually plays out, with probability]

SEVERITY LEVELS
Base (A only): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Stress (A+B): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Severe (A+B+C): [runway/ARR impact] — existential risk: [yes/no]

CASCADE MAP
[A → domain impact → B trigger → domain impact → end state]

EARLY WARNING SIGNALS
- [Signal 1 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 2 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 3 → which scenario it indicates]

HEDGES (take these actions now)
1. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
2. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
3. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]

RECOMMENDED DECISION
[One paragraph. What to do, in what order, and why.]

Rules for Good War Room Sessions

Max 3 variables per scenario. More than 3 is noise — you can't meaningfully prepare for 5-variable collapse. Model the 3 that actually worry you.

Quantify or estimate. "Revenue drops" is not useful. "$420K ARR at risk over 60 days" is. Use ranges if uncertain.

Don't stop at first-order effects. The damage is always in the cascade, not the initial hit.

Model recovery, not just impact. Every scenario should have a "what we do" path.

Separate base case from sensitivity. Don't conflate "what probably happens" with "what could happen."

Don't over-model. 3-4 scenarios per planning cycle is the right number. More creates analysis paralysis.


Common Scenarios by Stage

Seed:

  • Co-founder leaves + product misses launch
  • Funding runs out + bridge terms unfavorable

Series A:

  • Miss ARR target + fundraise delayed
  • Key customer churns + competitor raises

Series B:

  • Market contraction + burn multiple spikes
  • Lead investor wants pivot + team resists

Integration with C-Suite Roles

Scenario Type Primary Roles Cascade To
Revenue miss CRO, CFO CMO (pipeline), COO (cuts), CHRO (layoffs)
Key person departure CHRO, COO CTO (if eng), CRO (if sales)
Fundraise failure CFO, CEO COO (runway extension), CHRO (hiring freeze)
Security breach CISO, CTO CEO (comms), CFO (cost), CRO (customer impact)
Market shift CEO, CPO CMO (repositioning), CRO (new segments)
Competitor move CMO, CRO CPO (roadmap response), CEO (strategy)

References

  • references/scenario-planning.md — Shell methodology, pre-mortem, Monte Carlo, cascade frameworks
  • scripts/scenario_modeler.py — CLI tool for structured scenario modeling

04 同仓库更多 Skills

zhangzhang-111-i
zhangzhang-111-i/claude-skills111

risk-management-specialist

Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk control, risk matrix, benefit-risk analysis, residual risk, risk acceptability, or post-market risk.

★ 4
zhangzhang-111-i
zhangzhang-111-i/claude-skills111

regulatory-affairs-head

Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Prepares FDA 510(k), De Novo, and PMA submission packages; analyzes regulatory pathways for new medical devices; drafts responses to FDA deficiency letters and Notified Body queries; develops CE marking technical documentation under EU MDR 2017/745; coordinates multi-market approval strategies across FDA, EU, Health Canada, PMDA, and NMPA; and maintains regulatory intelligence on evolving standards. Use when users need to plan or execute FDA submissions, navigate 510(k) or PMA approval processes, achieve CE marking, prepare pre-submission meeting materials, write regulatory strategy documents, respond to agency queries, or manage compliance documentation for medical device market access.

★ 4
zhangzhang-111-i
zhangzhang-111-i/claude-skills111

quality-manager-qms-iso13485

ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device documentation, and corrective action workflows.

设计师视觉设计
★ 4
zhangzhang-111-i
zhangzhang-111-i/claude-skills111

quality-manager-qmr

Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2.

律师与法务
★ 4
zhangzhang-111-i
zhangzhang-111-i/claude-skills111

quality-documentation-manager

Document control system management for medical device QMS. Covers document numbering, version control, change management, and 21 CFR Part 11 compliance. Use for document control procedures, change control workflow, document numbering, version management, electronic signature compliance, or regulatory documentation review.

律师与法务文档处理
★ 4
zhangzhang-111-i
zhangzhang-111-i/claude-skills111

qms-audit-expert

ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use for internal audit planning, audit execution, finding classification, external audit preparation, or audit program management.

★ 4