tooluniverse-protein-therapeutic-design
Design novel protein therapeutics (binders, enzymes, scaffolds) using AI-guided de novo design. Uses RFdiffusion for backbone generation, ProteinMPNN for sequence design, ESMFold/AlphaFold2 for validation. Use when asked to design protein binders, therapeutic proteins, or engineer protein function.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-02
- Stars
- ★ 0
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- tooluniverse-protein-therapeutic-design
- description
- Design novel protein therapeutics (binders, enzymes, scaffolds) using AI-guided de novo design. Uses RFdiffusion for backbone generation, ProteinMPNN for sequence design, ESMFold/AlphaFold2 for validation. Use when asked to design protein binders, therapeutic proteins, or engineer protein function.
02 资源文件 5
- 参考文档CHECKLIST.md6.6 KB
- 参考文档DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md3.3 KB
- 参考文档design_templates.md2.8 KB
- 参考文档EXAMPLES.md10.7 KB
- 参考文档TOOLS_REFERENCE.md12.9 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Therapeutic Protein Designer
AI-guided de novo protein design using RFdiffusion backbone generation, ProteinMPNN sequence optimization, and structure validation for therapeutic protein development.
KEY PRINCIPLES:
- Structure-first - Generate backbone geometry before sequence
- Target-guided - Design binders with target structure in mind
- Iterative validation - Predict structure to validate designs
- Developability-aware - Consider aggregation, immunogenicity, expression
- Evidence-graded - Grade designs by confidence metrics
- Actionable output - Provide sequences ready for experimental testing
- English-first queries - Always use English terms in tool calls
Therapeutic protein design starts with the target interaction. What binding surface do you need to cover? A small pocket = nanobody or peptide. A large flat surface = designed protein. Stability, immunogenicity, and manufacturability constrain the design space.
LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS
When uncertain about any scientific fact, SEARCH databases first rather than reasoning from memory. A database-verified answer is always more reliable than a guess.
COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
When to Use
Apply when user asks to:
- Design a protein binder, therapeutic protein, or scaffold
- Optimize a protein sequence for function
- Design a de novo enzyme
- Generate protein variants for target binding
Workflow Overview
Phase 1: Target Characterization
Get structure (PDB, EMDB cryo-EM, AlphaFold), identify binding epitope
Phase 2: Backbone Generation (RFdiffusion)
Define constraints, generate >= 5 backbones, filter by geometry
Phase 3: Sequence Design (ProteinMPNN)
Design >= 8 sequences per backbone, sample with temperature control
Phase 4: Structure Validation (ESMFold/AlphaFold2)
Predict structure, compare to backbone, assess pLDDT/pTM
Phase 5: Developability Assessment
Aggregation, pI, expression prediction
Phase 6: Report Synthesis
Ranked candidates, FASTA, experimental recommendations
Critical Requirements
Report-First Approach (MANDATORY)
- Create
[TARGET]_protein_design_report.mdfirst with section headers - Progressively update as designs are generated
- Output
[TARGET]_designed_sequences.fastaand[TARGET]_top_candidates.csv
Design Documentation (MANDATORY)
Every design MUST include: Sequence, Length, Target, Method, and Quality Metrics (pLDDT, pTM, MPNN score, binding prediction).
NVIDIA NIM Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Key Parameter |
|---|---|---|
NvidiaNIM_rfdiffusion |
Backbone generation | diffusion_steps (NOT num_steps) |
NvidiaNIM_proteinmpnn |
Sequence design | pdb_string (NOT pdb) |
ESMFold_predict_structure |
Fast validation | sequence (NOT seq) |
NvidiaNIM_alphafold2 |
High-accuracy validation | sequence, algorithm |
NvidiaNIM_esm2_650m |
Sequence embeddings | sequences, format |
Common Parameter Mistakes
| Tool | Wrong | Correct |
|---|---|---|
NvidiaNIM_rfdiffusion |
num_steps=50 |
diffusion_steps=50 |
NvidiaNIM_proteinmpnn |
pdb=content |
pdb_string=content |
ESMFold_predict_structure |
seq="MVLS..." |
sequence="MVLS..." |
NvidiaNIM_alphafold2 |
seq="MVLS..." |
sequence="MVLS..." |
NVIDIA NIM Requirements
- API Key:
NVIDIA_API_KEYenvironment variable required - Rate limits: 40 RPM (1.5 second minimum between calls)
- AlphaFold2 may return 202 (polling required); RFdiffusion and ESMFold are synchronous
Supporting Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Key Parameters |
|---|---|---|
PDBe_get_uniprot_mappings |
Find PDB structures | uniprot_id |
RCSBData_get_entry |
Download PDB file | pdb_id |
alphafold_get_prediction |
Get AlphaFold DB structure | accession |
emdb_search |
Search cryo-EM maps | query |
emdb_get_entry |
Get entry details | entry_id |
UniProt_get_entry_by_accession |
Get target sequence | accession |
InterPro_get_protein_domains |
Get domains | accession |
Evidence Grading
| Tier | Criteria |
|---|---|
| T1 (best) | pLDDT >85, pTM >0.8, low aggregation, neutral pI |
| T2 | pLDDT >75, pTM >0.7, acceptable developability |
| T3 | pLDDT >70, pTM >0.65, developability concerns |
| T4 | Failed validation or major developability issues |
Completeness Checklist
- [ ] Target structure obtained (PDB or predicted)
- [ ] Binding epitope identified
- [ ] >= 5 backbones generated, top 3-5 selected
- [ ] >= 8 sequences per backbone, MPNN scores reported
- [ ] All sequences validated (ESMFold), pLDDT/pTM reported, >= 3 passing
- [ ] Developability assessed (aggregation, pI, expression)
- [ ] Ranked candidate list, FASTA file, experimental recommendations
Reference Files
- DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md - Phase-by-phase code examples, sampling parameters, fallback chains
- TOOLS_REFERENCE.md - Complete tool documentation with code examples
- EXAMPLES.md - Sample design workflows and outputs
- CHECKLIST.md - Detailed phase checklists and quality metrics
- design_templates.md - Report templates and output format examples
04 同仓库更多 Skills
clarify-requirements
Resolve genuine pre-execution ambiguity by scanning repo context, generating 1-6 grounded options, and asking 1-3 focused questions via AskUserQuestion. NOT for mid-task use (injection risk); NOT when the goal is already unambiguous; use to disambiguate vague prompts before any file edits.
openmm-md
Run FREE, open-source, Windows-native GPU molecular dynamics via the openmm-md MCP (OpenMM + CUDA on the local NVIDIA GPU). Use for protein / protein-ligand MD when you want a free stack or are on Windows without a Schrodinger license. Covers the full workflow (prepare, solvate, minimize, equilibrate, production, analyze, mmgbsa) AND an honest decision guide vs Schrodinger Desmond, including how to run Desmond legitimately on Linux or a cloud GPU with a real license. This is a deliberately LESSER free alternative and does NOT replace the schrodinger MCP tools. Do NOT use it to pick a free tool when a validated FEP+, WaterMap, IFD-MD, or Prime MM-GBSA result is actually required.
visual-review
Take screenshots of web pages and UI using Playwright for visual review and iteration
status
Diagnostic status report — shows metaswarm installation state, project setup, and potential issues
start
Use when starting work on any task, when the user mentions metaswarm, or when the user wants to begin tracked development work
setup
Interactive project setup — detects your project, configures metaswarm, writes project-local files