[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6D81J6S3A4NJRAM22S22TKT":3,"skill-same:01M6D81J6S3A4NJRAM22S22TKT":90},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":23,"publishedAt":40,"linkOnly":41,"markdownContent":42,"markdownBody":43,"frontMatter":44,"refName":48,"commitSha":49,"skillDirectory":50,"forksCount":51,"repositoryHtmlUrl":52,"repositoryHomepageUrl":53,"ownerHtmlUrl":54,"ownerBlogUrl":55,"ownerDescription":56,"updatedAt":57,"install":58,"resources":71},"01M6D81J6S3A4NJRAM22S22TKT","creator-metrics-review",null,"Review creator-media performance over time using raw YouTube evidence, portfolio metrics, programming goals, and explicit follow-up decisions","GeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills","GeorgeQLe","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F21134126?v=4","01M6D2JP418S0VGJGF8M93EC3H","George Le","01M6D2JPBAKYD82TA5FS6HKQ3D",1,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fpacks\u002Fcreator-foundation\u002Fcodex\u002Fcreator-metrics-review\u002Farchive\u002Fv0.4\u002FSKILL.md",[18],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究","SCENARIO","使用场景",[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39],"review","metrics","creator metrics review","performance","research","Media","programming","decisions","v0","channel","portfolio","evidence","up","youtube","goals","time","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: creator-metrics-review\ndescription: Review creator-media performance over time using raw YouTube evidence, portfolio metrics, programming goals, and explicit follow-up decisions\ntype: research\nversion: v0.4\nargument-hint: \"[channel slug] [--period monthly|quarterly]\"\ninterview_depth: none\n---\n\n## Pack Availability Guard\n\nBefore telling the user to run a skill from another project-local pack, check `.agents\u002Fproject.json.enabled_packs`. If the target pack is not enabled, recommend `$pack install \u003Cpack>` instead of the target skill. Global skills are always valid. Skills from this same pack are valid because the current skill is already running from that pack.\n\n# Creator Metrics Review\n\nInvoke as `$creator-metrics-review`.\n\n## Report-First Approval Gate\n\nDefault to scope-first approval: before synthesized research, inspect only enough repository, user, and source context to propose research scope, source plan, assumptions, output paths, and approval questions in a `review` alignment page plus a concise conversation summary.\n\nDo not perform synthesized research, rank candidates, make recommendations, or write working packets or canonical deliverables until final compiled YAML approves the research scope. Minimal pre-approval discovery may identify available files, source categories, and open questions; label it as scope evidence, not findings.\n\nAfter approved research-scope YAML, perform the research and write only the non-canonical working packet defined in the staged workflow. Then update the `review` alignment page with findings and stop again for feedback-only YAML or final compiled YAML artifact approval before creating or updating canonical research, spec, or task files.\n\nDo not include `Recommended next skill`, `Recommended next command`, or downstream routing language. The approval request itself is the next action. Only emit next-skill routing after the approved artifact has been written or updated.\n\n## Staged Research Workflow\n\nUse this staged workflow for synthesized research or report outputs that would create or update canonical research, spec, or task files.\n\n1. **Stage 1 - Scope discovery and approval.** Inspect only enough repository, user, and source context to propose research scope, source plan, assumptions, output paths, and approval questions. Build the `review` HTML alignment page before synthesized research. The page must render the proposed scope, available source categories, known context, assumptions\u002Fconfidence, proposed working-packet and canonical output paths, and research-scope approval gates. Stop for final compiled YAML approval of the research scope. Do not perform synthesized research, rank candidates, make recommendations, or write working packets, canonical research, spec, or task files in Stage 1.\n2. **Stage 2 - Research and artifact review.** Only after approved research-scope YAML with no unresolved `needs-clarification`, unresolved `down` feedback, or other unresolved negative feedback, perform the synthesized research, run required source\u002Fcode checks, and write only a non-canonical working packet: flat mode uses `research\u002F_working\u002Fpreliminary-\u003Cskill>-research.md`; product-path mode uses `research\u002F{slug}\u002F_working\u002Fpreliminary-\u003Cskill>-research.md`. Replace `\u003Cskill>` with this skill's `name` value. Raw evidence or search logs may remain as supporting evidence where this skill already requires them, but synthesized deliverables stay in the working packet. Update the `review` HTML alignment page with the full preliminary packet, evidence matrix, assumptions\u002Fconfidence register, source coverage gaps, proposed canonical file changes, and artifact approval gates. Stop for either feedback-only YAML or final compiled YAML. Feedback-only YAML revises the working packet and page, then remains in Stage 2.\n3. **Stage 3 - Finalize approved artifacts.** Consume final compiled YAML for artifact approval only when it has no unresolved `needs-clarification`, unresolved `down` feedback, or other unresolved negative feedback. Apply approved edits first, archive the working packet to `docs\u002Fhistory\u002Farchive\u002FYYYY-MM-DD\u002FHHMMSS\u002F\u003Coriginal-working-path>`, remove the active working packet, write the approved canonical artifacts to the unchanged output paths below, and convert the alignment page to `confirmed` with the approval record preserved.\n\nCanonical output paths remain unchanged. Search logs and other supporting evidence remain allowed only where this skill's output contract already requires them.\n\n## Evidence And Feedback Handling\n\nTreat user feedback as input to evaluate, not as automatic ground truth.\n\n- For factual, evidentiary, technical, or source-backed claims: verify against available evidence. If the user appears to misunderstand the evidence or states something factually incorrect, push back clearly and cite the evidence. Do not rewrite findings merely to agree.\n- For taste, brand, positioning preference, risk appetite, prioritization, or other subjective judgment calls: weigh user feedback heavily and adapt the recommendation unless it conflicts with verified evidence.\n- When feedback mixes facts and preference, separate them explicitly: correct the factual part, then incorporate the preference where it is a legitimate judgment call.\n- When uncertain, say what is known, what is inferred, and what would change the conclusion.\n\n## Inputs\n\n- Preferred creator context when present: `research\u002Fcreator-presence\u002F\u003Cslug>.md`, especially for cross-platform performance, audience\u002Fcommunity signals, and stale-positioning checks.\n- Raw metadata under `research\u002Fyoutube\u002Fdata\u002F\u003Cslug>\u002F`.\n- Channel audit, portfolio, positioning, programming, series specs, and product-led media map when present.\n- Optional prior metrics reviews.\n\n## Output\n\nCreate the `research\u002Fyoutube\u002F` directory if it does not exist.\n\nWrite `research\u002Fyoutube\u002Fmetrics-review-\u003Cslug>-YYYY-MM-DD.md` with:\n\n- Period covered and evidence paths.\n- KPI table: videos published, views, median views, views\u002Fday, views\u002Fminute, likes, comments, top-video concentration, transcript coverage.\n- Series and pillar performance.\n- Portfolio drift: whether videos still match the intended roles.\n- Wins, misses, and ambiguous signals.\n- Decisions: keep, stop, refresh, investigate, or specify.\n- Follow-up tasks routed by execution semantics:\n  - Strategy\u002Fresearch -> creator-media skills.\n  - Implementation or repo docs -> `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`.\n  - Human-only platform actions -> `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md`.\n  - Recurring review cadence -> `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md`.\n\n## Approved Artifact Handoff\n\nAfter an approved synthesized write, explicit write\u002Fupdate mode, or any direct artifact mutation:\n\n- List every created or updated synthesized artifact path in the final response.\n- State the verification performed, such as readback, schema\u002Fcheck command, or why no executable verification applies for a Markdown-only strategy artifact.\n- Check and report the relevant git status for intended artifacts when the project is a git repository. If intended artifacts are modified or untracked, make the next action shipping, committing, or an explicit dirty-artifact handoff before recommending downstream strategy work.\n- Do not imply the research workflow is complete while approved artifacts remain untracked or uncommitted unless the user explicitly asked not to ship.\n- If stopping for approval before writing, the approval request remains the next action; do not include downstream routing.\n\n## Intent-Aware Routing\n\nBefore applying the default `## Next-Skill Routing` sequence, classify the user's immediate intent and route to the missing action that best serves that intent:\n\n- Strategy refresh: recommend the missing or stale positioning, programming, portfolio, metrics, or product-media artifact.\n- Recording prep: recommend the missing series spec, script, build proof, walkthrough guide, or validation artifact needed before recording.\n- Upload prep: recommend packaging, title\u002Fthumbnail, description, chapters, or final metadata work before broader strategy work.\n- Performance review: recommend metrics, cadence, portfolio, peer benchmark, or owner-analytics export work before new content planning.\n- Owner analytics or private\u002Fmanual platform evidence: route to an explicit manual\u002Fguide handoff instead of inventing unavailable metrics.\n- Dirty intended artifacts: route to shipping\u002Fcommit\u002Fhandoff first, not another creator strategy skill.\n\nUse the default next-skill sequence only when no stronger user intent, missing artifact, manual blocker, or dirty-artifact handoff applies.\n\n## Alignment Page\n\nWhen this skill produces durable deliverables (research, specs, plans, reports, prototypes, or any document output), build a full-depth HTML alignment page following `ALIGNMENT-PAGE.md` in this skill's directory. Output: `alignment\u002Fcreator-metrics-review-{topic}.html`.\n\n## Constraints\n\n- Do not treat one video as a trend.\n- State metric gaps explicitly.\n- Use the dossier when present as preferred creator context for cross-platform signals; preserve raw YouTube evidence as the source of YouTube performance claims.\n- Do not perform external account actions or channel changes.\n\n## Default Shipping Contract\n\nFollow the shared shipping contract convention in CLAUDE.md.\n","## Pack Availability Guard\n\nBefore telling the user to run a skill from another project-local pack, check `.agents\u002Fproject.json.enabled_packs`. If the target pack is not enabled, recommend `$pack install \u003Cpack>` instead of the target skill. Global skills are always valid. Skills from this same pack are valid because the current skill is already running from that pack.\n\n# Creator Metrics Review\n\nInvoke as `$creator-metrics-review`.\n\n## Report-First Approval Gate\n\nDefault to scope-first approval: before synthesized research, inspect only enough repository, user, and source context to propose research scope, source plan, assumptions, output paths, and approval questions in a `review` alignment page plus a concise conversation summary.\n\nDo not perform synthesized research, rank candidates, make recommendations, or write working packets or canonical deliverables until final compiled YAML approves the research scope. Minimal pre-approval discovery may identify available files, source categories, and open questions; label it as scope evidence, not findings.\n\nAfter approved research-scope YAML, perform the research and write only the non-canonical working packet defined in the staged workflow. Then update the `review` alignment page with findings and stop again for feedback-only YAML or final compiled YAML artifact approval before creating or updating canonical research, spec, or task files.\n\nDo not include `Recommended next skill`, `Recommended next command`, or downstream routing language. The approval request itself is the next action. Only emit next-skill routing after the approved artifact has been written or updated.\n\n## Staged Research Workflow\n\nUse this staged workflow for synthesized research or report outputs that would create or update canonical research, spec, or task files.\n\n1. **Stage 1 - Scope discovery and approval.** Inspect only enough repository, user, and source context to propose research scope, source plan, assumptions, output paths, and approval questions. Build the `review` HTML alignment page before synthesized research. The page must render the proposed scope, available source categories, known context, assumptions\u002Fconfidence, proposed working-packet and canonical output paths, and research-scope approval gates. Stop for final compiled YAML approval of the research scope. Do not perform synthesized research, rank candidates, make recommendations, or write working packets, canonical research, spec, or task files in Stage 1.\n2. **Stage 2 - Research and artifact review.** Only after approved research-scope YAML with no unresolved `needs-clarification`, unresolved `down` feedback, or other unresolved negative feedback, perform the synthesized research, run required source\u002Fcode checks, and write only a non-canonical working packet: flat mode uses `research\u002F_working\u002Fpreliminary-\u003Cskill>-research.md`; product-path mode uses `research\u002F{slug}\u002F_working\u002Fpreliminary-\u003Cskill>-research.md`. Replace `\u003Cskill>` with this skill's `name` value. Raw evidence or search logs may remain as supporting evidence where this skill already requires them, but synthesized deliverables stay in the working packet. Update the `review` HTML alignment page with the full preliminary packet, evidence matrix, assumptions\u002Fconfidence register, source coverage gaps, proposed canonical file changes, and artifact approval gates. Stop for either feedback-only YAML or final compiled YAML. Feedback-only YAML revises the working packet and page, then remains in Stage 2.\n3. **Stage 3 - Finalize approved artifacts.** Consume final compiled YAML for artifact approval only when it has no unresolved `needs-clarification`, unresolved `down` feedback, or other unresolved negative feedback. Apply approved edits first, archive the working packet to `docs\u002Fhistory\u002Farchive\u002FYYYY-MM-DD\u002FHHMMSS\u002F\u003Coriginal-working-path>`, remove the active working packet, write the approved canonical artifacts to the unchanged output paths below, and convert the alignment page to `confirmed` with the approval record preserved.\n\nCanonical output paths remain unchanged. Search logs and other supporting evidence remain allowed only where this skill's output contract already requires them.\n\n## Evidence And Feedback Handling\n\nTreat user feedback as input to evaluate, not as automatic ground truth.\n\n- For factual, evidentiary, technical, or source-backed claims: verify against available evidence. If the user appears to misunderstand the evidence or states something factually incorrect, push back clearly and cite the evidence. Do not rewrite findings merely to agree.\n- For taste, brand, positioning preference, risk appetite, prioritization, or other subjective judgment calls: weigh user feedback heavily and adapt the recommendation unless it conflicts with verified evidence.\n- When feedback mixes facts and preference, separate them explicitly: correct the factual part, then incorporate the preference where it is a legitimate judgment call.\n- When uncertain, say what is known, what is inferred, and what would change the conclusion.\n\n## Inputs\n\n- Preferred creator context when present: `research\u002Fcreator-presence\u002F\u003Cslug>.md`, especially for cross-platform performance, audience\u002Fcommunity signals, and stale-positioning checks.\n- Raw metadata under `research\u002Fyoutube\u002Fdata\u002F\u003Cslug>\u002F`.\n- Channel audit, portfolio, positioning, programming, series specs, and product-led media map when present.\n- Optional prior metrics reviews.\n\n## Output\n\nCreate the `research\u002Fyoutube\u002F` directory if it does not exist.\n\nWrite `research\u002Fyoutube\u002Fmetrics-review-\u003Cslug>-YYYY-MM-DD.md` with:\n\n- Period covered and evidence paths.\n- KPI table: videos published, views, median views, views\u002Fday, views\u002Fminute, likes, comments, top-video concentration, transcript coverage.\n- Series and pillar performance.\n- Portfolio drift: whether videos still match the intended roles.\n- Wins, misses, and ambiguous signals.\n- Decisions: keep, stop, refresh, investigate, or specify.\n- Follow-up tasks routed by execution semantics:\n  - Strategy\u002Fresearch -> creator-media skills.\n  - Implementation or repo docs -> `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`.\n  - Human-only platform actions -> `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md`.\n  - Recurring review cadence -> `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md`.\n\n## Approved Artifact Handoff\n\nAfter an approved synthesized write, explicit write\u002Fupdate mode, or any direct artifact mutation:\n\n- List every created or updated synthesized artifact path in the final response.\n- State the verification performed, such as readback, schema\u002Fcheck command, or why no executable verification applies for a Markdown-only strategy artifact.\n- Check and report the relevant git status for intended artifacts when the project is a git repository. If intended artifacts are modified or untracked, make the next action shipping, committing, or an explicit dirty-artifact handoff before recommending downstream strategy work.\n- Do not imply the research workflow is complete while approved artifacts remain untracked or uncommitted unless the user explicitly asked not to ship.\n- If stopping for approval before writing, the approval request remains the next action; do not include downstream routing.\n\n## Intent-Aware Routing\n\nBefore applying the default `## Next-Skill Routing` sequence, classify the user's immediate intent and route to the missing action that best serves that intent:\n\n- Strategy refresh: recommend the missing or stale positioning, programming, portfolio, metrics, or product-media artifact.\n- Recording prep: recommend the missing series spec, script, build proof, walkthrough guide, or validation artifact needed before recording.\n- Upload prep: recommend packaging, title\u002Fthumbnail, description, chapters, or final metadata work before broader strategy work.\n- Performance review: recommend metrics, cadence, portfolio, peer benchmark, or owner-analytics export work before new content planning.\n- Owner analytics or private\u002Fmanual platform evidence: route to an explicit manual\u002Fguide handoff instead of inventing unavailable metrics.\n- Dirty intended artifacts: route to shipping\u002Fcommit\u002Fhandoff first, not another creator strategy skill.\n\nUse the default next-skill sequence only when no stronger user intent, missing artifact, manual blocker, or dirty-artifact handoff applies.\n\n## Alignment Page\n\nWhen this skill produces durable deliverables (research, specs, plans, reports, prototypes, or any document output), build a full-depth HTML alignment page following `ALIGNMENT-PAGE.md` in this skill's directory. Output: `alignment\u002Fcreator-metrics-review-{topic}.html`.\n\n## Constraints\n\n- Do not treat one video as a trend.\n- State metric gaps explicitly.\n- Use the dossier when present as preferred creator context for cross-platform signals; preserve raw YouTube evidence as the source of YouTube performance claims.\n- Do not perform external account actions or channel changes.\n\n## Default Shipping Contract\n\nFollow the shared shipping contract convention in CLAUDE.md.\n",{"name":5,"type":28,"version":45,"description":7,"argument-hint":46,"interview_depth":47},"v0.4","[channel slug] [--period monthly|quarterly]","none","master","96e2912af886dd1606b1b97df707715aef062b02","packs\u002Fcreator-foundation\u002Fcodex\u002Fcreator-metrics-review\u002Farchive\u002Fv0.4",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills","https:\u002F\u002Fagentic-skills-blush.vercel.app","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe","georgeqle.com","George Le is a futurist and serial tech entrepreneur who wants to work toward a world where humanity is free from robotic tasks.","2026-11-10 04:07:24",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":59,"prompt":69,"zipAvailable":70},[60,63,66],{"tool":61,"command":62},"npx","npx skills add GeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills --skill creator-metrics-review",{"tool":64,"command":65},"bunx","bunx skills add GeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills --skill creator-metrics-review",{"tool":67,"command":68},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add GeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills --skill creator-metrics-review","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fpacks\u002Fcreator-foundation\u002Fcodex\u002Fcreator-metrics-review\u002Farchive\u002Fv0.4\u002FSKILL.md",true,[72,78,82,86],{"path":73,"resourceType":74,"resourceTypeDesc":75,"sizeBytes":76,"sourceHtmlUrl":77},"agents\u002Fopenai.yaml","REFERENCE","参考文档",240,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSigurdHall\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Freporting\u002Forchestration\u002Fpowerbi-report-production-loop\u002Fagents\u002Fopenai.yaml",{"path":79,"resourceType":74,"resourceTypeDesc":75,"sizeBytes":80,"sourceHtmlUrl":81},"references\u002Fpublic\u002Foutput-artifacts.md",2909,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSigurdHall\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Freporting\u002Forchestration\u002Fpowerbi-report-production-loop\u002Freferences\u002Fpublic\u002Foutput-artifacts.md",{"path":83,"resourceType":74,"resourceTypeDesc":75,"sizeBytes":84,"sourceHtmlUrl":85},"references\u002Fpublic\u002Fsubagents.md",5083,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSigurdHall\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Freporting\u002Forchestration\u002Fpowerbi-report-production-loop\u002Freferences\u002Fpublic\u002Fsubagents.md",{"path":87,"resourceType":74,"resourceTypeDesc":75,"sizeBytes":88,"sourceHtmlUrl":89},"references\u002Fpublic\u002Ftable-migration.md",3470,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSigurdHall\u002Fskills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fskills\u002Freporting\u002Forchestration\u002Fpowerbi-report-production-loop\u002Freferences\u002Fpublic\u002Ftable-migration.md",[91,103,113,125,138,149],{"skillNo":92,"name":93,"nameZh":6,"description":94,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":95,"categories":96,"keywords":97,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G0NJES15RJKZE6YZ0TSYGF","source-checkout-allowed","Valid source-checkout-only fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fsource-checkout-allowed\u002FSKILL.md",[],[98,99,100,101,32,102],"source checkout allowed","checkout","fixture","only","valid",{"skillNo":104,"name":105,"nameZh":6,"description":106,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":107,"categories":108,"keywords":109,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G0NFZ3R1MNB1E3DVTM0WB7","deck-install-valid","Valid deck install fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fdeck-install\u002FSKILL.md",[],[110,111,112,102,100,32],"deck install valid","deck","install",{"skillNo":114,"name":115,"nameZh":6,"description":116,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":117,"categories":118,"keywords":119,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G0ND3QZQC4MDZ9NVB97PT2","codex-pack-guard-valid","Valid Codex Pack Availability Guard fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fcodex-pack-guard\u002FSKILL.md",[],[120,121,122,102,123,124,100,32],"codex pack guard valid","pack","guard","codex","availability",{"skillNo":126,"name":127,"nameZh":6,"description":128,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":129,"categories":130,"keywords":134,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G0NA9YB3NKGZKD3S96JMNB","codex-missing-skill-valid","Valid Codex missing skill fallback fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fcodex-missing-skill-fallback\u002FSKILL.md",[131],{"categoryNo":132,"categoryName":133,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[135,136,102,123,32,137,100],"codex missing skill valid","missing","fallback",{"skillNo":139,"name":140,"nameZh":6,"description":141,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":142,"categories":143,"keywords":145,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G0N7PC0EKFD40ZWQAXSAQ9","codex-base-skill-fallback-valid","Valid Codex base skill fallback fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fcodex-base-skill-fallback\u002FSKILL.md",[144],{"categoryNo":132,"categoryName":133,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[102,123,137,146,147,148,32,100],"base skill","codex base skill fallback valid","base",{"skillNo":150,"name":151,"nameZh":6,"description":152,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":153,"categories":154,"keywords":155,"publishedAt":40},"01M6G0N4VRR2YKZQ6N3Y6S2BQA","claude-pack-guard-valid","Valid Claude Pack Availability Guard fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fclaude-pack-guard\u002FSKILL.md",[],[102,122,121,156,124,32,100],"claude pack guard valid"]