[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6D6FHFADSJ405TXQADE4F05":3,"skill-same:01M6D6FHFADSJ405TXQADE4F05":84},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":39,"linkOnly":40,"markdownContent":41,"markdownBody":42,"frontMatter":43,"refName":51,"commitSha":52,"skillDirectory":53,"forksCount":54,"repositoryHtmlUrl":55,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":56,"ownerBlogUrl":57,"ownerDescription":58,"updatedAt":59,"install":60,"resources":73},"01M6D6FHFADSJ405TXQADE4F05","board-deck-builder",null,"Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.","oabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw","oabdelmaksoud","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F50699149?v=4","01M6D5CVVN778ZCDP1WHS816SP","Omar Abdelmaksoud","01M6D5CW1RHNSKCJR85GJACBFT",2,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-import\u002Fclaude-skills\u002Freferences\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"board deck builder","board","deck","builder","investor update","governance","bad","roles","fundraising","news","delivery","structure","frameworks","use","business","meetings","perspectives","common","template","update","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: board-deck-builder\ndescription: \"Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.\"\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  version: 1.0.0\n  author: Alireza Rezvani\n  category: c-level\n  domain: board-governance\n  updated: 2026-03-05\n  frameworks: deck-frameworks, board-deck-template\n---\n\n# Board Deck Builder\n\nBuild board decks that tell a story — not just show data. Every section has an owner, a narrative, and a \"so what.\"\n\n## Keywords\nboard deck, investor update, board meeting, board pack, investor relations, quarterly review, board presentation, fundraising deck, investor deck, board narrative, QBR, quarterly business review\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```\n\u002Fboard-deck [quarterly|monthly|fundraising] [stage: seed|seriesA|seriesB]\n```\n\nProvide available metrics. The builder fills gaps with explicit placeholders — never invents numbers.\n\n## Deck Structure (Standard Order)\n\nEvery section follows: **Headline → Data → Narrative → Ask\u002FNext**\n\n### 1. Executive Summary (CEO)\n**3 sentences. No more.**\n- Sentence 1: State of the business (where we are)\n- Sentence 2: Biggest thing that happened this period\n- Sentence 3: Where we're going next quarter\n\n*Bad:* \"We had a good quarter with lots of progress across all areas.\"\n*Good:* \"We closed Q3 at $2.4M ARR (+22% QoQ), signed our largest enterprise contract, and enter Q4 with 14-month runway. The strategic shift to mid-market is working — ACV up 40% and sales cycle down 3 weeks. Q4 priority: close the $3M Series A and hit $2.8M ARR.\"\n\n### 2. Key Metrics Dashboard (COO)\n**6-8 metrics max. Use a table.**\n\n| Metric | This Period | Last Period | Target | Status |\n|--------|-------------|-------------|--------|--------|\n| ARR | $2.4M | $1.97M | $2.3M | ✅ |\n| MoM growth | 8.1% | 7.2% | 7.5% | ✅ |\n| Burn multiple | 1.8x | 2.1x | \u003C2x | ✅ |\n| NRR | 112% | 108% | >110% | ✅ |\n| CAC payback | 11 months | 14 months | \u003C12 months | ✅ |\n| Headcount | 24 | 21 | 25 | ? |\n\nPick metrics the board actually tracks. Swap out anything they've said they don't care about.\n\n### 3. Financial Update (CFO)\n- P&L summary: Revenue, COGS, Gross margin, OpEx, Net burn\n- Cash position and runway (months)\n- Burn multiple trend (3-quarter view)\n- Variance to plan (what was different and why)\n- Forecast update for next quarter\n\n**One sentence on each variance.** Boards hate \"revenue was below target\" with no explanation. Say why.\n\n### 4. Revenue & Pipeline (CRO)\n- ARR waterfall: starting → new → expansion → churn → ending\n- NRR and logo churn rates\n- Pipeline by stage (in $, not just count)\n- Forecast: next quarter with confidence level\n- Top 3 deals: name\u002Famount\u002Fclose date\u002Frisk\n\n**The forecast must have a confidence level.** \"We expect $2.8M\" is weak. \"High confidence $2.6M, upside to $2.9M if two late-stage deals close\" is useful.\n\n### 5. Product Update (CPO)\n- Shipped this quarter: 3-5 bullets, user impact for each\n- Shipping next quarter: 3-5 bullets with target dates\n- PMF signal: NPS trend, DAU\u002FMAU ratio, feature adoption\n- One key learning from customer research\n\n**No feature lists.** Only features with evidence of user impact.\n\n### 6. Growth & Marketing (CMO)\n- CAC by channel (table)\n- Pipeline contribution by channel ($)\n- Brand\u002Fawareness metrics relevant to stage (traffic, share of voice)\n- What's working, what's being cut, what's being tested\n\n### 7. Engineering & Technical (CTO)\n- Delivery velocity trend (last 4 quarters)\n- Tech debt ratio and plan\n- Infrastructure: uptime, incidents, cost trend\n- Security posture (one line, flag anything pending)\n\n**Keep this short unless there's a material issue.** Boards don't need sprint details.\n\n### 8. Team & People (CHRO)\n- Headcount: actual vs plan\n- Hiring: offers out, pipeline, time-to-fill trend\n- Attrition: regrettable vs non-regrettable\n- Engagement: last survey score, trend\n- Key hires this quarter, key open roles\n\n### 9. Risk & Security (CISO)\n- Security posture: status of critical controls\n- Compliance: certifications in progress, deadlines\n- Incidents this quarter (if any): impact, resolution, prevention\n- Top 3 risks and mitigation status\n\n### 10. Strategic Outlook (CEO)\n- Next quarter priorities: 3-5 items, ranked\n- Key decisions needed from the board\n- Asks: budget, introductions, advice, votes\n\n**The \"asks\" slide is the most important.** Be specific. \"We'd like 3 warm introductions to CFOs at Series B companies\" beats \"any help would be appreciated.\"\n\n### 11. Appendix\n- Detailed financial model\n- Full pipeline data\n- Cohort retention charts\n- Customer case studies\n- Detailed headcount breakdown\n\n---\n\n## Narrative Framework\n\nBoards see 10+ decks per quarter. Yours needs a through-line.\n\n**The 4-Act Structure:**\n1. **Where we said we'd be** (last quarter's targets)\n2. **Where we actually are** (honest assessment)\n3. **Why the gap exists** (one cause per variance, not excuses)\n4. **What we're doing about it** (specific, dated actions)\n\nThis works for good news AND bad news. It's credible because it acknowledges reality.\n\n**Opening frame:** Start with the one thing that matters most — the board should know the key message by slide 3, not slide 30.\n\n---\n\n## Delivering Bad News\n\nNever bury it. Boards find out eventually. Finding out late makes it worse.\n\n**Framework:**\n1. **State it plainly** — \"We missed Q3 ARR target by $300K (12% gap)\"\n2. **Own the cause** — \"Primary driver was longer-than-expected sales cycle in enterprise segment\"\n3. **Show you understand it** — \"We analyzed 8 lost\u002Fstalled deals; the pattern is X\"\n4. **Present the fix** — \"We've made 3 changes: [specific, dated changes]\"\n5. **Update the forecast** — \"Revised Q4 target is $2.6M; here's the bottom-up build\"\n\n**What NOT to do:**\n- Don't lead with good news to soften bad news — boards notice and distrust the framing\n- Don't explain without owning — \"market conditions\" is not a cause, it's a context\n- Don't present a fix without data behind it\n- Don't show a revised forecast without showing your assumptions\n\n---\n\n## Common Board Deck Mistakes\n\n| Mistake | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Too many slides (>25) | Cut ruthlessly — if you can't explain it in the room, the slide is wrong |\n| Metrics without targets | Every metric needs a target and a status |\n| No narrative | Data without story forces boards to draw their own conclusions |\n| Burying bad news | Lead with it, own it, fix it |\n| Vague asks | Specific, actionable, person-assigned asks only |\n| No variance explanation | Every gap from target needs one-sentence cause |\n| Stale appendix | Appendix is only useful if it's current |\n| Designing for the reader, not the room | Decks are presented — they must work spoken aloud |\n\n---\n\n## Cadence Notes\n\n**Quarterly (standard):** Full deck, all sections, 20-30 slides. Sent 48 hours in advance.\n**Monthly (for early-stage):** Condensed — metrics dashboard, financials, pipeline, top risks. 8-12 slides.\n**Fundraising:** Opens with market\u002Fvision, closes with ask. See `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` for Sequoia format.\n\n## References\n- `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` — SaaS board pack format, Sequoia structure, investor tailoring\n- `templates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md` — fill-in template for complete board decks\n","# Board Deck Builder\n\nBuild board decks that tell a story — not just show data. Every section has an owner, a narrative, and a \"so what.\"\n\n## Keywords\nboard deck, investor update, board meeting, board pack, investor relations, quarterly review, board presentation, fundraising deck, investor deck, board narrative, QBR, quarterly business review\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```\n\u002Fboard-deck [quarterly|monthly|fundraising] [stage: seed|seriesA|seriesB]\n```\n\nProvide available metrics. The builder fills gaps with explicit placeholders — never invents numbers.\n\n## Deck Structure (Standard Order)\n\nEvery section follows: **Headline → Data → Narrative → Ask\u002FNext**\n\n### 1. Executive Summary (CEO)\n**3 sentences. No more.**\n- Sentence 1: State of the business (where we are)\n- Sentence 2: Biggest thing that happened this period\n- Sentence 3: Where we're going next quarter\n\n*Bad:* \"We had a good quarter with lots of progress across all areas.\"\n*Good:* \"We closed Q3 at $2.4M ARR (+22% QoQ), signed our largest enterprise contract, and enter Q4 with 14-month runway. The strategic shift to mid-market is working — ACV up 40% and sales cycle down 3 weeks. Q4 priority: close the $3M Series A and hit $2.8M ARR.\"\n\n### 2. Key Metrics Dashboard (COO)\n**6-8 metrics max. Use a table.**\n\n| Metric | This Period | Last Period | Target | Status |\n|--------|-------------|-------------|--------|--------|\n| ARR | $2.4M | $1.97M | $2.3M | ✅ |\n| MoM growth | 8.1% | 7.2% | 7.5% | ✅ |\n| Burn multiple | 1.8x | 2.1x | \u003C2x | ✅ |\n| NRR | 112% | 108% | >110% | ✅ |\n| CAC payback | 11 months | 14 months | \u003C12 months | ✅ |\n| Headcount | 24 | 21 | 25 | ? |\n\nPick metrics the board actually tracks. Swap out anything they've said they don't care about.\n\n### 3. Financial Update (CFO)\n- P&L summary: Revenue, COGS, Gross margin, OpEx, Net burn\n- Cash position and runway (months)\n- Burn multiple trend (3-quarter view)\n- Variance to plan (what was different and why)\n- Forecast update for next quarter\n\n**One sentence on each variance.** Boards hate \"revenue was below target\" with no explanation. Say why.\n\n### 4. Revenue & Pipeline (CRO)\n- ARR waterfall: starting → new → expansion → churn → ending\n- NRR and logo churn rates\n- Pipeline by stage (in $, not just count)\n- Forecast: next quarter with confidence level\n- Top 3 deals: name\u002Famount\u002Fclose date\u002Frisk\n\n**The forecast must have a confidence level.** \"We expect $2.8M\" is weak. \"High confidence $2.6M, upside to $2.9M if two late-stage deals close\" is useful.\n\n### 5. Product Update (CPO)\n- Shipped this quarter: 3-5 bullets, user impact for each\n- Shipping next quarter: 3-5 bullets with target dates\n- PMF signal: NPS trend, DAU\u002FMAU ratio, feature adoption\n- One key learning from customer research\n\n**No feature lists.** Only features with evidence of user impact.\n\n### 6. Growth & Marketing (CMO)\n- CAC by channel (table)\n- Pipeline contribution by channel ($)\n- Brand\u002Fawareness metrics relevant to stage (traffic, share of voice)\n- What's working, what's being cut, what's being tested\n\n### 7. Engineering & Technical (CTO)\n- Delivery velocity trend (last 4 quarters)\n- Tech debt ratio and plan\n- Infrastructure: uptime, incidents, cost trend\n- Security posture (one line, flag anything pending)\n\n**Keep this short unless there's a material issue.** Boards don't need sprint details.\n\n### 8. Team & People (CHRO)\n- Headcount: actual vs plan\n- Hiring: offers out, pipeline, time-to-fill trend\n- Attrition: regrettable vs non-regrettable\n- Engagement: last survey score, trend\n- Key hires this quarter, key open roles\n\n### 9. Risk & Security (CISO)\n- Security posture: status of critical controls\n- Compliance: certifications in progress, deadlines\n- Incidents this quarter (if any): impact, resolution, prevention\n- Top 3 risks and mitigation status\n\n### 10. Strategic Outlook (CEO)\n- Next quarter priorities: 3-5 items, ranked\n- Key decisions needed from the board\n- Asks: budget, introductions, advice, votes\n\n**The \"asks\" slide is the most important.** Be specific. \"We'd like 3 warm introductions to CFOs at Series B companies\" beats \"any help would be appreciated.\"\n\n### 11. Appendix\n- Detailed financial model\n- Full pipeline data\n- Cohort retention charts\n- Customer case studies\n- Detailed headcount breakdown\n\n---\n\n## Narrative Framework\n\nBoards see 10+ decks per quarter. Yours needs a through-line.\n\n**The 4-Act Structure:**\n1. **Where we said we'd be** (last quarter's targets)\n2. **Where we actually are** (honest assessment)\n3. **Why the gap exists** (one cause per variance, not excuses)\n4. **What we're doing about it** (specific, dated actions)\n\nThis works for good news AND bad news. It's credible because it acknowledges reality.\n\n**Opening frame:** Start with the one thing that matters most — the board should know the key message by slide 3, not slide 30.\n\n---\n\n## Delivering Bad News\n\nNever bury it. Boards find out eventually. Finding out late makes it worse.\n\n**Framework:**\n1. **State it plainly** — \"We missed Q3 ARR target by $300K (12% gap)\"\n2. **Own the cause** — \"Primary driver was longer-than-expected sales cycle in enterprise segment\"\n3. **Show you understand it** — \"We analyzed 8 lost\u002Fstalled deals; the pattern is X\"\n4. **Present the fix** — \"We've made 3 changes: [specific, dated changes]\"\n5. **Update the forecast** — \"Revised Q4 target is $2.6M; here's the bottom-up build\"\n\n**What NOT to do:**\n- Don't lead with good news to soften bad news — boards notice and distrust the framing\n- Don't explain without owning — \"market conditions\" is not a cause, it's a context\n- Don't present a fix without data behind it\n- Don't show a revised forecast without showing your assumptions\n\n---\n\n## Common Board Deck Mistakes\n\n| Mistake | Fix |\n|---------|-----|\n| Too many slides (>25) | Cut ruthlessly — if you can't explain it in the room, the slide is wrong |\n| Metrics without targets | Every metric needs a target and a status |\n| No narrative | Data without story forces boards to draw their own conclusions |\n| Burying bad news | Lead with it, own it, fix it |\n| Vague asks | Specific, actionable, person-assigned asks only |\n| No variance explanation | Every gap from target needs one-sentence cause |\n| Stale appendix | Appendix is only useful if it's current |\n| Designing for the reader, not the room | Decks are presented — they must work spoken aloud |\n\n---\n\n## Cadence Notes\n\n**Quarterly (standard):** Full deck, all sections, 20-30 slides. Sent 48 hours in advance.\n**Monthly (for early-stage):** Condensed — metrics dashboard, financials, pipeline, top risks. 8-12 slides.\n**Fundraising:** Opens with market\u002Fvision, closes with ask. See `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` for Sequoia format.\n\n## References\n- `references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md` — SaaS board pack format, Sequoia structure, investor tailoring\n- `templates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md` — fill-in template for complete board decks\n",{"name":5,"license":15,"metadata":44,"description":7},{"author":45,"domain":46,"updated":47,"version":48,"category":49,"frameworks":50},"Alireza Rezvani","board-governance",1772668800000,"1.0.0","c-level","deck-frameworks, board-deck-template","main","7b610356e36623652299fa2acb477ff821b1d920","upstream-import\u002Fclaude-skills\u002Freferences\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.linkedin.com\u002Fin\u002Fo-abdelmaksoud\u002F","Full-Stack Engineer | AI Systems Architect | Building autonomous multi-agent systems","2026-03-08 21:12:53",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":61,"prompt":71,"zipAvailable":72},[62,65,68],{"tool":63,"command":64},"npx","npx skills add oabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw --skill board-deck-builder",{"tool":66,"command":67},"bunx","bunx skills add oabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw --skill board-deck-builder",{"tool":69,"command":70},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add oabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw --skill board-deck-builder","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-import\u002Fclaude-skills\u002Freferences\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder\u002FSKILL.md",true,[74,80],{"path":75,"resourceType":76,"resourceTypeDesc":77,"sizeBytes":78,"sourceHtmlUrl":79},"references\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",6952,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-import\u002Fclaude-skills\u002Freferences\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder\u002Freferences\u002Fdeck-frameworks.md",{"path":81,"resourceType":76,"resourceTypeDesc":77,"sizeBytes":82,"sourceHtmlUrl":83},"templates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md",5885,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-import\u002Fclaude-skills\u002Freferences\u002Fc-level-advisor\u002Fboard-deck-builder\u002Ftemplates\u002Fboard-deck-template.md",[85,106,120,150,176,195],{"skillNo":86,"name":87,"nameZh":6,"description":88,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":89,"categories":90,"keywords":96,"publishedAt":39},"01M6D88QCPTBZVCRED0NZ1Y8K8","visa-doc-translate","Translate visa application documents (images) to English and create a bilingual PDF with original and translation","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-sync\u002Fwork\u002Fecc\u002Fskills\u002Fvisa-doc-translate\u002FSKILL.md",[91],{"categoryNo":92,"categoryName":93,"taxonomyType":94,"taxonomyTypeDesc":95},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000002","文档处理","SCENARIO","使用场景",[97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105],"translate","doc","visa doc translate","translation","application","create","images","PDF","documents",{"skillNo":107,"name":108,"nameZh":6,"description":109,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":110,"categories":111,"keywords":112,"publishedAt":39},"01M6D88NBM95T3TFM50CYYAP65","verification-loop","A comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-sync\u002Fwork\u002Fecc\u002Fskills\u002Fverification-loop\u002FSKILL.md",[],[113,114,115,116,117,118,119],"verification","loop","verification loop","sessions","code","claude code sessions","system",{"skillNo":121,"name":122,"nameZh":6,"description":123,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":124,"categories":125,"keywords":137,"publishedAt":39},"01M6D88JFZ2P996GVRHJNSZSTM","tdd-workflow","Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-sync\u002Fwork\u002Fecc\u002Fskills\u002Ftdd-workflow\u002FSKILL.md",[126,129,132],{"categoryNo":127,"categoryName":128,"taxonomyType":94,"taxonomyTypeDesc":95},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":130,"categoryName":131,"taxonomyType":94,"taxonomyTypeDesc":95},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",{"categoryNo":133,"categoryName":134,"taxonomyType":135,"taxonomyTypeDesc":136},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[138,139,140,141,142,143,117,144,32,145,146,147,148,149],"tdd","workflow","tdd workflow","e2e tests","e2e","integration","development","test","refactoring","coverage","tests","writing",{"skillNo":151,"name":152,"nameZh":6,"description":153,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":154,"categories":155,"keywords":156,"publishedAt":39},"01M6D88FTHRRSVJMXF2G7MQAK3","swiftui-patterns","SwiftUI architecture patterns, state management with @Observable, view composition, navigation, performance optimization, and modern iOS\u002FmacOS UI best practices.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-sync\u002Fwork\u002Fecc\u002Fskills\u002Fswiftui-patterns\u002FSKILL.md",[],[157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175],"patterns","swiftui","swiftui patterns","architecture","macos","performance","state management","best practices","state","ui","Optimization","ios","architecture patterns","Composition","performance optimization","view","management","swiftui architecture","navigation",{"skillNo":177,"name":178,"nameZh":6,"description":179,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":180,"categories":181,"keywords":183,"publishedAt":39},"01M6D88D527QTQT9DKHTRFN6EA","swift-protocol-di-testing","Protocol-based dependency injection for testable Swift code — mock file system, network, and external APIs using focused protocols and Swift Testing.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-sync\u002Fwork\u002Fecc\u002Fskills\u002Fswift-protocol-di-testing\u002FSKILL.md",[182],{"categoryNo":127,"categoryName":128,"taxonomyType":94,"taxonomyTypeDesc":95},[184,185,186,187,117,188,189,190,191,119,192,193,194],"swift protocol di testing","protocol","swift","testing","protocols","file","network","injection","dependency","swift testing","dependency injection",{"skillNo":196,"name":197,"nameZh":6,"description":198,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":199,"categories":200,"keywords":201,"publishedAt":39},"01M6D88AJW8H2QNWSW5ZY82R43","swift-concurrency-6-2","Swift 6.2 Approachable Concurrency — single-threaded by default, @concurrent for explicit background offloading, isolated conformances for main actor types.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Foabdelmaksoud\u002FSuperClaw\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fupstream-sync\u002Fwork\u002Fecc\u002Fskills\u002Fswift-concurrency-6-2\u002FSKILL.md",[],[202,203,186,204,205,51],"concurrency","swift concurrency","swift concurrency 6 2","default"]