[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6D52BR5VBYH3AWRYHYYRVF4":3,"skill-same:01M6D52BR5VBYH3AWRYHYYRVF4":66},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":23,"publishedAt":35,"linkOnly":36,"markdownContent":37,"markdownBody":38,"frontMatter":39,"refName":42,"commitSha":43,"skillDirectory":44,"forksCount":45,"repositoryHtmlUrl":46,"repositoryHomepageUrl":47,"ownerHtmlUrl":48,"ownerBlogUrl":49,"ownerDescription":50,"updatedAt":51,"install":52,"resources":65},"01M6D52BR5VBYH3AWRYHYYRVF4","scale-audit",null,"Evaluate codebase against enterprise ICP for production readiness, compliance, and multi-stakeholder journey coverage","GeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills","GeorgeQLe","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F21134126?v=4","01M6D2JP418S0VGJGF8M93EC3H","George Le","01M6D2JPBAKYD82TA5FS6HKQ3D",1,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fpacks\u002Fbusiness-ops\u002Fclaude\u002Fscale-audit\u002Farchive\u002Fv0.1\u002FSKILL.md",[18],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000037","律师与法务","PROFESSION","适用职业",[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34],"audit","scale audit","spec","compliance","Enterprise","Production","analysis","coverage","v0","journey","production readiness","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: scale-audit\ndescription: Evaluate codebase against enterprise ICP for production readiness, compliance, and multi-stakeholder journey coverage\ntype: analysis\nversion: v0.1\nargument-hint: \"[optional: path-to-enterprise-icp-spec]\"\n---\n\n## Pack Availability Guard\n\nBefore telling the user to run a skill from another project-local pack, check `.agents\u002Fproject.json.enabled_packs`. If the target pack is not enabled, recommend `\u002Fpack install \u003Cpack>` instead of the target skill. Global skills are always valid. Skills from this same pack are valid because the current skill is already running from that pack.\n\n# Scale Audit — Enterprise Production Readiness\n\nAutomated analysis that evaluates the current codebase against the enterprise discovery in `research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`. Identifies what's missing for enterprise deals — per-stakeholder journey coverage, compliance, infrastructure, and operational readiness. No interview — this is the agent doing the work.\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n`research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md` (or `research\u002F{app}\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`) must exist. If it doesn't, tell the user to run `\u002Fenterprise-icp` first and stop.\n\n## Process\n\n### 0. App Scope Resolution (Monorepo Support)\n\nBefore checking prerequisites, determine the app scope:\n\n1. If `$ARGUMENTS` specifies an app name matching a subdirectory of `research\u002F`, use it.\n2. If `research\u002F` contains subdirectories (excluding files), list them and ask the user which app to target. If only one subdirectory exists, use it automatically.\n3. If no subdirectories exist, proceed with flat structure (single-product mode).\n\nWhen app scope `{app}` is active:\n- Read\u002Fwrite research from `research\u002F{app}\u002F` instead of `research\u002F`\n- Read\u002Fwrite specs from `specs\u002F{app}\u002F` instead of `specs\u002F`\n- Also read `research\u002Ficp.md` (cross-app overview) for broader context\n\n### 1. Load Context\n\n- Read `research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md` (or `research\u002F{app}\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`) — stakeholder map, per-persona journeys, deal-killers, lifecycle, onboarding matrix\n- Read `research\u002Ficp.md` (or `research\u002F{app}\u002Ficp.md`) if it exists — carry forward startup context\n- Read `research\u002Fmvp-gap.md` (or `research\u002F{app}\u002Fmvp-gap.md`) if it exists — note unresolved startup gaps that become more critical at enterprise scale\n- Read CLAUDE.md, README, package config, existing specs\n- Read `tasks\u002Froadmap.md`, `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`, `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md`, `tasks\u002Frecord-todo.md`, and `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md` (if they exist) for work in progress or advisory records\n\n### 2. Analyse the Codebase\n\nRead source files thoroughly — auth system, data layer, API design, infrastructure config (Docker, k8s, terraform, CI\u002FCD), monitoring\u002Flogging setup, environment configuration, security implementation. Build a complete picture of production readiness.\n\n### 3. Evaluate Against Enterprise ICP\n\n#### Per-Persona Journey Coverage\nFor each stakeholder identified in `research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`:\n- **End users**: Can they complete their core workflows? Does the UX scale to enterprise complexity?\n- **Team admin**: Is there an admin panel? Seat management? Permission configuration? Usage analytics?\n- **IT \u002F Security**: Can they complete a security review? Are audit logs available? Is SSO configurable? Can they answer a vendor security questionnaire?\n- **Procurement**: Is there an enterprise pricing page? Contract-friendly terms? Volume licensing?\n- **Executive sponsor**: Is there ROI reporting? Usage dashboards? Success metrics?\n\n#### Onboarding Gap Analysis\nFor each onboarding path from `research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`:\n- Self-serve: Does it exist? Is it frictionless?\n- Team: Can an admin onboard a team? Bulk invite? Role assignment?\n- SSO-provisioned: Is SCIM supported? JIT provisioning? Auto-deprovisioning?\n- Migration: Data import tools? Competitor mapping? Migration guides?\n- Training: In-app guidance? Documentation? API reference?\n\n#### Compliance Readiness\n- **SOC 2**: Audit logging, access controls, change management, incident response procedures\n- **GDPR**: Data deletion\u002Fexport, consent management, data processing records, DPA template\n- **HIPAA** (if applicable): BAA template, PHI handling, encryption, access audit trail\n- **General security**: Encryption at rest and in transit, secrets management, vulnerability scanning, dependency auditing\n\n#### Infrastructure Readiness\n- **Multi-tenancy**: Data isolation model (shared DB with tenant ID? Separate schemas? Separate DBs?)\n- **Horizontal scaling**: Can the system scale to enterprise load? Connection pooling? Queue-based processing?\n- **Disaster recovery**: Backup strategy, recovery time objectives, failover capability\n- **Observability**: Structured logging, metrics collection, distributed tracing, alerting\n- **CI\u002FCD maturity**: Automated testing, staging environment, deployment rollback, feature flags\n- **Environment parity**: Dev\u002Fstaging\u002Fproduction consistency\n\n#### Operational Readiness\n- **Incident response**: Runbooks, on-call setup, status page, incident communication\n- **SLA monitoring**: Uptime tracking, latency monitoring, error rate dashboards\n- **Support workflow**: Ticketing, escalation paths, customer communication channels\n- **Customer success**: Health scoring, usage analytics, renewal tracking\n\n#### Unresolved Startup Gaps\nIf `research\u002Fmvp-gap.md` exists, check each unresolved gap:\n- Is it still unresolved?\n- Does it become more critical at enterprise scale?\n- Flag any startup gaps that are now enterprise deal-killers.\n\n### 4. Prioritise\n\nTag each gap with:\n- **`hard-blocker`** — No enterprise deal closes without this. Non-negotiable.\n- **`soft-blocker`** — Most enterprise deals will require this. Can sometimes be worked around in early deals.\n- **`differentiator`** — Not required but gives competitive advantage in enterprise sales.\n\nEstimate effort for each: S \u002F M \u002F L \u002F XL.\n\n### 5. Populate Next Steps\n\nBefore writing, check which files exist to populate the `## Next Steps` section contextually. Include a **Recommended** item and 2–4 other applicable options. Choose the recommendation by the first matching condition:\n\n1. IF any `hard-blocker` lacks a full implementation spec: `\u002Fux-variations [top blocker]` — explore solution directions for the highest-priority enterprise hard-blocker from `specs\u002Fscale-audit.md`.\n2. IF enterprise stakeholder journey context is missing: `\u002Fjourney-map enterprise` — map enterprise stakeholder journeys before sequencing build work.\n3. IF startup gaps escalated and `research\u002Fmvp-gap.md` is missing or stale: `\u002Fmvp-gap` — re-evaluate startup readiness first.\n4. IF enterprise SLA or compliance gaps lack closure metrics: `\u002Fmetrics` — define metrics covering enterprise SLAs.\n5. OTHERWISE: `\u002Froadmap` — sequence the already-specced enterprise work into implementation phases.\n\nOnly recommend `\u002Froadmap` as the primary next step when every hard-blocker already has a full spec or is already tracked in `tasks\u002Froadmap.md`, `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`, `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md`, `tasks\u002Frecord-todo.md`, or `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md`.\n\n## Output\n\n### `specs\u002Fscale-audit.md` (or `specs\u002F{app}\u002Fscale-audit.md`)\n\n```markdown\n# Enterprise Scale Audit\n\n> Evaluated against: research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md (or research\u002F{app}\u002Fenterprise-icp.md)\n> Date: [current date]\n> Codebase state: [brief summary of what exists]\n\n## Summary\n[2-3 sentences: overall enterprise readiness and most critical gaps]\n\n## Hard Blockers\n- **[Gap title]** — [What's missing, which stakeholder it blocks, and why]. Effort: S\u002FM\u002FL\u002FXL\n  _Start with:_ `\u002Fux-variations [topic]`\n- ...\n\n## Soft Blockers\n- **[Gap title]** — [What's missing and impact]. Effort: S\u002FM\u002FL\u002FXL\n  _Start with:_ `\u002Fux-variations [topic]`\n- ...\n\n## Differentiators\n- **[Gap title]** — [What's missing and competitive advantage]. Effort: S\u002FM\u002FL\u002FXL\n  _Start with:_ `\u002Fux-variations [topic]`\n- ...\n\n## Stakeholder Coverage Matrix\n| Stakeholder | Journey Covered? | Key Gaps |\n|-------------|-----------------|----------|\n| End users   | Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n| Team admin  | Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n| IT\u002FSecurity | Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n| Procurement | Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n| Exec sponsor| Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n\n## Compliance Matrix\n| Standard | Status | Key Gaps |\n|----------|--------|----------|\n| SOC 2    | Not started\u002FPartial\u002FReady | ... |\n| GDPR     | Not started\u002FPartial\u002FReady | ... |\n| HIPAA    | N\u002FA\u002FNot started\u002FPartial\u002FReady | ... |\n\n## Recommended Build Sequence\n[Ordered list: hard blockers first, then soft blockers, then differentiators.\n Within each tier, order by: most deals unblocked per unit of effort.\n Note dependencies — what must exist before other things can be built.]\n\n## Unresolved Startup Gaps (Escalated)\n[Gaps from research\u002Fmvp-gap.md that are now more critical at enterprise scale]\n\n## Next Steps\n\n**Recommended:** [first matching command from step 5] — [reason grounded in this audit]\n\nOther options:\n- [conditional items from step 5 — only include items whose conditions are met]\n```\n\n## Task Classification\n\nWhen this skill produces follow-up work, file it by execution semantics:\n\n- Immediately actionable implementation or documentation work goes in `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`.\n- Human-only external actions tied to automated steps go in `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md` with `_(blocks: Step N.X)_` or `_(after: Step N.X)_`; repo edits, SDK wiring, generated assets, local commands, tests, audits, and authenticated CLI\u002FAPI work stay in `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`.\n- One-time condition-gated records, baselines, or future measurements go in `tasks\u002Frecord-todo.md` with source, condition, non-blocking reason, evidence, and promotion rule.\n- Cadence-based reviews, playtests, adoption checks, investor updates, retros, or docs-health checks go in `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md` with cadence, owner\u002Fagent, next due, evidence path, and escalation conditions.\n- Do not put non-blocking records or recurring obligations in `tasks\u002Ftodo.md` unless they have been explicitly promoted into current execution work.\n\n## Constraints\n\n- **Do not make code changes.** Analysis only.\n- **Every gap must cite evidence** — missing middleware, absent SCIM endpoint, no audit log table, etc.\n- **Distinguish \"first enterprise deal\" from \"100th enterprise deal.\"** Early enterprise sales can tolerate workarounds; at scale they can't. Be clear about which gaps matter when.\n- **Include `\u002Fux-variations` prompts** for each gap that lacks a full spec so the user can immediately explore solution directions for the blocker.\n- **Do not duplicate work already tracked** in `tasks\u002Froadmap.md`, `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`, `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md`, `tasks\u002Frecord-todo.md`, or `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md`.\n- **If the codebase is minimal**, be honest about it — don't fabricate detailed infrastructure gaps for a prototype.\n\n## Alignment Page\n\nWhen this skill produces durable deliverables (research, specs, plans, reports, prototypes, or any document output), build a full-depth HTML alignment page following `ALIGNMENT-PAGE.md` in this skill's directory. Output: `alignment\u002Fscale-audit-{topic}.html`.\n\n## Default Shipping Contract\n\nFollow the shared shipping contract convention in CLAUDE.md.\n","## Pack Availability Guard\n\nBefore telling the user to run a skill from another project-local pack, check `.agents\u002Fproject.json.enabled_packs`. If the target pack is not enabled, recommend `\u002Fpack install \u003Cpack>` instead of the target skill. Global skills are always valid. Skills from this same pack are valid because the current skill is already running from that pack.\n\n# Scale Audit — Enterprise Production Readiness\n\nAutomated analysis that evaluates the current codebase against the enterprise discovery in `research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`. Identifies what's missing for enterprise deals — per-stakeholder journey coverage, compliance, infrastructure, and operational readiness. No interview — this is the agent doing the work.\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n`research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md` (or `research\u002F{app}\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`) must exist. If it doesn't, tell the user to run `\u002Fenterprise-icp` first and stop.\n\n## Process\n\n### 0. App Scope Resolution (Monorepo Support)\n\nBefore checking prerequisites, determine the app scope:\n\n1. If `$ARGUMENTS` specifies an app name matching a subdirectory of `research\u002F`, use it.\n2. If `research\u002F` contains subdirectories (excluding files), list them and ask the user which app to target. If only one subdirectory exists, use it automatically.\n3. If no subdirectories exist, proceed with flat structure (single-product mode).\n\nWhen app scope `{app}` is active:\n- Read\u002Fwrite research from `research\u002F{app}\u002F` instead of `research\u002F`\n- Read\u002Fwrite specs from `specs\u002F{app}\u002F` instead of `specs\u002F`\n- Also read `research\u002Ficp.md` (cross-app overview) for broader context\n\n### 1. Load Context\n\n- Read `research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md` (or `research\u002F{app}\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`) — stakeholder map, per-persona journeys, deal-killers, lifecycle, onboarding matrix\n- Read `research\u002Ficp.md` (or `research\u002F{app}\u002Ficp.md`) if it exists — carry forward startup context\n- Read `research\u002Fmvp-gap.md` (or `research\u002F{app}\u002Fmvp-gap.md`) if it exists — note unresolved startup gaps that become more critical at enterprise scale\n- Read CLAUDE.md, README, package config, existing specs\n- Read `tasks\u002Froadmap.md`, `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`, `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md`, `tasks\u002Frecord-todo.md`, and `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md` (if they exist) for work in progress or advisory records\n\n### 2. Analyse the Codebase\n\nRead source files thoroughly — auth system, data layer, API design, infrastructure config (Docker, k8s, terraform, CI\u002FCD), monitoring\u002Flogging setup, environment configuration, security implementation. Build a complete picture of production readiness.\n\n### 3. Evaluate Against Enterprise ICP\n\n#### Per-Persona Journey Coverage\nFor each stakeholder identified in `research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`:\n- **End users**: Can they complete their core workflows? Does the UX scale to enterprise complexity?\n- **Team admin**: Is there an admin panel? Seat management? Permission configuration? Usage analytics?\n- **IT \u002F Security**: Can they complete a security review? Are audit logs available? Is SSO configurable? Can they answer a vendor security questionnaire?\n- **Procurement**: Is there an enterprise pricing page? Contract-friendly terms? Volume licensing?\n- **Executive sponsor**: Is there ROI reporting? Usage dashboards? Success metrics?\n\n#### Onboarding Gap Analysis\nFor each onboarding path from `research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md`:\n- Self-serve: Does it exist? Is it frictionless?\n- Team: Can an admin onboard a team? Bulk invite? Role assignment?\n- SSO-provisioned: Is SCIM supported? JIT provisioning? Auto-deprovisioning?\n- Migration: Data import tools? Competitor mapping? Migration guides?\n- Training: In-app guidance? Documentation? API reference?\n\n#### Compliance Readiness\n- **SOC 2**: Audit logging, access controls, change management, incident response procedures\n- **GDPR**: Data deletion\u002Fexport, consent management, data processing records, DPA template\n- **HIPAA** (if applicable): BAA template, PHI handling, encryption, access audit trail\n- **General security**: Encryption at rest and in transit, secrets management, vulnerability scanning, dependency auditing\n\n#### Infrastructure Readiness\n- **Multi-tenancy**: Data isolation model (shared DB with tenant ID? Separate schemas? Separate DBs?)\n- **Horizontal scaling**: Can the system scale to enterprise load? Connection pooling? Queue-based processing?\n- **Disaster recovery**: Backup strategy, recovery time objectives, failover capability\n- **Observability**: Structured logging, metrics collection, distributed tracing, alerting\n- **CI\u002FCD maturity**: Automated testing, staging environment, deployment rollback, feature flags\n- **Environment parity**: Dev\u002Fstaging\u002Fproduction consistency\n\n#### Operational Readiness\n- **Incident response**: Runbooks, on-call setup, status page, incident communication\n- **SLA monitoring**: Uptime tracking, latency monitoring, error rate dashboards\n- **Support workflow**: Ticketing, escalation paths, customer communication channels\n- **Customer success**: Health scoring, usage analytics, renewal tracking\n\n#### Unresolved Startup Gaps\nIf `research\u002Fmvp-gap.md` exists, check each unresolved gap:\n- Is it still unresolved?\n- Does it become more critical at enterprise scale?\n- Flag any startup gaps that are now enterprise deal-killers.\n\n### 4. Prioritise\n\nTag each gap with:\n- **`hard-blocker`** — No enterprise deal closes without this. Non-negotiable.\n- **`soft-blocker`** — Most enterprise deals will require this. Can sometimes be worked around in early deals.\n- **`differentiator`** — Not required but gives competitive advantage in enterprise sales.\n\nEstimate effort for each: S \u002F M \u002F L \u002F XL.\n\n### 5. Populate Next Steps\n\nBefore writing, check which files exist to populate the `## Next Steps` section contextually. Include a **Recommended** item and 2–4 other applicable options. Choose the recommendation by the first matching condition:\n\n1. IF any `hard-blocker` lacks a full implementation spec: `\u002Fux-variations [top blocker]` — explore solution directions for the highest-priority enterprise hard-blocker from `specs\u002Fscale-audit.md`.\n2. IF enterprise stakeholder journey context is missing: `\u002Fjourney-map enterprise` — map enterprise stakeholder journeys before sequencing build work.\n3. IF startup gaps escalated and `research\u002Fmvp-gap.md` is missing or stale: `\u002Fmvp-gap` — re-evaluate startup readiness first.\n4. IF enterprise SLA or compliance gaps lack closure metrics: `\u002Fmetrics` — define metrics covering enterprise SLAs.\n5. OTHERWISE: `\u002Froadmap` — sequence the already-specced enterprise work into implementation phases.\n\nOnly recommend `\u002Froadmap` as the primary next step when every hard-blocker already has a full spec or is already tracked in `tasks\u002Froadmap.md`, `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`, `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md`, `tasks\u002Frecord-todo.md`, or `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md`.\n\n## Output\n\n### `specs\u002Fscale-audit.md` (or `specs\u002F{app}\u002Fscale-audit.md`)\n\n```markdown\n# Enterprise Scale Audit\n\n> Evaluated against: research\u002Fenterprise-icp.md (or research\u002F{app}\u002Fenterprise-icp.md)\n> Date: [current date]\n> Codebase state: [brief summary of what exists]\n\n## Summary\n[2-3 sentences: overall enterprise readiness and most critical gaps]\n\n## Hard Blockers\n- **[Gap title]** — [What's missing, which stakeholder it blocks, and why]. Effort: S\u002FM\u002FL\u002FXL\n  _Start with:_ `\u002Fux-variations [topic]`\n- ...\n\n## Soft Blockers\n- **[Gap title]** — [What's missing and impact]. Effort: S\u002FM\u002FL\u002FXL\n  _Start with:_ `\u002Fux-variations [topic]`\n- ...\n\n## Differentiators\n- **[Gap title]** — [What's missing and competitive advantage]. Effort: S\u002FM\u002FL\u002FXL\n  _Start with:_ `\u002Fux-variations [topic]`\n- ...\n\n## Stakeholder Coverage Matrix\n| Stakeholder | Journey Covered? | Key Gaps |\n|-------------|-----------------|----------|\n| End users   | Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n| Team admin  | Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n| IT\u002FSecurity | Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n| Procurement | Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n| Exec sponsor| Partial\u002FYes\u002FNo  | ...      |\n\n## Compliance Matrix\n| Standard | Status | Key Gaps |\n|----------|--------|----------|\n| SOC 2    | Not started\u002FPartial\u002FReady | ... |\n| GDPR     | Not started\u002FPartial\u002FReady | ... |\n| HIPAA    | N\u002FA\u002FNot started\u002FPartial\u002FReady | ... |\n\n## Recommended Build Sequence\n[Ordered list: hard blockers first, then soft blockers, then differentiators.\n Within each tier, order by: most deals unblocked per unit of effort.\n Note dependencies — what must exist before other things can be built.]\n\n## Unresolved Startup Gaps (Escalated)\n[Gaps from research\u002Fmvp-gap.md that are now more critical at enterprise scale]\n\n## Next Steps\n\n**Recommended:** [first matching command from step 5] — [reason grounded in this audit]\n\nOther options:\n- [conditional items from step 5 — only include items whose conditions are met]\n```\n\n## Task Classification\n\nWhen this skill produces follow-up work, file it by execution semantics:\n\n- Immediately actionable implementation or documentation work goes in `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`.\n- Human-only external actions tied to automated steps go in `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md` with `_(blocks: Step N.X)_` or `_(after: Step N.X)_`; repo edits, SDK wiring, generated assets, local commands, tests, audits, and authenticated CLI\u002FAPI work stay in `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`.\n- One-time condition-gated records, baselines, or future measurements go in `tasks\u002Frecord-todo.md` with source, condition, non-blocking reason, evidence, and promotion rule.\n- Cadence-based reviews, playtests, adoption checks, investor updates, retros, or docs-health checks go in `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md` with cadence, owner\u002Fagent, next due, evidence path, and escalation conditions.\n- Do not put non-blocking records or recurring obligations in `tasks\u002Ftodo.md` unless they have been explicitly promoted into current execution work.\n\n## Constraints\n\n- **Do not make code changes.** Analysis only.\n- **Every gap must cite evidence** — missing middleware, absent SCIM endpoint, no audit log table, etc.\n- **Distinguish \"first enterprise deal\" from \"100th enterprise deal.\"** Early enterprise sales can tolerate workarounds; at scale they can't. Be clear about which gaps matter when.\n- **Include `\u002Fux-variations` prompts** for each gap that lacks a full spec so the user can immediately explore solution directions for the blocker.\n- **Do not duplicate work already tracked** in `tasks\u002Froadmap.md`, `tasks\u002Ftodo.md`, `tasks\u002Fmanual-todo.md`, `tasks\u002Frecord-todo.md`, or `tasks\u002Frecurring-todo.md`.\n- **If the codebase is minimal**, be honest about it — don't fabricate detailed infrastructure gaps for a prototype.\n\n## Alignment Page\n\nWhen this skill produces durable deliverables (research, specs, plans, reports, prototypes, or any document output), build a full-depth HTML alignment page following `ALIGNMENT-PAGE.md` in this skill's directory. Output: `alignment\u002Fscale-audit-{topic}.html`.\n\n## Default Shipping Contract\n\nFollow the shared shipping contract convention in CLAUDE.md.\n",{"name":5,"type":30,"version":40,"description":7,"argument-hint":41},"v0.1","[optional: path-to-enterprise-icp-spec]","master","96e2912af886dd1606b1b97df707715aef062b02","packs\u002Fbusiness-ops\u002Fclaude\u002Fscale-audit\u002Farchive\u002Fv0.1",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills","https:\u002F\u002Fagentic-skills-blush.vercel.app","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe","georgeqle.com","George Le is a futurist and serial tech entrepreneur who wants to work toward a world where humanity is free from robotic tasks.","2026-11-10 04:07:24",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":53,"prompt":63,"zipAvailable":64},[54,57,60],{"tool":55,"command":56},"npx","npx skills add GeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills --skill scale-audit",{"tool":58,"command":59},"bunx","bunx skills add GeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills --skill scale-audit",{"tool":61,"command":62},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add GeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills --skill scale-audit","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Fpacks\u002Fbusiness-ops\u002Fclaude\u002Fscale-audit\u002Farchive\u002Fv0.1\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[67,79,89,101,116,127],{"skillNo":68,"name":69,"nameZh":6,"description":70,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":71,"categories":72,"keywords":73,"publishedAt":35},"01M6G0NJES15RJKZE6YZ0TSYGF","source-checkout-allowed","Valid source-checkout-only fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fsource-checkout-allowed\u002FSKILL.md",[],[74,75,76,77,32,78],"source checkout allowed","checkout","fixture","only","valid",{"skillNo":80,"name":81,"nameZh":6,"description":82,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":83,"categories":84,"keywords":85,"publishedAt":35},"01M6G0NFZ3R1MNB1E3DVTM0WB7","deck-install-valid","Valid deck install fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fdeck-install\u002FSKILL.md",[],[86,87,88,78,76,32],"deck install valid","deck","install",{"skillNo":90,"name":91,"nameZh":6,"description":92,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":93,"categories":94,"keywords":95,"publishedAt":35},"01M6G0ND3QZQC4MDZ9NVB97PT2","codex-pack-guard-valid","Valid Codex Pack Availability Guard fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fcodex-pack-guard\u002FSKILL.md",[],[96,97,98,78,99,100,76,32],"codex pack guard valid","pack","guard","codex","availability",{"skillNo":102,"name":103,"nameZh":6,"description":104,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":105,"categories":106,"keywords":112,"publishedAt":35},"01M6G0NA9YB3NKGZKD3S96JMNB","codex-missing-skill-valid","Valid Codex missing skill fallback fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fcodex-missing-skill-fallback\u002FSKILL.md",[107],{"categoryNo":108,"categoryName":109,"taxonomyType":110,"taxonomyTypeDesc":111},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[113,114,78,99,32,115,76],"codex missing skill valid","missing","fallback",{"skillNo":117,"name":118,"nameZh":6,"description":119,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":120,"categories":121,"keywords":123,"publishedAt":35},"01M6G0N7PC0EKFD40ZWQAXSAQ9","codex-base-skill-fallback-valid","Valid Codex base skill fallback fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fcodex-base-skill-fallback\u002FSKILL.md",[122],{"categoryNo":108,"categoryName":109,"taxonomyType":110,"taxonomyTypeDesc":111},[78,99,115,124,125,126,32,76],"base skill","codex base skill fallback valid","base",{"skillNo":128,"name":129,"nameZh":6,"description":130,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":131,"categories":132,"keywords":133,"publishedAt":35},"01M6G0N4VRR2YKZQ6N3Y6S2BQA","claude-pack-guard-valid","Valid Claude Pack Availability Guard fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FGeorgeQLe\u002Fagentic-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmaster\u002Ftests\u002Ffixtures\u002Fskill-install-routing\u002Fvalid\u002Fclaude-pack-guard\u002FSKILL.md",[],[78,98,97,134,100,32,76],"claude pack guard valid"]