time-stepping
Plan and control time-step policies for simulations. Use when coupling CFL/physics limits with adaptive stepping, ramping initial transients, scheduling outputs/checkpoints, or planning restart strategies for long runs.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-04-16
- Stars
- ★ 52
- Forks
- 13
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- time-stepping
- description
- Plan and control time-step policies for simulations. Use when coupling CFL/physics limits with adaptive stepping, ramping initial transients, scheduling outputs/checkpoints, or planning restart strategies for long runs.
- allowed-tools
- Read, Bash, Write, Grep, Glob
02 资源文件 7
- 参考文档references/cfl_coupling.md7.3 KB
- 参考文档references/output_checkpoint_guidelines.md9.1 KB
- 参考文档references/ramping_strategies.md7.6 KB
- 脚本scripts/checkpoint_planner.py2.9 KB
- 脚本scripts/lighthouse_audit.py2.6 KB
- 脚本scripts/output_schedule.py2.3 KB
- 脚本scripts/timestep_planner.py4.8 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Time Stepping
Goal
Provide a reliable workflow for choosing, ramping, and monitoring time steps plus output/checkpoint cadence.
Requirements
- Python 3.8+
- No external dependencies (uses stdlib)
Inputs to Gather
| Input | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Stability limits | CFL/Fourier/reaction limits | dt_max = 1e-4 |
| Target dt | Desired time step | 1e-5 |
| Total run time | Simulation duration | 10 s |
| Output interval | Time between outputs | 0.1 s |
| Checkpoint cost | Time to write checkpoint | 120 s |
Decision Guidance
Time Step Selection
Is stability limit known?
├── YES → Use min(dt_target, dt_limit × safety)
└── NO → Start conservative, increase adaptively
Need ramping for startup?
├── YES → Start at dt_init, ramp to dt_target over N steps
└── NO → Use dt_target from start
Ramping Strategy
| Problem Type | Ramp Steps | Initial dt |
|---|---|---|
| Smooth IC | None needed | Full dt |
| Sharp gradients | 5-10 | 0.1 × dt |
| Phase change | 10-20 | 0.01 × dt |
| Cold start | 10-50 | 0.001 × dt |
Script Outputs (JSON Fields)
| Script | Key Outputs |
|---|---|
scripts/timestep_planner.py |
dt_limit, dt_recommended, ramp_schedule |
scripts/output_schedule.py |
output_times, interval, count |
scripts/checkpoint_planner.py |
checkpoint_interval, checkpoints, overhead_fraction |
Workflow
- Get stability limits - Use numerical-stability skill
- Plan time stepping - Run
scripts/timestep_planner.py - Schedule outputs - Run
scripts/output_schedule.py - Plan checkpoints - Run
scripts/checkpoint_planner.py - Monitor during run - Adjust dt if limits change
Conversational Workflow Example
User: I'm running a 10-hour phase-field simulation. How often should I checkpoint?
Agent workflow:
- Plan checkpoints based on acceptable lost work:
python3 scripts/checkpoint_planner.py --run-time 36000 --checkpoint-cost 120 --max-lost-time 1800 --json - Interpret: Checkpoint every 30 minutes, overhead ~0.7%, max 30 min lost work on crash.
Pre-Run Checklist
- [ ] Confirm dt limits from stability analysis
- [ ] Define ramping strategy for transient startup
- [ ] Choose output interval consistent with physics time scales
- [ ] Plan checkpoints based on restart risk
- [ ] Re-evaluate dt after parameter changes
CLI Examples
# Plan time stepping with ramping
python3 scripts/timestep_planner.py --dt-target 1e-4 --dt-limit 2e-4 --safety 0.8 --ramp-steps 10 --json
# Schedule output times
python3 scripts/output_schedule.py --t-start 0 --t-end 10 --interval 0.1 --json
# Plan checkpoints for long run
python3 scripts/checkpoint_planner.py --run-time 36000 --checkpoint-cost 120 --max-lost-time 1800 --json
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
dt-target must be positive |
Invalid time step | Use positive value |
t-end must be > t-start |
Invalid time range | Check time bounds |
checkpoint-cost must be < run-time |
Checkpoint too expensive | Reduce checkpoint size |
Interpretation Guidance
dt Behavior
| Observation | Meaning | Action |
|---|---|---|
| dt stable at target | Good | Continue |
| dt shrinking | Stability issue | Check CFL, reduce target |
| dt oscillating | Borderline stability | Add safety factor |
Checkpoint Overhead
| Overhead | Acceptability |
|---|---|
| < 1% | Excellent |
| 1-5% | Good |
| 5-10% | Acceptable |
| > 10% | Too frequent, increase interval |
Limitations
- Not adaptive control: Plans static schedules, not runtime adaptation
- Assumes constant physics: If parameters change, re-plan
References
references/cfl_coupling.md- Combining multiple stability limitsreferences/ramping_strategies.md- Startup policiesreferences/output_checkpoint_guidelines.md- Cadence rules
Version History
- v1.1.0 (2024-12-24): Enhanced documentation, decision guidance, examples
- v1.0.0: Initial release with 3 planning scripts
04 同仓库更多 Skills
what-if-oracle
Run structured What-If scenario analysis with multi-branch possibility exploration. Use this skill when the user asks speculative questions like "what if...", "what would happen if...", "what are the possibilities", "explore scenarios", "scenario analysis", "possibility space", "what could go wrong", "best case / worst case", "risk analysis", "contingency planning", "strategic options", or any question about uncertain futures. Also trigger when the user faces a fork-in-the-road decision, wants to stress-test an idea, or needs to think through consequences before committing.
venue-templates
Access comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
the-fool
Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.
scientific-writing
Core skill for the deep research and writing tool. Write scientific manuscripts in full paragraphs (never bullet points). Use two-stage process with (1) section outlines with key points using research-lookup then (2) convert to flowing prose. IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA), for research papers and journal submissions.
scientific-brainstorming
Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.
research-lookup
Look up current research information using the Parallel Chat API (primary) or Perplexity sonar-pro-search (academic paper searches). Automatically routes queries to the best backend. Use for finding papers, gathering research data, and verifying scientific information.