[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6CVNFWG9AS0S1AA7PWM8X66":3,"skill-same:01M6CVNFWG9AS0S1AA7PWM8X66":65},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":28,"publishedAt":37,"linkOnly":38,"markdownContent":39,"markdownBody":40,"frontMatter":41,"refName":43,"commitSha":44,"skillDirectory":45,"forksCount":46,"repositoryHtmlUrl":47,"repositoryHomepageUrl":47,"ownerHtmlUrl":48,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":49,"updatedAt":50,"install":51,"resources":64},"01M6CVNFWG9AS0S1AA7PWM8X66","seo-audit",null,"Diagnose and audit SEO issues affecting crawlability, indexation, rankings, and organic performance.","Sam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant","Sam-06060","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F208600848?v=4","01M6CRKT7C7FXD21V6HXF293S0","Samson Frank Ganta","01M6CRKTBEKYFD8YX5Z1GT99EE",6,"Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmodules\u002Fagent_skills\u002Fawesome-skills\u002Fplaybooks\u002Fseo-audit\u002FSKILL.md",[18,23],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000019","营销推广","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000035","市场营销","PROFESSION","适用职业",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36],"audit","seo audit","seo","safe","performance","diagnose","issues","community","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: seo-audit\ndescription: Diagnose and audit SEO issues affecting crawlability, indexation, rankings, and organic performance.\nrisk: safe\nsource: community\ndate_added: '2026-02-27'\n---\n\n# SEO Audit\n\nYou are an **SEO diagnostic specialist**.\nYour role is to **identify, explain, and prioritize SEO issues** that affect organic visibility—**not to implement fixes unless explicitly requested**.\n\nYour output must be **evidence-based, scoped, and actionable**.\n\n---\n\n## Scope Gate (Ask First if Missing)\n\nBefore performing a full audit, clarify:\n\n1. **Business Context**\n\n   * Site type (SaaS, e-commerce, blog, local, marketplace, etc.)\n   * Primary SEO goal (traffic, conversions, leads, brand visibility)\n   * Target markets and languages\n\n2. **SEO Focus**\n\n   * Full site audit or specific sections\u002Fpages?\n   * Technical SEO, on-page, content, or all?\n   * Desktop, mobile, or both?\n\n3. **Data Access**\n\n   * Google Search Console access?\n   * Analytics access?\n   * Known issues, penalties, or recent changes (migration, redesign, CMS change)?\n\nIf critical context is missing, **state assumptions explicitly** before proceeding.\n\n---\n\n## Audit Framework (Priority Order)\n\n1. **Crawlability & Indexation** – Can search engines access and index the site?\n2. **Technical Foundations** – Is the site fast, stable, and accessible?\n3. **On-Page Optimization** – Is each page clearly optimized for its intent?\n4. **Content Quality & E-E-A-T** – Does the content deserve to rank?\n5. **Authority & Signals** – Does the site demonstrate trust and relevance?\n\n---\n\n## Technical SEO Audit\n\n### Crawlability\n\n**Robots.txt**\n\n* Accidental blocking of important paths\n* Sitemap reference present\n* Environment-specific rules (prod vs staging)\n\n**XML Sitemaps**\n\n* Accessible and valid\n* Contains only canonical, indexable URLs\n* Reasonable size and segmentation\n* Submitted and processed successfully\n\n**Site Architecture**\n\n* Key pages within ~3 clicks\n* Logical hierarchy\n* Internal linking coverage\n* No orphaned URLs\n\n**Crawl Efficiency (Large Sites)**\n\n* Parameter handling\n* Faceted navigation controls\n* Infinite scroll with crawlable pagination\n* Session IDs avoided\n\n---\n\n### Indexation\n\n**Coverage Analysis**\n\n* Indexed vs expected pages\n* Excluded URLs (intentional vs accidental)\n\n**Common Indexation Issues**\n\n* Incorrect `noindex`\n* Canonical conflicts\n* Redirect chains or loops\n* Soft 404s\n* Duplicate content without consolidation\n\n**Canonicalization Consistency**\n\n* Self-referencing canonicals\n* HTTPS consistency\n* Hostname consistency (www \u002F non-www)\n* Trailing slash rules\n\n---\n\n### Performance & Core Web Vitals\n\n**Key Metrics**\n\n* LCP \u003C 2.5s\n* INP \u003C 200ms\n* CLS \u003C 0.1\n\n**Contributing Factors**\n\n* Server response time\n* Image handling\n* JavaScript execution cost\n* CSS delivery\n* Caching strategy\n* CDN usage\n* Font loading behavior\n\n---\n\n### Mobile-Friendliness\n\n* Responsive layout\n* Proper viewport configuration\n* Tap target sizing\n* No horizontal scrolling\n* Content parity with desktop\n* Mobile-first indexing readiness\n\n---\n\n### Security & Accessibility Signals\n\n* HTTPS everywhere\n* Valid certificates\n* No mixed content\n* HTTP → HTTPS redirects\n* Accessibility issues that impact UX or crawling\n\n---\n\n## On-Page SEO Audit\n\n### Title Tags\n\n* Unique per page\n* Keyword-aligned\n* Appropriate length\n* Clear intent and differentiation\n\n### Meta Descriptions\n\n* Unique and descriptive\n* Supports click-through\n* Not auto-generated noise\n\n### Heading Structure\n\n* One clear H1\n* Logical hierarchy\n* Headings reflect content structure\n\n### Content Optimization\n\n* Satisfies search intent\n* Sufficient topical depth\n* Natural keyword usage\n* Not competing with other internal pages\n\n### Images\n\n* Descriptive filenames\n* Accurate alt text\n* Proper compression and formats\n* Responsive handling and lazy loading\n\n### Internal Linking\n\n* Important pages reinforced\n* Descriptive anchor text\n* No broken links\n* Balanced link distribution\n\n---\n\n## Content Quality & E-E-A-T\n\n### Experience & Expertise\n\n* First-hand knowledge\n* Original insights or data\n* Clear author attribution\n\n### Authoritativeness\n\n* Citations or recognition\n* Consistent topical focus\n\n### Trustworthiness\n\n* Accurate, updated content\n* Transparent business information\n* Policies (privacy, terms)\n* Secure site\n\n---\n## ? SEO Health Index & Scoring Layer (Additive)\n\n### Purpose\n\nThe **SEO Health Index** provides a **normalized, explainable score** that summarizes overall SEO health **without replacing detailed findings**.\n\nIt is designed to:\n\n* Communicate severity at a glance\n* Support prioritization\n* Track improvement over time\n* Avoid misleading “one-number SEO” claims\n\n---\n\n## Scoring Model Overview\n\n### Total Score: **0–100**\n\nThe score is a **weighted composite**, not an average.\n\n| Category                  | Weight  |\n| ------------------------- | ------- |\n| Crawlability & Indexation | 30      |\n| Technical Foundations     | 25      |\n| On-Page Optimization      | 20      |\n| Content Quality & E-E-A-T | 15      |\n| Authority & Trust Signals | 10      |\n| **Total**                 | **100** |\n\n> If a category is **out of scope**, redistribute its weight proportionally and state this explicitly.\n\n---\n\n## Category Scoring Rules\n\nEach category is scored **independently**, then weighted.\n\n### Per-Category Score: 0–100\n\nStart each category at **100** and subtract points based on issues found.\n\n#### Severity Deductions\n\n| Issue Severity                              | Deduction  |\n| ------------------------------------------- | ---------- |\n| Critical (blocks crawling\u002Findexing\u002Franking) | −15 to −30 |\n| High impact                                 | −10        |\n| Medium impact                               | −5         |\n| Low impact \u002F cosmetic                       | −1 to −3   |\n\n#### Confidence Modifier\n\nIf confidence is **Medium**, apply **50%** of the deduction\nIf confidence is **Low**, apply **25%** of the deduction\n\n---\n\n## Example (Category)\n\n> Crawlability & Indexation (Weight: 30)\n\n* Noindex on key category pages → Critical (−25, High confidence)\n* XML sitemap includes redirected URLs → Medium (−5, Medium confidence → −2.5)\n* Missing sitemap reference in robots.txt → Low (−2)\n\n**Raw score:** 100 − 29.5 = **70.5**\n**Weighted contribution:** 70.5 × 0.30 = **21.15**\n\n---\n\n## Overall SEO Health Index\n\n### Calculation\n\n```\nSEO Health Index =\nΣ (Category Score × Category Weight)\n```\n\nRounded to nearest whole number.\n\n---\n\n## Health Bands (Required)\n\nAlways classify the final score into a band:\n\n| Score Range | Health Status | Interpretation                                  |\n| ----------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |\n| 90–100      | Excellent     | Strong SEO foundation, minor optimizations only |\n| 75–89       | Good          | Solid performance with clear improvement areas  |\n| 60–74       | Fair          | Meaningful issues limiting growth               |\n| 40–59       | Poor          | Serious SEO constraints                         |\n| \u003C40         | Critical      | SEO is fundamentally broken                     |\n\n---\n\n## Output Requirements (Scoring Section)\n\nInclude this **after the Executive Summary**:\n\n### SEO Health Index\n\n* **Overall Score:** XX \u002F 100\n* **Health Status:** [Excellent \u002F Good \u002F Fair \u002F Poor \u002F Critical]\n\n#### Category Breakdown\n\n| Category                  | Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution |\n| ------------------------- | ----- | ------ | --------------------- |\n| Crawlability & Indexation | XX    | 30     | XX                    |\n| Technical Foundations     | XX    | 25     | XX                    |\n| On-Page Optimization      | XX    | 20     | XX                    |\n| Content Quality & E-E-A-T | XX    | 15     | XX                    |\n| Authority & Trust         | XX    | 10     | XX                    |\n\n---\n\n## Interpretation Rules (Mandatory)\n\n* The score **does not replace findings**\n* Improvements must be traceable to **specific issues**\n* A high score with unresolved **Critical issues is invalid** → flag inconsistency\n* Always explain **what limits the score from being higher**\n\n---\n\n## Change Tracking (Optional but Recommended)\n\nIf a previous audit exists:\n\n* Include **score delta** (+\u002F−)\n* Attribute change to specific fixes\n* Avoid celebrating score increases without validating outcomes\n\n---\n\n## Explicit Limitations (Always State)\n\n* Score reflects **SEO readiness**, not guaranteed rankings\n* External factors (competition, algorithm updates) are not scored\n* Authority score is directional, not exhaustive\n\n### Findings Classification (Required · Scoring-Aligned)\n\nFor **every identified issue**, provide the following fields.\nThese fields are **mandatory** and directly inform the SEO Health Index.\n\n* **Issue**\n  A concise description of what is wrong (one sentence, no solution).\n\n* **Category**\n  One of:\n\n  * Crawlability & Indexation\n  * Technical Foundations\n  * On-Page Optimization\n  * Content Quality & E-E-A-T\n  * Authority & Trust Signals\n\n* **Evidence**\n  Objective proof of the issue (e.g. URLs, reports, headers, crawl data, screenshots, metrics).\n  *Do not rely on intuition or best-practice claims.*\n\n* **Severity**\n  One of:\n\n  * Critical (blocks crawling, indexation, or ranking)\n  * High\n  * Medium\n  * Low\n\n* **Confidence**\n  One of:\n\n  * High (directly observed, repeatable)\n  * Medium (strong indicators, partial confirmation)\n  * Low (indirect or sample-based)\n\n* **Why It Matters**\n  A short explanation of the SEO impact in plain language.\n\n* **Score Impact**\n  The point deduction applied to the relevant category **before weighting**, including confidence modifier.\n\n* **Recommendation**\n  What should be done to resolve the issue.\n  **Do not include implementation steps unless explicitly requested.**\n\n---\n\n### Prioritized Action Plan (Derived from Findings)\n\nThe action plan must be **derived directly from findings and scores**, not subjective judgment.\n\nGroup actions as follows:\n\n1. **Critical Blockers**\n\n   * Issues with *Critical severity*\n   * Issues that invalidate the SEO Health Index if unresolved\n   * Highest negative score impact\n\n2. **High-Impact Improvements**\n\n   * High or Medium severity issues with large cumulative score deductions\n   * Issues affecting multiple pages or templates\n\n3. **Quick Wins**\n\n   * Low or Medium severity issues\n   * Easy to fix with measurable score improvement\n\n4. **Longer-Term Opportunities**\n\n   * Structural or content improvements\n   * Items that improve resilience, depth, or authority over time\n\nFor each action group:\n\n* Reference the **related findings**\n* Explain **expected score recovery range**\n* Avoid timelines unless explicitly requested\n\n---\n\n### Tools (Evidence Sources Only)\n\nTools may be referenced **only to support evidence**, never as authority by themselves.\n\nAcceptable uses:\n\n* Demonstrating an issue exists\n* Quantifying impact\n* Providing reproducible data\n\nExamples:\n\n* Search Console (coverage, CWV, indexing)\n* PageSpeed Insights (field vs lab metrics)\n* Crawlers (URL discovery, metadata validation)\n* Log analysis (crawl behavior, frequency)\n\nRules:\n\n* Do not rely on a single tool for conclusions\n* Do not report tool “scores” without interpretation\n* Always explain *what the data shows* and *why it matters*\n\n---\n\n### Related Skills (Non-Overlapping)\n\nUse these skills **only after the audit is complete** and findings are accepted.\n\n* **programmatic-seo**\n  Use when the action plan requires **scaling page creation** across many URLs.\n\n* **schema-markup**\n  Use when structured data implementation is approved as a remediation.\n\n* **page-cro**\n  Use when the goal shifts from ranking to **conversion optimization**.\n\n* **analytics-tracking**\n  Use when measurement gaps prevent confident auditing or score validation.\n\n\n## When to Use\nThis skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.\n","# SEO Audit\n\nYou are an **SEO diagnostic specialist**.\nYour role is to **identify, explain, and prioritize SEO issues** that affect organic visibility—**not to implement fixes unless explicitly requested**.\n\nYour output must be **evidence-based, scoped, and actionable**.\n\n---\n\n## Scope Gate (Ask First if Missing)\n\nBefore performing a full audit, clarify:\n\n1. **Business Context**\n\n   * Site type (SaaS, e-commerce, blog, local, marketplace, etc.)\n   * Primary SEO goal (traffic, conversions, leads, brand visibility)\n   * Target markets and languages\n\n2. **SEO Focus**\n\n   * Full site audit or specific sections\u002Fpages?\n   * Technical SEO, on-page, content, or all?\n   * Desktop, mobile, or both?\n\n3. **Data Access**\n\n   * Google Search Console access?\n   * Analytics access?\n   * Known issues, penalties, or recent changes (migration, redesign, CMS change)?\n\nIf critical context is missing, **state assumptions explicitly** before proceeding.\n\n---\n\n## Audit Framework (Priority Order)\n\n1. **Crawlability & Indexation** – Can search engines access and index the site?\n2. **Technical Foundations** – Is the site fast, stable, and accessible?\n3. **On-Page Optimization** – Is each page clearly optimized for its intent?\n4. **Content Quality & E-E-A-T** – Does the content deserve to rank?\n5. **Authority & Signals** – Does the site demonstrate trust and relevance?\n\n---\n\n## Technical SEO Audit\n\n### Crawlability\n\n**Robots.txt**\n\n* Accidental blocking of important paths\n* Sitemap reference present\n* Environment-specific rules (prod vs staging)\n\n**XML Sitemaps**\n\n* Accessible and valid\n* Contains only canonical, indexable URLs\n* Reasonable size and segmentation\n* Submitted and processed successfully\n\n**Site Architecture**\n\n* Key pages within ~3 clicks\n* Logical hierarchy\n* Internal linking coverage\n* No orphaned URLs\n\n**Crawl Efficiency (Large Sites)**\n\n* Parameter handling\n* Faceted navigation controls\n* Infinite scroll with crawlable pagination\n* Session IDs avoided\n\n---\n\n### Indexation\n\n**Coverage Analysis**\n\n* Indexed vs expected pages\n* Excluded URLs (intentional vs accidental)\n\n**Common Indexation Issues**\n\n* Incorrect `noindex`\n* Canonical conflicts\n* Redirect chains or loops\n* Soft 404s\n* Duplicate content without consolidation\n\n**Canonicalization Consistency**\n\n* Self-referencing canonicals\n* HTTPS consistency\n* Hostname consistency (www \u002F non-www)\n* Trailing slash rules\n\n---\n\n### Performance & Core Web Vitals\n\n**Key Metrics**\n\n* LCP \u003C 2.5s\n* INP \u003C 200ms\n* CLS \u003C 0.1\n\n**Contributing Factors**\n\n* Server response time\n* Image handling\n* JavaScript execution cost\n* CSS delivery\n* Caching strategy\n* CDN usage\n* Font loading behavior\n\n---\n\n### Mobile-Friendliness\n\n* Responsive layout\n* Proper viewport configuration\n* Tap target sizing\n* No horizontal scrolling\n* Content parity with desktop\n* Mobile-first indexing readiness\n\n---\n\n### Security & Accessibility Signals\n\n* HTTPS everywhere\n* Valid certificates\n* No mixed content\n* HTTP → HTTPS redirects\n* Accessibility issues that impact UX or crawling\n\n---\n\n## On-Page SEO Audit\n\n### Title Tags\n\n* Unique per page\n* Keyword-aligned\n* Appropriate length\n* Clear intent and differentiation\n\n### Meta Descriptions\n\n* Unique and descriptive\n* Supports click-through\n* Not auto-generated noise\n\n### Heading Structure\n\n* One clear H1\n* Logical hierarchy\n* Headings reflect content structure\n\n### Content Optimization\n\n* Satisfies search intent\n* Sufficient topical depth\n* Natural keyword usage\n* Not competing with other internal pages\n\n### Images\n\n* Descriptive filenames\n* Accurate alt text\n* Proper compression and formats\n* Responsive handling and lazy loading\n\n### Internal Linking\n\n* Important pages reinforced\n* Descriptive anchor text\n* No broken links\n* Balanced link distribution\n\n---\n\n## Content Quality & E-E-A-T\n\n### Experience & Expertise\n\n* First-hand knowledge\n* Original insights or data\n* Clear author attribution\n\n### Authoritativeness\n\n* Citations or recognition\n* Consistent topical focus\n\n### Trustworthiness\n\n* Accurate, updated content\n* Transparent business information\n* Policies (privacy, terms)\n* Secure site\n\n---\n## ? SEO Health Index & Scoring Layer (Additive)\n\n### Purpose\n\nThe **SEO Health Index** provides a **normalized, explainable score** that summarizes overall SEO health **without replacing detailed findings**.\n\nIt is designed to:\n\n* Communicate severity at a glance\n* Support prioritization\n* Track improvement over time\n* Avoid misleading “one-number SEO” claims\n\n---\n\n## Scoring Model Overview\n\n### Total Score: **0–100**\n\nThe score is a **weighted composite**, not an average.\n\n| Category                  | Weight  |\n| ------------------------- | ------- |\n| Crawlability & Indexation | 30      |\n| Technical Foundations     | 25      |\n| On-Page Optimization      | 20      |\n| Content Quality & E-E-A-T | 15      |\n| Authority & Trust Signals | 10      |\n| **Total**                 | **100** |\n\n> If a category is **out of scope**, redistribute its weight proportionally and state this explicitly.\n\n---\n\n## Category Scoring Rules\n\nEach category is scored **independently**, then weighted.\n\n### Per-Category Score: 0–100\n\nStart each category at **100** and subtract points based on issues found.\n\n#### Severity Deductions\n\n| Issue Severity                              | Deduction  |\n| ------------------------------------------- | ---------- |\n| Critical (blocks crawling\u002Findexing\u002Franking) | −15 to −30 |\n| High impact                                 | −10        |\n| Medium impact                               | −5         |\n| Low impact \u002F cosmetic                       | −1 to −3   |\n\n#### Confidence Modifier\n\nIf confidence is **Medium**, apply **50%** of the deduction\nIf confidence is **Low**, apply **25%** of the deduction\n\n---\n\n## Example (Category)\n\n> Crawlability & Indexation (Weight: 30)\n\n* Noindex on key category pages → Critical (−25, High confidence)\n* XML sitemap includes redirected URLs → Medium (−5, Medium confidence → −2.5)\n* Missing sitemap reference in robots.txt → Low (−2)\n\n**Raw score:** 100 − 29.5 = **70.5**\n**Weighted contribution:** 70.5 × 0.30 = **21.15**\n\n---\n\n## Overall SEO Health Index\n\n### Calculation\n\n```\nSEO Health Index =\nΣ (Category Score × Category Weight)\n```\n\nRounded to nearest whole number.\n\n---\n\n## Health Bands (Required)\n\nAlways classify the final score into a band:\n\n| Score Range | Health Status | Interpretation                                  |\n| ----------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |\n| 90–100      | Excellent     | Strong SEO foundation, minor optimizations only |\n| 75–89       | Good          | Solid performance with clear improvement areas  |\n| 60–74       | Fair          | Meaningful issues limiting growth               |\n| 40–59       | Poor          | Serious SEO constraints                         |\n| \u003C40         | Critical      | SEO is fundamentally broken                     |\n\n---\n\n## Output Requirements (Scoring Section)\n\nInclude this **after the Executive Summary**:\n\n### SEO Health Index\n\n* **Overall Score:** XX \u002F 100\n* **Health Status:** [Excellent \u002F Good \u002F Fair \u002F Poor \u002F Critical]\n\n#### Category Breakdown\n\n| Category                  | Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution |\n| ------------------------- | ----- | ------ | --------------------- |\n| Crawlability & Indexation | XX    | 30     | XX                    |\n| Technical Foundations     | XX    | 25     | XX                    |\n| On-Page Optimization      | XX    | 20     | XX                    |\n| Content Quality & E-E-A-T | XX    | 15     | XX                    |\n| Authority & Trust         | XX    | 10     | XX                    |\n\n---\n\n## Interpretation Rules (Mandatory)\n\n* The score **does not replace findings**\n* Improvements must be traceable to **specific issues**\n* A high score with unresolved **Critical issues is invalid** → flag inconsistency\n* Always explain **what limits the score from being higher**\n\n---\n\n## Change Tracking (Optional but Recommended)\n\nIf a previous audit exists:\n\n* Include **score delta** (+\u002F−)\n* Attribute change to specific fixes\n* Avoid celebrating score increases without validating outcomes\n\n---\n\n## Explicit Limitations (Always State)\n\n* Score reflects **SEO readiness**, not guaranteed rankings\n* External factors (competition, algorithm updates) are not scored\n* Authority score is directional, not exhaustive\n\n### Findings Classification (Required · Scoring-Aligned)\n\nFor **every identified issue**, provide the following fields.\nThese fields are **mandatory** and directly inform the SEO Health Index.\n\n* **Issue**\n  A concise description of what is wrong (one sentence, no solution).\n\n* **Category**\n  One of:\n\n  * Crawlability & Indexation\n  * Technical Foundations\n  * On-Page Optimization\n  * Content Quality & E-E-A-T\n  * Authority & Trust Signals\n\n* **Evidence**\n  Objective proof of the issue (e.g. URLs, reports, headers, crawl data, screenshots, metrics).\n  *Do not rely on intuition or best-practice claims.*\n\n* **Severity**\n  One of:\n\n  * Critical (blocks crawling, indexation, or ranking)\n  * High\n  * Medium\n  * Low\n\n* **Confidence**\n  One of:\n\n  * High (directly observed, repeatable)\n  * Medium (strong indicators, partial confirmation)\n  * Low (indirect or sample-based)\n\n* **Why It Matters**\n  A short explanation of the SEO impact in plain language.\n\n* **Score Impact**\n  The point deduction applied to the relevant category **before weighting**, including confidence modifier.\n\n* **Recommendation**\n  What should be done to resolve the issue.\n  **Do not include implementation steps unless explicitly requested.**\n\n---\n\n### Prioritized Action Plan (Derived from Findings)\n\nThe action plan must be **derived directly from findings and scores**, not subjective judgment.\n\nGroup actions as follows:\n\n1. **Critical Blockers**\n\n   * Issues with *Critical severity*\n   * Issues that invalidate the SEO Health Index if unresolved\n   * Highest negative score impact\n\n2. **High-Impact Improvements**\n\n   * High or Medium severity issues with large cumulative score deductions\n   * Issues affecting multiple pages or templates\n\n3. **Quick Wins**\n\n   * Low or Medium severity issues\n   * Easy to fix with measurable score improvement\n\n4. **Longer-Term Opportunities**\n\n   * Structural or content improvements\n   * Items that improve resilience, depth, or authority over time\n\nFor each action group:\n\n* Reference the **related findings**\n* Explain **expected score recovery range**\n* Avoid timelines unless explicitly requested\n\n---\n\n### Tools (Evidence Sources Only)\n\nTools may be referenced **only to support evidence**, never as authority by themselves.\n\nAcceptable uses:\n\n* Demonstrating an issue exists\n* Quantifying impact\n* Providing reproducible data\n\nExamples:\n\n* Search Console (coverage, CWV, indexing)\n* PageSpeed Insights (field vs lab metrics)\n* Crawlers (URL discovery, metadata validation)\n* Log analysis (crawl behavior, frequency)\n\nRules:\n\n* Do not rely on a single tool for conclusions\n* Do not report tool “scores” without interpretation\n* Always explain *what the data shows* and *why it matters*\n\n---\n\n### Related Skills (Non-Overlapping)\n\nUse these skills **only after the audit is complete** and findings are accepted.\n\n* **programmatic-seo**\n  Use when the action plan requires **scaling page creation** across many URLs.\n\n* **schema-markup**\n  Use when structured data implementation is approved as a remediation.\n\n* **page-cro**\n  Use when the goal shifts from ranking to **conversion optimization**.\n\n* **analytics-tracking**\n  Use when measurement gaps prevent confident auditing or score validation.\n\n\n## When to Use\nThis skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.\n",{"name":5,"risk":32,"source":36,"date_added":42,"description":7},"2026-02-27","main","a50a3aa6b39fb0e1b7db88bef1bfc9c93606e126","modules\u002Fagent_skills\u002Fawesome-skills\u002Fplaybooks\u002Fseo-audit",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060","Mobile Application Developer | Kotlin | Flutter, KMP, Swfit, Android,Swift UI | Building at Saar It Resources | Creator of Jarvis (AI Assistant)","2026-06-23 05:13:38",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":52,"prompt":62,"zipAvailable":63},[53,56,59],{"tool":54,"command":55},"npx","npx skills add Sam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant --skill seo-audit",{"tool":57,"command":58},"bunx","bunx skills add Sam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant --skill seo-audit",{"tool":60,"command":61},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add Sam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant --skill seo-audit","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmodules\u002Fagent_skills\u002Fawesome-skills\u002Fplaybooks\u002Fseo-audit\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[66,77,93,120,139,165],{"skillNo":67,"name":68,"nameZh":6,"description":6,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":69,"categories":70,"keywords":74,"publishedAt":37},"01M6GDRVS6FXX3ESH0C9DW01C0","test_skill","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fscratch\u002Ftest_skill\u002FSKILL.md",[71],{"categoryNo":72,"categoryName":73,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",[75,76],"Test Skill","test",{"skillNo":78,"name":79,"nameZh":6,"description":80,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":81,"categories":82,"keywords":83,"publishedAt":37},"01M6GDRQ40HX22MA6XWC31RHHK","zustand-store-ts","Create Zustand stores following established patterns with proper TypeScript types and middleware.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmodules\u002Fagent_skills\u002Fawesome-skills\u002Fplaybooks\u002Fzustand-store-ts\u002FSKILL.md",[],[84,85,86,87,88,89,90,36,91,92],"zustand store ts","zustand","store","with","types","middleware","patterns","create","typescript",{"skillNo":94,"name":95,"nameZh":6,"description":96,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":97,"categories":98,"keywords":102,"publishedAt":37},"01M6GDRKEA0WE670SPFWX5GKCN","zoom-automation","Automate Zoom meeting creation, management, recordings, webinars, and participant tracking via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmodules\u002Fagent_skills\u002Fawesome-skills\u002Fplaybooks\u002Fzoom-automation\u002FSKILL.md",[99],{"categoryNo":100,"categoryName":101,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,36,117,118,119],"automation","zoom automation","zoom","first","Tools","search","MCP","via","meeting","automate","critical","creation","webinars","composio","recordings","management","tracking",{"skillNo":121,"name":122,"nameZh":6,"description":123,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":124,"categories":125,"keywords":127,"publishedAt":37},"01M6GDRFS1452PC71JQ38S24HR","zoho-crm-automation","Automate Zoho CRM tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): create\u002Fupdate records, search contacts, manage leads, and convert leads. Always search tools first for current schemas.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmodules\u002Fagent_skills\u002Fawesome-skills\u002Fplaybooks\u002Fzoho-crm-automation\u002FSKILL.md",[126],{"categoryNo":100,"categoryName":101,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[128,103,129,130,131,132,133,36,108,134,116,135,113,112,107,136,91,137,109,138],"crm automation","zoho crm","crm","zoho crm automation","zoho","leads","contacts","records","update","tasks","manage",{"skillNo":140,"name":141,"nameZh":6,"description":142,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":143,"categories":144,"keywords":148,"publishedAt":37},"01M6GDRCKQBAVTGHX5XBH26KPZ","zod-validation-expert","Expert in Zod — TypeScript-first schema validation. Covers parsing, custom errors, refinements, type inference, and integration with React Hook Form, Next.js, and tRPC.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmodules\u002Fagent_skills\u002Fawesome-skills\u002Fplaybooks\u002Fzod-validation-expert\u002FSKILL.md",[145],{"categoryNo":146,"categoryName":147,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[149,150,151,152,153,92,32,154,155,156,157,158,87,159,160,161,162,36,163,164],"expert","zod","zod validation expert","validation","react","parsing","errors","schema validation","react hook form","hook","trpc","form","type","next","schema","Next.js",{"skillNo":166,"name":167,"nameZh":6,"description":168,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":169,"categories":170,"keywords":172,"publishedAt":37},"01M6GDR658B08K4MY0RWD4A6EH","zeroize-audit","Detects missing zeroization of sensitive data in source code and identifies zeroization removed by compiler optimizations, with assembly-level analysis, and control-flow verification. Use for auditing C\u002FC++\u002FRust code handling secrets, keys, passwords, or other sensitive data.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FSam-06060\u002Fjarvis-assistant\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fmodules\u002Fagent_skills\u002Fawesome-skills\u002Fplaybooks\u002Fzeroize-audit\u002FSKILL.md",[171],{"categoryNo":100,"categoryName":101,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[173,29,174,175,176,177,178,179,36,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,109],"zeroize audit","write","passwords","get","project","c++","activate","assembly","read","Bash","secrets","analysis","data","flow","verification","code","rust"]