compliance-readiness
Checks your readiness for a lightweight SOC 2 security audit and lists the gaps. Use when preparing for an audit or customer security questionnaires.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 所属仓库
- vibbs/company-os
- 最近更新
- 2026-10-21
- Stars
- ★ 6
- Forks
- 2
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- compliance-readiness
- description
- Checks your readiness for a lightweight SOC 2 security audit and lists the gaps. Use when preparing for an audit or customer security questionnaires.
- user-invocable
- true
03 SKILL.md 正文
Compliance Readiness
Reference
- ID: S-RISK-03
- Category: Risk
- Inputs: current security controls, policies, infrastructure configuration, vendor list
- Outputs: compliance readiness report → artifacts/risk/
- Used by: Ops & Risk Agent
- Tool scripts: ./tools/artifact/validate.sh
Purpose
Assesses the organization's compliance posture against SOC2 Trust Service Criteria (or a lightweight subset), identifies gaps, and produces a prioritized remediation plan to achieve or maintain compliance readiness.
Procedure
Step 0: Stage-Based Compliance Routing
Read company.stage and data types handled from company.config.yaml.
idea/mvp stage:
- GDPR basics: consent mechanism, privacy policy, deletion rights, DPA with Stripe/email provider
- CCPA awareness if US-based users
- HIPAA awareness check (if health data)
- PCI scope check (using Stripe = not in PCI scope)
- Skip full SOC2 assessment
growth/scale stage or explicit enterprise customer requirement:
- Full SOC2-lite assessment (existing procedure below)
- Add vendor security questionnaire readiness
- Data processing inventory
- Define the compliance scope: which systems, services, and data are in scope.
- Map current controls against SOC2 Trust Service Criteria categories:
- Security (CC): access controls, encryption, vulnerability management.
- Availability (A): uptime SLAs, disaster recovery, backup procedures.
- Processing Integrity (PI): data validation, error handling, change management.
- Confidentiality (C): data classification, encryption at rest/in transit.
- Privacy (P): data collection, use, retention, disclosure, disposal.
- For each criterion, assess current state: compliant, partially compliant, or gap.
- Document evidence for compliant controls.
- For each gap, define the remediation action, owner, and target date.
- Prioritize gaps by risk severity and audit timeline.
- Review third-party vendor compliance status and SOC2 reports.
- Create a compliance roadmap with milestones.
- Save the readiness report to
artifacts/risk/. - Validate the artifact using
./tools/artifact/validate.sh.
Quality Checklist
- [ ] Scope is clearly defined (systems, services, data)
- [ ] All five Trust Service Criteria categories are assessed
- [ ] Each control has a status: compliant, partial, or gap
- [ ] Evidence is documented for compliant controls
- [ ] Gaps have remediation actions with owners and dates
- [ ] Vendor compliance is reviewed
- [ ] Compliance roadmap has realistic milestones
- [ ] Artifact passes validation
04 同仓库更多 Skills
typo-field
Fixture skill with a misspelled top-level field.
spaced-comments
Fixture skill with comments and spaces after block keys.
crlf-comments
Fixture skill with Windows line endings.
claude-fields
Fixture skill using top-level fields Claude Code documents.
workflow-router
Maps an objective to the artifacts, stages and agents it needs. Use when deciding what happens next or which agents to involve.
weekly-review
Summarizes your week: what shipped, AI spend, support themes, security health and next priorities. Use at the end of each week.