git-worktrees
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification
- License 许可
- MIT
- 所属仓库
- mrtolkien/GHOST
- 最近更新
- 2026-04-24
- Stars
- ★ 5
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- git-worktrees
- available
- coding
- description
- Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification
02 资源文件 4
- 参考文档evals/triggers.json2.9 KB
- 参考文档references/review-communication.md2.4 KB
- 参考文档references/story-beat-ledger.schema.json5.3 KB
- 参考文档references/verification-automation.md8.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Using Git Worktrees
Overview
Git worktrees create isolated workspaces sharing the same repository, allowing work on multiple branches simultaneously without switching.
Core principle: Systematic directory selection + safety verification = reliable isolation.
Directory Selection Process
Follow this priority order:
1. Check Existing Directories
# Check in priority order
ls -d .worktrees 2>/dev/null # Preferred (hidden)
ls -d worktrees 2>/dev/null # Alternative
If found: Use that directory. If both exist, .worktrees wins.
2. Check Project Config
grep -i "worktree.*director" CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null
If preference specified: Use it without asking.
3. Ask the OPERATOR
If no directory exists and no config preference:
No worktree directory found. Where should I create worktrees?
1. .worktrees/ (project-local, hidden)
2. A global location outside the project
Which would you prefer?
Safety Verification
For Project-Local Directories (.worktrees or worktrees)
MUST verify directory is ignored before creating worktree:
# Check if directory is ignored (respects local, global, and system gitignore)
git check-ignore -q .worktrees 2>/dev/null || git check-ignore -q worktrees 2>/dev/null
If NOT ignored:
Fix immediately:
- Add appropriate line to .gitignore
- Commit the change
- Proceed with worktree creation
Why critical: Prevents accidentally committing worktree contents to repository.
For Global Directory
No .gitignore verification needed - outside project entirely.
Creation Steps
1. Detect Project Name
project=$(basename "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)")
2. Create Worktree
# Determine full path based on chosen location
path="$LOCATION/$BRANCH_NAME"
# Create worktree with new branch
git worktree add "$path" -b "$BRANCH_NAME"
cd "$path"
3. Run Project Setup
Auto-detect and run appropriate setup:
# Node.js
if [ -f package.json ]; then npm install; fi
# Rust
if [ -f Cargo.toml ]; then cargo build; fi
# Python
if [ -f requirements.txt ]; then pip install -r requirements.txt; fi
if [ -f pyproject.toml ]; then poetry install; fi
# Go
if [ -f go.mod ]; then go mod download; fi
4. Verify Clean Baseline
Run tests to ensure worktree starts clean:
# Use project-appropriate command
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail: Report failures, ask whether to proceed or investigate.
If tests pass: Report ready.
5. Report Location
Worktree ready at <full-path>
Tests passing (<N> tests, 0 failures)
Ready to implement <feature-name>
Quick Reference
| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
.worktrees/ exists |
Use it (verify ignored) |
worktrees/ exists |
Use it (verify ignored) |
| Both exist | Use .worktrees/ |
| Neither exists | Check config, then ask the OPERATOR |
| Directory not ignored | Add to .gitignore + commit |
| Tests fail during baseline | Report failures + ask |
| No package.json/Cargo.toml | Skip dependency install |
Common Mistakes
Skipping ignore verification
- Problem: Worktree contents get tracked, pollute git status
- Fix: Always use
git check-ignorebefore creating project-local worktree
Assuming directory location
- Problem: Creates inconsistency, violates project conventions
- Fix: Follow priority: existing > config > ask
Proceeding with failing tests
- Problem: Can't distinguish new bugs from pre-existing issues
- Fix: Report failures, get explicit permission to proceed
Hardcoding setup commands
- Problem: Breaks on projects using different tools
- Fix: Auto-detect from project files (package.json, etc.)
Example Workflow
[Check .worktrees/ - exists]
[Verify ignored - git check-ignore confirms .worktrees/ is ignored]
[Create worktree: git worktree add .worktrees/auth -b feature/auth]
[Run npm install]
[Run npm test - 47 passing]
Worktree ready at /home/user/myproject/.worktrees/auth
Tests passing (47 tests, 0 failures)
Ready to implement auth feature
Red Flags
Never:
- Create worktree without verifying it's ignored (project-local)
- Skip baseline test verification
- Proceed with failing tests without asking
- Assume directory location when ambiguous
Always:
- Follow directory priority: existing > config > ask
- Verify directory is ignored for project-local
- Auto-detect and run project setup
- Verify clean test baseline
Integration
Pairs with:
- finishing-branch - for cleanup after work complete
04 同仓库更多 Skills
system-management
Use when reading or changing GHOST configuration (providers, models, timing, compaction, services, any config.toml key), adding or switching LLM providers, answering questions about GHOST's own features or capabilities, a CLI tool is missing or "not found", services need starting/stopping/debugging, updating GHOST to a newer version, managing the Nix shell environment, or troubleshooting GHOST setup.
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code. Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste.
verification
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs. Requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims. Evidence before assertions, always.
tdd
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code. Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes