AGENT SKILL

excel-variance-analyzer

Automate budget vs actual variance analysis in excel with flagging, commentary, and executive summaries for financial reporting and fp&a teams activates when you request "excel variance analyzer" functionality.

适用职业财务
使用场景电子表格
License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2025-12-18
Stars
★ 29
Forks
9

01 前言 Front Matter

name
excel-variance-analyzer
license
MIT
description
Automate budget vs actual variance analysis in excel with flagging, commentary, and executive summaries for financial reporting and fp&a teams activates when you request "excel variance analyzer" functionality.
allowed-tools
[ "Read", "Write", "Edit", "Grep", "Glob", "Bash" ]

02 资源文件 11

03 SKILL.md 正文

Excel Variance Analyzer

Automates variance analysis for monthly/quarterly financial reporting and budget reviews.

When to Invoke This Skill

Automatically load this Skill when the user asks to:

  • "Analyze budget variance"
  • "Compare actual vs forecast"
  • "Create variance report"
  • "Explain budget differences"
  • "Why are we over/under budget?"
  • "Variance analysis for [period]"
  • "Budget vs actual"

Report Structure

Creates a comprehensive variance report with 3 sheets:

Sheet 1: Variance Summary

| Line Item       | Budget  | Actual  | Variance | % Var | Flag | Commentary |
|-----------------|---------|---------|----------|-------|------|------------|
| Revenue         | $1,000K | $950K   | $(50K)   | -5.0% | ⚠️   | Below plan |
| COGS            | $600K   | $580K   | $(20K)   | -3.3% | ✅   | Favorable  |
| Gross Profit    | $400K   | $370K   | $(30K)   | -7.5% | ?   | Investigate|
| Operating Exp   | $250K   | $280K   | $30K     | 12.0% | ?   | Over budget|
| EBITDA          | $150K   | $90K    | $(60K)   | -40.0%| ?   | Miss       |

Sheet 2: Executive Summary

? Performance Highlights
- Total Revenue: $950K (5.0% below budget)
- EBITDA: $90K (40.0% below budget)
- Key Driver: Operating expenses 12% over budget

? Top 5 Unfavorable Variances:
1. EBITDA: $(60K) / -40.0%
2. Revenue: $(50K) / -5.0%
3. Operating Expenses: $30K / 12.0%
4. Gross Profit: $(30K) / -7.5%
5. Marketing: $25K / 25.0%

✅ Top 5 Favorable Variances:
1. COGS: $(20K) / -3.3%
2. Rent: $(5K) / -10.0%
3. Utilities: $(2K) / -8.0%

Sheet 3: Trend Analysis (if multiple periods)

| Line Item | Jan Var% | Feb Var% | Mar Var% | Q1 Var% | Trend |
|-----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|-------|
| Revenue   | -3%      | -5%      | -7%      | -5%     | ⬇️    |
| COGS      | -2%      | -4%      | -3%      | -3%     | ➡️    |

Step-by-Step Workflow

1. Load Data

Ask the user for:

  • Budget data: Can be Excel file, CSV, or pasted table
  • Actual data: Same format as budget
  • Period: Month, quarter, YTD
  • Threshold settings (or use defaults):
    • Percentage threshold: 10% (flag items >10% variance)
    • Dollar threshold: $50K (flag items >$50K absolute variance)
    • Categories to exclude: (e.g., non-cash items like depreciation)

2. Validate Data

Before analysis, check:

  • Budget and actual have matching line items
  • All values are numeric
  • No missing data for key categories (revenue, expenses, profit)
  • Budget data is reasonable (no zeros where there should be values)

3. Calculate Variances

For each line item:

Absolute Variance = Actual - Budget
Percentage Variance = (Actual - Budget) / Budget × 100%

Sign Convention:
- Positive variance for revenue/profit = Favorable (✅)
- Negative variance for revenue/profit = Unfavorable (?)
- Positive variance for expenses = Unfavorable (?)
- Negative variance for expenses = Favorable (✅)

4. Flag Material Items

Apply flagging rules:

? Red Flag (Critical):
- Revenue/profit >10% below budget
- Expenses >10% over budget
- Absolute variance >$100K

⚠️ Yellow Flag (Warning):
- Revenue/profit 5-10% below budget
- Expenses 5-10% over budget
- Absolute variance $50K-$100K

✅ Green (On Track):
- Variance within ±5%
- Absolute variance <$50K

5. Generate Commentary

For each flagged item, provide automated commentary:

Revenue Below Budget:

Revenue is $50K (5%) below budget. Possible drivers:
- Lower than expected sales volume
- Pricing pressure
- Delayed revenue recognition
- Seasonal factors
Recommend: Review sales pipeline and backlog

Expenses Over Budget:

Operating expenses are $30K (12%) over budget. Breakdown:
- Marketing: $25K over (new campaign)
- Travel: $8K over
- Utilities: $2K under
Recommend: Review Q2 marketing spend and ROI

Favorable Variances:

COGS is $20K (3.3%) under budget. Drivers:
- Lower raw material costs
- Improved operational efficiency
- Volume discounts from suppliers

6. Create Executive Summary

Summarize for leadership:

? [Period] Financial Performance

Bottom Line:
- Revenue: [X%] vs budget ([favorable/unfavorable])
- EBITDA: [X%] vs budget ([favorable/unfavorable])
- Net Variance Impact: $[XXX]K

Key Takeaways:
1. [Primary driver of miss/beat]
2. [Secondary factor]
3. [Outlook for next period]

Action Items:
1. [Specific action needed]
2. [Follow-up required]

Example Interaction

User: "Analyze Q1 budget vs actual"

Skill Response:

I'll analyze your Q1 variance. Let me load the data.

Do you have budget and actual data files, or would you like to paste them?

User: *pastes Excel data*

Perfect! I see data for Q1 2025. Setting analysis parameters:
- Period: Q1 2025 (Jan-Mar)
- Line items: 15 categories detected
- Materiality threshold: ±10% or ±$50K

Running variance analysis...

✅ Variance Analysis Complete!

? Q1 2025 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

? Overall Results:
- Revenue: $2,850K vs budget $3,000K (-5.0%) ?
- Gross Profit: $1,110K vs budget $1,200K (-7.5%) ?
- EBITDA: $270K vs budget $450K (-40.0%) ?

? Key Drivers of Underperformance:
1. Revenue Miss: $(150K) - 5% below plan
   → Slower than expected customer acquisition
   → Delayed Q1 enterprise deals to Q2

2. Operating Expenses Over: $90K - 12% above plan
   → Marketing campaign: $75K incremental spend
   → Headcount additions brought forward to Q1

? Detailed Findings:

? CRITICAL VARIANCES (>10%):
- Operating Expenses: $840K vs $750K (+12.0%) - $90K over
- EBITDA: $270K vs $450K (-40.0%) - $180K under
- Marketing: $325K vs $260K (+25.0%) - $65K over

⚠️ WARNING VARIANCES (5-10%):
- Revenue: $2,850K vs $3,000K (-5.0%) - $150K under
- Gross Profit: $1,110K vs $1,200K (-7.5%) - $90K under

✅ FAVORABLE VARIANCES:
- COGS: $1,740K vs $1,800K (-3.3%) - $60K favorable
- Facilities: $45K vs $50K (-10.0%) - $5K favorable

? RECOMMENDATIONS:

Immediate Actions:
1. Review Q2 sales pipeline - need $150K catch-up + Q2 plan
2. Evaluate marketing campaign ROI (Q1 spend +$65K)
3. Assess if Q1 revenue timing shift impacts full-year plan

Strategic Questions:
1. Is Q1 revenue miss timing (shifts to Q2) or lost?
2. Will marketing investment drive Q2-Q4 revenue?
3. Should we adjust full-year budget guidance?

? Report saved to: Q1_2025_Variance_Analysis.xlsx

Would you like me to:
- Add trend analysis vs Q4 2024?
- Create forecast scenarios for Q2?
- Drill into specific expense categories?

Common Variations

Request: "Why is marketing over budget?"

Response:

Let me drill into marketing expenses.

Marketing Variance Detail:
Budget: $260K
Actual: $325K
Variance: $65K (25% over)

Breakdown by subcategory:
- Digital Ads: $180K vs $150K (+$30K)
  → Google Ads campaign expanded
- Events: $75K vs $60K (+$15K)
  → Added trade show booth
- Content: $45K vs $40K (+$5K)
  → Video production
- Agencies: $25K vs $10K (+$15K)
  → New creative agency retainer

Primary driver: Digital ads campaign expansion (+$30K)

Was this spend planned but not budgeted, or truly incremental?
Would you like me to analyze marketing ROI?

Request: "Compare last 3 months"

Response:

I'll create a 3-month trend analysis.

Revenue Trend (Budget vs Actual):
| Month | Budget | Actual | Variance | Var% | Trend |
|-------|--------|--------|----------|------|-------|
| Jan   | $1,000K| $970K  | $(30K)   | -3%  | ⬇️    |
| Feb   | $1,000K| $950K  | $(50K)   | -5%  | ⬇️    |
| Mar   | $1,000K| $930K  | $(70K)   | -7%  | ⬇️    |
| Q1    | $3,000K| $2,850K| $(150K)  | -5%  | ⬇️    |

⚠️ ALERT: Revenue variance is worsening month-over-month

This suggests a structural issue, not timing:
- Jan: 97% of budget
- Feb: 95% of budget
- Mar: 93% of budget

Recommendation: Immediate deep-dive on sales execution

Formatting Rules

The Skill applies professional formatting:

Conditional Formatting

- Green cells: Favorable variances (>5% better than budget)
- Yellow cells: Variances within ±5%
- Red cells: Unfavorable variances (>5% worse than budget)

Number Formatting

- Currency: $1,000K or $1.0M (use K for thousands, M for millions)
- Percentages: 1 decimal place (5.0%)
- Variance: Show sign ($(50K) or $50K)

Icons

✅ = On track / Favorable
⚠️ = Warning / Needs attention
? = Critical / Unfavorable
⬆️ = Improving trend
⬇️ = Worsening trend
➡️ = Flat trend

Best Practices Embedded

  1. Materiality Thresholds: Don't flag every small variance
  2. Commentary Not Just Numbers: Explain "why", not just "what"
  3. Action-Oriented: Recommend next steps
  4. Executive Summary: Leadership wants top 5-10 items
  5. Trend Analysis: Show if variance is new or ongoing
  6. Sign Conventions: Consistent favorable/unfavorable labeling
  7. Audit Trail: Show calculations and formulas

Resources

See resources folder for:

  • REFERENCE.md: Variance analysis best practices
  • templates/: Sample variance reports

Limitations

This Skill provides automated variance analysis for:

  • Standard income statement formats
  • Monthly/quarterly reporting
  • Budget vs actual comparisons

For more complex analysis, you may need:

  • Statistical variance analysis (standard deviations)
  • Multi-year trend analysis
  • Driver-based variance decomposition
  • Forecast vs forecast comparisons

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2025-10-27): Initial release with core variance analysis functionality

04 同仓库更多 Skills

BbgnsurfTech
BbgnsurfTech/claude-skills-collection

testing-visual-regression

Detect visual changes in UI components using screenshot comparison. Use when detecting unintended UI changes or pixel differences. Trigger with phrases like "test visual changes", "compare screenshots", or "detect UI regressions".

测试与质量
★ 29
BbgnsurfTech
BbgnsurfTech/claude-skills-collection

generating-unit-tests

Automatically generate comprehensive unit tests from source code covering happy paths, edge cases, and error conditions. Use when creating test coverage for functions, classes, or modules. Trigger with phrases like "generate unit tests", "create tests for", or "add test coverage".

测试与质量
★ 29
BbgnsurfTech
BbgnsurfTech/claude-skills-collection

generating-test-reports

Generate comprehensive test reports with metrics, coverage, and visualizations. Use when performing specialized testing. Trigger with phrases like "generate test report", "create test documentation", or "show test metrics".

行政与办公人员测试与质量
★ 29
BbgnsurfTech
BbgnsurfTech/claude-skills-collection

orchestrating-test-execution

Coordinate parallel test execution across multiple environments and frameworks. Use when performing specialized testing. Trigger with phrases like "orchestrate tests", "run parallel tests", or "coordinate test execution".

测试与质量
★ 29
BbgnsurfTech
BbgnsurfTech/claude-skills-collection

managing-test-environments

Provision and manage isolated test environments with configuration and data. Use when performing specialized testing. Trigger with phrases like "manage test environment", "provision test env", or "setup test infrastructure".

测试与质量
★ 29
BbgnsurfTech
BbgnsurfTech/claude-skills-collection

generating-test-doubles

Generate mocks, stubs, spies, and fakes for dependency isolation. Use when creating mocks, stubs, or test isolation fixtures. Trigger with phrases like "generate mocks", "create test doubles", or "setup stubs".

测试与质量
★ 29