AGENT SKILL

curating-memories

Guidance for maintaining memory quality through curation. Covers updating outdated notes, marking obsolete content, and linking related knowledge. Use when notes need modification, when new information supersedes old, or when building knowledge graph connections.

License 许可
MIT
所属仓库
loriensleafs/brain
最近更新
2026-03-11
Stars
★ 0
Forks
0

01 前言 Front Matter

name
curating-memories
model
claude-sonnet-4-5
agents
[ "memory" ]
license
MIT
metadata
{ "version": "2.0.0" }
description
Guidance for maintaining memory quality through curation. Covers updating outdated notes, marking obsolete content, and linking related knowledge. Use when notes need modification, when new information supersedes old, or when building knowledge graph connections.

02 资源文件 1

03 SKILL.md 正文

Curating Memories

Active curation keeps the knowledge base accurate and connected. Outdated notes pollute search results and reduce effectiveness.

Triggers

Trigger Phrase Operation
how do I update a memory edit_note with append/replace_section
how do I mark a memory obsolete edit_note to add obsolescence marker
how do I link related memories edit_note to add relation wikilinks
how do I deduplicate memories Curation workflow: search, analyze, merge
how do I clean up stale memories Identify and mark obsolete outdated content

When to Update a Note

Use edit_note when:

  • Information needs correction or clarification
  • Content needs refinement or additional observations
  • Relations to other notes need to be added
  • A section needs replacement with updated content
# Append new observations to a note
mcp__plugin_brain_brain__edit_note({
  "identifier": "<note title or permalink>",
  "operation": "append",
  "content": "\n- [fact] Updated information about this topic #tag"
})

# Replace a specific section
mcp__plugin_brain_brain__edit_note({
  "identifier": "<note title or permalink>",
  "operation": "replace_section",
  "heading": "Observations",
  "content": "## Observations\n\n- [decision] Revised approach selected #architecture\n- [fact] New constraint discovered #constraint"
})

# Find and replace specific content
mcp__plugin_brain_brain__edit_note({
  "identifier": "<note title or permalink>",
  "operation": "find_replace",
  "content": "old content",
  "replacement": "new content"
})

When to Mark Obsolete

Mark a note obsolete when:

  • Note is outdated or contradicted by newer information
  • Decision has been reversed or superseded
  • Referenced code/feature no longer exists
  • Note was created in error
# Add obsolescence marker via append
mcp__plugin_brain_brain__edit_note({
  "identifier": "<note title or permalink>",
  "operation": "append",
  "content": "\n\n## Status\n\n- [decision] OBSOLETE: Superseded by new architecture decision #obsolete\n\n## Relations\n\n- supersedes [[New Decision Note Title]]"
})

For notes that should be fully removed:

mcp__plugin_brain_brain__delete_note({
  "identifier": "<note title or permalink>"
})

When to Link Notes

Use edit_note to add relations when:

  • Concepts are related but not connected via wikilinks
  • Building explicit knowledge graph structure
  • Connecting decisions to their implementations
  • Relating patterns across projects
# Add relations to an existing note
mcp__plugin_brain_brain__edit_note({
  "identifier": "<note title or permalink>",
  "operation": "append",
  "content": "\n- relates_to [[Target Note Title]]\n- implements [[ADR-015 Auth Strategy]]"
})

Relations are expressed as wikilinks in the Relations section. Valid relation types: implements, depends_on, relates_to, extends, part_of, inspired_by, contains, pairs_with, supersedes, leads_to, caused_by.

Curation Workflow

When creating new notes, check impact on existing knowledge:

Step 1: Search for Related Notes

mcp__plugin_brain_brain__search({
  "query": "<topic of new note>",
  "mode": "semantic",
  "limit": 5
})

Step 2: Analyze Each Result

For each existing note, determine action:

Situation Action
Existing note is still accurate Add relation wikilink to it
Existing note has minor gaps Edit it with edit_note (append)
Existing note is now wrong Mark obsolete, create new note
Existing note is partially valid Create new note, add relations between both

Step 3: Execute Curation Plan

Present plan to user before executing:

Curation plan:
- Create: "New Authentication Approach" in decisions/
- Mark obsolete: "Old Auth Pattern" (superseded)
- Add relation: New note -> "Security Requirements" note

Proceed? (y/n)

Step 4: Execute and Report

After user confirms:

  1. Create new note via write_note
  2. Mark obsolete notes via edit_note (append obsolescence marker)
  3. Add relations via edit_note (append wikilinks)
  4. Report results with all changes made

Signs of Poor Curation

Watch for these indicators:

  • Multiple similar notes on same topic (deduplicate)
  • Notes referencing deleted code (mark obsolete)
  • Contradictory notes (resolve conflict)
  • Orphaned notes with no relations (consider linking or removing)

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Existing notes need correction or updated content
  • New information supersedes an older note
  • Building explicit relations between related knowledge
  • Duplicate notes need consolidation
  • Referenced code or features no longer exist

Use exploring-knowledge-graph instead when:

  • Traversing relations for comprehensive context
  • Investigating cross-project connections

Process

  1. Search for the target note using mcp__plugin_brain_brain__search
  2. Read the note using mcp__plugin_brain_brain__read_note
  3. Evaluate whether the note needs editing, linking, or marking obsolete
  4. Apply the appropriate curation operation via edit_note, write_note, or delete_note
  5. Verify the change took effect

Anti-Patterns

Avoid Why Instead
Deleting notes without checking relations Breaks wikilinks in other notes Mark obsolete first, check for incoming relations
Creating duplicates of existing notes Pollutes search results Search first, edit existing if found
Linking everything to everything Dilutes relationship signal Link only semantically meaningful connections
Skipping user confirmation on curation plans May obsolete valuable content Present plan and wait for approval
Ignoring orphaned notes Degrades search quality over time Periodically review and cull disconnected notes

Verification

After curation operations:

  • [ ] Updated notes reflect accurate current state
  • [ ] Obsolete notes have clear reason documented
  • [ ] New relations use valid relation types and wikilink format
  • [ ] No duplicate notes remain on the same topic
  • [ ] Curation changes were confirmed by user before execution

04 同仓库更多 Skills

loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

validation-authority

Treat upstream validators as authoritative. Align local config to them. Use when validation fails unexpectedly, before modifying validator behavior, or when tempted to change upstream tool code.

★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

using-brain-memory

Guidance for using Brain semantic memory effectively. Applies Zettelkasten atomic note principles with observations and relations. Use when deciding whether to query or create notes, structuring note content, or understanding the semantic knowledge graph.

★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

threat-modeling

Structured security analysis using OWASP Four-Question Framework and STRIDE methodology. Generates threat matrices with risk ratings, mitigations, and prioritization. Use for attack surface analysis, security architecture review, or when asking what can go wrong.

★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

taste-lints

Custom lints with agent-readable remediation instructions. Enforces taste invariants (file size, naming conventions, structured logging, complexity) and surfaces errors that agents can act on directly. Use when writing or reviewing code to catch style violations early.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

style-enforcement

Validate code against style rules from .editorconfig, StyleCop.json, and Directory.Build.props. Detects line ending violations, naming convention issues, indentation problems, and charset mismatches across C#, Python, TypeScript, and JavaScript. Produces JSON reports for pre-commit hooks and CI pipelines.

★ 0
loriensleafs
loriensleafs/brain

steering-matcher

Match file paths against steering file glob patterns to determine applicable steering guidance. Use when orchestrator needs to inject context-aware guidance based on files being modified.

★ 0