go-testing-code-review
Reviews Go test code for proper table-driven tests, assertions, and coverage patterns. Use when reviewing *_test.go files.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-03
- Stars
- ★ 1
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- go-testing-code-review
- description
- Reviews Go test code for proper table-driven tests, assertions, and coverage patterns. Use when reviewing *_test.go files.
02 资源文件 3
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml165 B
- 参考文档references/mocking.md5.7 KB
- 参考文档references/structure.md5.3 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Go Testing Code Review
Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| Test structure, naming | references/structure.md |
| Mocking, interfaces | references/mocking.md |
Review Checklist
- [ ] Tests are table-driven with clear case names
- [ ] Subtests use t.Run for parallel execution
- [ ] Test names describe behavior, not implementation
- [ ] Errors include got/want with descriptive message
- [ ] Cleanup registered with t.Cleanup
- [ ] Parallel tests don't share mutable state
- [ ] Mocks use interfaces defined in test file
- [ ] Coverage includes edge cases and error paths
Critical Patterns
Table-Driven Tests
// BAD - repetitive
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
if Add(1, 2) != 3 {
t.Error("wrong")
}
if Add(0, 0) != 0 {
t.Error("wrong")
}
}
// GOOD
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
a, b int
want int
}{
{"positive numbers", 1, 2, 3},
{"zeros", 0, 0, 0},
{"negative", -1, 1, 0},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
if got != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Add(%d, %d) = %d, want %d", tt.a, tt.b, got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
Error Messages
// BAD
if got != want {
t.Error("wrong result")
}
// GOOD
if got != want {
t.Errorf("GetUser(%d) = %v, want %v", id, got, want)
}
// For complex types
if diff := cmp.Diff(want, got); diff != "" {
t.Errorf("GetUser() mismatch (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
}
Parallel Tests
func TestFoo(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct{...}
for _, tt := range tests {
tt := tt // capture (not needed Go 1.22+)
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// test code
})
}
}
Cleanup
// BAD - manual cleanup, skipped on failure
func TestWithTempFile(t *testing.T) {
f, _ := os.CreateTemp("", "test")
defer os.Remove(f.Name()) // skipped if test panics
}
// GOOD
func TestWithTempFile(t *testing.T) {
f, _ := os.CreateTemp("", "test")
t.Cleanup(func() {
os.Remove(f.Name())
})
}
Anti-Patterns
1. Testing Internal Implementation
// BAD - tests private state
func TestUser(t *testing.T) {
u := NewUser("alice")
if u.id != 1 { // testing internal field
t.Error("wrong id")
}
}
// GOOD - tests behavior
func TestUser(t *testing.T) {
u := NewUser("alice")
if u.ID() != 1 {
t.Error("wrong ID")
}
}
2. Shared Mutable State
// BAD - tests interfere with each other
var testDB = setupDB()
func TestA(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
testDB.Insert(...) // race!
}
// GOOD - isolated per test
func TestA(t *testing.T) {
db := setupTestDB(t)
t.Cleanup(func() { db.Close() })
db.Insert(...)
}
3. Assertions Without Context
// BAD
assert.Equal(t, want, got) // "expected X got Y" - which test?
// GOOD
assert.Equal(t, want, got, "user name after update")
When to Load References
- Reviewing test file structure → structure.md
- Reviewing mock implementations → mocking.md
Review Questions
- Are tests table-driven with named cases?
- Do error messages include input, got, and want?
- Are parallel tests isolated (no shared state)?
- Is cleanup done via t.Cleanup?
- Do tests verify behavior, not implementation?
04 同仓库更多 Skills
next-workflow-step
Use this skill when the user wants to transition to the next workflow step, wrap up a session cleanly, prepare a handoff, or says things like "next step", "continue the workflow", "wrap up", "hand off", "move to the next phase", "what's next in embrace", or "prepare for /clear". Also triggers when the current octo:embrace phase appears complete and no explicit next action is set.
source-discovery
This skill should be used when the user asks to "find sources", "discover URLs", "catalog a source", "classify a URL", "search for libraries", "check what exists", or mentions source discovery, URL cataloging, source classification, or research source management.
review-synthesis
This skill should be used when the user asks to "summarize review findings", "prioritize fixes", "rank review issues", "combine reviewer feedback", "create action items from review", or mentions review synthesis, finding prioritization, severity ranking, or review result summarization.
research-scoring
This skill should be used when the user asks to "score research", "check research quality", "evaluate coverage", "measure improvement", "assess research completeness", or mentions research scoring, quality metrics, coverage gaps, improvement baseline, or research pipeline status.
notebooklm-integration
This skill should be used when the user asks to "ingest into NotebookLM", "query NotebookLM", "add sources to notebook", "cross-source synthesis", "check stale sources", or mentions NotebookLM, notebook integration, source ingestion, or knowledge consolidation.
evidence-synthesis
This skill should be used when the user asks to "synthesize findings", "combine research", "cross-reference sources", "summarize evidence", "write a deep review", or mentions evidence synthesis, finding consolidation, cross-source analysis, or research summarization.