[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6CAY30HCRCZYW20YVF5PV0J":3,"skill-same:01M6CAY30HCRCZYW20YVF5PV0J":49},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":17,"publishedAt":23,"linkOnly":24,"markdownContent":25,"markdownBody":26,"frontMatter":27,"refName":28,"commitSha":29,"skillDirectory":30,"forksCount":31,"repositoryHtmlUrl":32,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":33,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":34,"install":35,"resources":48},"01M6CAY30HCRCZYW20YVF5PV0J","advice",null,"Obtain independent, revision-bound second opinions with explicit coverage and a fail-closed approval quorum.","jleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills","jleechanorg","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F221404966?v=4","01M6C1VJ99XG950X1DWPEBCBGX","01M6C1VJDK5YVDNT3362RT5WSB",6,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fportable\u002Fskills\u002Fadvice\u002FSKILL.md",[],[5,18,19,20,21,22],"coverage","approval","with","revision","second","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: advice\ndescription: Obtain independent, revision-bound second opinions with explicit coverage and a fail-closed approval quorum.\n---\n\n# Advice\n\n1. Ground the decision, constraints, exact revision or document hashes, complete changed files\u002Fdiff and relevant evidence. Give reviewers pointers to readable artifacts, not the entire conversation or a framed question; the orchestrator answers the user's question in its synthesis.\n2. Select eligible reviewers through the canonical advice tiers before using [parallelize-to-ceiling](..\u002Fparallelize-to-ceiling\u002FSKILL.md) for any admitted native reviewer lanes within current authorized capacity. Reviewers must read the complete assigned material independently. Preserve their identity, revision, coverage and raw verdict as review evidence.\n3. Follow the canonical lifecycle-selected quorum and advice reviewer-class caps. One full-scope reviewer suffices only for an eligible one-vote route; stricter and mandatory two-vote obligations remain. Research and the orchestrator do not vote. A competent objection can block; unavailable or partial coverage cannot satisfy quorum. Report APPROVED, NOT APPROVED or WITHHELD, with findings and missing coverage.\n4. Run [research](..\u002Fresearch\u002FSKILL.md) only when a separate unanswered source question warrants a lane; keep it outside the approval quorum. External browser review is a separate [web-advice](..\u002Fweb-advice\u002FSKILL.md) route requiring the applicable recipient\u002Fcontent authorization and the canonical last-tier admission; availability alone grants no disclosure permission.\n5. Bind findings to paths\u002Flines and the exact source revision. After a head move, inspect the delta and changed external artifacts. Material changes need fresh review. A nonbehavioral delta may be explicitly reaffirmed only with prior coverage, provenance and the new delta reviewed; never relabel old evidence.\n6. Preserve completed results and retry only concretely failed lanes. Read supporting artifacts before relying on a reviewer summary. Resolve findings or report why approval is withheld.\n7. Save the bounded synthesis in the authorized workspace. Publishing a gist, PR comment, or private source to an outside provider is not implicit. Missing transport means missing coverage, not permission to bypass access controls.\n8. Every reviewer gets a cold, verbatim, static-review-owned prompt (only its specified fields filled) plus a fixed per-channel preamble; the receipt records the exact prompt, and any deviation voids the vote. Load `${CLAUDE_HOME:-$HOME\u002F.claude}\u002Fskills\u002Fadvice\u002FSKILL.md`, the canonical owner, not this portable summary. Follow its §2 for capability tiers, at-most-one-Dot counting, aggregate static\u002FHermes caps and web-last fallback. This package does not ship that owner: if it is absent or resolves back to this summary, record scheduling `UNAVAILABLE` and the review `WITHHELD`; never invent the missing policy. Retain eligible earlier-tier votes under the canonical quorum, independence and substitution rules. Record each unavailable seat as host, CLI or static reviewer, attempted or skipped, time and reason, and tell the user. Static-review votes need the canonical `\u002Fstatic-review` skill's verbatim templates and preambles; this portable package does not ship them, so where that skill is not installed, record static review as UNAVAILABLE rather than improvising a prompt.\n","# Advice\n\n1. Ground the decision, constraints, exact revision or document hashes, complete changed files\u002Fdiff and relevant evidence. Give reviewers pointers to readable artifacts, not the entire conversation or a framed question; the orchestrator answers the user's question in its synthesis.\n2. Select eligible reviewers through the canonical advice tiers before using [parallelize-to-ceiling](..\u002Fparallelize-to-ceiling\u002FSKILL.md) for any admitted native reviewer lanes within current authorized capacity. Reviewers must read the complete assigned material independently. Preserve their identity, revision, coverage and raw verdict as review evidence.\n3. Follow the canonical lifecycle-selected quorum and advice reviewer-class caps. One full-scope reviewer suffices only for an eligible one-vote route; stricter and mandatory two-vote obligations remain. Research and the orchestrator do not vote. A competent objection can block; unavailable or partial coverage cannot satisfy quorum. Report APPROVED, NOT APPROVED or WITHHELD, with findings and missing coverage.\n4. Run [research](..\u002Fresearch\u002FSKILL.md) only when a separate unanswered source question warrants a lane; keep it outside the approval quorum. External browser review is a separate [web-advice](..\u002Fweb-advice\u002FSKILL.md) route requiring the applicable recipient\u002Fcontent authorization and the canonical last-tier admission; availability alone grants no disclosure permission.\n5. Bind findings to paths\u002Flines and the exact source revision. After a head move, inspect the delta and changed external artifacts. Material changes need fresh review. A nonbehavioral delta may be explicitly reaffirmed only with prior coverage, provenance and the new delta reviewed; never relabel old evidence.\n6. Preserve completed results and retry only concretely failed lanes. Read supporting artifacts before relying on a reviewer summary. Resolve findings or report why approval is withheld.\n7. Save the bounded synthesis in the authorized workspace. Publishing a gist, PR comment, or private source to an outside provider is not implicit. Missing transport means missing coverage, not permission to bypass access controls.\n8. Every reviewer gets a cold, verbatim, static-review-owned prompt (only its specified fields filled) plus a fixed per-channel preamble; the receipt records the exact prompt, and any deviation voids the vote. Load `${CLAUDE_HOME:-$HOME\u002F.claude}\u002Fskills\u002Fadvice\u002FSKILL.md`, the canonical owner, not this portable summary. Follow its §2 for capability tiers, at-most-one-Dot counting, aggregate static\u002FHermes caps and web-last fallback. This package does not ship that owner: if it is absent or resolves back to this summary, record scheduling `UNAVAILABLE` and the review `WITHHELD`; never invent the missing policy. Retain eligible earlier-tier votes under the canonical quorum, independence and substitution rules. Record each unavailable seat as host, CLI or static reviewer, attempted or skipped, time and reason, and tell the user. Static-review votes need the canonical `\u002Fstatic-review` skill's verbatim templates and preambles; this portable package does not ship them, so where that skill is not installed, record static review as UNAVAILABLE rather than improvising a prompt.\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","d57b06df00b496fc5debe2002b49987696f02a8c","portable\u002Fskills\u002Fadvice",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg","2026-11-12 14:45:07",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":36,"prompt":46,"zipAvailable":47},[37,40,43],{"tool":38,"command":39},"npx","npx skills add jleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills --skill advice",{"tool":41,"command":42},"bunx","bunx skills add jleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills --skill advice",{"tool":44,"command":45},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add jleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills --skill advice","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fportable\u002Fskills\u002Fadvice\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[50,68,90,104,118,134],{"skillNo":51,"name":52,"nameZh":6,"description":53,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":54,"categories":55,"keywords":56,"publishedAt":23},"01M716Y5MTJ6GYJZ2ATXCJK8G4","instinct","Use when the user invokes \u002Finstinct or \u002Fin, or asks to \"message Instinct\", \"ask Instinct\", \"tell Instinct\", \"check Instinct\", or read replies from the configured peer assistant. iMessage first, WhatsApp Web as fallback.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Finstinct\u002FSKILL.md",[],[52,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67],"user","when","replies","check","use","identity","whatsapp","gmail","read","message","ask",{"skillNo":69,"name":70,"nameZh":6,"description":71,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":72,"categories":73,"keywords":79,"publishedAt":23},"01M716Y4HF7FVVMJSA2CCVN5VF","hr","Compatibility alias for history-resume; produce the same fresh-state, provenance-aware resume briefing.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fhr\u002FSKILL.md",[74],{"categoryNo":75,"categoryName":76,"taxonomyType":77,"taxonomyTypeDesc":78},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000038","人力资源","PROFESSION","适用职业",[70,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89],"resume","compatibility","provenance","for","history","produce","alias","briefing","state","fresh",{"skillNo":91,"name":92,"nameZh":6,"description":93,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":94,"categories":95,"keywords":97,"publishedAt":23},"01M716Y1FFNFKFJYYKF8HQA6T8","history-resume","Resume briefing for the current repository branch or worktree using fresh state and admitted history sources.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fhistory-resume\u002FSKILL.md",[96],{"categoryNo":75,"categoryName":76,"taxonomyType":77,"taxonomyTypeDesc":78},[84,80,98,99,57,100,87,101,83,102,103,88,89],"history resume","branch","analysis","repository","worktree","sources",{"skillNo":105,"name":106,"nameZh":6,"description":107,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":108,"categories":109,"keywords":110,"publishedAt":23},"01M716XWXJ8EPHK4RH9T14TR85","grok","Alias for the canonical grokbot browser conversation workflow; \u002Fgrok talks to the Grok bot the same way \u002Fdot talks to Dot.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fgrok\u002FSKILL.md",[],[106,111,112,113,83,114,86,115,116,117],"dot","bot","workflow","canonical","conversation","browser","grokbot",{"skillNo":119,"name":120,"nameZh":6,"description":121,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":122,"categories":123,"keywords":124,"publishedAt":23},"01M70N9Q07DTE0EW5KFXMMMSJ0","codexa-bench","Compare `codexa` and normal `codex` on a fair split of comparable work by default; use `--strict` for duplicate runs of the exact same task.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fcodexa-bench\u002FSKILL.md",[],[125,126,127,61,128,83,129,130,131,132,133],"codexa bench","work","split","default","duplicate","task","compare","normal","codex",{"skillNo":135,"name":136,"nameZh":6,"description":137,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":138,"licenseFileUrl":139,"sourceHtmlUrl":140,"categories":141,"keywords":153,"publishedAt":23},"01M6C24S2X60SP8BBFGAEKPEGW","frontend-design","Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML\u002FCSS layouts, or when styling\u002Fbeautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Ffrontend-design\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Ffrontend-design\u002FSKILL.md",[142,147,150],{"categoryNo":143,"categoryName":144,"taxonomyType":145,"taxonomyTypeDesc":146},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":148,"categoryName":149,"taxonomyType":145,"taxonomyTypeDesc":146},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000015","视觉设计",{"categoryNo":151,"categoryName":152,"taxonomyType":77,"taxonomyTypeDesc":78},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000032","设计师",[154,155,156,61,157,158,159,57,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,20,175,176,58,177],"frontend","design","frontend design","generic","ui design","react","html","components","code","artifacts","ui","aesthetics","Production","web components","landing","applications","quality","web","css","create","examples","react components","web ui","pages"]