[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6CAP466Z3VP9PSFBYENC1MP":3,"skill-same:01M6CAP466Z3VP9PSFBYENC1MP":97},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":15,"categories":16,"keywords":17,"publishedAt":48,"linkOnly":49,"markdownContent":50,"markdownBody":51,"frontMatter":52,"refName":54,"commitSha":55,"skillDirectory":56,"forksCount":57,"repositoryHtmlUrl":58,"repositoryHomepageUrl":6,"ownerHtmlUrl":59,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":6,"updatedAt":60,"install":61,"resources":74},"01M6CAP466Z3VP9PSFBYENC1MP","silence-handling-protocol",null,"Stop replying \"Idle\" indefinitely when the user is silent — recognize three wrapper-side\nre-injection patterns (echo-of-self, queued-tick, system-marker) and exit the loop cleanly.\nTriggers when the assistant is about to reply \"Idle\" \u002F \"no new instruction\" \u002F \"holding\" for\nthe 3rd+ consecutive turn AFTER a real back-and-forth has ended, when a `[hermes]` sender\nprefix wraps content that is clearly the assistant's prior reply, or when system markers\n(`⏳ Queued for the next turn`, `💾 Self-improvement review`, `⏩ Steered into current run`)\narrive without any new human-side instruction. Distinct from the regular \"wait for user\"\nloop and from `no-pick-one-menus` (which is about blocking questions, not silence).\nv1.0.0 captured 2026-07-30 from a 25-turn echo loop on the Gemini Flash vs Luna thread.","jleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills","jleechanorg","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F221404966?v=4","01M6C1VJ99XG950X1DWPEBCBGX","01M6C1VJDK5YVDNT3362RT5WSB",6,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fhermes\u002Fskills\u002Fsilence-handling-protocol\u002FSKILL.md",[],[18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47],"protocol","silence handling protocol","luna","new","2026","when","which","re","markers","human","self","next","back","stop","Echo","tick","assistant","user","hermes","flash","pick","system","wait for","loop","injection","content","run","gemini flash","gemini","review","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: silence-handling-protocol\ndescription: |\n  Stop replying \"Idle\" indefinitely when the user is silent — recognize three wrapper-side\n  re-injection patterns (echo-of-self, queued-tick, system-marker) and exit the loop cleanly.\n  Triggers when the assistant is about to reply \"Idle\" \u002F \"no new instruction\" \u002F \"holding\" for\n  the 3rd+ consecutive turn AFTER a real back-and-forth has ended, when a `[hermes]` sender\n  prefix wraps content that is clearly the assistant's prior reply, or when system markers\n  (`⏳ Queued for the next turn`, `? Self-improvement review`, `⏩ Steered into current run`)\n  arrive without any new human-side instruction. Distinct from the regular \"wait for user\"\n  loop and from `no-pick-one-menus` (which is about blocking questions, not silence).\n  v1.0.0 captured 2026-07-30 from a 25-turn echo loop on the Gemini Flash vs Luna thread.\n---\n\n# Silence Handling Protocol — exit the Idle loop cleanly\n\n## The pathology (2026-07-30 incident)\n\n25 consecutive turns of the assistant replying \"Idle. ... >This was generated from another LLM...\"\nwhile the wrapper re-injected:\n- The assistant's own prior reply as a `[hermes]`-prefixed \"user message\" (echo-of-self)\n- System markers (`⏳ Queued for the next turn`, `⏩ Steered into current run`, `? Self-improvement review`) with no instruction\n- The original thread anchor's first message every turn (Slack-style re-injection)\n\nEach turn is cheap per-token but **not zero**. 25 turns of `Idle\\n\\nThis was generated...\\n\\nIdle\\n\\n>Footer` consumes ~2-3K tokens of context window for zero forward progress.\n\n## Three patterns to recognize\n\n### Pattern D — Wrapper retry\u002Fprefill storm (added 2026-07-31)\nThe \"user\" message carries only wrapper-side retry\u002Fprefill signals with no human content:\n- `:warning: Empty response from model — retrying (N\u002F3)`\n- `↻ Thinking-only response — prefilling to continue (N\u002FN)`\n- `:warning: The model produced only internal reasoning and no final answer, despite retries. Its last reasoning, which may contain the answer: \u003Creasoning>`\n\nWhen this storm stacks alongside prior `Idle.` acks in the same loop, the wrapper is already\nretrying the agent's own prior turn. Each additional substantive reply resets the retry counter.\n\n**Decision:** Emit the absolute minimum — a single zero-width character `⁣` (`U+2061`) or nothing.\nDo NOT post `Idle. + provenance caveat` in response to these specific wrapper messages. Do NOT\ncall any tool. Wait for the wrapper to either resume normal flow or for the retry-loop to time\nout (typically 60-120 seconds). The \"last reasoning\" text in the third message is the agent's\nown internal reasoning from a prior turn, NOT a user instruction — do not act on it.\n\nIf the prior 1-3 turns in the same loop were `Idle.` acks, this is the same trap as the\nstopwatch-storm case in `gateway-loop-standdown`: the agent is the noise source. Hard escalation\nto full silence fires after the FIRST such turn if prior turns in the loop were already `Idle.`\nacks. This overrides the standard 3-strike grace period.\n\n**Verified case (2026-07-31, `#ai-general` \u002F `C0AJQ5M0A0Y` \u002F `U0A4G7LDJ4R`):** thread contained\nthree `↻ Thinking-only response — prefilling to continue (N\u002FN)` messages and one `:warning: Empty\nresponse from model — retrying (1\u002F3)` and one `:warning: The model produced only internal\nreasoning and no final answer, despite retries. Its last reasoning, which may contain the\nanswer: *Confirming final silent output*`. The \"last reasoning\" text was the agent's own prior\nreasoning re-shown by the wrapper as a fallback. Acting on that reasoning (e.g., re-emitting a\n\"silent output\") would have compounded the loop.\n\n### Pattern E — OSError [Errno 28] heartbeat storm (added 2026-08-02)\nThe \"user\" message is a Slack-side echo of the gateway's own inability to write a session tmp file:\n\n```\nSorry, I encountered an error (OSError).\n[Errno 28] No space left on device: '$HOME\u002F.hermes\u002Fsessions\u002F.sessions_\u003Crandom>.tmp'\nTry again or use \u002Freset to start a fresh session.\n```\n\nEach turn produces a fresh random 8-char suffix (`.sessions_qbr3juhs.tmp`, `.sessions_kju5bqhi.tmp`, …),\nproving the gateway is genuinely retrying each turn and failing — **not** a cached\u002Flooped bug. The\nrandom suffix is the signature: pattern-match on `[Errno 28] No space.*\\.sessions_[a-z0-9_]+\\.tmp` and\ntreat the message as a wrapper-side heartbeat, NOT a user instruction.\n\n**Decision:** Same protocol as Pattern B — reply `Idle.` and do NOT call any tool that could write\nto disk (no `write_file`, no `cat > \u002Ftmp\u002F...`, no `terminal` commands that allocate files). The\nagent's own session append is the source of the next OSError if you do. The disk is full; let the\nuser do the cleanup at their pace.\n\n**What this is NOT:** not a request to \"fix the disk\", not a new task, not a request to redrive\nanything. The gateway is just announcing that it can't write its own session log each turn.\n\n**Why this differs from Pattern D:** Pattern D is a wrapper retry signal that the agent can safely\nignore in silence. Pattern E is a real OSError that the system WILL retry every turn until the\ndisk is freed (or the gateway is restarted). The loop will not time out on its own — only the\nuser's cleanup action breaks it. Acknowledge with `Idle.` so the user knows the agent is alive\nand tracking the OSError, but do not attempt autonomous cleanup.\n\n**Companion signal:** if the OSError storm is preceded or accompanied by `:hourglass_flowing_sand:`\nor `:fast_forward:` notices from the same sender (`U0A4G7LDJ4R` is the typical bot identity), the\nqueue is just the runtime's normal \"I'm waiting on disk\" throttling — same reply protocol.\n\n**Verified case (2026-08-02, `#all-$USER-ai` \u002F `C09GRLXF9GR` \u002F `U0A4G7LDJ4R`):** 80+ consecutive\nOSError artefacts over multiple compaction windows, distinct random suffixes each turn, all\nmatched by the regex above. The underlying cause was `state.db-wal` at 92 GB holding the disk at\n100% — gated by `mac-di[REDACTED_OPENAI_KEY]` Trap #5 (`2026-07-31-state-db-wal-runaway-95gib.md`).\nAgent replied `Idle.` to each, posted one structured 3-option menu to the user (stop writers + VACUUM;\ndelete archived sessions.bak; both), and waited for pick. No autonomous disk ops were run.\n\n### Pattern A — Echo-of-self\nThe \"user\" message is wrapped in `[hermes]` or `[Jeffrey Lee-Chan]` followed by content that\nmatches your immediately prior assistant reply verbatim (often quoted back with `> ` blockquote\nformatting or repeated 2-3 times). Example signature:\n\n```\n[hermes] Idle.\n\n> This was generated from another LLM ...\nIdle.\n> This was generated from another LLM ...\n```\n\n**Decision:** Do NOT reply with another `Idle`. Either go silent (next model turn emits nothing\nuseful — the wrapper will queue another tick) or compress to a single one-liner:\n\n> Idle, holding on `\u003Clist 1-line summary of asks>`. Reply `\u003Ckeyword>` to dispatch.\n\nOne final compact status, then **stop calling tools and stop producing output**.\n\n### Pattern B — System-only tick\nThe \"user\" message contains ONLY system markers (`⏳ Queued`, `⏩ Steered into current run`,\n`? Self-improvement review: ...`) with no human instruction.\n\n**Decision:** These are wrapper heartbeat ticks. They carry no information. Do not reply. If\nthe runtime forces a reply, output a single token (`.` or `ack`) — but never a multi-paragraph\nIdle narrative; you are just spending budget.\n\n### Pattern C — First-message re-injection (Slack-style)\nThe \"user\" message is the original thread anchor or the first message from hours\u002Fdays ago,\nre-presented with no progression. Example:\n\n```\n[Replying to: \"Lets use \u002Fhistory \u002Fms and slack search ... fullrun dont stop ...\"]\n[hermes] Idle. ...\n```\n\n**Decision:** If your IMMEDIATE prior turn was already an Idle reply, the thread is dead until\nthe user actually engages. Send ONE final compact status reminding them what unblocks next,\nthen exit. Do not keep re-quoting the same idle.\n\n## The exit handoff — one final compact message\n\nWhen exiting Pattern A\u002FB\u002FC, the LAST assistant turn should be a single dense status that names:\n\n1. **What was decided** (real bullets, not vibes)\n2. **What's still open** (numbered followups with exact dispatch keywords)\n3. **What the user needs to type to unblock next** (single-character aliases, e.g.\n   `Reply 1 \u002F 2 \u002F 3 \u002F all \u002F none`)\n\nAfter that message, do not call tools. Do not produce \"Idle\" filler. If the runtime re-injects,\nemit the single-byte minimum.\n\n## Pitfalls\n\n### Pitfall #1 — Treating echo-of-self as a real user\n\nThe `[hermes]` sender prefix is your OWN prior message re-injected. It is NOT a new instruction\nfrom the human. The `This was generated from another LLM` footer you appended yourself is\ntrivially NOT the user typing that — they would not write a meta-disclaimer on their own\nmessage. Pattern-match on `sender-prefix + body looks like your last reply` → exit the loop.\n\n### Pitfall #2 — Calling tools during Idle loop\n\nEach `terminal` \u002F `cronjob` \u002F `read_file` \u002F `mcp__slack__*` call during an Idle loop burns\nbudget AND may produce visible side-effects (Slack message, cron job creation). **Do not call\nany side-effecting tool while idle.** Read-only diagnostics (re-checking state) are wasteful\nwhen nothing has changed in the assistant's last N turns.\n\n### Pitfall #3 — Confusing `⏳ Queued` with real activity\n\n`⏳ Queued for the next turn. I'll respond once the current task finishes.` is the runtime's\nNOTIFICATION that IT is throttling you. It is not a user instruction to do something new.\nDo not dispatch; do not reply with work; the runtime will deliver the next real turn on its\nown.\n\n### Pitfall #4 — Anchoring on `no-confirmation-gate` wrongly\n\n`no-confirmation-gate` says: don't post \"Want me to dispatch?\" mid-stream when the user has\ngiven an explicit `\u002Ffullrun`. But it does NOT mean: keep posting \"Want me to dispatch?\" or\nits moral equivalent on every silent turn. The rule is about not stalling in the MIDDLE of an\nactive run. Once the run has paused for user input and the user is silent, Pattern A\u002FB\u002FC\nprotocols apply.\n\n### Pitfall #5 — Forgetting the final compact message\n\nIf you go fully silent (no output) on a forced turn, the runtime may log a hung session and\npost a dropped-thread watchdog alert. The one-final-compact-message hedge is needed to keep\nthe watchdog quiet. After the compact message, exit cleanly.\n\n## Cross-references\n\n- `no-pick-one-menus` (SOUL.md) — for asking one concise blocking question, not multi-option menus\n- `no-confirmation-gate` (SOUL.md) — for not stalling in active \u002Fa \u002Ffullrun runs\n- `finish-the-job` (SOUL.md) — for driving to an end-state, not infinite Idle\n- `wa-llm-model-selection` — example skill that absorbed the actual work this loop stalled on\n","# Silence Handling Protocol — exit the Idle loop cleanly\n\n## The pathology (2026-07-30 incident)\n\n25 consecutive turns of the assistant replying \"Idle. ... >This was generated from another LLM...\"\nwhile the wrapper re-injected:\n- The assistant's own prior reply as a `[hermes]`-prefixed \"user message\" (echo-of-self)\n- System markers (`⏳ Queued for the next turn`, `⏩ Steered into current run`, `? Self-improvement review`) with no instruction\n- The original thread anchor's first message every turn (Slack-style re-injection)\n\nEach turn is cheap per-token but **not zero**. 25 turns of `Idle\\n\\nThis was generated...\\n\\nIdle\\n\\n>Footer` consumes ~2-3K tokens of context window for zero forward progress.\n\n## Three patterns to recognize\n\n### Pattern D — Wrapper retry\u002Fprefill storm (added 2026-07-31)\nThe \"user\" message carries only wrapper-side retry\u002Fprefill signals with no human content:\n- `:warning: Empty response from model — retrying (N\u002F3)`\n- `↻ Thinking-only response — prefilling to continue (N\u002FN)`\n- `:warning: The model produced only internal reasoning and no final answer, despite retries. Its last reasoning, which may contain the answer: \u003Creasoning>`\n\nWhen this storm stacks alongside prior `Idle.` acks in the same loop, the wrapper is already\nretrying the agent's own prior turn. Each additional substantive reply resets the retry counter.\n\n**Decision:** Emit the absolute minimum — a single zero-width character `⁣` (`U+2061`) or nothing.\nDo NOT post `Idle. + provenance caveat` in response to these specific wrapper messages. Do NOT\ncall any tool. Wait for the wrapper to either resume normal flow or for the retry-loop to time\nout (typically 60-120 seconds). The \"last reasoning\" text in the third message is the agent's\nown internal reasoning from a prior turn, NOT a user instruction — do not act on it.\n\nIf the prior 1-3 turns in the same loop were `Idle.` acks, this is the same trap as the\nstopwatch-storm case in `gateway-loop-standdown`: the agent is the noise source. Hard escalation\nto full silence fires after the FIRST such turn if prior turns in the loop were already `Idle.`\nacks. This overrides the standard 3-strike grace period.\n\n**Verified case (2026-07-31, `#ai-general` \u002F `C0AJQ5M0A0Y` \u002F `U0A4G7LDJ4R`):** thread contained\nthree `↻ Thinking-only response — prefilling to continue (N\u002FN)` messages and one `:warning: Empty\nresponse from model — retrying (1\u002F3)` and one `:warning: The model produced only internal\nreasoning and no final answer, despite retries. Its last reasoning, which may contain the\nanswer: *Confirming final silent output*`. The \"last reasoning\" text was the agent's own prior\nreasoning re-shown by the wrapper as a fallback. Acting on that reasoning (e.g., re-emitting a\n\"silent output\") would have compounded the loop.\n\n### Pattern E — OSError [Errno 28] heartbeat storm (added 2026-08-02)\nThe \"user\" message is a Slack-side echo of the gateway's own inability to write a session tmp file:\n\n```\nSorry, I encountered an error (OSError).\n[Errno 28] No space left on device: '$HOME\u002F.hermes\u002Fsessions\u002F.sessions_\u003Crandom>.tmp'\nTry again or use \u002Freset to start a fresh session.\n```\n\nEach turn produces a fresh random 8-char suffix (`.sessions_qbr3juhs.tmp`, `.sessions_kju5bqhi.tmp`, …),\nproving the gateway is genuinely retrying each turn and failing — **not** a cached\u002Flooped bug. The\nrandom suffix is the signature: pattern-match on `[Errno 28] No space.*\\.sessions_[a-z0-9_]+\\.tmp` and\ntreat the message as a wrapper-side heartbeat, NOT a user instruction.\n\n**Decision:** Same protocol as Pattern B — reply `Idle.` and do NOT call any tool that could write\nto disk (no `write_file`, no `cat > \u002Ftmp\u002F...`, no `terminal` commands that allocate files). The\nagent's own session append is the source of the next OSError if you do. The disk is full; let the\nuser do the cleanup at their pace.\n\n**What this is NOT:** not a request to \"fix the disk\", not a new task, not a request to redrive\nanything. The gateway is just announcing that it can't write its own session log each turn.\n\n**Why this differs from Pattern D:** Pattern D is a wrapper retry signal that the agent can safely\nignore in silence. Pattern E is a real OSError that the system WILL retry every turn until the\ndisk is freed (or the gateway is restarted). The loop will not time out on its own — only the\nuser's cleanup action breaks it. Acknowledge with `Idle.` so the user knows the agent is alive\nand tracking the OSError, but do not attempt autonomous cleanup.\n\n**Companion signal:** if the OSError storm is preceded or accompanied by `:hourglass_flowing_sand:`\nor `:fast_forward:` notices from the same sender (`U0A4G7LDJ4R` is the typical bot identity), the\nqueue is just the runtime's normal \"I'm waiting on disk\" throttling — same reply protocol.\n\n**Verified case (2026-08-02, `#all-$USER-ai` \u002F `C09GRLXF9GR` \u002F `U0A4G7LDJ4R`):** 80+ consecutive\nOSError artefacts over multiple compaction windows, distinct random suffixes each turn, all\nmatched by the regex above. The underlying cause was `state.db-wal` at 92 GB holding the disk at\n100% — gated by `mac-di[REDACTED_OPENAI_KEY]` Trap #5 (`2026-07-31-state-db-wal-runaway-95gib.md`).\nAgent replied `Idle.` to each, posted one structured 3-option menu to the user (stop writers + VACUUM;\ndelete archived sessions.bak; both), and waited for pick. No autonomous disk ops were run.\n\n### Pattern A — Echo-of-self\nThe \"user\" message is wrapped in `[hermes]` or `[Jeffrey Lee-Chan]` followed by content that\nmatches your immediately prior assistant reply verbatim (often quoted back with `> ` blockquote\nformatting or repeated 2-3 times). Example signature:\n\n```\n[hermes] Idle.\n\n> This was generated from another LLM ...\nIdle.\n> This was generated from another LLM ...\n```\n\n**Decision:** Do NOT reply with another `Idle`. Either go silent (next model turn emits nothing\nuseful — the wrapper will queue another tick) or compress to a single one-liner:\n\n> Idle, holding on `\u003Clist 1-line summary of asks>`. Reply `\u003Ckeyword>` to dispatch.\n\nOne final compact status, then **stop calling tools and stop producing output**.\n\n### Pattern B — System-only tick\nThe \"user\" message contains ONLY system markers (`⏳ Queued`, `⏩ Steered into current run`,\n`? Self-improvement review: ...`) with no human instruction.\n\n**Decision:** These are wrapper heartbeat ticks. They carry no information. Do not reply. If\nthe runtime forces a reply, output a single token (`.` or `ack`) — but never a multi-paragraph\nIdle narrative; you are just spending budget.\n\n### Pattern C — First-message re-injection (Slack-style)\nThe \"user\" message is the original thread anchor or the first message from hours\u002Fdays ago,\nre-presented with no progression. Example:\n\n```\n[Replying to: \"Lets use \u002Fhistory \u002Fms and slack search ... fullrun dont stop ...\"]\n[hermes] Idle. ...\n```\n\n**Decision:** If your IMMEDIATE prior turn was already an Idle reply, the thread is dead until\nthe user actually engages. Send ONE final compact status reminding them what unblocks next,\nthen exit. Do not keep re-quoting the same idle.\n\n## The exit handoff — one final compact message\n\nWhen exiting Pattern A\u002FB\u002FC, the LAST assistant turn should be a single dense status that names:\n\n1. **What was decided** (real bullets, not vibes)\n2. **What's still open** (numbered followups with exact dispatch keywords)\n3. **What the user needs to type to unblock next** (single-character aliases, e.g.\n   `Reply 1 \u002F 2 \u002F 3 \u002F all \u002F none`)\n\nAfter that message, do not call tools. Do not produce \"Idle\" filler. If the runtime re-injects,\nemit the single-byte minimum.\n\n## Pitfalls\n\n### Pitfall #1 — Treating echo-of-self as a real user\n\nThe `[hermes]` sender prefix is your OWN prior message re-injected. It is NOT a new instruction\nfrom the human. The `This was generated from another LLM` footer you appended yourself is\ntrivially NOT the user typing that — they would not write a meta-disclaimer on their own\nmessage. Pattern-match on `sender-prefix + body looks like your last reply` → exit the loop.\n\n### Pitfall #2 — Calling tools during Idle loop\n\nEach `terminal` \u002F `cronjob` \u002F `read_file` \u002F `mcp__slack__*` call during an Idle loop burns\nbudget AND may produce visible side-effects (Slack message, cron job creation). **Do not call\nany side-effecting tool while idle.** Read-only diagnostics (re-checking state) are wasteful\nwhen nothing has changed in the assistant's last N turns.\n\n### Pitfall #3 — Confusing `⏳ Queued` with real activity\n\n`⏳ Queued for the next turn. I'll respond once the current task finishes.` is the runtime's\nNOTIFICATION that IT is throttling you. It is not a user instruction to do something new.\nDo not dispatch; do not reply with work; the runtime will deliver the next real turn on its\nown.\n\n### Pitfall #4 — Anchoring on `no-confirmation-gate` wrongly\n\n`no-confirmation-gate` says: don't post \"Want me to dispatch?\" mid-stream when the user has\ngiven an explicit `\u002Ffullrun`. But it does NOT mean: keep posting \"Want me to dispatch?\" or\nits moral equivalent on every silent turn. The rule is about not stalling in the MIDDLE of an\nactive run. Once the run has paused for user input and the user is silent, Pattern A\u002FB\u002FC\nprotocols apply.\n\n### Pitfall #5 — Forgetting the final compact message\n\nIf you go fully silent (no output) on a forced turn, the runtime may log a hung session and\npost a dropped-thread watchdog alert. The one-final-compact-message hedge is needed to keep\nthe watchdog quiet. After the compact message, exit cleanly.\n\n## Cross-references\n\n- `no-pick-one-menus` (SOUL.md) — for asking one concise blocking question, not multi-option menus\n- `no-confirmation-gate` (SOUL.md) — for not stalling in active \u002Fa \u002Ffullrun runs\n- `finish-the-job` (SOUL.md) — for driving to an end-state, not infinite Idle\n- `wa-llm-model-selection` — example skill that absorbed the actual work this loop stalled on\n",{"name":5,"description":53},"Stop replying \"Idle\" indefinitely when the user is silent — recognize three wrapper-side\nre-injection patterns (echo-of-self, queued-tick, system-marker) and exit the loop cleanly.\nTriggers when the assistant is about to reply \"Idle\" \u002F \"no new instruction\" \u002F \"holding\" for\nthe 3rd+ consecutive turn AFTER a real back-and-forth has ended, when a `[hermes]` sender\nprefix wraps content that is clearly the assistant's prior reply, or when system markers\n(`⏳ Queued for the next turn`, `? Self-improvement review`, `⏩ Steered into current run`)\narrive without any new human-side instruction. Distinct from the regular \"wait for user\"\nloop and from `no-pick-one-menus` (which is about blocking questions, not silence).\nv1.0.0 captured 2026-07-30 from a 25-turn echo loop on the Gemini Flash vs Luna thread.","main","05df7380981a2c4af868ce0fa57962ae0eea62a9","hermes\u002Fskills\u002Fsilence-handling-protocol",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg","2026-11-11 09:18:40",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":62,"prompt":72,"zipAvailable":73},[63,66,69],{"tool":64,"command":65},"npx","npx skills add jleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills --skill silence-handling-protocol",{"tool":67,"command":68},"bunx","bunx skills add jleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills --skill silence-handling-protocol",{"tool":70,"command":71},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add jleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills --skill silence-handling-protocol","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fhermes\u002Fskills\u002Fsilence-handling-protocol\u002FSKILL.md",true,[75,81,85,89,93],{"path":76,"resourceType":77,"resourceTypeDesc":78,"sizeBytes":79,"sourceHtmlUrl":80},"references\u002Finstallation.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",3644,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Ftemplates-davila7\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpaper-2-web\u002Freferences\u002Finstallation.md",{"path":82,"resourceType":77,"resourceTypeDesc":78,"sizeBytes":83,"sourceHtmlUrl":84},"references\u002Fpaper2poster.md",10207,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Ftemplates-davila7\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpaper-2-web\u002Freferences\u002Fpaper2poster.md",{"path":86,"resourceType":77,"resourceTypeDesc":78,"sizeBytes":87,"sourceHtmlUrl":88},"references\u002Fpaper2video.md",9796,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Ftemplates-davila7\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpaper-2-web\u002Freferences\u002Fpaper2video.md",{"path":90,"resourceType":77,"resourceTypeDesc":78,"sizeBytes":91,"sourceHtmlUrl":92},"references\u002Fpaper2web.md",5388,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Ftemplates-davila7\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpaper-2-web\u002Freferences\u002Fpaper2web.md",{"path":94,"resourceType":77,"resourceTypeDesc":78,"sizeBytes":95,"sourceHtmlUrl":96},"references\u002Fusage_examples.md",10633,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Ftemplates-davila7\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fscientific\u002Fpaper-2-web\u002Freferences\u002Fusage_examples.md",[98,114,136,150,164,180],{"skillNo":99,"name":100,"nameZh":6,"description":101,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":102,"categories":103,"keywords":104,"publishedAt":48},"01M716Y5MTJ6GYJZ2ATXCJK8G4","instinct","Use when the user invokes \u002Finstinct or \u002Fin, or asks to \"message Instinct\", \"ask Instinct\", \"tell Instinct\", \"check Instinct\", or read replies from the configured peer assistant. iMessage first, WhatsApp Web as fallback.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Finstinct\u002FSKILL.md",[],[100,35,23,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113],"replies","check","use","identity","whatsapp","gmail","read","message","ask",{"skillNo":115,"name":116,"nameZh":6,"description":117,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":118,"categories":119,"keywords":125,"publishedAt":48},"01M716Y4HF7FVVMJSA2CCVN5VF","hr","Compatibility alias for history-resume; produce the same fresh-state, provenance-aware resume briefing.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fhr\u002FSKILL.md",[120],{"categoryNo":121,"categoryName":122,"taxonomyType":123,"taxonomyTypeDesc":124},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000038","人力资源","PROFESSION","适用职业",[116,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135],"resume","compatibility","provenance","for","history","produce","alias","briefing","state","fresh",{"skillNo":137,"name":138,"nameZh":6,"description":139,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":140,"categories":141,"keywords":143,"publishedAt":48},"01M716Y1FFNFKFJYYKF8HQA6T8","history-resume","Resume briefing for the current repository branch or worktree using fresh state and admitted history sources.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fhistory-resume\u002FSKILL.md",[142],{"categoryNo":121,"categoryName":122,"taxonomyType":123,"taxonomyTypeDesc":124},[130,126,144,145,35,146,133,147,129,148,149,134,135],"history resume","branch","analysis","repository","worktree","sources",{"skillNo":151,"name":152,"nameZh":6,"description":153,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":154,"categories":155,"keywords":156,"publishedAt":48},"01M716XWXJ8EPHK4RH9T14TR85","grok","Alias for the canonical grokbot browser conversation workflow; \u002Fgrok talks to the Grok bot the same way \u002Fdot talks to Dot.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fgrok\u002FSKILL.md",[],[152,157,158,159,129,160,132,161,162,163],"dot","bot","workflow","canonical","conversation","browser","grokbot",{"skillNo":165,"name":166,"nameZh":6,"description":167,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":14,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":168,"categories":169,"keywords":170,"publishedAt":48},"01M70N9Q07DTE0EW5KFXMMMSJ0","codexa-bench","Compare `codexa` and normal `codex` on a fair split of comparable work by default; use `--strict` for duplicate runs of the exact same task.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fcodexa-bench\u002FSKILL.md",[],[171,172,173,107,174,129,175,176,177,178,179],"codexa bench","work","split","default","duplicate","task","compare","normal","codex",{"skillNo":181,"name":182,"nameZh":6,"description":183,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":6,"repositoryNo":12,"starsCount":13,"licenseSpdxId":184,"licenseFileUrl":185,"sourceHtmlUrl":186,"categories":187,"keywords":199,"publishedAt":48},"01M6C24S2X60SP8BBFGAEKPEGW","frontend-design","Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML\u002FCSS layouts, or when styling\u002Fbeautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Ffrontend-design\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjleechanorg\u002Fjleechan-skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Ffrontend-design\u002FSKILL.md",[188,193,196],{"categoryNo":189,"categoryName":190,"taxonomyType":191,"taxonomyTypeDesc":192},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":194,"categoryName":195,"taxonomyType":191,"taxonomyTypeDesc":192},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000015","视觉设计",{"categoryNo":197,"categoryName":198,"taxonomyType":123,"taxonomyTypeDesc":124},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000032","设计师",[200,201,202,107,203,204,205,35,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,23,224],"frontend","design","frontend design","generic","ui design","react","html","components","code","artifacts","ui","aesthetics","Production","web components","landing","applications","quality","web","css","create","examples","with","react components","web ui","pages"]