[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6C40HN6A1JFM64VMESKJR10":3,"skill-same:01M6C40HN6A1JFM64VMESKJR10":119},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":28,"publishedAt":54,"linkOnly":55,"markdownContent":56,"markdownBody":57,"frontMatter":58,"refName":62,"commitSha":63,"skillDirectory":64,"forksCount":65,"repositoryHtmlUrl":66,"repositoryHomepageUrl":67,"ownerHtmlUrl":68,"ownerBlogUrl":6,"ownerDescription":69,"updatedAt":70,"install":71,"resources":84},"01M6C40HN6A1JFM64VMESKJR10","code-review",null,"Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue\u002Fspec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".","fderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web","fderuiter","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F127706008?v=4","01M6C40AWP9EPQBS3EG0RF5DRD","Frederick de Ruiter","01M6C40B116HSW5KCWXDPRX69M",5,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fcode-review\u002FSKILL.md",[18,23],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000007","代码审查","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53],"review","code review","code","when","point","changes","for","reviews","progress","what the","reports","standards","use","user","repo","branch","work","parallel","coding","matt pocock","coding standards","pr","merge","commit","spec","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: code-review\ndescription: \"Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue\u002Fspec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \\\"review since X\\\".\"\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  author: Matt Pocock\n  version: \"1.0\"\n---\n\nTwo-axis review of the diff between `HEAD` and a fixed point the user supplies:\n\n- **Standards**: does the code conform to this repo's documented coding standards?\n- **Spec**: does the code faithfully implement the originating issue \u002F spec?\n\nBoth axes run as **parallel sub-agents** so they don't pollute each other's context, then this skill aggregates their findings.\n\nThe issue tracker should have been provided to you. If `docs\u002Fagents\u002Fissue-tracker.md` is missing, tell the user to run `\u002Fsetup-matt-pocock-skills`.\n\n## Process\n\n### 1. Pin the fixed point\n\nWhatever the user said is the fixed point (a commit SHA, branch name, tag, `main`, `HEAD~5`, etc.). If they didn't specify one, ask for it.\n\nCapture the diff command once: `git diff \u003Cfixed-point>...HEAD` (three-dot, so the comparison is against the merge-base). Also note the list of commits via `git log \u003Cfixed-point>..HEAD --oneline`.\n\nBefore going further, confirm the fixed point resolves (`git rev-parse \u003Cfixed-point>`) and the diff is non-empty. A bad ref or empty diff should fail here, not inside two parallel sub-agents.\n\n### 2. Identify the spec source\n\nLook for the originating spec, in this order:\n\n1. Issue references in the commit messages (`#123`, `Closes #45`, GitLab `!67`, etc.), fetched via the workflow in `docs\u002Fagents\u002Fissue-tracker.md`.\n2. A path the user passed as an argument.\n3. A spec file under `docs\u002F`, `specs\u002F`, or `.scratch\u002F` matching the branch name or feature.\n4. If nothing is found, ask the user where the spec is. If they say there isn't one, the **Spec** sub-agent will skip and report \"no spec available\".\n\n### 3. Identify the standards sources\n\nAnything in the repo that documents how code should be written, such as `CODING_STANDARDS.md` or `CONTRIBUTING.md`.\n\nOn top of whatever the repo documents, the Standards axis always carries the **smell baseline** below: a fixed set of Fowler code smells (_Refactoring_, ch.3) that applies even when a repo documents nothing. Two rules bind it:\n\n- **The repo overrides.** A documented repo standard always wins; where it endorses something the baseline would flag, suppress the smell.\n- **Always a judgement call.** Each smell is a labelled heuristic (\"possible Feature Envy\"), never a hard violation. Like any standard here, skip anything tooling already enforces.\n\nEach smell reads *what it is* → *how to fix*; match it against the diff:\n\n- **Mysterious Name**: a function, variable, or type whose name doesn't reveal what it does or holds. → rename it; if no honest name comes, the design's murky.\n- **Duplicated Code**: the same logic shape appears in more than one hunk or file in the change. → extract the shared shape, call it from both.\n- **Feature Envy**: a method that reaches into another object's data more than its own. → move the method onto the data it envies.\n- **Data Clumps**: the same few fields or params keep travelling together (a type wanting to be born). → bundle them into one type, pass that.\n- **Primitive Obsession**: a primitive or string standing in for a domain concept that deserves its own type. → give the concept its own small type.\n- **Repeated Switches**: the same `switch`\u002F`if`-cascade on the same type recurs across the change. → replace with polymorphism, or one map both sites share.\n- **Shotgun Surgery**: one logical change forces scattered edits across many files in the diff. → gather what changes together into one module.\n- **Divergent Change**: one file or module is edited for several unrelated reasons. → split so each module changes for one reason.\n- **Speculative Generality**: abstraction, parameters, or hooks added for needs the spec doesn't have. → delete it; inline back until a real need shows.\n- **Message Chains**: long `a.b().c().d()` navigation the caller shouldn't depend on. → hide the walk behind one method on the first object.\n- **Middle Man**: a class or function that mostly just delegates onward. → cut it, call the real target direct.\n- **Refused Bequest**: a subclass or implementer that ignores or overrides most of what it inherits. → drop the inheritance, use composition.\n\n### 4. Spawn both sub-agents in parallel\n\n**Standards sub-agent prompt** should include:\n\n- The full diff command and commit list.\n- The list of standards-source files you found in step 3, **plus the smell baseline from step 3** pasted in full (the sub-agent has no other access to it).\n- The brief: \"Report, per file\u002Fhunk where relevant, (a) every place the diff violates a documented standard: cite the standard (file + the rule); and (b) any baseline smell you spot: name it and quote the hunk. Distinguish hard violations from judgement calls: documented-standard breaches can be hard, but baseline smells are always judgement calls, and a documented repo standard overrides the baseline. Skip anything tooling enforces. Under 400 words.\"\n\n**Spec sub-agent prompt** should include:\n\n- The diff command and commit list.\n- The path or fetched contents of the spec.\n- The brief: \"Report: (a) requirements the spec asked for that are missing or partial; (b) behaviour in the diff that wasn't asked for (scope creep); (c) requirements that look implemented but where the implementation looks wrong. Quote the spec line for each finding. Under 400 words.\"\n\nIf the spec is missing, skip the Spec sub-agent and note this in the final report.\n\n### 5. Aggregate\n\nPresent the two reports under `## Standards` and `## Spec` headings, verbatim or lightly cleaned. Do **not** merge or rerank findings, because the two axes are deliberately separate (see _Why two axes_).\n\nEnd with a one-line summary: total findings per axis, and the worst issue _within each axis_ (if any). Don't pick a single winner across axes: that's the reranking the separation exists to prevent.\n\n## Why two axes\n\nA change can pass one axis and fail the other:\n\n- Code that follows every standard but implements the wrong thing → **Standards pass, Spec fail.**\n- Code that does exactly what the issue asked but breaks the project's conventions → **Spec pass, Standards fail.**\n\nReporting them separately stops one axis from masking the other.\n","Two-axis review of the diff between `HEAD` and a fixed point the user supplies:\n\n- **Standards**: does the code conform to this repo's documented coding standards?\n- **Spec**: does the code faithfully implement the originating issue \u002F spec?\n\nBoth axes run as **parallel sub-agents** so they don't pollute each other's context, then this skill aggregates their findings.\n\nThe issue tracker should have been provided to you. If `docs\u002Fagents\u002Fissue-tracker.md` is missing, tell the user to run `\u002Fsetup-matt-pocock-skills`.\n\n## Process\n\n### 1. Pin the fixed point\n\nWhatever the user said is the fixed point (a commit SHA, branch name, tag, `main`, `HEAD~5`, etc.). If they didn't specify one, ask for it.\n\nCapture the diff command once: `git diff \u003Cfixed-point>...HEAD` (three-dot, so the comparison is against the merge-base). Also note the list of commits via `git log \u003Cfixed-point>..HEAD --oneline`.\n\nBefore going further, confirm the fixed point resolves (`git rev-parse \u003Cfixed-point>`) and the diff is non-empty. A bad ref or empty diff should fail here, not inside two parallel sub-agents.\n\n### 2. Identify the spec source\n\nLook for the originating spec, in this order:\n\n1. Issue references in the commit messages (`#123`, `Closes #45`, GitLab `!67`, etc.), fetched via the workflow in `docs\u002Fagents\u002Fissue-tracker.md`.\n2. A path the user passed as an argument.\n3. A spec file under `docs\u002F`, `specs\u002F`, or `.scratch\u002F` matching the branch name or feature.\n4. If nothing is found, ask the user where the spec is. If they say there isn't one, the **Spec** sub-agent will skip and report \"no spec available\".\n\n### 3. Identify the standards sources\n\nAnything in the repo that documents how code should be written, such as `CODING_STANDARDS.md` or `CONTRIBUTING.md`.\n\nOn top of whatever the repo documents, the Standards axis always carries the **smell baseline** below: a fixed set of Fowler code smells (_Refactoring_, ch.3) that applies even when a repo documents nothing. Two rules bind it:\n\n- **The repo overrides.** A documented repo standard always wins; where it endorses something the baseline would flag, suppress the smell.\n- **Always a judgement call.** Each smell is a labelled heuristic (\"possible Feature Envy\"), never a hard violation. Like any standard here, skip anything tooling already enforces.\n\nEach smell reads *what it is* → *how to fix*; match it against the diff:\n\n- **Mysterious Name**: a function, variable, or type whose name doesn't reveal what it does or holds. → rename it; if no honest name comes, the design's murky.\n- **Duplicated Code**: the same logic shape appears in more than one hunk or file in the change. → extract the shared shape, call it from both.\n- **Feature Envy**: a method that reaches into another object's data more than its own. → move the method onto the data it envies.\n- **Data Clumps**: the same few fields or params keep travelling together (a type wanting to be born). → bundle them into one type, pass that.\n- **Primitive Obsession**: a primitive or string standing in for a domain concept that deserves its own type. → give the concept its own small type.\n- **Repeated Switches**: the same `switch`\u002F`if`-cascade on the same type recurs across the change. → replace with polymorphism, or one map both sites share.\n- **Shotgun Surgery**: one logical change forces scattered edits across many files in the diff. → gather what changes together into one module.\n- **Divergent Change**: one file or module is edited for several unrelated reasons. → split so each module changes for one reason.\n- **Speculative Generality**: abstraction, parameters, or hooks added for needs the spec doesn't have. → delete it; inline back until a real need shows.\n- **Message Chains**: long `a.b().c().d()` navigation the caller shouldn't depend on. → hide the walk behind one method on the first object.\n- **Middle Man**: a class or function that mostly just delegates onward. → cut it, call the real target direct.\n- **Refused Bequest**: a subclass or implementer that ignores or overrides most of what it inherits. → drop the inheritance, use composition.\n\n### 4. Spawn both sub-agents in parallel\n\n**Standards sub-agent prompt** should include:\n\n- The full diff command and commit list.\n- The list of standards-source files you found in step 3, **plus the smell baseline from step 3** pasted in full (the sub-agent has no other access to it).\n- The brief: \"Report, per file\u002Fhunk where relevant, (a) every place the diff violates a documented standard: cite the standard (file + the rule); and (b) any baseline smell you spot: name it and quote the hunk. Distinguish hard violations from judgement calls: documented-standard breaches can be hard, but baseline smells are always judgement calls, and a documented repo standard overrides the baseline. Skip anything tooling enforces. Under 400 words.\"\n\n**Spec sub-agent prompt** should include:\n\n- The diff command and commit list.\n- The path or fetched contents of the spec.\n- The brief: \"Report: (a) requirements the spec asked for that are missing or partial; (b) behaviour in the diff that wasn't asked for (scope creep); (c) requirements that look implemented but where the implementation looks wrong. Quote the spec line for each finding. Under 400 words.\"\n\nIf the spec is missing, skip the Spec sub-agent and note this in the final report.\n\n### 5. Aggregate\n\nPresent the two reports under `## Standards` and `## Spec` headings, verbatim or lightly cleaned. Do **not** merge or rerank findings, because the two axes are deliberately separate (see _Why two axes_).\n\nEnd with a one-line summary: total findings per axis, and the worst issue _within each axis_ (if any). Don't pick a single winner across axes: that's the reranking the separation exists to prevent.\n\n## Why two axes\n\nA change can pass one axis and fail the other:\n\n- Code that follows every standard but implements the wrong thing → **Standards pass, Spec fail.**\n- Code that does exactly what the issue asked but breaks the project's conventions → **Spec pass, Standards fail.**\n\nReporting them separately stops one axis from masking the other.\n",{"name":5,"license":15,"metadata":59,"description":7},{"author":60,"version":61},"Matt Pocock","1.0","main","5e9ab49e1cb8cac3dbf2019f3f975572fc7282f7",".agents\u002Fskills\u002Fcode-review",0,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web","https:\u002F\u002Fqrcraftly.com","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter","Clinical Data Specialist at @Bright-Research \r\n\r\nInterests in Photogrammetry, Data Analytics + Pipelines, Mathematics, and AI\u002FML.\r\n\r\nPython, Rust, TS.","2026-11-11 07:27:14",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":72,"prompt":82,"zipAvailable":83},[73,76,79],{"tool":74,"command":75},"npx","npx skills add fderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web --skill code-review",{"tool":77,"command":78},"bunx","bunx skills add fderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web --skill code-review",{"tool":80,"command":81},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add fderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web --skill code-review","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fcode-review\u002FSKILL.md",true,[85,91,97,101,107,111,115],{"path":86,"resourceType":87,"resourceTypeDesc":88,"sizeBytes":89,"sourceHtmlUrl":90},"agents\u002Fopenai.yaml","REFERENCE","参考文档",100,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fcode-review\u002Fagents\u002Fopenai.yaml",{"path":92,"resourceType":93,"resourceTypeDesc":94,"sizeBytes":95,"sourceHtmlUrl":96},"assets\u002FREADME.md","ASSET","资产文件",456,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Fplugins-community\u002Fplugins\u002Fsecurity\u002Fhipaa-compliance-checker\u002Fskills\u002Fchecking-hipaa-compliance\u002Fassets\u002FREADME.md",{"path":98,"resourceType":87,"resourceTypeDesc":88,"sizeBytes":99,"sourceHtmlUrl":100},"references\u002FREADME.md",663,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Fplugins-community\u002Fplugins\u002Fsecurity\u002Fhipaa-compliance-checker\u002Fskills\u002Fchecking-hipaa-compliance\u002Freferences\u002FREADME.md",{"path":102,"resourceType":103,"resourceTypeDesc":104,"sizeBytes":105,"sourceHtmlUrl":106},"scripts\u002Fconfig_validator.py","SCRIPT","脚本",2889,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Fplugins-community\u002Fplugins\u002Fsecurity\u002Fhipaa-compliance-checker\u002Fskills\u002Fchecking-hipaa-compliance\u002Fscripts\u002Fconfig_validator.py",{"path":108,"resourceType":103,"resourceTypeDesc":104,"sizeBytes":109,"sourceHtmlUrl":110},"scripts\u002Fhipaa_scan.py",2885,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Fplugins-community\u002Fplugins\u002Fsecurity\u002Fhipaa-compliance-checker\u002Fskills\u002Fchecking-hipaa-compliance\u002Fscripts\u002Fhipaa_scan.py",{"path":112,"resourceType":103,"resourceTypeDesc":104,"sizeBytes":113,"sourceHtmlUrl":114},"scripts\u002FREADME.md",423,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Fplugins-community\u002Fplugins\u002Fsecurity\u002Fhipaa-compliance-checker\u002Fskills\u002Fchecking-hipaa-compliance\u002Fscripts\u002FREADME.md",{"path":116,"resourceType":103,"resourceTypeDesc":104,"sizeBytes":117,"sourceHtmlUrl":118},"scripts\u002Freport_generator.py",2923,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FDicklesworthstone\u002Fpi_agent_rust\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftests\u002Fext_conformance\u002Fartifacts\u002Fplugins-community\u002Fplugins\u002Fsecurity\u002Fhipaa-compliance-checker\u002Fskills\u002Fchecking-hipaa-compliance\u002Fscripts\u002Freport_generator.py",[120,134,152,192,211,224],{"skillNo":121,"name":122,"nameZh":6,"description":123,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":124,"categories":125,"keywords":126,"publishedAt":54},"01M6C40FJCT5X27N59TX7RQZRY","claude-handoff","Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fclaude-handoff\u002FSKILL.md",[],[127,128,129,130,131,132,133,45,48],"claude handoff","handoff","background","hand","fresh","conversation","up",{"skillNo":135,"name":136,"nameZh":6,"description":137,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":138,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":139,"categories":140,"keywords":141,"publishedAt":54},"01M6C42TV73ZZ5TY86HHA682KG","steward","How to drive a QRCraftly pull request to merged. Use when opening a PR, handling CI or review events on it, updating its branch, or deciding whether to merge.","AGPL-3.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Fsteward\u002FSKILL.md",[],[136,32,29,51,50,142,143,144,145,44,41,146,147,148,149,150,151],"pull request","pull","ci","how","opening a pr","drive","how to","events","it","request",{"skillNo":153,"name":154,"nameZh":6,"description":155,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":138,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":156,"categories":157,"keywords":164,"publishedAt":54},"01M6C42QWPRJ0G7BXDXE3DK50N","run-qrcraftly","Build, run, and drive the QRCraftly web app (Vike + React on Vite). Use when asked to start the dev server or production preview, take a screenshot of a page, click through the generator or QR code checker, download a generated code, confirm a UI change works in the real app, call a src\u002Fpackages function directly, or run unit and Playwright e2e tests in this container.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.claude\u002Fskills\u002Frun-qrcraftly\u002FSKILL.md",[158,161],{"categoryNo":159,"categoryName":160,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":162,"categoryName":163,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,41,175,176,177,178,179,32,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,31,187,188,189,190,191],"run","run qrcraftly","app","qr code","take a screenshot","checker","generator","unit","click","generated","tests","vite","preview","container","call","page","playwright","web","react","change","e2e tests","packages","dev","server","start","e2e","src",{"skillNo":193,"name":194,"nameZh":6,"description":195,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":196,"categories":197,"keywords":204,"publishedAt":54},"01M6C42NHXSZNS2E96WP7VQR4K","writing-shape","Writing, exploit: shape raw material into an article, paragraph by paragraph.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fwriting-shape\u002FSKILL.md",[198,201],{"categoryNo":199,"categoryName":200,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":202,"categoryName":203,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[205,206,207,48,208,209,210],"shape","writing shape","writing","exploit","article","material",{"skillNo":212,"name":213,"nameZh":6,"description":214,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":215,"categories":216,"keywords":219,"publishedAt":54},"01M6C42M1W5P95XKMR7B1HD7F3","writing-fragments","Writing, explore: mine raw fragments, no structure yet.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fwriting-fragments\u002FSKILL.md",[217,218],{"categoryNo":199,"categoryName":200,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":202,"categoryName":203,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},[220,207,221,222,48,223],"writing fragments","mine","structure","explore",{"skillNo":225,"name":226,"nameZh":6,"description":227,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":228,"categories":229,"keywords":232,"publishedAt":54},"01M6C42J3DYGGDFFKNV8QFFSS9","writing-for-agents","Writing documents for agents. Use when creating or editing skills, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Ffderuiter\u002FQRCraftly-web\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002F.agents\u002Fskills\u002Fwriting-for-agents\u002FSKILL.md",[230,231],{"categoryNo":199,"categoryName":200,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":202,"categoryName":203,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},[35,233,207,234,32,41,235,48],"writing for agents","documents","editing"]