principle-never-block-on-the-human
Apply when tempted to ask 'should I do X?' on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct after the fact; reserve confirmation for irreversible actions.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-09
- Stars
- ★ 1
- Forks
- 0
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- principle-never-block-on-the-human
- description
- Apply when tempted to ask 'should I do X?' on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct after the fact; reserve confirmation for irreversible actions.
- disable-model-invocation
- true
03 SKILL.md 正文
Never Block on the Human
The human supervises asynchronously. Agents must stay unblocked. Make reasonable decisions, proceed, and let the human course-correct after the fact.
Why: Every permission pause stalls the pipeline and makes the human the bottleneck. Since code changes are reversible and reviewable, a wrong decision usually costs less than blocking.
Pattern:
- Proceed, then present. Do the work, show the result. Don't ask "should I do X?" Do X, explain why.
- Reserve questions for genuine ambiguity. Ask only when you cannot infer intent from context.
- Make the system self-healing. When you notice a problem, log it and fix it in the next round.
- Supervision is async. Design workflows for review-after-the-fact.
Boundaries:
- Irreversible actions (force-push, delete production data, send external messages) still require confirmation.
- Reversible actions (write code, edit notes, split tasks) should proceed without blocking.
- Product direction comes from the human. Execution should not block.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
workflow-economics-lite
Escape AI pilot purgatory: require completion-loop workflows with one owner, baseline, economic metric, system-of-record integration, and audit trail. Block orphan chatbots and interest-as-ROI claims.
verification-before-completion
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
value-center-lite
Apply InfoQ Rohrer value-center / VSM five questions (agency + coherence). Use when planning work, shipping releases, or auditing agent autonomy claims. Fail closed on product-only slogans without WQTU/paywall value.
using-superpowers
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
using-git-worktrees
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback